14:31:38 #startmeeting Helium Release Review 14:31:38 Meeting started Thu Sep 25 14:31:38 2014 UTC. The chair is gzhao. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 14:31:38 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:31:38 The meeting name has been set to 'helium_release_review' 14:31:50 #topic roll call 14:32:05 #info gzhao for release 14:32:09 #info Rafat and Radhika for SDNi 14:32:10 #info Hideyuki for VTN 14:32:23 #info colindixon for, you know, things 14:32:32 #info edwarnicke for everything 14:32:41 #info tbachman for groupbasedpolicy 14:33:26 #info regXboi for mischief, gadflyness, and general mayhem 14:33:34 #info Phil Robb 14:34:03 #chair colindixon phrobb regXboi edwarnicke 14:34:03 Current chairs: colindixon edwarnicke gzhao phrobb regXboi 14:34:09 and maybe even some help :) 14:34:21 ok, let's link the google page? 14:34:51 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TRYposNDFPaKcySlvwkOXvfR6Anx2EFujlIjoTthhRY/edit#gid=972372068 the schedule for today (and yesterday) 14:35:15 are we ready for SDNi? 14:35:18 SDNi Release Review: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/ODL-SDNiApp:Release_Review 14:35:21 SDNi Release Note: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/ODL-SDNi_App:Helium_Release_Notes 14:35:23 #topic SDNi 14:35:25 Yes 14:35:30 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/ODL-SDNiApp:Release_Review 14:35:36 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/ODL-SDNi_App:Helium_Release_Notes 14:35:39 * colindixon reads 14:36:17 #info while this isn't on the specific release agenda, can you all fix your Jenkin's merge job? 14:37:04 #action Rafat to migrate SDNi docs from the wiki to asciidoc (or at least put a hyperlink from the asciidoc to the appropriate wiki pages) 14:37:24 Yes Colin..Unfortunately I am not aware of the process... 14:37:29 Any link I can follow 14:38:04 Rafat, this is an example with content 14:38:06 https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/11560/ 14:38:43 Basically, you’ll want to replace the stuff thats there in the sdni.adoc files 14:38:53 at least with links to relevant wiki content 14:39:33 reach out to me if you need help later 14:39:40 #info question on the jenkins merge job 14:40:06 #info how is origin/$GERRIT_BRANCH getting resolved? 14:40:18 other than regXboi’s question I’m happy 14:40:46 lol 14:41:20 sorry folks, I know that isn't on the requirements list, but we've found a couple of broken configurations and so I'm checking it on everybody today 14:41:54 Sure Colin.Will take this up 14:42:09 did we lose Rafat? 14:42:17 can you speak to regXboi’s question? 14:42:22 No..I just joined back. :-) 14:42:23 To second regXboi this isn't a 'You haven't met a stated requirement thing' its a 'mechanically bad shit breaks if this isn't done right' thing 14:42:43 “while this isn't on the specific release agenda, can you all fix your Jenkin's merge job?” 14:42:52 “how is origin/$GERRIT_BRANCH getting resolved?" 14:43:30 Rafat_1? 14:43:45 if you can explain how it resolves to origin/master, it's all good 14:43:58 Can you elaborate the question please 14:44:04 ok 14:44:11 so... in https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/sdninterfaceapp/job/sdninterfaceapp-merge/configure 14:44:14 regXboi: can you I have you two take this offline? 14:44:16 so we can keep going? 14:44:28 colindixon: well, I have to ask it of everybody 14:44:33 so... 14:44:35 ok 14:44:51 the branches to build is origin/$GERRIT_BRANCH 14:45:20 I'm asking how you get that to resolve to origin/master - if your are specifying the GERRIT_BRANCH as master by hand when running the build, that's fine 14:45:38 regXboi: it’s listed here: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/GettingStarted:Jenkins_Verify_Job_Setup 14:45:55 it’s step 8.6 14:45:57 colindixon: yes, but that used to be wrong 14:46:42 ok, I looked in the console output of #12 and it's correct, so I'm good 14:46:53 Ok..I got the query.We can change it.Will have to confirm once since was working Ed all along 14:46:54 i.e. https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/sdninterfaceapp/job/sdninterfaceapp-merge/12/consoleFull has a reference to origin/master 14:47:04 Rafat_1: no need - I'm satisfied 14:47:11 ok..thank you 14:47:14 it gets populated by the gerrit trigger 14:47:19 #info regXboi satisfied sdni has a valid verify job 14:47:20 https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/yangtools/job/yangtools-merge/configure works just fine and works correctly with multiple branches (just make sure you have your versions right) 14:47:32 regXboi: verify job or merge job? 14:47:39 https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/sdninterfaceapp/job/sdninterfaceapp-merge/12/parameters/ 