16:59:56 #startmeeting TSC Meeting 2014-06-12 16:59:56 Meeting started Thu Jun 12 16:59:56 2014 UTC. The chair is phrobb. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 16:59:56 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:59:56 The meeting name has been set to 'tsc_meeting_2014_06_12' 17:01:08 #info lenrow 17:01:18 #topic TSC members please #info in 17:01:41 #info Dave Meyer is Here 17:01:49 #info Chris Wright 17:02:36 @cdub are you joining the webex also, or just irc? 17:02:49 you might not know this, but I can't stand webex 17:02:57 ;) 17:03:06 i'm currently fighting it over here 17:03:09 #chair colindixon lenrow Madhu 17:03:09 Current chairs: Madhu colindixon lenrow phrobb 17:03:31 hey all 17:03:48 howdy colindixon 17:04:47 #info Chris Price joined the call 17:05:05 edwarnicke: do you want to #info in? 17:05:08 kwatsen: are you going to join via audio? 17:05:27 #info Ed Warnicke 17:05:39 colindixon: Apologies... having a morning (internet went out :( ) 17:05:41 #info Kent Watsen 17:06:30 #topic TSC charter update 17:06:32 #topic Bylaw and charter edits for TSC At-Large Elections 17:06:43 #info Rob Dolin proxy for Rajeev Nagar (Microsoft) 17:09:04 anyone sharing agenda on webex? 17:09:25 no 17:09:37 can some #info that ? 17:09:39 i didn't get it :) 17:09:40 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/TSC:Main#Meeting_Agenda meeting agenda 17:09:55 would you mind doing it lenrow? I have too much window manuvering to do to share for long periods of time 17:10:05 Madhu: you need the agenda? 17:10:13 done (see above) 17:10:23 phrobb: no. the stuff that ed just said. 17:11:26 #link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veil_of_ignorance edwarnicke explains this term and advocates for decisions w.r.t. to at large TSC seats to be made with this in mind 17:11:29 Madhu: does that help 17:11:46 colindixon: thanks. yes 17:12:29 #info the wording change for the TSC charter is to allow for the platinum-designate to the TSC to not step down when an At-Large committer is elected from the same company. 17:13:06 #info Mohammad Banikazemi attending the TSC meeting for Ryan Moats 17:15:25 #info the wording allows the Board, by supermajority, can vote to remove the mandate that the platinum designate step down for the particular election. Also the Board's choice to do this needs to be *before* the election begins so that they make that decision in a "veil-of-ignorance" with regard to the outcome of the election 17:15:40 thanks banix 17:16:08 phrobb: no problem 17:16:26 i have no idea what we are talking about 17:17:53 cdub: we’re waxing philosophically about how we might like to run an arbitrary representative democracy 17:18:08 sorry, i think this is a waste of time 17:18:09 #info the other issue to be considered is what happens to a platinum designate if/when we have core project leaders joining the Board 17:18:19 can we get to something concrete? 17:18:23 cdub: +1 17:18:29 ok, I have to run 17:18:39 sudden meeting 17:18:43 #not the Board… sorry, I meant when a Core Project Lead joins the TSC 17:19:14 irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/#notinfo not the Board… sorry, I meant when a Core Project Lead joins the TSC 17:20:24 colindixon: cdub Not at all philosophical.. such things are strongly helpful in spotting potential problems and unforseen issues 17:21:46 #info Q: Should we clarify if/when a TSC member is representing their company vs their own views to the project?… Rob, did I capture this accurately? 17:25:10 #info The group is not yet ready to put forth specific text for the charter and bylaws 17:25:52 #info It was noted that the 60 day deadline has passed so expediency is needed 17:26:00 #topic TSC Call cadence 17:26:45 #info choices, reduce call length to 1 hour, and/or reduce call frequency to biweekly 17:26:55 +1 17:27:03 +1 17:27:27 #info Chris W, Rob, and Ed all are fans of reducing call time from 2h to 1h 17:27:43 +1 17:28:02 #agreed Reduce call from 2h to 1h (by voice vote) 17:28:02 #agreed call duration reduced to 1hr, weekly 17:28:14 thanks cdub 17:28:28 #topic Lithium Simultaneous Release 17:30:17 maybe it will be a mood stabilizing release? 17:32:13 * tbachman hands cdub a mood ring 17:32:28 “I think it’s blue" 17:32:30 heh, completely forgot about those 17:32:35 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Lithium_Release_Plan 17:34:40 #action phrobb to kick off discusion on discuss list for Lithium release planning 17:35:07 #topic Helium Release Vehicles 17:37:16 #info discussion ensues on "what should be the balance between focus-on-stability vs new features"? 17:39:04 #info It is noted that without adequate stability, a rich feature set is undeployable 17:41:29 kwatsen: yes, i agree 17:42:11 #info discussion ensues on process-oriented technical requirements to ensure stabilty, scalability, etc. 17:47:01 #info further discussion on requirements vs implementation as a method to steering the projects to improve stability 17:50:32 #info concern is raised that requirements without committment and resources to work on filling the requirements will not succeed 17:51:39 +1 17:51:57 #action A request to all TSC members and community members to voice their thoughts on needs of the community for stability and performance improvements needed for the project 17:52:36 +100 :) and you all know that 17:52:54 #info please bring your thoughts for these improvements to the TSC meetings 17:54:43 #info differing views on responsibility of TSC to improve process for stability of the code produced vs setting the timeline for future releases 17:59:08 #endmeeting