#opendaylight-meeting: tsc

Meeting started by phrobb at 17:31:24 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

    1. regXboi (irc only) (regXboi, 17:31:39)

  2. Roll Call - TSC members please #info in (phrobb, 17:31:43)
    1. dlenrow (dlenrow, 17:31:47)
    2. colindixon (colindixon, 17:32:09)
    3. https://meetings.webex.com/collabs/#/meetings/detail?uuid=MEME176XJHU3O6MQ2WIS54FBIO-9VIB&rnd=320201.28932 (colindixon, 17:32:46)
    4. jmedved (jmedved, 17:33:24)
    5. edwarnicke (edwarnicke, 17:33:27)
    6. Luis Gomez (LuisGomez, 17:33:34)
    7. https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2014-November/002096.html an e-mail I sent ~30 minutes ago going trhough what we need to do here (colindixon, 17:35:20)
    8. mohnish (mohnish, 17:35:23)

  3. helium SU1 Release (tbachman, 17:35:47)
  4. Helium SU1 Release (colindixon, 17:35:48)
    1. https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2014-November/002096.html an e-mail I sent ~30 minutes ago going trhough what we need to do here (tbachman, 17:36:05)
    2. since release artifacts were cut, we’ve had no other critical bugs come up, LuisGomez ran all the regression tests with success (tbachman, 17:36:38)
    3. https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/integration-dev/2014-November/002021.html email indicating to push fix for clustering to the next SR (tbachman, 17:37:54)
    4. https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/groups/staging/org/opendaylight/integration/distribution-karaf/0.2.1-Helium-SR1/ link to download release artifacts from nexus (tbachman, 17:38:18)
    5. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TRYposNDFPaKcySlvwkOXvfR6Anx2EFujlIjoTthhRY/edit#gid=1109333662 Spreadsheet with critical bugs (tbachman, 17:38:45)
    6. VOTE: Voted on "Shall the TSC approve the official release of Helium SR-1?" Results are, +1: 7 (phrobb, 17:40:26)
    7. AGREED: TSC approves the on-time shipment of Helium SR-1 (phrobb, 17:41:07)

  5. Lithium Release Plan (tbachman, 17:41:19)
    1. https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/groups/staging/org/opendaylight/integration/distribution-karaf/0.2.1-Helium-SR1/ (tbachman, 17:42:14)
    2. ACTION: gzhao or edwarnicke will provide tykeal with th repo ID (colindixon, 17:42:54)

