18:00:52 #startmeeting tsc 18:00:52 Meeting started Thu Dec 4 18:00:52 2014 UTC. The chair is phrobb. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 18:00:52 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:00:52 The meeting name has been set to 'tsc' 18:01:20 #topic Rollcall - TSC members please #info in 18:01:21 #topic Agenda Bashing, Roll Call, Action Items 18:01:29 phrobb: ah, sorry ;) 18:01:31 * tbachman can’t undo 18:01:38 #chair tbachman 18:01:38 Current chairs: phrobb tbachman 18:01:44 #info Kent Watsen 18:01:45 #info alagalah (Keith Burns) in for Jan Medved 18:02:00 #info colindixon 18:02:10 #info dlenrow 18:02:12 #info ChrisPrice text only for a short while 18:02:13 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/TSC:Main#Agenda the agenda 18:02:15 #link https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2014/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2014-11-20-18.03.html Minutes from last week’s meeing 18:02:16 #info Youcef Laribi 18:02:35 oops 18:02:36 :) 18:02:41 #link https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2014/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2014-11-20-18.03.html two weeks ago meeting minutes (for action items) 18:02:51 #chair colindixon ChrisPriceAB 18:02:51 Current chairs: ChrisPriceAB colindixon phrobb tbachman 18:02:57 #info jburns 18:03:10 #info LuisGomez 18:03:30 jburns: which TSC chair are you representing? 18:03:51 #action colindixon to start the conversation and collect ideas on how to resolve cross-project version bumping in timely fashion 18:04:17 #action mlemay to Investigate usage of repotool manifest for inter-repo + tags management with zxiiro 18:04:48 Hi 18:05:01 I'm trying to connect to the meeting, but webex is giving me a 31001 error 18:05:07 #info regXboi is running late 18:05:25 #chair regXboi 18:05:25 Current chairs: ChrisPriceAB colindixon phrobb regXboi tbachman 18:05:35 huzzah for Forge domain! /me is glad no one snatched it 18:05:36 #chair regXboi 18:05:36 Current chairs: ChrisPriceAB colindixon phrobb regXboi tbachman 18:05:42 #unchair regXboi 18:05:42 Current chairs: ChrisPriceAB colindixon phrobb tbachman 18:05:48 #action colindixon and phrobb to work with the CAPWAP team to make sure the proposal goes through 18:05:56 yes I unchaired myself 18:05:57 @colindixon I'm still at another meeting running late 18:06:06 regXboi after chairing ;) 18:06:08 I'm running late and am rebuilding my infrastructure 18:06:09 CHAIR FIGHT CHAIR FIGHT 18:06:44 Anyone have the correct meeting number handy? The one in the community calendar isn't working 18:06:54 #action phrobb and tykeal to follow up on getting the new certifacte for nexus to make archetypes work on MacOS 18:06:57 dneary: 194 548 370 18:07:09 alagalah: Channeling Bobby Knight? 18:07:19 :) 18:07:24 dneary: The GCal? That's the one I gave you and the one I'm using 18:07:38 dfarrell07, That's the one I'm using... working OK for everyone else? 18:07:42 #info edwarnicke 18:07:51 I will just dial in 18:07:53 dneary: Yep, seems so. Hang up and try again? 18:08:02 Was trying to connect via webex service 18:08:12 * dfarrell07 gave up on webex a long time ago 18:08:35 #topic VPN Service Creation Review 18:08:36 * tykeal dials in for voice and connects to webex on his tablet for any video 18:08:41 * tbachman apologizes — will be “here” soon 18:08:52 7" tablets are tiny for screen sharing though ;) 18:08:52 #topic VPN Creation Review 18:09:08 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:VPN_Service the proposal page 18:09:10 #info Chris Wright 18:09:21 dude... that font is *awesome*... what is it? 18:09:23 Dave Neary here too 18:09:28 Dialled in now 18:10:20 #info propsoing a model for deploying VPN services in ODL 18:10:28 * tbachman cracks knuckles 18:10:29 back 18:10:40 edwarnicke: Some form of stencil font (if you google I guess) 18:11:11 #info motivation is network virtualization in the data center, recognizing that interworking with traditional networking being a problem 18:11:19 tbachman: thanks! 