============================================= #opendaylight-meeting: Lithium release review ============================================= Meeting started by gzhao at 14:31:26 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2015/lithium_release_review/opendaylight-meeting-lithium_release_review.2015-06-23-14.31.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (gzhao, 14:31:50) * Project Leaders and TSC members please #info in (phrobb, 14:32:25) * oflibMichal for openflowjava and topoprocessing (oflibMichal, 14:32:28) * LuisGomez (LuisGomez, 14:32:53) * colindixon (colindixon, 14:33:01) * Openflow Java (gzhao, 14:33:46) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Openflow_Protocol_Library:Release_Notes:Lithium_Release_Review release review (oflibMichal, 14:33:53) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Openflow_Protocol_Library:Release_Notes:Lithium_Release_Notes release notes (oflibMichal, 14:33:57) * shague (shague, 14:35:39) * colindixon asks about any issues with compatibility or migration (gzhao, 14:38:09) * gzhao suggests unit test coverage link with the test and oflibMichal will do the update (gzhao, 14:38:51) * oflibMichal says the model changed and the writing/flushing mechanism changed, so it’s not compatible with Helium (colindixon, 14:38:55) * ACTION: oflibMichal to add the bug from the release review to the release notes (colindixon, 14:40:25) * Topoprocessing (gzhao, 14:42:17) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Topology_Processing_Framework:Lithium_Release_Review release review (oflibMichal, 14:42:21) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Topology_Processing_Framework:Lithium_Release_Notes release notes (oflibMichal, 14:42:25) * ACTION: oflibMichal is to fix the broken link for https://www.markoweb.eu/topoprocessing/presentation (gzhao, 14:45:46) * colindixon asks is there a reason that only two of the bugs listed on the release review are also listed in the release notes (gzhao, 14:48:13) * LINK: https://github.com/opendaylight/docs/blob/stable/lithium/manuals/developer-guide/src/main/asciidoc/topoprocessing/odl-topoprocessing-framework-dev.adoc developer docs (colindixon, 14:50:10) * SDNi (gzhao, 14:51:58) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/ODL-SDNi:Lithium_Release_Review <-- Release Review (SDNiShahid, 14:52:13) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/ODL-SDNi:Lithium_Release_Notes <-- Release Notes (SDNiShahid, 14:52:25) * SDNiShahid is representing SDNi (gzhao, 14:52:49) * LINK: https://github.com/opendaylight/docs/blob/stable/lithium/manuals/developer-guide/src/main/asciidoc/sdninterfaceapp/odl-sdninterfaceapp-all-dev.adoc developer docs (colindixon, 14:55:33) * LINK: https://github.com/opendaylight/docs/blob/stable/lithium/manuals/user-guide/src/main/asciidoc/sdninterfaceapp/odl-sdninterfaceapp-all-user.adoc user docs (colindixon, 14:56:02) * ACTION: SDNiShahid will link user guide, dev guide and release note in release review (gzhao, 14:57:17) * SDNiShahid says SDNi has tested with 12.04 and 14.04, it should work with other environments where ODL is supported (gzhao, 14:59:14) * ACTION: SDNiShahid to update the "Compatibility with Previous Releases section" in release notes (gzhao, 15:00:09) * phrobb notes By including those ubuntu versions specifically, the implication is that other environments are not for execution. This may be confusing to our users. (gzhao, 15:01:01) * ACTION: SDNiShahid to remove the ubuntu versions. (gzhao, 15:02:32) * ACTION: colindixon to work on getting requirements more clearly stated in release notes/review (colindixon, 15:03:49) * OVSDB (gzhao, 15:04:12) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OVSDB:Lithium_Release_Review (shague, 15:04:26) * shague is representing for OVSDB (gzhao, 15:04:47) * ACTION: shague to update to use Open vSwitch not OpenvSwitch (gzhao, 15:08:08) * colindixon notes there is no compatibility with Helium (colindixon, 15:09:22) * Opflex (gzhao, 15:11:06) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpFlex:LithiumReleaseReview Release Review (readams, 15:12:10) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpFlex:Lithium_Release_Notes Release Notes (readams, 15:12:17) * readams is representing for Opflex (gzhao, 15:12:20) * LINK: https://github.com/opendaylight/docs/blob/stable/lithium/manuals/developer-guide/src/main/asciidoc/opflex/libopflex-dev.adoc libopflex dev guide (readams, 15:12:43) * LINK: https://github.com/opendaylight/docs/blob/stable/lithium/manuals/developer-guide/src/main/asciidoc/opflex/genie-dev.adoc genie dev guide (readams, 15:12:49) * LINK: https://github.com/opendaylight/docs/blob/stable/lithium/manuals/developer-guide/src/main/asciidoc/opflex/agent-ovs-dev.adoc OVS agent dev guide (readams, 15:12:55) * LINK: https://github.com/opendaylight/docs/blob/stable/lithium/manuals/getting-started-guide/src/main/asciidoc/opflex/agent-ovs-install.adoc Agent install guide (readams, 15:13:01) * LINK: https://github.com/opendaylight/docs/blob/stable/lithium/manuals/user-guide/src/main/asciidoc/opflex/agent-ovs-user.adoc