========================== #opendaylight-meeting: tsc ========================== Meeting started by phrobb at 17:31:24 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2014/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2014-11-10-17.31.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * regXboi (irc only) (regXboi, 17:31:39) * Roll Call - TSC members please #info in (phrobb, 17:31:43) * dlenrow (dlenrow, 17:31:47) * colindixon (colindixon, 17:32:09) * LINK: https://meetings.webex.com/collabs/#/meetings/detail?uuid=MEME176XJHU3O6MQ2WIS54FBIO-9VIB&rnd=320201.28932 (colindixon, 17:32:46) * jmedved (jmedved, 17:33:24) * edwarnicke (edwarnicke, 17:33:27) * Luis Gomez (LuisGomez, 17:33:34) * LINK: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2014-November/002096.html an e-mail I sent ~30 minutes ago going trhough what we need to do here (colindixon, 17:35:20) * mohnish (mohnish, 17:35:23) * helium SU1 Release (tbachman, 17:35:47) * Helium SU1 Release (colindixon, 17:35:48) * LINK: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2014-November/002096.html an e-mail I sent ~30 minutes ago going trhough what we need to do here (tbachman, 17:36:05) * since release artifacts were cut, we’ve had no other critical bugs come up, LuisGomez ran all the regression tests with success (tbachman, 17:36:38) * LINK: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/integration-dev/2014-November/002021.html email indicating to push fix for clustering to the next SR (tbachman, 17:37:54) * LINK: https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/groups/staging/org/opendaylight/integration/distribution-karaf/0.2.1-Helium-SR1/ link to download release artifacts from nexus (tbachman, 17:38:18) * LINK: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TRYposNDFPaKcySlvwkOXvfR6Anx2EFujlIjoTthhRY/edit#gid=1109333662 Spreadsheet with critical bugs (tbachman, 17:38:45) * VOTE: Voted on "Shall the TSC approve the official release of Helium SR-1?" Results are, +1: 7 (phrobb, 17:40:26) * AGREED: TSC approves the on-time shipment of Helium SR-1 (phrobb, 17:41:07) * Lithium Release Plan (tbachman, 17:41:19) * LINK: https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/groups/staging/org/opendaylight/integration/distribution-karaf/0.2.1-Helium-SR1/ (tbachman, 17:42:14) * ACTION: gzhao or edwarnicke will provide tykeal with th repo ID (colindixon, 17:42:54) * Lithium Simultaneous Release Discussion (phrobb, 17:43:17) * There have been 2 edits of substance since the Li release plan was reviewed at last Thursday’s TSC (tbachman, 17:43:28) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CrossProject:Integration_Group:Lithium_Project_Integration_Requirements integration requirements (colindixon, 17:43:45) * System test is encouraged to use robot, but if projects want to use something else they can (i.e. don’t mandate technology) (tbachman, 17:45:10) * Also changed to clarify projects vs. integration projects. (tbachman, 17:45:38) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CrossProject:Documentation_Group:Lithium_Project_Documentation_Requirements documentation requirements (colindixon, 17:46:04) * This has been updated to make it clear that user documentation should be for user-facing features, and not grouped by project (since they don’t care which project a user-facing feature comes from) (tbachman, 17:46:44) * The main release page has language added to encourage project to talk about cross-project incompatibilities (tbachman, 17:47:43) * There’s also been a note added to the feature test section along these same lines (tbachman, 17:48:52) * ACTION: gzhao to email release asking for per-project release notes for stable/helium (tbachman, 17:50:27) * edwarnicke asks if it’s possible for people to report the outcome of the incompatibility conversations (tbachman, 17:51:03) * ACTION: colindixon to put together pieces for the release (tbachman, 17:52:19) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:DRAFT_Release_Plan_2014_Template (colindixon, 17:53:04) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:DRAFT_Release_Plan_2014_Template Proposed Lithium Release Plan (tbachman, 17:53:50) * colindixon asks if anyone objects to edwarnicke’s modification to the release plan re: incompatibilities (tbachman, 17:54:48) * no objectsions were voiced (tbachman, 17:54:57) * LINK: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/89ec1a86dc1c976618e7 possible date options (colindixon, 17:56:18) * colindixon would like to hear feedback on which dates provided in the link appeal to folks (tbachman, 17:57:34) * LuisGomez says he has no preference from the testing perspective (tbachman, 18:02:14) * colindixon asks edwarnicke if he prefers his original dates or the +2 weeks to M1 (tbachman, 18:05:18) * edwarnicke says he prefers to have weekly RC’s, which was the motivation for his dates (tbachman, 18:05:58) * LINK: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/8f5b41c666847a9a3385 (colindixon, 18:07:10) * LINK: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/8f5b41c666847a9a3385 updated proposed dates for Lithium Release (tbachman, 18:08:33) * VOTE: Voted on "Shall the TSC declare weekly (Option 1) or bi-weekly (Option 2) RC candidates for the Lithium Release?" Results are, 1: 4, 2: 1 (phrobb, 18:15:59) * VOTE: Voted on "Shall the TSC declare the Lithium Release plan to contain 3, or 4 RCs?" Results are, 3: 1, 4: 5 (phrobb, 18:17:14) * VOTE: Voted on "Shall the TSC declare M1 for Lithium starting on 11/21 (Option 1), or on 12/11 which allows approximately 4 weeks between M0 and M1(Option 2)?" Results are, 1: 1, 2: 6 (phrobb, 18:21:05) * it’s my understanding that this means we weill use the following offset 0 dates M0: 11/11, M1: 12/11, M2: 1/22 M3: 2/19, M4: 3/19, M5: 4/16, RC0: 5/28, RC1: 6/4, RC2: 6/11, RC3: 6/18, Release: 6/25, SR1: 8/13, SR2: 9/24 (colindixon, 18:24:20) * I withdraw my previous suggestion of M2 at 1/29 (regXboi, 18:24:59) * VOTE: Voted on "Shall the TSC approve the Lithium Release Plan as documented on the wiki as DRAFT_Lithium_Release_Plan_ckd with the date-modification indicated above?" Results are, +1: 7 (phrobb, 18:25:51) * ACTION: colindixon to make the date adjustments to the Li Release Plan (tbachman, 18:26:08) * ACTION: colindixon to remove the “Draft” indications from the documents that say “Draft” (tbachman, 18:26:38) Meeting ended at 18:27:19 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * colindixon * colindixon to put together pieces for the release * colindixon to make the date adjustments to the Li Release Plan * colindixon to remove the “Draft” indications from the documents that say “Draft” * edwarnicke * gzhao or edwarnicke will provide tykeal with th repo ID * gzhao * gzhao or edwarnicke will provide tykeal with th repo ID * gzhao to email release asking for per-project release notes for stable/helium * tykeal * gzhao or edwarnicke will provide tykeal with th repo ID People present (lines said) --------------------------- * tbachman (55) * regXboi (38) * odl_meetbot (32) * colindixon (26) * phrobb (19) * edwarnicke (17) * dlenrow (11) * jmedved (8) * LuisGomez (7) * mohnish (7) * tykeal (4) * gzhao (3) * hideyuki (1) * abhijitkumbhare (1) * edwarnicke_ (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4