14:47:44 #undo 14:47:44 Removing item from minutes: 14:47:49 Rafat_1: reach out to me about docs if you’re lost 14:48:03 #info regXboi satisfied sdni has a valid merge job 14:48:05 #topic VTN 14:48:09 edwarnicke: thanks 14:48:12 hideyuki, you’re up 14:48:14 We will do it and update accordingly 14:48:17 thanks Rafat_1 14:48:22 thanks Colin 14:48:33 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Virtual_Tenant_Network_(VTN):Helium_Release_Notes 14:48:37 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Virtual_Tenant_Network_(VTN):Helium_Release_Review 14:49:06 #info VTN's merge job is hardcoded to origin/master - it's fine 14:49:52 #info standard asciidoc comment applies 14:50:14 #undo 14:50:14 Removing item from minutes: 14:50:47 #action hideyuki to move VTN’s wiki docs to asciidoc (or at least put links to the right wiki pages in) 14:51:13 colindixon: Ok. We are working on this. 14:51:33 one general questions: should release notes only contains major features in this release 14:52:14 and major bug fixes for previous releases? 14:52:23 gzhao: as a general rule, yes, but we haven’t really figured out what “major” is, so it’s basically what people choose to put 14:52:26 gzhao: I'm not sure. So we've written both previous features and new features. 14:52:53 the release notes is haphazard at best, which is likely my fault 14:53:11 the key things I’m looking for are known limitations and the target environment 14:53:36 colindixon: ok, this will be lithium 14:53:55 I’d like to see none or n/a in the empty sections of the release review, but that’s a really minor nit 14:54:12 do we need to talk about the bugs? 14:55:30 Bug 2074 is a really critical bug for VTN project. I would be happy if the bug is fixed quickly. 14:56:14 I think many other project faces issues by this Bug 2074. 14:56:25 that isn't on the list 14:56:30 it is 14:56:41 it’s a controller bug 14:56:53 it’s under bugzilla in the release review 14:56:53 That's all what I would like to say about bugs in this meeting. 14:57:13 is it a show-stopping bug? 14:57:26 hideyuki: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TRYposNDFPaKcySlvwkOXvfR6Anx2EFujlIjoTthhRY/edit#gid=670022163 is in the showstoppers list 14:57:51 #info hideyuki notes that but 2074 is a show-stopper bug for him, it’s being worked on 14:57:53 colindixon: it's not in the "All Blocking He Bugs" tab 14:58:01 that's what confused me 14:58:02 colindixon: It is not a show-stopping, because it is not happen everytime. It happens about 50%. 14:58:05 are there any restrictions on who can edit the spreadsheet? I was unable to do that 14:58:13 colindixon: Thank you. 14:58:26 colindixon: I think it is ok we call it show-stopper bug :) 14:58:39 I'd agree 50% is too often 14:58:49 dkutenic: give me your email I will add you 14:58:57 regXboi: +1 14:59:13 dkutenic: because it is a tab in a huge spreadsheet 14:59:18 #action colindixon to add show stopping bugs after 2058 to the spreadsheet 14:59:24 ok 14:59:29 otherwise, this looks really good hideyuki 14:59:32 docs look good 14:59:38 colindixon: Thank you very much. 14:59:39 anyone else? phrobb? edwarnicke? regXboi? 15:00:10 I'm good 15:00:20 #topic TTP 15:00:36 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Table_Type_Patterns:Helium_Release_Review 15:00:41 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Table_Type_Patterns:Helium_Release_Notes 15:00:42 * edwarnicke waits for colindixon to ask himself questions 15:00:50 does TTP have a jenkins job? 15:01:00 regXboi: it does, merge specifies master 15:01:17 colindixon: found it 15:01:42 #link https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/ttp/job/ttp-merge/configure specifies origin/master under “Branches to build” 15:02:04 * regXboi doublechecks :) 15:02:21 * regXboi and nods 15:02:32 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Cutting_Stability_Branches colindixon notes that the cutting stable branches instructions are what actually talks about doing this for the merge job 15:02:46 presumably with the assumption that prior to that there was *only* master 15:02:59 Do you have commit # 15:03:08 for doc.git 15:03:12 #info regXboi thanks TTP for the gerrit asciidoc commit :) 15:03:37 #action colindixon to fix the jenkins merge instructions for new projects to only build origin/master 15:03:41 gzhao: it’s there 15:03:55 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/11560/ gerrit for docs in asciidoc 15:03:55 gzhao: I see it in the review docs :) 15:04:06 and show stoppers? 15:04:07 merged even 15:04:12 nope 15:04:14 everything is good 15:04:23 then I'm happy :) 15:04:37 colindixon: thanks 15:04:37 * regXboi thanks colindixon and thinks he took some hints :) 15:04:47 me, never! 