Agent user guide (readams, 15:13:06) * colindixon notes that the target environment is different here and that’s likely intentional (colindixon, 15:14:12) * readams says he doesn't have code coverage numbers specifically (it's harder for C++) but based on prior experience I'd estimate on the order of ~75-85% (gzhao, 15:16:25) * ACTION: readams to link dev, user doc to https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpFlex:LithiumReleaseReview (gzhao, 15:16:55) * phrobb asks The release notes mention that genie generates "group-based-policy" model, and agent-ovs implements "group-based-policy" model with OpenStack "group-based-policy". When you reference "group-based-policy" is that to the ODL Group Based Policy project and if so, is there a relationship/dependency between OPFLEX and ODL GBP? (gzhao, 15:19:32) * readams says they implement the same policy model (colindixon, 15:19:52) * readams says Group-based policy is a multi-project initialive across OpenStack and OpenDaylight (gzhao, 15:20:02) * SXP (gzhao, 15:22:31) * mrobertson is representing for SXP (gzhao, 15:23:03) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/SXP:Lithium:Release_Review <-- release review (gzhao, 15:24:22) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/SXP:Lithium:Release_Notes <-- release notes (gzhao, 15:24:35) * ACTION: mrobertson_ to fix user guide and dev guide link in release review (gzhao, 15:27:31) * ACTION: mrobertson_ to update target environment with 64 bit (gzhao, 15:29:56) * ACTION: gzhao to inform SDNi to update release notes for limitation of 64 bit linux (gzhao, 15:30:19) * colindixon notes that the target environment should really read “as per OpenDaylight” (colindixon, 15:32:28) * ACTION: mrobertson_ to remove “TOUPDATE” from the bugzilla summary (colindixon, 15:33:19) * l2switch (colindixon, 15:33:50) * alefan is representing for L2switch (gzhao, 15:34:09) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/L2_Switch:Lithium:Release_Review release review (colindixon, 15:34:53) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/L2_Switch:Lithium:Release_Notes relase notes (colindixon, 15:35:03) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/L2_Switch:Helium:Release_Notes#New_Features_and_Enhancements (gzhao, 15:38:11) * LuisGomez says we still have failing l2switch CSIT tests failing because links are not being removed correctly and asks that it be listed in known issues (colindixon, 15:39:37) * ACTION: alefan to update the release notes and release review with the known issues around link removal (colindixon, 15:40:18) * ACTION: alefan to fix the issues raised above, e.g., wrong links in the non-code aspects of the release review, misnamed section in release notes, and the other known issues (gzhao, 15:44:30) * openflow plugin (gzhao, 15:44:49) * abhijitkumbhare is representing for openflow plugin (gzhao, 15:45:05) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OpenFlow_Plugin:Lithium_Release_Review (abhijitkumbhare, 15:45:27) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OpenFlow_Plugin:Lithium_Release_Notes (abhijitkumbhare, 15:45:43) * ACTION: abhijitkumbhare to remove the “per-edition release notes” from the top of the release notes (colindixon, 15:46:40) * dlux (colindixon, 15:52:38) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_dlux:Lithium_Release_Review release review (colindixon, 15:52:48) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_dlux:Lithium_Release_Notes release notes (colindixon, 15:52:59) * harman_ says that issues around the YANG UI and YANG visualizer have been fixed (colindixon, 15:58:16) * harman_ says that migration should be trivial for a user (colindixon, 15:58:30) * harman_ says that some modifications might be required for a developer who wrote a dlux extension for Heiium to port it to LIthium (colindixon, 15:59:31) * ACTION: harman_ to update the release notes with information on compatibility with and migration from Helium (colindixon, 16:00:27) * USC (colindixon, 16:00:41) * Helen_Chen is here for USC (Helen_Chen, 16:00:48) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/USC:Lithium:Release_Review relase review (colindixon, 16:00:53) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/USC:Lithium:Release_Notes release notes (colindixon, 16:01:02) * USC is a new project for Lithium (Helen_Chen, 16:02:17) * ACTION: Helen_Chen to remove the “per-edition release notes” header and “release notes for later releases” section since they’re not really applicable (colindixon, 16:06:31) * just leave the major features, target environment, known issues, testing (colindixon, 16:06:55) * colindixon and phrobb ask about testing, how it’s done, if there’s a USC proxy and how somebody else might use it (colindixon, 16:10:15) * Helen_Chen says she’ll post that later (colindixon, 16:10:29) * capwap (colindixon, 16:10:43) * navinagrawal for capwap (navinagrawal, 16:10:46) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CAPWAP:Lithium:Release_Review (navinagrawal, 16:10:54) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/CAPWAP:Lithium:Release_Notes (navinagrawal, 16:11:00) * ACTION: navinagrawal to update the security section to say that security wasn’t considered in the first release (colindixon, 16:20:23) * ACTION: navinagrawal to remove “not applicable” from QA (colindixon, 16:21:06) * ACTION: nagrawal to remove Per-Edition from capwap release note (navinagrawal, 16:21:19) * VTN (colindixon, 16:21:49) * Hideyuki for VTN (hideyuki, 16:21:52) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Virtual_Tenant_Network_(VTN):Lithium_Release_Review (hideyuki, 16:21:56) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Virtual_Tenant_Network_(VTN):Lithium_Release_Notes (hideyuki, 16:22:03) * ACTION: hideyuki to add either the description of the workaround for 3818 to the release notes/review or say see the bugzilla notes for the workaround (colindixon, 16:27:42) * colindixon asks about compatibility with Helium, hideyuki says the REST API to VTN is the same (colindixon, 16:28:22) * ACTION: hideyuki to add a section noting that other than that the REST API is the same, compatibility with Helium is unknown and untested (colindixon, 16:28:51) * ACTION: hideyuki to note that VTN supports the NIC interface in Lithium (colindixon, 16:29:12) * iotdm (colindixon, 16:31:09) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Iotdm:Lithium_Release_Review release review (colindixon, 16:31:26) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Iotdm:Lithium_Release_Notes release notes (colindixon, 16:31:30) * ACTION: jburns to remove the “draft” statement from the top of the release notes (colindixon, 16:32:48) * LuisGomez asks if a failing CSIT test is expected, jburns says maybe, they are still working on quality given that it’s the first release, they don’t see it as blocking (colindixon, 16:33:35) * ACTION: jburns to provide some guidance about the bugs and how to work around them for users as appropriate for bugs in the release notes (colindixon, 16:38:54) * ACTION: jburns to look at "known Issues" and provide more context and work arounds as appropriate (phrobb, 16:39:12) Meeting ended at 16:40:44 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * abhijitkumbhare * abhijitkumbhare to remove the “per-edition release notes” from the top of the release notes * alefan * alefan to update the release notes and release review with the known issues around link removal * alefan to fix the issues raised above, e.g., wrong links in the non-code aspects of the release review, misnamed section in release notes, and the other known issues * colindixon * colindixon to work on getting requirements more clearly stated in release notes/review * gzhao * gzhao to inform SDNi to update release notes for limitation of 64 bit linux * harman_ * harman_ to update the release notes with information on compatibility with and migration from Helium * Helen_Chen * Helen_Chen to remove the “per-edition release notes” header and “release notes for later releases” section since they’re not really applicable * hideyuki * hideyuki to add either the description of the workaround for 3818 to the release notes/review or say see the bugzilla notes for the workaround * hideyuki to add a section noting that other than that the REST API is the same, compatibility with Helium is unknown and untested * hideyuki to note that VTN supports the NIC interface in Lithium * jburns * jburns to remove the “draft” statement from the top of the release notes * jburns to provide some guidance about the bugs and how to work around them for users as appropriate for bugs in the release notes * jburns to look at "known Issues" and provide more context and work arounds as appropriate * mrobertson_ * mrobertson_ to fix user guide and dev guide link in release review * mrobertson_ to update target environment with 64 bit * mrobertson_ to remove “TOUPDATE” from the bugzilla summary * navinagrawal * navinagrawal to update the security section to say that security wasn’t considered in the first release * navinagrawal to remove “not applicable” from QA * oflibMichal * oflibMichal to add the bug from the release review to the release notes * oflibMichal is to fix the broken link for https://www.markoweb.eu/topoprocessing/presentation * readams * readams to link dev, user doc to https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpFlex:LithiumReleaseReview * SDNiShahid * SDNiShahid will link user guide, dev guide and release note in release review * SDNiShahid to update the "Compatibility with Previous Releases section" in release notes * SDNiShahid to remove the ubuntu versions. * shague * shague to update to use Open vSwitch not OpenvSwitch People present (lines said) --------------------------- * colindixon (189) * gzhao (87) * phrobb (43) * harman_ (24) * readams (21) * oflibMichal (20) * LuisGomez (19) * alefan (14) * Helen_Chen (13) * SDNiShahid (12) * navinagrawal (11) * jburns (9) * hideyuki (9) * abhijitkumbhare (9) * shague (8) * mrobertson_ (7) * odl_meetbot (6) * vishnoianil (4) * mrobertson (1) * zxiiro (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4