17:00:31 #startmeeting tsc 17:00:31 Meeting started Thu May 14 17:00:31 2015 UTC. The chair is colindixon. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 17:00:31 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:31 The meeting name has been set to 'tsc' 17:00:38 #topic agenda bashing and roll call 17:00:41 #info colindixon 17:01:12 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/index.php?title=TSC:Main&oldid=30397#Agenda the agenda 17:01:16 #info dlenrow 17:01:28 #info edwarnicke has asked that we talk about IPv6 downstream patches, I’m putting it on the agenda under lithium 17:01:29 #info Thomas Kee 17:01:34 #undo 17:01:34 Removing item from minutes: 17:01:39 #info Chris Price 17:01:43 #info edwarnicke 17:01:43 #info LuisGomez 17:01:52 xsited: glad to have you! but #info is for TSC members to track quorum 17:02:20 #chair phrobb phrobb1 dfarrell07 tbachman ChrisPriceAB edwarnicke 17:02:20 Current chairs: ChrisPriceAB colindixon dfarrell07 edwarnicke phrobb phrobb1 tbachman 17:02:25 #info Casey 17:02:44 #undo 17:02:44 Removing item from minutes: 17:03:36 #link https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2015/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2015-05-07-17.01.html meeting minutes from last week for action items 17:03:54 I'm here but IRC only 17:04:04 alagalah_: are you here for Jan 17:04:15 colindixon: let me check 17:04:24 #action colindixon to try to find somebody to help with documenting the general procedure for the platform upgrade 17:05:26 #action LuisGomez and tykeal and jamoluhrsen to work out retaining the performance metrics for as long as we can 17:06:21 #info jmedved 17:06:55 * ChrisPriceAB what time do we need a room in Vancouver time? is it 10:00-11:00? 17:07:23 yes, that's what I'm checking on 17:07:36 #topics events 17:07:47 #link http://www.opendaylight.org/news/events/ the events in the usual place 17:09:44 #info mohnish anumala 17:09:53 #startvote could you attend a TSC meeting next week for ~30-45 minutes (-1 no, +1 yes)? 17:09:53 Begin voting on: could you attend a TSC meeting next week for ~30-45 minutes (-1 no, +1 yes)? Valid vote options are Yes, No. 17:09:53 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:10:02 #vote +1 17:10:03 #vote -1 17:10:05 #vote +1 17:10:10 #vote +1 17:10:10 #vote +1 17:10:11 #vote +0 17:10:15 #v I tell +1 17:10:23 * dfarrell07 doesn't have cdub's char atm 17:10:26 chair* 17:10:39 * ChrisPriceAB we can hog-tie him and drag him along 17:10:40 #vote +1 17:10:54 #endvote 17:10:54 Voted on "could you attend a TSC meeting next week for ~30-45 minutes (-1 no, +1 yes)?" Results are 17:10:55 * edwarnicke thinks dfarrell07 is far to talented to be sheparding furniture... 17:11:18 there were 6 +1, a +0 and a -1 (mohnish) 17:11:19 find a room at openstack meeting? 17:11:24 edwarnicke: rofl, took me a sec to get that ;) 17:11:31 * edwarnicke is subtle 17:11:35 #agreed the TSC will meet next week, but it may be abridged 17:11:47 * ChrisPriceAB oh don't make him smlie dfarrell07 !!! 17:11:52 #action phrobb to find a room at openstack if possible 17:12:07 #info ONS notifications should be out by end of week 17:12:23 colin: then I might be able to attend as well 17:12:26 #info OpenStack Summit is next week, many ODL ppl attending 17:12:31 #info OpenStack next week, ONS mid june, our main summit at the end of July 17:12:55 #info OPNFV is having a meeting on Monday afternoon where it would be good for OpenDaylighter’s to be ther if possible 17:13:14 colindixon: Link ? 17:13:19 #link http://openstacksummitmay2015vancouver.sched.org/type/opnfv+day#.VVTXoluBBDY opnfv event at openstack 17:13:22 thanks 17:13:24 #topic lithium update 17:13:29 ChrisPriceAB: Thanks mate 17:13:37 #info offset 2 M5 deadline is today 17:13:37 ChrisPriceAB: So cool (OpenStack) kids only :( 17:13:52 * ChrisPriceAB hope to see you there alagalah_ 17:14:19 #info two offset 1 projects haven’t submitted M5, which is now 2 weeks late: SNBI and SNMP4SDN, nobody depends on them, so we can treat them as offset 2 and they’re not causing any pain 17:14:30 ChrisPriceAB: Not going :( (see... cool kids only) 17:14:39 * edwarnicke is pretty sure he's not cool... 17:14:42 * edwarnicke adjusts bow tie 17:14:43 * ChrisPriceAB :( 17:15:07 * ChrisPriceAB It's the lack of shoes that sets you apart edwarnicke !!! 