  6. Lithium Simultaneous Release Discussion (phrobb, 17:43:17)
    1. There have been 2 edits of substance since the Li release plan was reviewed at last Thursday’s TSC (tbachman, 17:43:28)
    2. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CrossProject:Integration_Group:Lithium_Project_Integration_Requirements integration requirements (colindixon, 17:43:45)
    3. System test is encouraged to use robot, but if projects want to use something else they can (i.e. don’t mandate technology) (tbachman, 17:45:10)
    4. Also changed to clarify projects vs. integration projects. (tbachman, 17:45:38)
    5. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CrossProject:Documentation_Group:Lithium_Project_Documentation_Requirements documentation requirements (colindixon, 17:46:04)
    6. This has been updated to make it clear that user documentation should be for user-facing features, and not grouped by project (since they don’t care which project a user-facing feature comes from) (tbachman, 17:46:44)
    7. The main release page has language added to encourage project to talk about cross-project incompatibilities (tbachman, 17:47:43)
    8. There’s also been a note added to the feature test section along these same lines (tbachman, 17:48:52)
    9. ACTION: gzhao to email release asking for per-project release notes for stable/helium (tbachman, 17:50:27)
    10. edwarnicke asks if it’s possible for people to report the outcome of the incompatibility conversations (tbachman, 17:51:03)
    11. ACTION: colindixon to put together pieces for the release (tbachman, 17:52:19)
    12. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:DRAFT_Release_Plan_2014_Template (colindixon, 17:53:04)
    13. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:DRAFT_Release_Plan_2014_Template Proposed Lithium Release Plan (tbachman, 17:53:50)
    14. colindixon asks if anyone objects to edwarnicke’s modification to the release plan re: incompatibilities (tbachman, 17:54:48)
    15. no objectsions were voiced (tbachman, 17:54:57)
    16. https://gist.github.com/anonymous/89ec1a86dc1c976618e7 possible date options (colindixon, 17:56:18)
    17. colindixon would like to hear feedback on which dates provided in the link appeal to folks (tbachman, 17:57:34)
    18. LuisGomez says he has no preference from the testing perspective (tbachman, 18:02:14)
    19. colindixon asks edwarnicke if he prefers his original dates or the +2 weeks to M1 (tbachman, 18:05:18)
    20. edwarnicke says he prefers to have weekly RC’s, which was the motivation for his dates (tbachman, 18:05:58)
    21. https://gist.github.com/anonymous/8f5b41c666847a9a3385 (colindixon, 18:07:10)
    22. https://gist.github.com/anonymous/8f5b41c666847a9a3385 updated proposed dates for Lithium Release (tbachman, 18:08:33)
    23. VOTE: Voted on "Shall the TSC declare weekly (Option 1) or bi-weekly (Option 2) RC candidates for the Lithium Release?" Results are, 1: 4, 2: 1 (phrobb, 18:15:59)
    24. VOTE: Voted on "Shall the TSC declare the Lithium Release plan to contain 3, or 4 RCs?" Results are, 3: 1, 4: 5 (phrobb, 18:17:14)
    25. VOTE: Voted on "Shall the TSC declare M1 for Lithium starting on 11/21 (Option 1), or on 12/11 which allows approximately 4 weeks between M0 and M1(Option 2)?" Results are, 1: 1, 2: 6 (phrobb, 18:21:05)
    26. it’s my understanding that this means we weill use the following offset 0 dates M0: 11/11, M1: 12/11, M2: 1/22 M3: 2/19, M4: 3/19, M5: 4/16, RC0: 5/28, RC1: 6/4, RC2: 6/11, RC3: 6/18, Release: 6/25, SR1: 8/13, SR2: 9/24 (colindixon, 18:24:20)
    27. I withdraw my previous suggestion of M2 at 1/29 (regXboi, 18:24:59)
    28. VOTE: Voted on "Shall the TSC approve the Lithium Release Plan as documented on the wiki as DRAFT_Lithium_Release_Plan_ckd with the date-modification indicated above?" Results are, +1: 7 (phrobb, 18:25:51)
    29. ACTION: colindixon to make the date adjustments to the Li Release Plan (tbachman, 18:26:08)
    30. ACTION: colindixon to remove the “Draft” indications from the documents that say “Draft” (tbachman, 18:26:38)


Meeting ended at 18:27:19 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. gzhao or edwarnicke will provide tykeal with th repo ID
  2. gzhao to email release asking for per-project release notes for stable/helium
  3. colindixon to put together pieces for the release
  4. colindixon to make the date adjustments to the Li Release Plan
  5. colindixon to remove the “Draft” indications from the documents that say “Draft”


Action items, by person

  1. colindixon
    1. colindixon to put together pieces for the release
    2. colindixon to make the date adjustments to the Li Release Plan
    3. colindixon to remove the “Draft” indications from the documents that say “Draft”
  2. edwarnicke
    1. gzhao or edwarnicke will provide tykeal with th repo ID
  3. gzhao
    1. gzhao or edwarnicke will provide tykeal with th repo ID
    2. gzhao to email release asking for per-project release notes for stable/helium
  4. tykeal
    1. gzhao or edwarnicke will provide tykeal with th repo ID


People present (lines said)

  1. tbachman (55)
  2. regXboi (38)
  3. odl_meetbot (32)
  4. colindixon (26)
  5. phrobb (19)
  6. edwarnicke (17)
  7. dlenrow (11)
  8. jmedved (8)
  9. LuisGomez (7)
  10. mohnish (7)
  11. tykeal (4)
  12. gzhao (3)
  13. hideyuki (1)
  14. abhijitkumbhare (1)
  15. edwarnicke_ (0)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.