17:03:43 #startmeeting TWS 17:03:43 Meeting started Mon Jun 30 17:03:43 2014 UTC. The chair is colindixon. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 17:03:43 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:03:43 The meeting name has been set to 'tws' 17:05:32 #topic HP presentation on possible contributions 17:05:59 #chair Madhu 17:05:59 Current chairs: Madhu colindixon 17:06:01 #chair networkstatic 17:06:01 Current chairs: Madhu colindixon networkstatic 17:06:20 ahh, ty col 17:06:46 anyone who wants to can start a line with #info to have it show up in the logs, same with #link 17:06:55 only chairs can #topic or #agreed 17:07:39 #info HP is exploring ways to help and contribute to ODL, this includes explaining their lessons from building their own controller 17:08:14 is there a link for the slides for those of us only on the phone? 17:08:17 #topic performance (of the controller) 17:08:23 regXboi: working on it, how’s that coming networkstatic ? 17:08:57 #info HP's Openflow plugin in HP commercial controller can perform @ 3Mpps 17:08:57 navigating stupid wiki 17:09:06 thanks Madhu 17:09:39 #info HP's plugin supports both OF1.0 and OF1.3 17:09:53 #info the numbers are from cbench which uses only OF1.0 17:10:37 #topic demo of the controller 17:12:01 #info controller starts in a karaf container in 3-4 seconds (impressive) 17:12:57 #info after one warm-up round of ~400k packet_in/second, we see 3.0–3.2 million packet_in/sec 17:13:27 regXboi https://www.dropbox.com/s/zlu9uwd7pqfdjhx/HP%20OpenFlow.pptx 17:13:34 dont pound yet 17:13:39 still getting it on wiki 17:13:40 I’ll post it if you want 17:13:48 i think i broke the stupid accordian 17:13:49 lol 17:14:38 #topic performance (how they got there) 17:14:39 #info Thomas's Demo was based on a few core open flow bundles running in Karaf container 17:16:25 #info some performance from caching information at the controller so that most operations are controller-local (ODL also does this mostly) 17:16:34 #info HP capped with 1.2 million pps w/ Netty 17:16:53 NIO? 17:17:16 nice 17:17:19 #Info started with Netty for for I/O, but found it limited them to 1.2 million packet_in/second, seemed to be because netty failed to pack multiple messages into a frame 17:17:29 #info HP Openflow plugin uses NIO to achieve the 3Mpps. 17:17:44 #topic testing 17:17:49 #info 3Mpps includes end-to-end packet processing (not just I/O) 17:17:52 #info unit tests cover 80% of the code 17:18:01 sorry Madhu :p 17:18:11 #topic deep dive 17:18:15 colindixon: np. am trying to cover the missing pieces :) 17:18:21 yup 17:18:45 #info the system abstraction is very much like the AD-SAL 17:19:58 #info diagram of the OpenFlow subsystem (see the slides) 17:20:09 clarification please, it was commented that they are using a stack similar to AD-SAL. This says to me that this demo is not using AD-SAL nor MD-SAL, so what components of ODL are being used? Or is this essentially just sharing the OSGi controller? 17:20:35 dbainbri: HP’s own controller 17:20:38 not based on ODL 17:20:44 ah, thx. 17:21:03 so the proposal is to contribute what exactly then? 17:21:15 regXboi: that’s a really good question 17:21:35 well, I'm going to ask it :) 17:22:30 #info they do run-to-completion packet_in handling with a system provide them with deterministic handling (ordering) 17:22:51 #info people who handle packet_ins are first advisors, then directors, then observers 17:24:44 I’m wondering if their Karaf container is the same as the one we have at ODL? 17:25:21 icbts: good question 17:25:28 ask if you want to 17:25:29 we are using a standalone karaf container, but have prototyped and been able to run in the karaf container that is being put into the controller 17:25:52 #info question (from icbts) if they’re using the same karaf container as ODL 17:25:53 uchau: Thanks — we’ve been building ODL to use Karaf 17:26:04 #info answer uchau “we are using a standalone karaf container, but have prototyped and been able to run in the karaf container that is being put into the controller” 17:27:00 #info advisors see the packet_in before any action is taken and can provide metadata that helps, directors actually take action on packets, observers can see the actions taken and make notes for the future 17:27:26 #info they currently use 16 I/O loops (that is threads), and so multiple switches can be mapped to the same I/O loop 17:28:26 how is mobility handled ? 17:28:40 clarify? mobility? 17:28:42 alagalah_: can you define mobility? 