17:15:15 #link projects we’re looking to remove from Lithium because they haven’t responded 17:17:03 * dfarrell07 has been moving around, sorry for poor notes help 17:17:17 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/coretutorials-dev/2015-May/000021.html discussion around coretutorials in Lithium and whether to ship it 17:18:23 #action colindixon to work with alagalah_, tom pantelis and LuisGomez around what do with coretutorials 17:18:28 #info Youcef Laribi 17:19:05 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2015-May/003060.html the other projects are discovery, maple, and plugin2oc 17:19:35 #action phrobb to contact those three projects to figure out if they will withdraw on their own (discovery, maple, and plugin2oc) 17:21:14 #action colindixon to start a thread on what it means to ship something as part of a release 17:22:01 #topic version bumping and IPv6 issues 17:23:21 #info yangtools fixed a bug on master, e.g., Beryllium, which now correctly enforces IPv6 prefix format, which breaks lots of downstream projects that were providing incorrect IPv6 prefixes 17:23:43 #info the result is that downstream projects need to fix these bugs *before* they can bump versions on master 17:24:02 #undo 17:24:02 Removing item from minutes: 17:24:22 #info the result is that downstream projects need to fix these bugs *before* they can cut their stable/lithium branches 17:24:26 #info edwarnicke's details of version bumping issue demonstrate more general issue with how we do cut/merge, solution being discussed on lists 17:24:56 #info the result is that openflow plugin is currently blocked on this, so most (if not) all offset 2 and many offset 1 projects are also blocked 17:25:11 #info on the plus side, we’re fixing a lot of possible IPv6 bugs 17:26:11 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2015-May/003063.html version bumping/branch cutting being discussed here 17:26:41 #action gzhao to send out a mail to release saying that many projects will be unable to cut stable/lithium right now, and point to this e-mail chain about it here: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2015-May/002315.html 17:27:36 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/coretutorials-dev/2015-May/000021.html < email thread for coretutorial discussion. 17:27:52 #info LuisGomez asks if projects should branch without bumping, colindixon says "no" and gives reasons too quickly to document 17:29:12 #info colindixon says to send M5 status anyway without the branch cut, report whether you are holding it or not based on that bug and then we’ll track branch cutting separately 17:29:37 #topic helium to lithum migration 17:29:48 Welcome cdub 17:29:53 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2015-May/003014.html we could use help here if anyone wants to volunteer 17:30:04 #link https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3160 this is the bug gracking things 17:30:24 #topic bugs it yangtools and controller 17:30:52 #link https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-docs/2015/docs/opendaylight-docs-docs.2015-05-13-15.08.html during the last bug scrub ttkacik said he would help mentor people on easy bugs in section 4 of those minutes 17:31:03 #info that’s a really good way to get involved 17:31:13 #undo 17:31:13 Removing item from minutes: 17:31:14 #undo 17:31:14 Removing item from minutes: 17:31:44 #link https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2015/md_sal_interest_call/opendaylight-meeting-md_sal_interest_call.2015-05-12-16.07.html during the last bug scrub ttkacik said he would help mentor people on easy bugs in section 4 of those minutes 17:31:52 #info that’s a really good way to get involved 17:32:24 ideally would be mention my irc handle tonytkacik or ttkacik and email :) 17:33:00 #info reach out to ttkacik or tonytkacik or his e-mail which you can find plastered over every mailing list everywhere 17:33:11 google ttkacik ;) 17:33:12 #topic system integration and test 17:33:46 #info there was a weird problem with single feature test that lori found the workaround for, yay! 17:33:59 #info otherwise everything is the same as before 17:34:11 #info phrobb asks for information about spirent and performance testing 17:35:11 #info spirent activity has died down, but people are using the stuff when they don’t have the gear, also some interns are getting VMs through the spirent lab to do more testing 17:35:13 #info LuisGomez didn't explicitly mention this, but dfarrell07 wants to call out the success of Integration wrt spinning-up new people. We have more devs pushing more useful code in parallel than ever before. Huzzah! 