17:00:14 #startmeeting tsc 17:00:14 Meeting started Thu Sep 25 17:00:14 2014 UTC. The chair is phrobb. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 17:00:14 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:14 The meeting name has been set to 'tsc' 17:00:37 #chair gzhao colindixon 17:00:37 Current chairs: colindixon gzhao phrobb 17:00:48 #topic roll call 17:00:51 #info colindixon 17:00:53 #info dmm 17:00:58 #info 17:01:02 #info Chris Price 17:01:02 #topic TSC members please #info in 17:01:14 #info Chris Price 17:01:14 #info Kent Watsen 17:01:25 sorry colindixon 17:01:54 #info Ivan Wood 17:02:28 #info Ryan Moats 17:02:33 On my way 17:02:47 * ChrisPriceAB loving the background music! 17:02:59 * regXboi - what no chair today? 17:03:05 * regXboi :-)s 17:03:15 #chair regXboi 17:03:15 Current chairs: colindixon gzhao phrobb regXboi 17:03:16 take a break! 17:03:24 * ChrisPriceAB oh too late! 17:03:37 somebody want to #link the agenda? 17:03:37 Led Zepplin? 17:03:45 Gilbert and Sullivan? 17:04:04 having webex issues 17:04:04 #info Chris Wright 17:04:12 how about aphex twin? 17:04:36 regXboi: Sounds like a complex mathematical algorithm 17:04:50 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/TSC:Main#Meeting_Agenda 17:04:51 it is 17:04:54 and it produces music 17:05:12 * regXboi points edwarnicke to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphex_Twin 17:05:18 * edwarnicke is tempted to sing on the call 17:05:24 * ChrisPriceAB noooo 17:05:32 * regXboi +10000000 to ChrisPriceAB 17:05:48 #info Lenrow 17:05:50 #topic Event Updates 17:06:14 #link http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/opendaylight-developer-design-forum/program/schedule << link to dev forum schedule 17:06:18 #info phrobb reports that schedules for the summit event next week are still being massaged 17:08:04 good man, Colin! 17:08:11 #info phrobb also reports on TSC chair elections - self-nominations are open until the weekend 17:08:18 #topic integration 17:08:53 #info LuisGomez reports that we are testing the release candidate and have been identifying blocking bugs and helping others find and solve them as well 17:09:07 #info LuisGomez reports on integration - they've identified one blocking issue for Helium which has been addressed and nothing more to report 17:09:38 #info regXboi, edwarnicke, and colindixon all would like to give a +10 to the integration team 17:09:41 #topic documentation 17:10:33 #info manny_ is working with edwarnicke to work on what’s going into the core release notes, barring him being hit by a truck the core docs will be done by EoD tomorrow 17:11:15 #info regXboi reports that the helium review included pushing projects to provide content to the doc projects 17:12:20 colindixon: got the action ready to go? 17:12:26 (i'm holding the topic for you 17:12:27 working on it 17:12:32 we’ll put it later when we talk about docs 17:12:34 just topic 17:12:36 #fopic helium release status 17:12:44 #topic helium release status 17:12:45 misspelled topic 17:12:48 * regXboi mumbles nice 17:13:46 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TRYposNDFPaKcySlvwkOXvfR6Anx2EFujlIjoTthhRY/edit#gid=670022163 17:13:56 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TRYposNDFPaKcySlvwkOXvfR6Anx2EFujlIjoTthhRY/edit?pli=1#gid=670022163 the blocking issues for Helium 17:14:55 +1000 to gzhao and his release spreadsheet 17:18:09 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TRYposNDFPaKcySlvwkOXvfR6Anx2EFujlIjoTthhRY/edit#gid=1622731782 <= blocking issue from Bugzilla by Colin 17:18:10 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Discovery << Discovery Project Proposal 17:18:16 What alias is the email on ??? 17:18:20 discuss ??? 17:18:22 TSC 17:18:28 LuisGomez: thanks 17:18:35 tbachman: yes 17:18:51 #action phudgins to put the contents of the e-mail clarification in the proposal 17:18:55 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2014-September/001782.html Project Proposal for Discovery 17:19:41 colindixon: It seems like this is a proactive sweep of the network into Inventory as opposed to the network element self-identifying. 17:21:22 #info colindixon says he does not understand why the topology and inventory models don’t provide the support described 17:22:32 #info phudgins says that this is really a generic method to “discover” a device, find a module to own it, and then push it into the right existing model(s) 17:23:32 Can't these project proposals have a seperate forum (dedicated meeting) to educate TSC and key committers to get offline consensus to drive TSC votes. Lack of time by TSC members is understandable but also an impediment to community progress. Great design summit topic! 