18:11:22 #undo 18:11:22 Removing item from minutes: 18:11:24 colindixon: np 18:11:29 let me know if you want a hand, esp for this part 18:11:46 #info motivation is network virtualization in the data center, recognizing that interworking with traditional networking elements being a problem 18:12:31 #info Application will use the MD-SAL and GBP-PCEP 18:12:43 #undo 18:12:43 Removing item from minutes: 18:12:47 oops 18:12:48 :) 18:12:52 #info Application will use the MD-SAL and BGP-PCEP 18:12:58 type GBP much? :-) 18:13:01 lol! 18:13:03 a little ;) 18:13:13 LOLZ 18:13:23 #info OVSDB and OpenFlow used to interact with switches 18:13:28 colindixon: Yes I have some questions too :) 18:13:58 #info The orchestrator will be OpenStack. 18:14:04 #info GRE tunnels will be used between the nodes and the gateway 18:14:12 #info mohnish 18:14:34 #info The data center GW doesn’t need a lot of state since they’re using “soft GRE" 18:15:47 #info diagram of new and existing parts of ODL in providing the service 18:15:51 #info New L3 components for ODL: MP-GBP, VPN Manager Service, Next-hop Manager Service, FIB Service, and Label Manager Service 18:16:04 #info MP-BGP will use existing BGP-LS infrastructure 18:16:09 abhijitkumbhare: Is this an implementation of DMVPN ? 18:16:24 Especially with "NHRP" functionality, it twigged as being DMVPN like 18:16:28 rgowrishankar: thx! 18:16:44 yw :) 18:17:44 * ChrisPriceAB lighter colours are better colours 18:18:32 #info edwarnicke asks if this is intended to have a “works out of the box” deployment scenario 18:19:04 #info edwarnicke asks what the deployment model is? right now most things “work out of the box” as long as there’s a JVM to run it in 18:19:04 #info Srikar says the new functions will be no different than the existing functions in ODL 18:19:19 colindixon: thx! 18:19:42 #info Srikar says there’s no component that he’s aware of that would require a higher end machine in order to be run 18:20:16 * ChrisPriceAB using a 3pp routing implementation is an optional approach, getting the BGP capability natively in ODL will enable the single instance model. 18:21:16 #info edwarnicke was not asking about individual components but about the overall deployment whether additional systems would be needed to set it up.. 18:21:31 #info srikar says most components are implemented in a prototype inside Ercsson as ODL elements that work just like ODL 18:21:33 #chair rgowrishankar 18:21:33 Current chairs: ChrisPriceAB colindixon phrobb rgowrishankar tbachman 18:21:39 :) 18:22:20 abhijitkumbhare: I just managed to get through the Proj Prop... I see its EVPN (L2) and MPLS VPN... 18:23:17 #info using REST to configure VPN will be available as well.. using OpenStack or other component is not mandatory. 18:23:22 alagalah - yes its MPLS VPN (to start), then EVPN in the future - sorry was not looking at the IRC 18:23:41 abhijitkumbhare: no problem, still reading up on your FIB ... 18:23:49 * alagalah wonders about scale and summarisation 18:24:54 #info colindixon asks what OpenStack APIs would be implemented? ML2? VPNaaS? 18:25:39 btw. BGPCEP already has a BGP-MP implementation 18:25:42 #info Targeting network of 100 vswitches and 1000 VRFs as scale 18:26:00 #info Srikar says that the existing VPNs in OpenStack are very IPSEC-centric, there are blueprints floating around that support MPLS-BGP VPN (what is being implemented here) and they would implement the one of those that is chosen 18:26:02 (e.g. BGP/LS is a plugin into an BGP-MP framework) 18:26:59 #info rovarga says that the BGPCEP project already provides BGP-MP, e.g., BGP/LS is a plugin into a BGP-MP framework 18:27:16 #info using softGre instead of VxLAN because lot of existing boxes that connect to WAN support softGRE and not VxLAN 18:27:27 * ChrisPriceAB There should be nothing stopping a VxLAN based solution also... step by step based on need. 18:28:33 #info cdub says “I don’t think you’ll find that tunnel overhead [for VxLAN] is significant” 18:28:40 #info rovarga asks what BGP-MP features the project is looking for 18:28:59 #info Srikar says it’s essentially the VPN functionality/RFCs 18:29:23 #info Srikar says also RFC 3107 for label propagation 18:29:48 #info rovarga says those could be realized as plugins to the existing BGP framework 18:31:14 #info There’s one tunnel from each vSwitch to the data center gateway 18:31:27 #info LuisGomez asks how they plan to do that for the gateway 18:32:07 #info It uses MPLS over softGRE