============================================= #opendaylight-meeting: lithium release review ============================================= Meeting started by phrobb at 14:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2015/lithium_release_review/opendaylight-meeting-lithium_release_review.2015-06-24-14.30.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (phrobb, 14:30:10) * Project Leaders and TSC members please #info in (phrobb, 14:30:22) * Prem_ for VPNService (Prem_, 14:30:45) * LuisGomez (LuisGomez, 14:30:57) * gzhao (gzhao, 14:30:59) * VPN Service (phrobb, 14:32:01) * Prem_ is representing VPN Service (gzhao, 14:32:59) * LuisGomez asks if the test failure in csit is expected (gzhao, 14:36:33) * ACTION: Prem_ to document known work-arounds for listed bugs in release notes (phrobb, 14:38:03) * phrobb asks if security feature really n/a, Prem_ says they are not leveraging any security features. (gzhao, 14:38:06) * Prem_ says manually the test works (gzhao, 14:40:12) * Prem_ notes they are still investigating csit failure (phrobb, 14:40:38) * SNMP4SDN (phrobb, 14:41:16) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/SNMP4SDN:Lithium_Release_Review (phrobb, 14:42:04) * SNMP4SDN (gzhao, 14:44:34) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/SNMP4SDN:Lithium_Release_Note (ChristineH, 14:44:41) * ChristineH is reprenting SNMP4SDN (gzhao, 14:45:54) * ChristineH are there any migration concerns for users moving from Helium to Lithium regarding SNMP4SDN? (phrobb, 14:46:32) * ChristineH notes that for developer, the API is changed. for user, I think it's more convenient for them to use snmp4sdn via REST AP (phrobb, 14:48:24) * Vina Ermagan for LISP Flow Mapping (vina_ermagan, 14:50:46) * LISP (gzhao, 14:51:02) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Lisp_Flow_Mapping:Lithium_Release_Review (vina_ermagan, 14:51:05) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Lisp_Flow_Mapping:Lithium_Release_Notes (vina_ermagan, 14:51:17) * vina_ermagan Can you describe the migration issues for users moving from Helium to Lithium? (phrobb, 14:54:06) * LINK: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KPpO9LH539Vlcoa4RvLa6PPCdLifi5JD-ihRhlybqeo/edit#gid=478292312 Link to voting page (phrobb, 14:55:07) * LISP Flow Mapping is Go on Li (vina_ermagan, 14:55:53) * vina_ermagan Notes that the only migration issue is transition to RPCs from original northbound apis and the release notes call out where the new interfaces are documents (phrobb, 14:57:41) * ALTO (phrobb, 15:00:43) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/ALTO:Lithium:Release_Review (__Kai__, 15:01:00) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/ALTO:Lithium:Release_Notes (__Kai__, 15:01:19) * ALTO (gzhao, 15:03:53) * ebrjohn for Service Function Chaining (ebrjohn, 15:05:56) * phrobb asks No Security considerations? Could you use AAA and chose not to this release or did it not make sense to use it ever?... as an example (phrobb, 15:07:06) * dongshu notes We could use AAA to protect sensitive info or customized info, but choose to not, for simplicity. (phrobb, 15:07:34) * ACTION: dongshu to security concern to release review (gzhao, 15:07:44) * ACTION: dongshu to update release review wiki re security consideration (phrobb, 15:07:59) * ACTION: dongshu __Kai__ to remove non-outstanding bugs from release review (gzhao, 15:12:31) * SFC (phrobb, 15:12:57) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Service_Function_Chaining:Lithium_Release_Review#Standards_.28summary_of_standard_compliance.29 (ebrjohn, 15:13:39) * ebrjohn for SFC (gzhao, 15:13:46) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Service_Function_Chaining:Lithium_Release_Review (ebrjohn, 15:14:13) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Service_Function_Chaining:Lithium_Release_Notes (ebrjohn, 15:14:30) * ebrjohn for SFC (ebrjohn, 15:16:52) * ebrjohn says 3825 was a blocker, but its been fixed (gzhao, 15:19:32) * odlparent (phrobb, 15:21:55) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/ODL_Root_Parent:Lithium_Release_Review (Vaishali, 15:22:03) * Vaishali representing odlparent (phrobb, 15:22:10) * phrobb asks are there any user or developer facing issues that may be encountered as they migrate from Helium to Lithium? (phrobb, 15:25:30) * Vaishali Notes that thre shoiuld not be any migration issues (phrobb, 15:25:48) * reservation (phrobb, 15:26:42) * mlemay for reservation project (phrobb, 15:27:14) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Reservation:Lithium_Release_Review (mlemay, 15:27:42) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Reservation:Lithium_Release_Notes (mlemay, 15:27:58) * phrobb asks if Java 8 is required, mlemay responds no it is not and he will make that more clear in the release notes (phrobb, 15:31:38) * ACTION: mlemay to clarify Java 7/8 requirements in release notes (phrobb, 15:31:59) * phrobb says there is no problem putting such a statement in your relese notes such as flag things as "experimental" this release"? (gzhao, 15:38:33) * mlemay notes no outstanding bugs found since there are not much testing on reservation (gzhao, 15:41:44) * phrobb strongly suggests putting some kind of warning in the release notes that this is Experimental/beta/tech-preview etc (gzhao, 15:42:31) * gbp (phrobb, 15:46:19) * Release Review: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Group_Based_Policy_(GBP)/Releases/Lithium/Release_Review (alagalah, 15:46:43) * Release