17:23:43 Even if you think this is a horrible idea, based on our bylaws we have no grounds to reject their request for incubation. Folks are allowed to incubate anything they are willing to work on. Why are we making him run the gauntlet before our inevitable approval? 17:24:14 If this is in scope for ODL (i.e. it has to do with networking) we will approve for incubation 17:24:28 #action phudgins to to add the committers for HP to the wiki 17:26:18 "This proposal does not include the algorithms to find new network elements, such as a ping sweep; It is assumed that finding is the responsibility of other modules. This proposal will interact with topology and inventory modules as network elements and links are discovered." 17:26:31 kwatsen: ^^ that's the "Scope" section 17:27:11 #info rexpugh notes that the TSC should consider having a separate meeting to educate TSC and key committers on project scope and description so that evaluation and approval for proposals can be done more quickly in TSC meeting. 17:27:27 #info edwarnicke asks for the scope to be explicitly stated to say that this project does not want to do the discovery but to provide APIs that help people do that once it’s discovered 17:28:54 #info colindixon asks if this is a generic form of discovery, we should get it to work with legacy projects as well as new ones… hence having committment/committer from those groups would be needed 17:29:38 #info phudgins notes that he would be happy to include other interested projects/committers in the project 17:31:11 #info edwarnicke says that he’s allergic forcing committers on anyone else, and so would favor approving things with the intended changes made (to committers, to scope, etc.) 17:32:15 #info dlenrow notes that getting into incubation for past project reviews has been very easy. Sending this project off to provide more information multiple times seems against our past behavior 17:34:16 #info TSC members note that being liberal in acceptance to incubation is a core value, but also from past experience there are some topics (committers, scope understanding, potential relationship to across other ODL projects) is helpful to understand 17:36:01 is this conditional on committers and scope being fixed? 17:36:19 i would say with the proposed changes to the proposal 17:36:24 committers, scope 17:36:29 We have conditionally approved in past 17:36:51 Approve pending completion of blah, blah 17:37:05 dlenrow: +1 17:38:14 #topic project merge jobs breaking 17:38:38 #info regXboi and edwarnicke note that a misconfigured merge job which broke integration 17:40:06 #info regXboi has done a linear walk of all the jenkins he cold find (based on the helium release) to make sure that no other merge jobs are broken in a way that will break things over the weekend 17:40:26 #Info this problem cost us a few days at a critical time and should be reviewed in the future 17:40:56 #Info edwarnicke pleads for us to ask the board for a community support person that can comb through things and find bugs like this early 17:41:53 #info dmm and colindixon agree that we this role should be filled 17:42:11 #topic release candidates 17:43:09 #info dmm notes that in the future we need to work on defining what release candidates are 17:43:38 #info regXboi asks if we ever agreed on release vehicles 17:44:11 #info colindixon notes that we did agree on karaf would be one of the release vehicles, but didn’t agree that it would be the only vehicle 17:44:24 #link http://odl-project-explorer.herokuapp.com/download << link to download page prototype 17:44:28 #undo 17:44:28 Removing item from minutes: 17:44:33 #topic Helium download tool 17:44:45 #link http://odl-project-explorer.herokuapp.com/download the download tool as it stands today 17:44:52 updated: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Discovery#Scope, let me know if this is not clear enough in terms of scope or committers. 17:45:15 #info phrobb has asked him for the full list of flip cards (mlemay_away has said he imagines it will be per-project) 17:46:26 #info edwarnicke says that this worries him because everything we’ve discussed previously was that all features would be presented, not just a subset or just projects 17:47:24 #info edwarnicke also note that it doesn’t work to download, phrobb confirms that and says this is just for look and feel 17:47:30 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PYxjiSYEks44uJByVO1P44rnI5xTJRulpKyrSsDQF9g/edit#gid=1751723309 17:48:25 #info colindixon also says he thought it would be feature-based 17:48:42 #info phrobb asks if the list of features listed in the above sheet are the right things to show to users 17:49:10 #info edwarnicke says some of this is out of date and some may need to be modulated by asking projects what features they want to expose to users 17:51:49 #info colindixon suggests that we use this list as a starting point, reach out to projects if we think they should be exposing different features, also telling all projects what we’re planning on doing so they can adjust if they need 17:53:30 #info colindixon explicitly notes that to avoid the political issues, it seems we pretty much need to allow projects to surface whatever features they want 17:53:45 #info kwatsen asks why are we doing a web portal instead of an installer? 