which can be realized using NETCONF, where a particular subnet applies to a softGRE 18:32:31 #info The current plan is to us MPLS for the VPN service label, but not the tunnel, but there’s thinking about using an LSP for tunnels as well 18:33:30 Benny and the D4A project apparently need to drop in ~7 minutes and would like to vote on committer promotions before they have to go… I may table this really briefly to take care of that 18:33:42 #info Labels are distributed via BGP to a remote site 18:33:50 just a heads up 18:34:05 colindixon: thx 18:34:12 * ChrisPriceAB need a Q&A to code generator, we'd be done in no time! 18:34:24 ChrisPriceAB: :-) 18:34:32 #topic committer promotions: Defense4all 18:34:55 #info Link for the presentation 18:34:59 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/File:VPN_Service.pptx 18:35:42 abhijitkumbhare: thx! 18:36:02 abhijitkumbhare: we’ll come back to the presentation in < 5 minutes 18:36:20 tbachman - returning the favor of scribing on the OpenFlow plugin meetings :) 18:36:26 :) 18:36:37 * tbachman reminds himself to put that meeting on his calendar 18:36:39 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/defense4all-dev/2014-September/000074.html the mailing list votes for new committers 18:36:57 * dfarrell07 is looking up stats 18:36:58 #info Defense4All lost 3 of the 5 committers 18:37:09 #info proposing two new committers: Gershon Soklosky and Asaf Oron 18:37:17 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/project:defense4all 18:37:57 #link http://spectrometer.opendaylight.org/?release=all&project_type=all&metric=loc&user_id=gershons Gershon Sokolsky history 18:38:03 dfarrell07: thx! 18:38:04 #link http://spectrometer.opendaylight.org/?metric=loc&user_id=gershons Gershon’s contributions 18:38:55 Can't find history for other two 18:39:03 dfarrell07: correct 18:39:41 #info D4A asked for 3 committers. Gershon has been contributing a lot of code and Asaf has been the main contact for the Helium release. Asaf has not been contributing to ODL directly. Gershon has been committing code from both of them. 18:40:32 #startvote Shall the TSC approve Gerson Soklosky as a committer on the Defense4All Project? -1, 0, +1 18:40:32 Begin voting on: Shall the TSC approve Gerson Soklosky as a committer on the Defense4All Project? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 18:40:32 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 18:40:33 If gershon is pushing asaf’s commits does asaf need to be a committer (i.e. will this change)? 18:40:40 #vote +1 18:40:41 #vote +1 18:40:44 #vote +1 18:40:46 #vote +1 18:40:46 #vote +1 18:40:49 #vote +1 18:40:50 #vote +1 18:40:53 #vote +1 18:40:54 #vote +1 18:40:58 #vote +1 18:41:07 #vote +1 18:41:18 #endvote 18:41:18 Voted on "Shall the TSC approve Gerson Soklosky as a committer on the Defense4All Project?" Results are 18:41:18 +1 (11): dlenrow, regXboi, alagalah, LuisGomez, ChrisPriceAB, edwarnicke, cdub, mohnish, kwatsen, colindixon, Youcef 18:41:40 #info colindixon asks how much oversight the TSC should exert on committer nominations 18:41:40 #agreed Gerson Soklosky is approved as a committer on the Defense4All project 18:41:57 #info cdub recommends light oversight with strong guidance 18:42:19 tbachman: heh, you make it sound clever ;) 18:42:24 btw. if d4a goes for lithium, they will need a leader and can cleanup their committers afterwards 18:42:25 lol 18:42:31 cdub: "Profound" 18:42:46 cdub: did I get it right? 18:42:53 tbachman: yes 18:42:58 18:43:16 BTW - I have uploaded a new version of the VPN service presentation (with "Ericsson Internal" removed from the footer) 18:43:25 * ChrisPriceAB prefer to wait tbh 18:43:33 Please use that version instead 18:43:36 When there's 2 or more developers working together on a patch, it's good practice to have the primary developer submit the patch as the author and include any additional developers via the "Also-By: First Last " in the footer of the commit message. 18:44:20 zxiiro: Does spectrometer pic kthat up ? 