#opendaylight-meeting: tsc
Meeting started by colindixon at 18:00:15 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- roll call and agenda bashing (colindixon, 18:00:22)
- colindixon (colindixon,
18:00:27)
- rajeev (on the phone) (colindixon,
18:00:36)
- edwarnicke (edwarnicke,
18:00:47)
- https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2015/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2015-02-12-18.00.html
link to last week’s TSC meeting minutes (tbachman,
18:00:53)
- regXboi (irc so far) (regXboi,
18:01:50)
- dfarrell07 (for cdub and Red Hat) (dfarrell07,
18:02:37)
- https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/TSC:Main#Agenda
This week’s agenda (tbachman,
18:02:44)
- kwatsen (kwatsen,
18:03:10)
- jmedved (jmedved,
18:03:36)
- Youcef Laribi (Youcef,
18:03:57)
- mohnish anumala (mohnish,
18:04:07)
- dlenrow (dlenrow,
18:05:24)
- regXboi in on phone only (regXboi,
18:06:17)
- Carol Sanders (proxy for Luis Gomez)
(colindixon,
18:06:57)
- We couldn't get WebEx to work well, host code
issue, no recording :( (dfarrell07,
18:07:32)
- unforunately, there will be no recording for
the WebEx this week because of host code issues (colindixon,
18:07:36)
- edwarnicke (edwarnicke,
18:08:15)
- ACTION: colindixon to
continue to follow AD-SAL deprecation between VTN, OVSDB, and
controller (are ther others?) (colindixon,
18:08:39)
- ACTION: colindixon
and TSC to elaborate on proper procedure for removal of committers
from a project (colindixon,
18:08:51)
- colindixon says progress has been made for the
new Helium SRs (tbachman,
18:09:09)
- ACTION: colindixon,
zxiiro and others to coordinate figuring out how to set up
opt-in/opt-out automatic version bump patches and tags (colindixon,
18:09:24)
- ACTION: colindixon to
start a discussion around possible use cases as focus areas for
lithium on the mailing list (colindixon,
18:09:29)
- ACTION: gzhao to ask
SNBI if and when the expect to be caught up, M3? (colindixon,
18:09:39)
- ACTION: phrobb to
hunt down projects to see if they would continue to support Helium
(at least) until Lithium is released (colindixon,
18:09:45)
- ACTION: gzhao to
follow up with projects that haven’t yet reported milestone
statuses, colindixon and/or phrobb can help (colindixon,
18:10:23)
- colindixon asks if the PCMM has joined the
Lithium release (tbachman,
18:11:05)
- ACTION: phrobb to
reach out to Rob Sherwood about closing down
net-virt-platform (colindixon,
18:11:30)
- ACTION: phrobb to
reach out to plugin2oc, SDNi, and defense4all about JJB
migration (colindixon,
18:11:36)
- Updates (tbachman, 18:12:19)
- colindixon says that there’s a LF collab event,
which is where phrobb- and LuisGomez are (representing ODL)
(tbachman,
18:12:47)
- colindixon says CFP for ODL summit closed on
Friday (tbachman,
18:13:01)
- colindixon says hackfest is coming up April
15-16 (tbachman,
18:13:19)
- alagalah says there was a hackfest/summit in
India — colindixon says this was in last week’s meeting minutes as
well (tbachman,
18:13:43)
- colindixon says it’s worth noting that voting
is now open for the openstack talks (tbachman,
18:14:02)
- http://www.opendaylight.org/events/2015-04-22/opendaylight-forum-india-2015
ODL India Forum mentioned above (dfarrell07,
18:14:11)
- gzhao says SNBI finalized their release
plan (tbachman,
18:15:32)
- VPN released their JJB (tbachman,
18:15:42)
- CAPWAP and one other said they would provide
their release plans today (tbachman,
18:15:55)
- gzhao says defense4all and Maple haven’t
provided a response yet (tbachman,
18:16:06)
- update — CAPWAP and PCMM said they would
provide their release plans today (tbachman,
18:16:21)
- colindixon says Maple is still working out
issues with Intellectual Property (tbachman,
18:16:34)
- ACTION: colindixon
and gzhao to reach out to Maple and Defense4All (colindixon,
18:16:58)
- colindixon asks for the SR3 and SR4
dates (tbachman,
18:17:26)
- gzhao says they’ll present to TSC on March
26th, with release on March 30th for SR3 (tbachman,
18:17:39)
- colindixon points out these are tentative dates
— those with objections should speak up (tbachman,
18:17:56)
- gzhao says the dates for SR4 are 7/16 to
present to the TSC, and release them on 7/20 (tbachman,
18:18:37)