15:04:59 #topic dLux 15:05:00 xsited1: you there? 15:05:12 #info here for dlux 15:05:23 release review doc link 15:05:24 hey harman_, go for it 15:05:24 colindixon: xsited is PCMM 15:05:25 https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_dlux:Helium_Release_Review 15:05:30 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_dlux:Helium_Release_Review 15:05:37 https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_dlux:Release_Notes_Helium 15:05:44 this is release note link 15:05:48 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_dlux:Release_Notes_Helium 15:05:54 #info dlux-merge has origin/master - that's good 15:06:32 I wish that empty sections instead said “none” or “n/a”, but that’s a minor nit 15:06:49 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/11562/ dev ascii doc commit 15:06:52 ok, i can update that 15:07:01 user guide ascii doc is in works 15:07:05 yes, one commit is still pending for user guide 15:07:14 document is complete 15:07:24 but not in gerrit, Divya is working on some reviews 15:07:35 other than 2011 any other issues? 15:07:48 nothing major 15:07:53 we have couple of small ones 15:07:54 and is 2011 a show stopper? 15:08:15 I don’t see 2011 15:08:20 no, its fixed 15:08:25 by AAA 15:08:35 have you verified that fix then? 15:08:45 user guide is still in progress? 15:08:46 Many thanks to liemmn in aaa for a quick fix for 2011 :) 15:08:52 yes, i tried 15:08:54 colindixon: I'm looking at the blocking issue tab 15:08:56 it works fine 15:09:04 and user guide is in progress 15:09:06 ok, then let's move that from "to be verified" to "fixed" 15:09:17 harman_: thx, I'm good 15:09:32 alright then 15:09:34 thanks 15:09:39 #action gzhao to move 2011 from to be verified to fixed 15:09:53 anybody else? 15:10:13 * regXboi trying to get us back on time, having derailed us up front 15:10:32 colindixon: I also tried to verify 2011, but encounter the same build issue as LuisGomez 15:10:36 #action harman_ to add some description of the requirements to run and develop for dlux to the rlease notes (I know it’s different than other projects) 15:10:55 sure, i can do taht 15:10:58 *that 15:11:02 harman_: what is status for user guide? 15:11:04 i have those in wiki page 15:11:13 so user guide is 90% complete 15:11:22 I’m good otherwise 15:11:32 divya is working on review comments from team members 15:11:46 harman_: also dlux should have dev guide as well 15:11:48 it should be in gerrit today/tomorrow 15:11:58 dev guide commit is in gerrit 15:12:09 gzhao: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/11562/ 15:12:14 #info quesiton: who maintains https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/? 15:12:26 can you add a link of user guid, dev guide to release review? 15:12:33 regXboi: that would be the linux foundation 15:12:39 gzhao: deve guide link is there 15:12:50 release review already have commit for dev guide 15:13:01 i’ll add user guide link, as sonn as i get it 15:13:04 #action LF needs to update https://jenkins.opendaylight.org to list all OF jenkins jobs in there (e.g. docs is not there) 15:13:16 #undo 15:13:16 Removing item from minutes: 15:13:17 regXboi: neither is ttp 15:13:27 you just have to browse directly 15:13:33 you can open a helpdesk ticket 15:13:34 colindixon: ttp IS there as "negotiable datapath models" 15:13:42 harman_: ok, thanks 15:13:44 I was waiting until after the release 15:13:59 #topic docs 15:14:05 #action regXboi to open help ticket with LF to update https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/ to list all ODL jenkins job there (after release) 15:14:11 colindixon: how's that ? 15:14:16 regXboi: :-) 15:14:24 do we have somebody from docs here? 15:14:34 #info docs uses parameterized merge job with parameter set to master - that's ok :) 15:14:59 * regXboi hears crickets 15:15:47 shall we move on? 15:15:55 #info it appear as though nobody is here for docs 15:16:10 #action gzhao and phrobb to figure out if we can do a release review for docs at a different time 15:16:17 #topic integration 15:16:21 honestly, can we *do* a review of docs before everybody else is done? 15:16:22 LuisGomez: you’re up 15:16:40 I am finishing integration call 15:16:40 regXboi: yeah, I think it’s going to be special cased 15:16:47 #undo 15:16:47 Removing item from minutes: 15:16:50 we’ll come back 15:16:54 LuisGomez: we’ll come back 15:16:59 #topic SFC 15:17:28 who’s the SFC contact? 15:17:49 colindixon: paul 15:18:00 * regXboi looks at edwarnicke who looks back at regXboi 15:18:19 * edwarnicke looks up queue 15:18:21 ok, i am here for the integration release review whenever is my turn 15:18:27 ok 15:18:29 #undo 15:18:29 Removing item from minutes: 15:18:32 #topic integration 15:18:34 regXboi: Isn't SFC scheduled for 8:30am PST? 15:18:45 let me post link 15:18:53 regXboi: yes, but schedules are .... flexible ... 