18:44:31 alagalah: patches accepted 18:44:35 dunno, would have to ask dtucker ;) 18:44:47 I feel for you on both ends? 18:44:52 :o 18:44:53 alagalah: i don't know much about spectrometer unfortunately 18:45:37 #info phrobb emplores asaf and benny to get asaf set up so that he can become a committer, as having a backup is important 18:45:41 +100 18:46:19 #info phrobb says that given asaf’s role within defense4all, it seems like he is the most likely candidate to be the project lead, and to become a project lead you need to first be a committer 18:47:10 #topic Creation Review for VPN Service (revisited) 18:47:40 #info colindixon asks what projects they imagine interacting with 18:48:11 #info Begun interaction with OVSDB, have not reached out to BGP-pCEP team 18:48:23 rgowrishankar: thanks! 18:48:32 #info Some contribution to openflowplugin as well 18:48:45 #info also wanted to reach out to the sdniapp team 18:49:09 #info any changes to the neutron API? 18:49:33 #info Srikar doesn’t see making any changes to the existing Neutron API, but adding functionality will be part of it 18:50:01 #info regXboi asks how they can add functionality without changing 18:50:51 #info Srikar says there are blueprints in OpenStack to add VPN as a service which would use neutron 18:51:26 #info regXboi asks if this would be something between ML2 and the controller 18:51:46 #info Srikar says it uses ML2 constructs, but has an extraneous association 18:52:19 * ChrisPriceAB I'm not sure OpenStack development has ever been in the scope of an ODL project formally 18:52:45 +1 ChrisPriceAB 18:53:32 ChrisPriceAB: and I want to *keep* it that way :) 18:53:40 #info colindixon asks if we have a mechanism to modify project scope 18:54:40 #info CDixon: add word VPN before service in the scope definition 18:54:50 #info colindixon asks to put the ODL usernames to help LF folks 18:54:59 huzzah! 18:55:06 :) 18:58:28 colindixon: +1 18:58:39 * tykeal is a stickler for rules ;) 18:59:03 #info any vote on the proposal will be conditional on: (i) adding ODL usernames for committers, (ii) removing the tech lead section, and (iii) adding the word VPN before service in the first two paragraphs of Scope, (iv) add prem as a committer 18:59:06 * ChrisPriceAB get that ball and chain attached 18:59:10 Coud we capture those 4 in the vote? 18:59:40 phrobb: Is on *fire* :) 18:59:45 #startvote Shall the TSC approve the VPN Service project to Incubation – conditional on adding Prem Sankar as a committer, removing the tech lead section from the proposal, adding “VPN” before the word “service” in the Scope section of the proposal, and finalizing Inbound Code Review? -1, 0, +1 18:59:45 Begin voting on: Shall the TSC approve the VPN Service project to Incubation – conditional on adding Prem Sankar as a committer, removing the tech lead section from the proposal, adding “VPN” before the word “service” in the Scope section of the proposal, and finalizing Inbound Code Review? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 18:59:45 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 18:59:47 * ChrisPriceAB yes! 18:59:50 #vote +1 18:59:55 #vote +1 18:59:55 #vote +1 18:59:57 #vote +1 18:59:57 #vote +1 19:00:01 #vote +1 19:00:13 yes, very cool project! :) 19:00:18 #vote +1 19:00:33 #vote +1 19:00:37 #endvote 19:00:37 Voted on "Shall the TSC approve the VPN Service project to Incubation – conditional on adding Prem Sankar as a committer, removing the tech lead section from the proposal, adding “VPN” before the word “service” in the Scope section of the proposal, and finalizing Inbound Code Review?" Results are 19:00:37 +1 (8): dlenrow, LuisGomez, ChrisPriceAB, edwarnicke, mohnish, kwatsen, colindixon, alagalah 19:00:38 #vote +1 19:00:42 cdub: too bad 19:00:47 * ChrisPriceAB congratulations VPN team! 19:00:47 Congratulations VPN team 19:00:55 oops 19:00:56 #agreed the VPN Service Project is approved 19:01:01 * regXboi missed the boat 19:01:04 colindixon: keep in mind that w/Intel we now have more for a majority 19:01:10 (still carried) 19:01:10 * ChrisPriceAB tut tut cdub! 19:01:20 ah, you’re right 19:01:21 sorry 19:01:29 * tbachman still working on counting 19:01:51 ChrisPriceAB: heh, too many IRC channels 19:01:54 Once more... from the top ;) 19:02:00 edwarnicke: :-) 19:02:07 #topic events 19:02:47 #info phrobb says that submission for the summit opens on 12/15 and closes 2/6 19:02:52 #undo 19:02:52 Removing item from minutes: 19:02:54 tbachman: damn you 19:03:07 #info phrobb says that submission for papers for the summit opens on 12/15 and closes 2/6 19:03:15 colindixon: :) 19:04:03 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2014-December/002197.html Phils proposal to do weekly IRC meetings in lieu of a face-to-face meeting in January 19:04:11 colindixon: got me back! :P 19:04:33 19:04:35 #Info one face-to-face meeting in the M4/M5 boundary later on 19:04:42 * edwarnicke suppresses the desire to suggest alternately we meet April 1... 