16:06:30 #startmeeting Weekly MD-SAL Call 16:06:30 Meeting started Tue Jun 3 16:06:30 2014 UTC. The chair is colindixon. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 16:06:30 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:06:30 The meeting name has been set to 'weekly_md_sal_call' 16:06:34 #chair edwarnicke 16:06:34 Current chairs: colindixon edwarnicke 16:07:08 #chair devinavery 16:07:08 Current chairs: colindixon devinavery edwarnicke 16:07:30 #topic status update 16:07:56 Is there a webex link for md-sal call? The linky on the wiki is stale. 16:08:41 WebEx: https://meetings.webex.com/collabs/#/meetings/detail?uuid=MCQK23GTHZNO7LDV6UWT6KLYPV-9VIB&rnd=497132.35684 16:08:47 thx 16:10:19 I’m working on it 16:10:46 3, sir! 16:12:47 #info all the data store improvements are checked in from rovarga_ 16:14:01 can u guys hear Tony ? :) 16:14:08 very, very, quietly 16:14:21 #info Moiz says that work continous on PoC on Akka clustered data store, they would like to present again next week 16:14:42 #info jquery for MD-SAL is ongoing with colindixon and Neel_B 16:18:39 #raiseshand... at some point I'd like to go through the controller Release Plan and see where we stand for Monday's M2 Milestone... since I will need to report out on that... but devinavery can put it in the agenda where ever it fits 16:20:13 edwarnicke: do u think we will need a TWS slot next monday to track M2 milestones ? 16:20:22 #info looking through bugs that have been merged, this includes 1120, 724, (others in the minutes) 16:20:54 Madhu: I think that is a good idea... but the report of record is email to discuss (in part to be timezone sensitive). 16:21:51 sure. just making sure... if we need a slot, we can make it available edwarnicke 16:22:21 #info a discussion of what should happen to get a patch merged goes on, the consensus is that you need to add a committer as a reviewer to get their attention, currently that is edwarnicke, ttkacik, and rovarga_ (it seems) 16:24:37 ins't this why we should use the DRAFTS branches? I understand that DRAFT is private, but I would love to make DRAFTS public by default. Make sense? 16:25:17 #info edwarnicke says to whack him upside the head if there’s a patch that seems to be atrophying 16:26:17 how about 2 types of drafts (shy vs non-shy mode)? 16:26:24 #info flaviof asks is drafts are better than “DO NOT MERGE” patches, but edwarnicke and colindixon note that drafts are not visible except to people who are directly added as reviewers, so they’re different 16:28:18 we should also probably have a proof-of-concept repository where we can push code and collaborate with others more easily 16:28:25 #action edwarnicke to start a thread on the mailing list about how to get your patches in (or delegate it) 16:29:15 moizer: there is something edwarnicke calls forge that we keep talking about, but it’s moved slowly, you should reach out to cdub and edwarnicke about it if you’re willing to help push it 16:29:27 #topic big things coming up 16:30:38 #info people (rovarga_ and ttkacik) are removing more xtend from things and people are reviewing them 16:31:52 I can hear you guys 16:36:17 devin is trying to call in using Skype to get audio back 16:36:34 #topic conversation about use of Akka 16:36:47 #info Madhu asks if Akka is a must (as was stated on the mailing list) or merely a good choice 16:37:08 #info people say that it’s just a really good fit/choice for the cluster/persistence 16:37:16 hm... how about git branch 'akka' ? 16:37:44 flaviof: we’re trying avoid branches if at all possible, but that’s a whole other thing 16:37:56 colindixon: understood. 16:38:01 that’s a different discussion though 16:38:27 #topic bug scrub 16:40:55 I asked DanF to join in the meeting. he logged the bug 16:43:07 #info see bug lists for results (we went through ones for md-sal, netconf, and yangtools) 16:45:05 #link https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1125 - just added this into the pile. Its a nice small good example of how to dig into something and chase it down. 16:46:55 You all have moved on, but bug 1124 guy here 16:47:04 #link https://bugs.opendaylight.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=IN_PROGRESS&bug_status=WAITING_FOR_REVIEW&bug_status=VERIFIED&component=General&component=mdsal&component=netconf&product=controller&product=yangtools&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&order=bug_id%20DESC&query_based_on= the bug list (I think) 16:47:24 dfarrell07: we just noted that it needed to be broken up into at least netconf and openflow plugin parts 16:47:39 colindixon: kk, can do, thanks for info 16:47:49 dfarrell07: it should be noted in the bug 16:47:52 Would request that we flip to a quick walk through of controller release plan at 10 till 16:50:19 #topic wrap-up 16:50:45 #info devinavery notes the bug scrub didn’t quite work as well as we might have hoped (we only made it through 2-3 bugs) 16:50:52 #info edwarnicke asks if IRC would be better 16:51:06 #info we’ll see what works for next week 16:51:28 #topic review of controller release plan M2 deliverables 16:54:20 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Controller:Helium_Release_Plan edwarnicke walks through this to figure out what M2 deliverables are there 16:56:10 #action edwarnicke will aggregate these results and present/note them later 17:05:25 #endmeeting