15:18:57 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CrossProject:Integration_Group:Helium_Release_Review 15:19:25 #action: we should instruct folks to be on the channel 10 minutes early in case we run ahead... 15:19:33 * colindixon chuckles at the result of “feature” being a name collision 15:19:43 any question on integration? 15:20:06 #info colindixon notes that while the docs are all in the wiki, it seems like integration might be the *one* case where the docs don’t need to be in asciidoc 15:20:07 * regXboi reads 15:20:32 #info regXboi +1 colindixon's comment 15:20:40 we have 2 kind of documentation: 15:20:45 #info colindixon notes that the hydrogen edition tests should probably be flagged as being EOLed unless we intend to turn them back on 15:21:00 um 15:21:17 1) test guides, how to test this or that is on wiki 15:21:24 what is our EOL policy on hydrogen? 15:21:36 2) test case documentation will be automated using robot plugin 15:21:46 if you project had a feature X in Hydrogen and doesn’t in Helium, you’re supposed to note it 15:21:49 #2 is targeted for Lithium 15:21:54 * regXboi shudders at the thought of free hydrogen running around 15:22:18 colindixon: I"m ok with all of this 15:22:20 ok, integration is kind of a special case, but this looks good 15:22:28 LuisGomez: any major blockers you need to report? 15:22:35 #info Manny here. sorry i'm late. i didn't know which channel i needed join. 15:22:36 Nop 15:22:45 No blockers 15:22:47 manny_: you’re up next 15:22:48 ok 15:22:49 cool 15:22:53 #topic docs 15:23:03 manny_: do you have a release review or release notes 15:23:05 #info regXboi notes that we should schedule integration and docs at the *END* of the review in the future 15:23:18 #undo 15:23:18 Removing item from minutes: 15:23:20 here's the url to the docs release review—https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Docs:Helium_Release_Review 15:23:20 #undo 15:23:20 Removing item from minutes: 15:23:28 #info regXboi notes that we should schedule integration and docs at the *END* of the review in the 15:23:30 #topic docs 15:23:37 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Docs:Helium_Release_Review 15:23:42 manny_: cool 15:23:44 * colindixon reads 15:24:00 i don't know how to get at the release notes once they've been checked into the repository. i'll need to follow up with mathieu on that. 15:24:20 #info colindixon notes that the release review is sparse, but this probably makes sense for docs 15:24:28 manny_: they are generated by the jenkins build, I or colindixon can help you with that 15:25:06 so, manny_, what are the big outstanding issues you need help with? 15:25:08 docs-merge uses parameterized build with GERRIT_BRANCH set to master - ok 15:25:14 i need to work with ed to figure out what needs to documented in the core release notes, but that won't take long to put together. 15:25:20 #info docs-merge uses parameterized build with GERRIT_BRANCH set to master - that's ok 15:25:22 I think developers are finally wrapping up and have cycles 15:25:59 i'm going to ask mathieu to check in the core doc files so i know that they'll get in on time. 15:26:10 jsut for this release, anyway 15:26:30 manny_: many of the teams have updated their wikis for their documentation and have not come to you with asciidocs. In the release reviews we've been requiring each team to put their documentation into asciidoc or at least provide a pointer to their wikis. You should see an uptick in folks coming to you asking about their asciidocs 15:26:35 #action manny_ will work with edwarnicke, mlemay_away, and colindixon to figure out what core docs we still need and see if we can farm some of that out to free agents 15:27:03 phrobb, manny_: I’m willing to help out with some of tha 15:27:07 manny_: as well as an uptick in contributions 15:27:15 thanks, phil 15:27:34 * colindixon notes that docs will need attention from now until the release (with no offense meant to the docs team or manny) 15:27:44 #info colindixon notes that docs will need attention from now until the release (with no offense meant to the docs team or manny) 15:27:47 ok 15:27:57 #info docs-merge job doesn't actually upload site information that regXboi can see - wasn't that the plan? 15:28:05 sorry, meant thanks, colin 15:28:27 manny_: also thank phrobb, he’s doing a lot for us here :-) 15:28:37 regXboi: we still need a plan for how to publish the docs 15:28:40 goes without saying ;-) 15:28:41 not clear what it is 15:29:11 #action we actually NEED a plan for how to publish the docs 15:29:22 #undo 15:29:22 Removing item from minutes: 15:29:23 #action manny_, regXboi, edwarnicke, phrobb, and mlemay_away to work on a plan to publish docs either as a site deploy or manually copying pdfs and html docs to the website 15:29:32 colindixon: +1 15:29:43 colindixon: +1 15:29:43 paulq is still awol 15:30:06 * colindixon notes the biggest risk with the release now are the custom downloader and publishing docs 15:30:21 edwarnicke: can you dig up paulq? 