17:28:55 App moves.... what happens ? 17:29:18 #topic demo number 2 17:29:23 ( and I have a bandaged finger so dont expect fast typing) 17:29:37 #info includes an application to show the topology 17:30:09 #info (aside) shows off javadoc with nice graphics and clearly some effort put into it 17:30:17 colindixon https://wiki.opendaylight.org/images/8/81/HP_OpenFlow.pptx 17:30:48 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/images/8/81/HP_OpenFlow.pptx (link to the slides) will also be on the wiki 17:30:52 networkstatic: thanks! 17:31:04 This is pretty cool actually 17:31:25 alagalah_ beating Netty is interesting 17:31:33 #info runs mininet with a tiered topology with nice layout showing the thing in the browser 17:31:37 networkstatic: lolz 17:31:45 Sorry keith not ignoring your question... by App, you mean consumer of the Network service API (Java or REST?) 17:32:21 rexpugh-HP: yes I mean consumer 17:32:27 remind me, did BSN use Netty for socket abstraction or did they end up with NIO also? 17:32:37 #info shows the path in the web UI and demonstrates multipathing (shortest path based on hop-count, can also do paths to avoid obstacles, provide waypoints, link weighting, etc.) 17:33:15 #info shows karaf CLI commands for hosts, devices, links, paths, etc. 17:33:47 rexpugh-HP: specifically either (which is a tautology) 17:34:08 rexpugh-HP: but this is cool 17:34:24 #info taking a link down shows the change in the UI in nearly real time (looks cool) 17:34:56 App mobility opens a different discussion around how we hooked the "controller" to cluster peers using message bus technology. HP product uses modified hazelcast for state sync etc 17:35:25 didnt want to bring that up in this forum 17:35:45 dont say motherhood and apple pie, we say that too much 17:35:55 #topic open to questions 17:35:55 makes me hungry too 17:36:25 What is the performance comparison? 17:36:27 #info colindixon asks if there was anything really surprising other than Netty being the performance bottleneck (other things seem mostly like good engineering) 17:36:31 MD/AS 17:36:37 er MD/HP_AD 17:36:53 rexpugh-HP: motherhood and apple pie .. there... I went there... and yes I am hungry 17:36:56 networkstatic: ~16,000 ops/second last I checked on Jan’s laptop I think in a vm 17:37:15 rexpugh-HP: :) 17:38:22 #Info it’s a combination of things, in particular they note get the factoring of functionality layered in the right places to keep things from causing other bottlenecks 17:38:34 thanks keith... I will bring dessert next time 17:38:41 #info regXboi asks what they’d be looking to contribute 17:38:57 colindixon: I think that was networkstatic 17:39:32 so, to play devil's advocate, if an OF plugin contribution won't actually improve overall performance, because of the upper layers, what are we looking to gain? 17:39:41 we == ODL 17:39:54 #info answer is that at a minimum, they’d want to to contribute the OF controller (the part that talks to switches) and the I/O loop, but would also like to contribute more because it might not improve performance without also reworking some of the upper layers 17:40:05 dbainbri what if you dont use it? 17:40:07 #info question of how close people are to being able to share code 17:40:15 networkstatic: good point 17:40:16 #info answer is that things are still in legal at the moment 17:40:28 yep... it's a third SAL 17:40:41 regXboi: yay 17:40:43 regXboi: that is what i was concerned about 17:40:58 #info jan medved asks how could we plug this into the MD-SAL in any way? 17:41:13 not like we dont already have two conrtollers already 17:41:13 #info lenrow says that’s the big question we all need to think through 17:41:16 why not 17:41:20 Can we talk about sharding ? 17:41:29 use karaf, build whatever alacart 17:41:31 Or replication 17:41:33 we are there anyways 17:41:46 networkstatic: don't understand your point, what if you don't use it? we have an OF plugin today. this contribution may be more performant than this plugin, but it sounds like the real performance is outside that device comms bit. 17:41:47 #info some comments (from networkstatic and regXboi, but I agree) that this looks like it would be a third SAL, i.e., almost a third controller 17:41:49 grab your bundles, build the controller to build your app 17:42:11 #info jan medved asks about sharding and data replication (as does alagalah_) 17:42:12 colindixon: +1 17:42:24 dbainbri sorry, meaning, if you dont need the nuclear submarine. we