19:04:49 #undo 19:04:49 Removing item from minutes: 19:05:02 #info second part of the proposal is one face-to-face meeting in the M4/M5 boundary later on 19:05:16 * ChrisPriceAB sounds like a solid play phrobb 19:05:37 #info edwarnicke says if we go with IRC weekly meetings, we should get them scheduled soon 19:06:05 what? work during a meeting? 19:06:12 never happens 19:06:17 * tykeal continues hacking on puppet ;) 19:06:19 tykeal: I know, I've never ever *ever* done that ;) 19:06:41 #info abhijitkumbhare asks if we’d have alternate time zone meetings 19:06:50 #info colindixon says we have to do alternate time zone meetings 19:07:04 #info abhijitkumbhare asks if we’re going to do 2x/day or alternate 19:07:07 #info edwarnicke opines that we need to solve the timezone issue... not certain as to the best solution 19:07:16 whoa 19:07:21 netsplit 19:07:23 * ChrisPriceAB ryan what did you do??? 19:07:26 brainsplit 19:07:35 lol 19:07:42 there it goes again 19:07:43 * ChrisPriceAB LOL 19:07:50 #info regXboi recommends not doing 2 meetings in a day 19:07:57 +1 19:08:07 * edwarnicke wonders if he is on the correct side of the partition 19:08:07 #info rovarg and abhijitkumbhare agreeswith regXboi 19:08:21 * tbachman has incomplete state 19:08:46 i strongly don't object 19:09:05 #agreed Weekly IRC meetings will be held between M1/M2 for Lithium planning/coordination 19:09:20 was that it? Weekly? 19:09:22 * ChrisPriceAB not in violent disagreement with cdub 19:09:23 Daily, right 19:09:25 ? 19:09:31 * tbachman is non-violent 19:09:35 ChrisPriceAB: hehe 19:09:38 * ChrisPriceAB good to hear! 19:09:47 #undo 19:09:47 Removing item from minutes: 19:09:53 #info note M1 to M2 is 12/11 and 2/5 19:09:56 Agreed 19:10:00 * edwarnicke is noticing a lot of double negativity on the IRC channel 19:10:07 Timezones and real time meetings do not mix well 19:10:09 #agreed Mechanism needed to deal with time zone issues for planning meetings 19:10:25 #action phrobb to kick off a discussion on the mailing list on how to deal with the timezone issues for these IRC meetings 19:10:31 phrobb: thx 19:10:38 #topic interns 19:10:41 tbachman: i think you #undid the first #agree 19:10:49 cdub: I did — b/c I wasn’t sure it was right? 19:10:55 #link http://www.opendaylight.org/community/summer-intern-program intern page 19:10:55 we agreed daily? 19:10:59 dfarrell07: thx! 19:11:04 wt... 19:11:11 we agreed weekly 19:11:11 daily? I heard weekly 19:11:12 sorry 19:11:13 k 19:11:20 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/InternProjects:Main <- Intern page 19:11:22 weekly + tz cleverness 19:11:29 out of context 19:11:31 but here goes 19:11:32 #agreed Weekly IRC meetings will be held between M1/M2 for Lithium planning/coordination 19:11:37 cdub: Quantum Entaglement... its the only way 19:11:48 cdub: Entanglement even 19:11:50 #info phrobb says they’ll be engaging with google summer of code org 19:12:00 I want a #lastinfo command that puts it in the last topic 19:12:11 #info phrobb says they’ll also reach out to the outreach program for women 19:12:17 also a #rollcall command that puts it at the top in it’s own category 19:12:19 colindixon: ack 19:12:36 #info phrobb says they have budget for up to 14 interns this year as well (~double last year's) 19:13:10 #info phrobb says that interns start committing themselves to programs in the December time frames; we need mentors and projects so that interns can start signing up 19:14:01 phrobb, Do we have partnerships with some universities in the project (like GEANT, for example)? Perhaps some "professor outreach" would be useful 19:14:05 lots of background noise 19:14:49 LuisGomez: I think the noise is you and me :-) 19:14:50 LuisGomez: I think it's you not on mute? 19:14:50 #info dneary asks if we hvae partnerships with universities in the project 19:14:51 * edwarnicke wonders what is being built in the background 19:14:56 #info phrobb says nothing formally 19:15:27 #info colindixon says there was some technicality that dq’d us from summer of code last year; have we fixed that 19:15:56 #info phrobb says the template has been modified to call out more information, and this is being done significantly early, both of which resulted in dq’s last year 19:16:36 #info colindixon says last year almost all interns were from outside the US; is this being addressed? 