15:30:27 PriyankaChopra: you there? 15:30:32 Yes 15:30:37 #topic plugin2oc 15:30:37 regXboi: No, but I can dig up repenno 15:30:40 shoot 15:30:50 #topic plugin2oc 15:30:57 I’m representing SFC 15:31:01 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Southbound_Plugin_to_the_OpenContrail_Platform:Helium_Release_Review 15:31:11 repenno: ok, we’ll do that next thanks for letting me know 15:31:13 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Southbound_Plugin_to_the_OpenContrail_Platform:Helium_Release_Notes 15:31:22 PriyankaChopra: using meetbot commands like a pro 15:31:50 we have an L3 ODL neutron driver? 15:32:08 not that I know of 15:32:16 Yes.. 15:32:38 * regXboi pads off to find mestery to get to the bottom of this 15:33:01 #action PriyankaChopra to migrate plugin2oc docs to asciidoc in the docs.git (or at least put in hyperlinks to the right wiki pages) 15:33:22 sure.. will do that.. 15:33:24 #info plugin2oc-merge uses parameterized build with master set - ok for now, but will need to be revisited when we cut stable/helium branch 15:33:56 ok, other than being confused about us having an L3 driver and the docs being in asciidoc, I’m happy 15:34:01 okay.. 15:34:25 have we been asking projects about stable/helium? 15:34:27 PriyankaChopra: I thought ODL relied on the OpenStack neutron L3 driver 15:34:37 tbachman: we have not, but should have been 15:34:43 tbachman: not yet 15:34:46 k 15:35:27 #action colindixon and regXboi to powwow with mestery about ODL neutron L3 driver 15:35:30 so, yeah, PriyankaChopra you’re aware that there will be a few stability releases of helium for which you’ll have to do tests and make sure thing still work and fix bugs if not 15:35:36 ? 15:35:43 coz I'm pretty sure that isn't in J 15:35:52 colindixon: you got delegated :) 15:36:29 * colindixon notes that since we haven’t asked everyone, we’re going to need to follow up on the participating stable releases anyway 15:36:39 Sure... I can do that.. If something specific needs to be tested please let me knoe 15:36:43 * regXboi +1's that comment 15:36:45 also, we can’t require it I don’t think 15:37:02 colindixon: unfortunately, no... but we WILL for lithium 15:37:07 #info colindixon notes PriyankaChopra says plugin2oc will be able to participate in stable releases 15:37:44 ok, I'm good 15:37:44 At least two versions of stable release have been in the Helium Release plan from the beginning so it should not be a surprise 15:37:53 #action gzhao to connect with projects to make sure they know stable releases are coming and what will be expected of them (probably do this after the He release) 15:37:55 ok 15:37:59 anything else on plugin2oc? 15:38:04 not from me 15:38:09 otherwise I’m putting repenno and SFC on the spot 15:38:10 next! 15:38:12 #topic SFC 15:38:15 repenno: you’re up 15:38:25 No I am done.. 15:38:53 PriyankaChopra: thanks 15:38:55 repenno: 15:38:56 ? 15:38:58 Yes 15:39:04 https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Service_Function_Chaining:Helium_Release_Review 15:39:11 #link 15:39:15 #undo 15:39:15 Removing item from minutes: 15:39:17 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Service_Function_Chaining:Helium_Release_Review 15:39:42 #info sfc-merge uses parameterized build with master set - ok for now, but will need to be revisited when we cut stable/helium branch 15:39:52 repenno: do you have release notes? 15:40:04 No 15:40:17 Any template or anything relevant I should say? 15:40:19 colindixon: need the standard #action for asciidocs 15:40:39 #action repenno to add a release notes page for SFC something like this: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Table_Type_Patterns:Helium_Release_Notes 15:40:56 repenno: when will user guide and dev guide be ready? 15:40:57 okay, will do 15:41:06 #action repenno to migrate docs to asciidoc in docs.git (or at least put hyperlinks pointing to any wiki page documentation that is there) 15:41:10 how do I get SFC into Sonar? 15:41:25 “People keep me asking about Sonar and I keep asking how to get SFC into Sonar....and nobody can tell me how to get SFC into Sonar. Vicious cycle “ 15:41:52 do we have good docs on getting projects into sonar? 15:41:54 colindixon: I'm not sure this is a "migrate" docs as I'm not seeing any docs (wiki or otherwise) to migrate. 