17:54:08 #info edwarnicke says the answer is that the people who wanted to do the work were willing to do that 17:54:11 time check 17:54:18 (Discovery project proposal) 17:55:02 #info phrobb asks if we want to surface internal features or just to drag them in through the other features 17:55:28 #info edwarnicke says he thinks it’s the latter, with the possible exception of clustering 17:55:40 tbachman: noted 17:56:03 tbachman: yeah, I know 17:56:10 :) 17:56:32 * tbachman apologizes for being a pest :) 17:57:36 #info cdub says he doesn’t quite see how we’re going to execute this before Monday 17:57:41 #info phrobb agrees with that 17:58:10 #info colindixon suggests that we ship the custom distribution downloader after the release and the first release is just the karaf zip file 17:58:23 #Info phrobb asks what docs we need to produce to make that possible 17:59:09 mlemay gets #action'd by not showing up...lesson to us all ;) 17:59:28 * alagalah cdub nice... 17:59:57 @tbachman: thx ;) 18:00:43 #Info edwarnicke suggests a 4 column table of: (i) human-readable component name, (ii) human-readable description, (iii) features command to load that component, (iv) compatibility notes 18:00:54 #info LuisGomez asks what information is in each project's installation guide given it's relation to name/desc/features, etc 18:01:20 #info we need somebody to make this table, it could be pulled from install guide if projects are filling it out right 18:01:24 #info i just want to make sure we do not work twice 18:01:48 #topic release artifact approval 18:02:12 #agree will will review release artifacts at a special TSC meeting on Monday morning 18:02:19 #undo 18:02:19 Removing item from minutes: 18:02:31 #agree will will review release artifacts at a special TSC meeting on Monday morning 18:02:34 #undo 18:02:34 Removing item from minutes: 18:02:37 #agree will will review release artifacts at a special TSC meeting on Monday aftenoon 18:02:45 #action colindixon will lead producing the documentation table 18:04:13 #info colindixon asks if we can do it during lunch in the summit 18:04:17 actually 12:15pm (lunch schedule) 18:04:36 #undo 18:04:36 Removing item from minutes: 18:04:46 #agree we will meet at 12:15p pacific on Monday 18:05:19 no objection 18:05:23 no objection 18:06:12 #agree the TSC agrees that the karaf distribution (possibly modulated by the web downloader) will be *the* release vehicle for Helium 18:06:42 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Discovery 18:06:49 #undo 18:06:49 Removing item from minutes: 18:06:51 #startvote Shall the TSC accept the Discovery project into OpenDaylight as an Incubation Project? -1, 0, +1 18:06:51 Begin voting on: Shall the TSC accept the Discovery project into OpenDaylight as an Incubation Project? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 18:06:51 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 18:06:53 #info colindixon notes that for clarification, we would like the web downloader in the future, we are just using an alternative for quicker delivery by 9/29 18:06:54 #topic revisit of discovery 18:06:59 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Discovery 18:07:03 #vote +1 18:07:08 #vote +1 18:07:08 #vote +1 18:07:21 #vote +1 18:07:26 #vote +1 18:07:27 #vote +1 (if we don't start one) 18:07:27 ChrisPriceAB: +1 (if we don't start one) is not a valid option. Valid options are -1, 0, +1. 18:07:35 #vote +1 18:07:37 #vote +1 18:07:45 #vote +1 18:07:50 #endvote 18:07:50 Voted on "Shall the TSC accept the Discovery project into OpenDaylight as an Incubation Project?" Results are 18:07:50 +1 (8): dlenrow, regXboi, dmm, ChrisPriceAB, cdub, edwarnicke, colindixon, IvanWood 18:07:53 #vote +1 18:07:59 * ChrisPriceAB congratulation! 18:08:00 #info congrats to discovery and welcome aboard! 18:08:06 #info note kwatsen had a late +1 vote for the record 18:08:07 thx. 18:08:12 #agreed Discovery Project is moved to Incubation 18:09:13 helium 18:09:33 branch + stable release 18:09:36 #topic final topics 18:09:47 #info we need to talk about EOLing hydrogen 18:09:52 #undo 18:09:52 Removing item from minutes: 18:10:08 #info regXboi says we need to talk about EOLing hydrogen in the future 18:10:40 #info we need to establish whether and how projects have to cut stable release branches for helium (or to delay it), we can do that on Monday 18:11:08 #endmeeting