- colindixon asks TSC members if they’d like to
vote on these dates now (tbachman,
18:19:10)
- ACTION: gzhao to
e-mail release and tsc with those proposed dates and their
interactions with the LIthium release plan so that we can get
feedback and hopefully vote next week (colindixon,
18:20:18)
- catohornet says that Integration met for
pre-M3, and is getting projects to get their system and job builders
converted so that they’re ready for the release (tbachman,
18:21:36)
- colindixon asks what our status is with JJB
migration (tbachman,
18:22:10)
- gzhao says there are 39 projects that have
moved to JJB (tbachman,
18:22:35)
- gzhao says defense4all, maple, SDNi, plugin2oc,
and OpFlex have yet to move to JJB (colindixon,
18:23:31)
- alagalah says that OpFlex is in discussions
with tykeal_away to migrate — a bit trickier b/c of the nature of
the project (tbachman,
18:24:18)
- edwarnicke says that SDNI has some C-based
pieces, which presents challenges in migrating to JJB (tbachman,
18:24:31)
- Distributed LLDP with Auto Attach Capability creation review (dfarrell07, 18:25:12)
- https://wiki.opendaylight.org/images/f/fb/ODL_TSC_slides.pptx
(Guest50305,
18:25:17)
- https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Distributed_LLDP_with_Auto_Attach_Capability
Project proposal wiki (dfarrell07,
18:25:22)
- https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/2015-January/000252.html
Proposed on 1/30/2015 (dfarrell07,
18:25:33)
- https://wiki.opendaylight.org/images/f/fb/ODL_TSC_slides.pptx
slides being presented for LLDP (regXboi,
18:25:42)
- Agenda: 4 slides; What is Auto attach, what
does it solve, what changes to LLDP are proposed (tbachman,
18:27:11)
- group has submitted patches to openvswitch for
the 2.4 release (tbachman,
18:27:36)
- Slide 2: what does Auto Attach (AA)
solve? (tbachman,
18:28:49)
- Avaya said they found a lot of people were
using PBB (provider backbone bridges) and SPB (shortest path
bridging) in data centers to proivde beter virtual networks
(colindixon,
18:30:20)
- ACTION: Guest50305
(brian) to add links to referenced standards as part of AA project
proposal (colindixon,
18:33:06)
- Shortest Path Bridging is 802.1aq, now fully
ratified into 802.1q, revision 14 (tbachman,
18:34:27)
- IS-IS is used as an L2 control plane
(tbachman,
18:36:39)
- they are proposing to a way to manage LLDP on a
per-port basis so that some ports in OVS can be managed using
distributed LLDP while others can remiain (in the current manner)
sending LLDP messages up to the controller (colindixon,
18:40:49)
- explains the text on slide 4 with diagram on
slide 5 (colindixon,
18:41:29)
- auto-attach server on slide 5 is the same as
the BEB on slide 2 (colindixon,
18:42:32)
- mohnish asks if the auto-attach server would
live in the LLDP project (tbachman,
18:43:38)
- AA says they’re open to where it should live —
in LLDP, in a separate project? (tbachman,
18:44:03)
- colindixon says there are projects that have
various pieces — LLDP in openflowplugin, vswitch management in
OVSDB, etc. (tbachman,
18:45:26)
- edwarnicke says he feels that it might make
sense for it to be its own project (tbachman,
18:45:51)
- colindixon recommends reaching out to OVSDB
project (tbachman,
18:46:27)
- colindixon says that network virtualization
component is probably different from what’s currently being done in
OVSDB, but also worth engaging that project to understand what’s
there (tbachman,
18:47:27)
- edwarnicke says there are models coming for the
OVSDB southbound (tbachman,
18:47:49)
- AA project says they have a working demo of
what’s presented already (tbachman,
18:48:09)
- colindixon asks if AA has reached out to phrobb
to do IPR (tbachman,
18:48:24)
- AA says they haven’t, but other TSC members
note that that’s actually a next step, and is perfectly fine
(tbachman,
18:48:50)
- jmedved asks what they’re using for their
POC (tbachman,
18:49:42)
- AA says they’re using hydrogen (tbachman,
18:49:49)
- jmedved says they would need to refactor it to
use the MD-SAL (tbachman,
18:49:59)
- regXboi raises flag that this is another
project where “do no harm” has to be important, b/c it also touches
the flow tables (tbachman,
18:50:47)
- regXboi asks if the AA project wants only one