15:41:55 I haven’t don it yet 15:42:00 phrobb: noted 15:42:33 #info phrobb notes that there appears to be no docs except a single git clone command 15:42:54 repenno: Madhu_offline and dave_tucker gave a TWS bit on getting things into sonar 15:43:05 you might try looking for it here: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Tech_Work_Stream:Main 15:43:12 repenno: there’s a TWS on it 15:43:13 yeah 15:43:14 lol 15:43:17 colindixon: beats me to it ;) 15:43:47 #info repenno asks about any information about getting sonar working, colindixon doesn’t know that we have it but there was a TWS from Madhu_offline and dave_tucker at some point 15:43:47 Which meeting? 15:44:09 #info it was the august 11th TWS call 15:44:22 there is a recording and minutes 15:44:22 * edwarnicke notes many folks have been complaiing there is no documentation about how to get stuff into sonar 15:44:23 that might help 15:44:27 colindixon: thx for the reference! 15:44:46 * colindixon notes he turns into a pumpkin in 10 minutes 15:45:01 * edwarnicke is afeared 15:45:06 * regXboi also 15:45:19 * regXboi ripping through rest of linear walk if he can 15:45:24 #link https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2014/tws/opendaylight-meeting-tws.2014-08-11-17.00.html the meeting minutes from when Madhu_offline and dave_tucker presented stuff on sonar 15:45:26 * tbachman wonders what this magic is that turns ODL folks into pumpkins at seemingly deliberately-timed moments 15:45:32 just skimmed the meeting notes. Is there something on the recording that tells me how to actually get into Sonar as opposed to telling me what Sonar is? 15:45:39 #link https://meetings.webex.com/collabs/url/DoaLWeoQ9KV-38qIuh042PUxbmlCDAJMFlXkP6_aOl400000 webex recording of same place 15:45:41 I think we need another round of review for SFC 15:45:59 gzhao: +1 15:46:01 repenno: I think it’s in the webex, but that’s the best I’ve got we need to write that up 15:46:23 repenno: yeah — also, have a look at the OVSDB coverage jenkins 15:46:26 * tbachman goes to get that link 15:46:27 gzhao, regXboi: why? 15:47:09 colindixon: pretty empty for me 15:47:12 colindixon: the sonar issue has me worried 15:47:19 #link https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/ovsdb/job/ovsdb-code-coverage/configure <== OVSDB teams code coverage jenkins job, which does SONAR reporting 15:47:36 repenno: ^^^ 15:47:36 regXboi: I think many projects don’t have sonar set up 15:47:48 * tbachman tiptoes quietly away 15:48:11 colindixon: do what you think is best - I need to finish my linear walk 15:48:13 okay, I will give it a try 15:48:24 I think SFC did a fine job except that they need *some* docs and release notes, but we’re not going to stop them for it 15:48:31 and I don’t think we need to require them to be in sonar 15:48:43 in fact, I think docs are more important than sonar 15:48:55 phrobb, gzhao, regXboi: feel free to overrule me 15:49:05 colindixon: can use tomorrow's 7:30am time 15:49:14 colindixon: +1, but everyone in sonar is a good thing to drive for next release. I think the majority of projects are not yet in sonar 15:49:51 phrobb: controller has been trying to get in for months and hitting various issues with developer infra... 15:49:53 so, other than docs and release notes, which many other projects still need to do, we’re fine 15:50:40 #info colindixon notes that gzhao and regXboi would like to re-review SFC, but colindixon feels as though the issues they have are the same as other projects, e.g., get docs together and get release notes written 15:50:48 and they already have actions on those two 15:50:54 I’d like to try to do AAA 15:51:03 #info liemmn for AAA 15:51:06 #topic AAA 15:51:09 liemmn: go for it 15:51:10 edwarnicke: I know, I talked to Andy about it yesterday… he thinks your last reported issue was resolved a bit ago but I'm assuming you've been to busy to see if you can make further progress 15:51:35 phrobb: In fairness, Andy has been great at resolving the reports... 15:51:44 hold on... sorry.. lost my browser 15:51:45 thanks edwarnicke 15:51:50 phrobb: I just only get a chance to check in on it every couple of days 15:52:06 liemmn: sure 15:52:22 edwarnicke: i figured… we'll address it with focus once Helium is out (along with the long list of other infra todos) 15:52:51 colindixon: the main reason I want to review SFC is to make sure all actions are taken care of, unlike other projects, SFC is always not responding to status related report, for example, https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TRYposNDFPaKcySlvwkOXvfR6Anx2EFujlIjoTthhRY/edit#gid=1408765403 15:52:55 https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/AAA:Helium_Release_Review 15:53:07 colindixon: they haven't reported required document type