Notes: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Group_Based_Policy_(GBP)/Releases/Lithium/Release_Notes (alagalah, 15:46:58) * LINK: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KPpO9LH539Vlcoa4RvLa6PPCdLifi5JD-ihRhlybqeo/edit#gid=478292312 (phrobb, 15:58:43) * alagalah notes technically more correct to say SFC is part of the renderer, not the core model and policy resolution process. (gzhao, 15:58:49) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Persistence:Lithium:Release_Review (Shreyas, 16:02:28) * Persistence (phrobb, 16:02:29) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Persistence:Lithium:Release_Review (Shreyas, 16:02:43) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Persistence:Lithium_Release_Notes (Shreyas, 16:02:48) * LuisGomez asks there is no bugs and limitations? (gzhao, 16:05:13) * Shreyas notest that This is the first release for Persistence; as other modules will start using it now, we might have bugs coming in (phrobb, 16:05:56) * ACTION: Shreyas to link the unit test coverage in release review (phrobb, 16:06:27) * ACTION: Shreyas to add "known Limitations" section to release notes calling out Persistence works only for in-memory databases (phrobb, 16:07:58) * LuisGomez asks so this is kind of experimental/beta code this rel ease? (phrobb, 16:08:53) * ACTION: Shreyas to update relesase notes to call out that this release of Persistence is experimental/beta code (phrobb, 16:09:42) * NIC (phrobb, 16:11:41) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Reservation:Lithium_Release_Review (dbainbri, 16:12:11) * dbainbri for NIC (phrobb, 16:12:12) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Network_Intent_Composition:Lithium_Release_Notes (dbainbri, 16:12:20) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Network_Intent_Composition:Lithium_Release_Review (dbainbri, 16:13:39) * ACTION: dbainbri to remove N/A second and add a notice to indicate this project in Lithium is experimental (gzhao, 16:21:27) * LINK: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KPpO9LH539Vlcoa4RvLa6PPCdLifi5JD-ihRhlybqeo/edit#gid=478292312 (phrobb, 16:22:30) * AAA (phrobb, 16:23:27) * TSDR (phrobb, 16:25:18) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/TSDR:Lithium:Release_Review (YuLing_, 16:25:49) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/TSDR:Lithium:Release_Notes (YuLing_, 16:25:57) * LINK: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/CSIT-1node/job/tsdr-csit-1node-cds-hbase-datastore-only-stable-lithium/ (LuisGomez, 16:28:41) * DIDM (phrobb, 16:33:00) * Gunjan for DIDM (Gunjan, 16:33:06) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/DIDM:_Lithium_Release_Review (Gunjan, 16:33:19) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/DIDM:_Lithium_Release_Notes (Gunjan, 16:33:26) * LuisGomez notes that DIDM indicates they are beta quality in their Release Notes (phrobb, 16:36:17) * gzhao asks is didm java 8 compatible? (phrobb, 16:36:46) * Gunjan replies we haven't tested it with java 8, is that something we should have done? (phrobb, 16:37:12) * ACTION: LuisGomez and phrobb to work with TSC to add experimental tag for such projects in Be and beyond (phrobb, 16:39:19) * PCMM (phrobb, 16:42:00) * kkershaw for PCMM (kkershaw, 16:42:10) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/PacketCablePCMM:LithiumReleaseReview (kkershaw, 16:42:25) * LINK: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/PacketCablePCMM:LithiumReleaseNotes (kkershaw, 16:42:45) * LuisGomez asks are there any migration concern helium-lithium? (phrobb, 16:46:09) * kkershaw responds APIs were non-functional in helium Also, we know of no users. Lithium APIs are clean and operational (phrobb, 16:46:43) * kkershaw notes no backwards compatible for pcmm (gzhao, 16:48:08) * kkershaw notes lithium code is well tested. (gzhao, 16:50:04) * kkershaw and mlemay note bugs are mainly from older release and will be deprecated (gzhao, 16:51:36) * COOKIES (phrobb, 16:54:57) Meeting ended at 16:56:19 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * __Kai__ * dongshu __Kai__ to remove non-outstanding bugs from release review * dbainbri * dbainbri to remove N/A second and add a notice to indicate this project in Lithium is experimental * dongshu * dongshu to security concern to release review * dongshu to update release review wiki re security consideration * dongshu __Kai__ to remove non-outstanding bugs from release review * LuisGomez * LuisGomez and phrobb to work with TSC to add experimental tag for such projects in Be and beyond * mlemay * mlemay to clarify Java 7/8 requirements in release notes * phrobb * LuisGomez and phrobb to work with TSC to add experimental tag for such projects in Be and beyond * Prem_ * Prem_ to document known work-arounds for listed bugs in release notes * Shreyas * Shreyas to link the unit test coverage in release review * Shreyas to add "known Limitations" section to release notes calling out Persistence works only for in-memory databases * Shreyas to update relesase notes to call out that this release of Persistence is experimental/beta code People present (lines said) --------------------------- * phrobb (186) * gzhao (105) * LuisGomez (55) * mlemay (36) * alagalah (32) * ebrjohn (24) * dbainbri (22) * YuLing_ (20) * kkershaw (14) * vina_ermagan (14) * Prem_ (14) * Shreyas (12) * dongshu (10) * odl_meetbot (10) * Gunjan (9) * __Kai__ (8) * ChristineH (8) * Vaishali (8) * vishnoianil (3) * vthapar (1) * zxiiro (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4