person as a committer on the project (tbachman,
18:51:41)
- colindixon says it’s good to have more than one
committer on the project (tbachman,
18:51:54)
- edwarnicke says TSC doesn’t typically mandate
the number of committers, but advises more than one committer for
sake of sanity (tbachman,
18:52:30)
- alagalah asks if we can explain the difference
between what a committer, contributor, and resources committed
are (tbachman,
18:53:28)
- colindixon says that anyone with an ODL user ID
can contribute (tbachman,
18:53:37)
- colindixon says that if you are a committer on
a project, you have permission to merge patches onto the mainline
branch, as well as manage things like jenkins jobs (tbachman,
18:54:18)
- colindixon says committers are also allowed to
vote for certain elections (tbachman,
18:54:33)
- dlenrow says responsibilities include owing to
the project to review and move patches (tbachman,
18:55:03)
- AA says Dennis Flynn is committer for
OVS (tbachman,
18:56:12)
- regXboi asks if AA intends to participate in
Lithium (tbachman,
18:57:34)
- AA says no — they won’t be participate in
Lithium (tbachman,
18:57:47)
- colindixon recommends handling the vote to the
mailing list (tbachman,
19:00:33)
- AGREED: Vote to move
AA project into incubation will be done on the TSC mailing
list (tbachman,
19:00:58)
- cookies (tbachman,
19:01:13)
- cookies (tbachman, 19:01:23)
Meeting ended at 19:01:27 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- colindixon to continue to follow AD-SAL deprecation between VTN, OVSDB, and controller (are ther others?)
- colindixon and TSC to elaborate on proper procedure for removal of committers from a project
- colindixon, zxiiro and others to coordinate figuring out how to set up opt-in/opt-out automatic version bump patches and tags
- colindixon to start a discussion around possible use cases as focus areas for lithium on the mailing list
- gzhao to ask SNBI if and when the expect to be caught up, M3?
- phrobb to hunt down projects to see if they would continue to support Helium (at least) until Lithium is released
- gzhao to follow up with projects that haven’t yet reported milestone statuses, colindixon and/or phrobb can help
- phrobb to reach out to Rob Sherwood about closing down net-virt-platform
- phrobb to reach out to plugin2oc, SDNi, and defense4all about JJB migration
- colindixon and gzhao to reach out to Maple and Defense4All
- gzhao to e-mail release and tsc with those proposed dates and their interactions with the LIthium release plan so that we can get feedback and hopefully vote next week
- Guest50305 (brian) to add links to referenced standards as part of AA project proposal
Action items, by person
- colindixon
- colindixon to continue to follow AD-SAL deprecation between VTN, OVSDB, and controller (are ther others?)
- colindixon and TSC to elaborate on proper procedure for removal of committers from a project
- colindixon, zxiiro and others to coordinate figuring out how to set up opt-in/opt-out automatic version bump patches and tags
- colindixon to start a discussion around possible use cases as focus areas for lithium on the mailing list
- gzhao to follow up with projects that haven’t yet reported milestone statuses, colindixon and/or phrobb can help
- colindixon and gzhao to reach out to Maple and Defense4All
- Guest50305
- Guest50305 (brian) to add links to referenced standards as part of AA project proposal
- UNASSIGNED
- gzhao to ask SNBI if and when the expect to be caught up, M3?
- phrobb to hunt down projects to see if they would continue to support Helium (at least) until Lithium is released
- phrobb to reach out to Rob Sherwood about closing down net-virt-platform
- phrobb to reach out to plugin2oc, SDNi, and defense4all about JJB migration
- gzhao to e-mail release and tsc with those proposed dates and their interactions with the LIthium release plan so that we can get feedback and hopefully vote next week
People present (lines said)
- tbachman (107)
- colindixon (42)
- dfarrell07 (21)
- snoble (15)
- Guest50305 (14)
- regXboi (10)
- odl_meetbot (10)
- rovarga (8)
- alagalah (7)
- edwarnicke (6)
- dlenrow (3)
- jmedved (1)
- cdub (1)
- kwatsen (1)
- Youcef (1)
- mohnish (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.