for long time 15:53:12 #undo 15:53:12 Removing item from minutes: 15:53:39 gzhao: that's a good reason for require a follow up 15:54:07 phrobb: that is why want a re-review on SFC 15:54:10 #action gzhao and phrobb to schedule a second release review with repenno for SFC tomorrow (hopefully during the normal release sync time), largely because they have been unresponsive to request for information 15:54:12 done 15:54:12 #info aaa-merge uses parameterized build with master set - ok for now, but will need to be revisited when we cut stable/helium branch 15:54:16 #undo 15:54:16 Removing item from minutes: 15:54:19 #topic AAA 15:54:34 #info regXboi notes aaa-merge uses parameterized build with master set - ok for now, but will need to be revisited when we cut stable/helium branch 15:54:39 liemmn: you there? 15:54:42 yes 15:54:48 nm 15:54:49 found it 15:54:57 https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/AAA:Helium_Release_Review 15:54:59 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/AAA:Helium_Release_Review 15:55:03 thx 15:55:04 do we have release notes? 15:55:07 * colindixon reads 15:55:22 liemmn: do we have a link for the dev guide? 15:55:27 to a gerrit? 15:55:36 yes, currently under review... holdon 15:56:00 https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/11515/ 15:56:03 #action liemmn to add a link to the gerrit for the asciidoc dev guide to the AAA release review page 15:56:23 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/11515/ is the link 15:56:37 #info colindixon notes that the patch has been -1ed awaiting revision 15:56:48 liemmn: do we have any release notes 15:56:57 something like this: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Table_Type_Patterns:Helium_Release_Notes 15:57:26 thx, will add that in! 15:57:39 #action liemmn will add a release notes page for AAA something like https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Table_Type_Patterns:Helium_Release_Notes 15:57:46 liemmn: about the HTTPS 15:58:01 does it not support HTTPS or just we need to enable it in tomcat (or whatever) 15:58:19 yes... It is just a matter of enabling https on the jetty connector, which we can document... 15:58:39 security token is kinda out of the door over plain http :) 15:59:02 ok good to know 15:59:26 ok... I'm out... talk to folks later 15:59:28 #info colindixon would love to see how the schedule slipped listed, but it’s fine 15:59:49 thanks regXboi 16:00:00 otherwise this looks OK to me 16:00:09 phrobb: is tykeal around on IRC? I have a question for him 16:00:25 regXboi: what's up? 16:00:40 regXboi: there's your answer ;-) 16:01:51 ok 16:01:54 colindixon: are we moving on?… are we finished until 9:30am? 16:01:54 I think AAA is done 16:02:03 Madhu: hello 16:02:09 gzhao: hi. 16:02:17 Madhu: are you abel to do ovsdb now? 16:02:18 thanks liemmn 16:02:19 ok, thanks... I will get the release notes done asap 16:02:21 ah great! hi Madhu 16:02:26 liemmn: thanks 16:02:26 I think he’s not ready until 9:30 16:02:33 want to leave this open until then? 16:02:35 thank you liemmn 16:02:49 #topic OVSDB (at 9:30 PST in ~30 minutes) 16:02:53 no need if madhu is here and can go now for OVSDB 16:03:03 phrobb: nope. 9.30am Guys :) 16:03:09 i am getting the wiki ready 16:03:10 phrobb: he doesn’t have the stuff on the wiki yet 16:03:11 colindixon: yeah, forgot he mentioned he has conflict at 9:00 16:03:12 ah, Ok, sorry, did n't understand 16:03:19 so, I’ll hold this open 16:03:22 9:30 then 16:03:28 unless we want to shut it down and reopen 16:03:28 yup' 16:04:03 we can discuss blocking bugs 16:04:15 it seems we got several new ones 16:05:58 #topic blocking issues 16:06:29 colindixon: gzhao: folks may not be online? 16:06:41 we probably should have set something up in advance 16:06:43 likely, but we can still go through a few 16:06:51 that, or we rabble-rouse the crew 16:06:53 k 16:07:27 do we have snbi people look at 2085? 16:07:55 gzhao: I think I fixed 2085 with them this morning 16:08:05 gzhao: The issue wasn't in their code but in their Jenkins setup 16:08:05 wow amazing 16:08:20 yeah, cool, 16:08:27 @all: I am seeing actions for me.. Will catch up on these in 1h 16:08:55 gzhao: I’ve gone ahead and marked 1984, 1985, 2019, and 2051 as verified 16:09:16 in order to release on 9/29, we need to respin sometime today, that will give LuisGomez etc one day to do regression. 