19:16:38 colindixon: iirc google soc is similar $ 19:16:40 $6000 per month for an intern!?! 19:16:54 google soc used to be 5k 19:16:55 * dneary confirms what cdub said 19:16:55 #info phrobb says we want to keep parity with the google summer of code 19:17:05 dneary: for Google pays better 19:17:05 * ChrisPriceAB Do we base a global activity on "valley" compensation? 19:17:07 cdub, And $500 for the org 19:17:38 colindixon, They're intended to replace free internships or fast food jobs 19:18:01 * ChrisPriceAB lol 19:18:52 #action phrobb to start a thread on possibly changing compensation to attract interns more people 19:19:30 #Info cdub and phrobb say maybe the way to do that is through member companies instead 19:19:41 lol 19:19:49 sadist 19:19:50 it's more "project" based 19:20:28 #action phrobb to kick off email thread on compensation and possible "internships" board 19:20:31 #topic system integration and test update 19:20:35 #info no update this week 19:20:41 #info Lithium and Stable/Helium updates 19:21:09 #info colindixon asks if we’re done with the version bumps for stable helium 19:21:10 tbachman: s/info/topic 19:21:27 lol 19:21:30 dfarrell07: thx! 19:21:32 #undo 19:21:32 Removing item from minutes: 19:21:33 #undo 19:21:33 Removing item from minutes: 19:21:43 #topic Lithium and Stable/Helium updates 19:21:44 [2:21pm] 19:21:49 : #info colindixon asks if we’re done with the version bumps for stable helium 19:21:52 dang 19:22:08 what was someone saying about doing other things during meetings? 19:22:15 #info colindixon asks if we’re done with the version bumps for stable helium 19:22:20 #info zxiiro says yes they’ve been completed 19:22:24 tbachman: never happens ;) 19:22:27 lol 19:22:51 #info zxiiro has also been looking at the Lithium auto-build, which is currently failing due to 2 features that depend on each other 19:23:06 #info zxiiro thinks the stable/helium autobuilds are failing as well due to a test failure 19:23:16 #info colindixon says he thinks it’s in l2switch and is being looked at 19:23:18 #info colindixon notes helium sr2 is jan 12 19:23:27 cdub: thx! 19:23:46 np 19:24:10 #topic Infrastructure 19:24:28 #info tykeal says ODL forge was greenlighted and the name has been purchased 19:24:30 #info andy is working on getting infra in place. odlforge.org has been bought 19:24:38 #info tykeal is looking into getting certs for ODL forge 19:24:51 w00t! 19:24:54 #info odlforge is coming up on l7 systems. 19:25:06 #info EL7 systems 19:25:07 rgowrishankar: s/l7/el7/ 19:25:22 #undo 19:25:22 Removing item from minutes: 19:25:24 #undo 19:25:24 Removing item from minutes: 19:25:31 tykeal: nice! 19:25:33 #info odlforge is coming up on EL7 systems 19:25:42 #info tykeal says there’s been a lot of requests for the puppet manifests; they’re starting with new manifest sets for ODL forge 19:26:02 tykeal: sorry, i misheard...you're doing what? 19:26:05 #info tykeal is hoping to have ODL forge up and running by end of next week 19:26:22 cdub: lol 19:26:26 ;) 19:27:59 #info we now have a way to retrigger jobs, thanks to zxiiro 19:28:01 sorry 19:28:03 lol 19:28:09 missed the mechanism 19:28:44 #link https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/ Jenkins Job Builder link 19:28:51 oops 19:28:52 #undo 19:28:52 Removing item from minutes: 19:28:56 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/RelEng:Main#Builder RelEng page 19:28:57 you want the project proposal? 19:28:59 ah 19:29:03 thanks dfarrell07 :) 19:29:05 * tbachman is lost today 19:29:13 #info you can retrigger a verify by putting a comment on the gerrit with “recheck” and similar for merge with “remerge" 19:29:18 colindixon: thx 19:29:39