use topology and OF13 17:42:27 thats it 17:42:50 so seeing 16k flowmods p/sec vs a very streamlined OF implementation 17:42:56 why not 17:43:02 networkstatic: +1 17:43:02 is it me or does this sounds like this is self sharded 17:43:04 competition is good imo 17:43:11 keep peeps on their toes 17:43:13 regXboi: WTF does that mean 17:43:16 regXboi: I’m not really following this 17:43:18 lol 17:43:26 but we don't get the demonstrated through put unless we have the contributed plugin as well as the upper layers used. 17:43:44 Madhu: can you summarize that if you understood it? 17:43:56 colindixon: yes 17:44:00 yeah, i heard that too dbainbri until we see code hard to say. 17:44:03 regXboi: Dude... wtf does "self clustering" mean? you flummaxed me 17:44:13 agree competition is good, but it gets harder and harder to define what ODL is. 17:44:15 what I heard in that conversation about remote processing is that the implementation is already doing sharding 17:44:17 Madhu: and I can summarize flexibility 17:44:29 or its equiv to keep requests local whenever possible 17:44:30 #info the Clustering support is in the Manager layer and not on the Plugin layer 17:44:34 dbainbri i think a pretty tight package went over the cliff 6 months ago 17:44:45 networkstatic: lol 17:44:49 hehe 17:45:10 i just want to see nerd rage wars really 17:45:13 thats all 17:45:18 umm... I don't think the upper IO is the important thing here, I think its the lower level API that are important 17:45:20 #info this is AD-SAL clustering design as well. where the plugin layer performs all the local I/O processing while the NSF / Manager layer manages the clustering data-store across controllers 17:45:46 i just fear the customer support call. well i started with the ODL bundle you gave me then swapped out X, Y, and Z. not it isn't working. Please fix it vendor. 17:46:00 #info Madhu asks about extensibility with a focus on OpenFlow 17:46:30 #info response is that they can do them by defining new/different messages, then provide encoders and decoders 17:46:40 networkstatic: This convo requires beer 17:47:05 +1 edwarnicke extensions 17:47:08 networkstatic: but it ia too early 17:47:13 #info edwarnicke asks if they can do “side wise augmentation”, that is you can provide a new action at the bottom and consume it at the top without modifying the middle 17:47:15 w/o changing the plguin 17:48:12 #info the answer right now is no for the whole stack, but the answer seems to be yes for OpenFlow 17:49:56 protocol agnostic loosely means “doesn’t use OF in class names” in my experience (in both ODL and this) 17:50:13 colindixon: We've *tried* to do better than that in ODL 17:50:18 And sometimes succeeded 17:50:31 edwarnicke: I know, it’s hard, it was mostly innocent snark 17:50:36 though there’s a grain of truth in it 17:53:06 We can share javadocs today. 17:53:49 that would be excellent. one thing I wonder is how you identify links for example :) 17:54:48 #info back and forth about abstractions and low-level vs. high-level and protocol specific vs. protocol agnostic 17:55:09 #info colindixon asks what the intent is w.r.t. the community 17:55:29 #info response is that they want to help shepherd the code in and get help from the community, but that they intend to have developers to help support 17:56:12 #info jan medved asks if HP would be willing to help the current openflow plugin in ODL, instead of of (or maybe in addition to) a separate implementation 17:57:32 #info answer is yes, they’d like that, it sounded like they would like to explore both options though 17:59:32 #info it would obviously be nice to not have even more places where the code base is forked 17:59:48 #info colindixon asks if the productization of ODL is the HP product road map 18:00:32 #info answer is that they’re not really willing to make a statement about product strategy in that way, but that they don’t intend to just dump code and walk 18:01:01 #info that being said, they say “it would be difficult to productize opendaylight with the current performance” 18:02:21 top of the hour 18:02:23 lets wrap 18:03:12 #info their code is already shipping and so they need to avoid regressing, so they would need at least the performance to come into line; the APIs and abstractions are somewhat more negotiable and would be nice to collaborate on 18:03:54 #info HP says they very much want to have this stuff be shared infrastructure and genuinely participate in the community 18:03:59 #endmeeting