16:09:17 where is the list of the blocking bugs? 16:09:27 tbachman: thanks, I will do the update 16:09:32 np! 16:09:46 abhijitkumbhare: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TRYposNDFPaKcySlvwkOXvfR6Anx2EFujlIjoTthhRY/edit#gid=670022163 16:10:04 abhijitkumbhare: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TRYposNDFPaKcySlvwkOXvfR6Anx2EFujlIjoTthhRY/edit#gid=1622731782 16:10:37 gzhao: We had significant issues with folks unable to test show stopper bugs for the last couple of days due to 2085... you literally couldn't build integration against a clean .m2 16:10:51 thanks gzhao 16:10:54 gzhao: So we lost about 2 days of bug fixing and testing show stopper bugs 16:11:36 edwarnicke: are we still good to respin something today? 16:11:43 edwarnicke: do they have a build can test now? 16:11:46 LuisGomez: I think we should try :) 16:12:00 gzhao: I think I fixed the 2085 issue this morning with the help of the snbi committers 16:12:10 So folks should be unblocked 16:12:18 But this morning for me is late at night for some in the community 16:12:26 yes, it looks like 2085 is fixed now 16:13:30 cool, the last build that push to nexus was: 98 16:14:17 it may not pick up edwarnicke 's fix for 2085 16:14:23 gzhao: I don’t think 2075 will be a blocker for groupbasedpolicy 16:14:28 it’s extremely hard to reproduce 16:15:14 tbachman: Do you have extra logs to help debug if it does manifest? 16:15:23 Also - not sure what to do about 2049. I think they catch the exception now, and print a log message, so it’s “fixed” in that sense, but am not sure whether to resolve it or leave it open, as it seems like there still needs to be something done to address the root cause 16:15:33 edwarnicke: they’re instrumented :) 16:15:40 * tbachman is spending his time today running tests :) 16:17:02 gzhao: I think it’s safe to say that 2049 doesn’t have to be considered blocking at this point. 16:17:20 but I think we might want to leave it open 16:18:02 * tbachman is going to disappear for a bit 16:30:04 gzhao: I’ve been updating this: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TRYposNDFPaKcySlvwkOXvfR6Anx2EFujlIjoTthhRY/edit?pli=1#gid=1622731782 16:32:04 Is Madhu ready? 16:32:20 phrobb: res. 16:32:25 whenever u guys 16:32:27 is this IRC only ? 16:32:28 colindixon: I was unaware of that spreadsheet and havre been tracking and driving to resolution: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TRYposNDFPaKcySlvwkOXvfR6Anx2EFujlIjoTthhRY/edit#gid=670022163 16:32:33 yes irc only 16:32:42 okay. whenever u r ready... 16:32:49 and the topic still says blocking issues ;) 16:32:52 is that the intention ? 16:33:27 colindixon: edwarnicke gzhao are you ready for OVSDB Release Review? 16:33:37 I’m a bit distracted 16:33:38 dmm is here now too? 16:33:45 yes 16:34:01 phrobb: gzhao will the topic be changed ? 16:34:08 #topic OVSDB 16:34:14 thanks colindixon :) 16:34:14 go ahead and #link things 16:34:14 thanks colindixon 16:34:20 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OVSDB_Integration:Helium_Release_Review 16:34:21 colindixon: you types faster than me 16:34:35 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OVSDB_Integration:Helium_Release_Notes 16:37:08 is somebody looking at this 16:37:10 * colindixon is in another meeting 16:37:35 #info colindixon notes that the asciidoc gerrit doesn’t build 16:37:53 Madhu: any remaining blocking bugs? 16:38:09 colindixon: nope. we had 1 in controller 2002. but we have a workaround 16:38:43 do we have links for how to and dev guide? 16:39:47 gzhao: dev guide is here: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/11528/ 16:40:10 Madhu: are you planning to provide any other docs than that in the main docs place? 16:40:23 gotcha, it is all in the adoc 16:40:25 yes. flaviof is working with Sujatha on that. 16:40:40 Installation, User and Dev guides 16:40:48 #info flaviof is working with the docs team on more docs, including install and user guides 16:41:14 colindixon: i think this gerrit also contains install guide 16:41:16 #Info colindixon notes that ovsdb jenkins merge builds from origin/master 16:41:28 Madhu: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/11528/ 16:41:32 I see dev and that’s it 16:41:45 colindixon: right. but it is supposed to have also installation guide 16:41:51 I will check with flaviof and sujatha 16:42:01 and is there a requirement to move to stable/helium by today ? 16:42:06 i thought it was on 09/29 ? 16:42:28 Madhu: it’s on 9/29, and we’ll probably waive it 16:42:42 colindixon: delay... delay... not waive ;) 16:42:44 we need to figure out how we want people to cut to stable/helium 16:42:48 edwarnicke: noted 16:42:57 we will cut it certainly today/tomorrow 16:43:08 #info OVSDB project will switch to stable/helium shortly ;) 16:43:35 colindixon: gzhao phrobb anything else guys ? 16:43:43 no, I think I’m good 16:43:45 I am fine now 16:43:50 you know you need to participate in stable releases 16:43:52 Not from me Madhu, this looks good 16:43:53 but that’s fine 16:43:54 gzhao: we are on the green :) 16:43:57 thanks! 16:44:01 #endmeeting