17:35:24 I am waiting for IXIA to get back to me on the license, working with Spirent also, have some issues running their virtual system, will meet both at ONF appfest next week 17:36:00 #info snoble is waiting for IXIA to get back to me on the license, working with Spirent also, have some issues running their virtual system, will meet both at ONF appfest next week 17:36:59 great to hear dfarrell07 and snoble, we mentioned this on the call if you aren't there… assuming you aren't 17:37:02 #info Integration is still pushing to get perf tests in CI, especially to make the recent batch of additions more stable 17:37:29 phrobb1: I'm here, just didn't get unmuted in time :) 17:37:49 #link https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-cds-cbench-performance-only-master/plot/ the performance dropped recently, people are debugging it 17:38:30 dfarrell07: cool :-) wasn't sure and I wanted to make sure your comments were seen/heard by all 17:38:52 phrobb1: appreciated, def a good move generally :) 17:39:02 #info LuisGomez says “my kingdom for a dashboard” 17:39:21 #topic infrastructure 17:39:43 #link https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/autorelease-daily-master/26/artifact/dependencies.log 17:39:56 #info Thanh wrote a tool which scans pom files and lists what other projects it thinks you depend on (see above link for lastest results) 17:40:56 #info tykeal says some people may have seen a slight outage this morning to deal with the venom cdd and he apologizes for the outage and everything should be back up 17:41:42 #topic committer promotion on packetcable 17:41:50 colindixon: if we have extra time, Integration just finished a vote on a committer promotion 17:42:19 #info Thomas Kee would like to to move Steven Pisarski on packetcable 17:42:24 dfarrell07: done, can you prep a vote 17:42:31 ack 17:42:37 #link http://spectrometer.opendaylight.org/?user_id=spisarski&project_type=opendaylight&release=all&metric=loc&company= ~7000 lines of code 17:42:47 #ink http://spectrometer.opendaylight.org/?user_id=spisarski&project_type=opendaylight&release=all&metric=commits 25 patches 17:45:03 * ChrisPriceAB I'm ok to vote tbh, what do we achieve by waiting 17:45:20 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/PacketCablePCMM:Main the only issue is that while Thomas Kee is demonstrobly the only committer, there are several others that we haven’t gotten to vote 17:45:32 #startvote Shall the TSC approve Steven Pisarski as a committer for the PacketCable project? -1, 0, +1 17:45:32 Begin voting on: Shall the TSC approve Steven Pisarski as a committer for the PacketCable project? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 17:45:32 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:45:32 #startvote Shall the TSC approve Steven Pisarski as a committer on the Packet Cable PCMM Project? -1, 0, +1 17:45:32 Already voting on 'Shall the TSC approve Steven Pisarski as a committer for the PacketCable project' 17:45:37 ahh 17:45:37 idk 17:45:40 #info Thomas Kee +1 17:45:42 #vote +1 17:45:43 the last vote is taken 17:45:46 #vote +1 17:45:47 #vote +1 17:45:48 #vote +1 17:45:48 #vote +1 17:45:50 #vote +1 17:45:51 * ChrisPriceAB Thomas you need to try again 17:45:56 #vote +1 17:45:59 #vote +1 17:46:04 #endvote 17:46:04 Voted on "Shall the TSC approve Steven Pisarski as a committer for the PacketCable project?" Results are 17:46:04 +1 (8): dlenrow, jmedved, LuisGomez, ChrisPriceAB, edwarnicke, mohnish, colindixon, Youcef 17:46:04 oh, you're asking about the vote question 17:46:08 that would be the first one 17:46:13 #agreed The TSC approves Steven Pisarski as a committer for the PacketCable project 17:46:31 #agreed Steven Pisarski is now a committer on the PacketCable project 17:46:34 * gzhao thinks we should have a procedure to make sure committers in projects are "active" committers. 17:46:43 I wonder what I just #voted for on that openstack IRC channel by accident.... 17:46:50 * ChrisPriceAB congrats 17:47:03 * ChrisPriceAB cookie time! 17:47:25 cookie 17:47:41 * alagalah_ ChrisPriceAB Same thing I tell me daughter before soccer though, only winners get icecream 17:47:55 #info Thomas Kee as the only active committer I vote +1 for steven pisarski committer promotion 17:47:57 coffee is for closers? 17:48:00 :-) 17:48:30 colindixon: you sound like a sysadmin with that statement ;) 17:48:35 colindixon: Integration committer vote? 17:48:46 #topic new committer on integration 17:49:17 #info Vratko has been very active/useful on Integration code reviews, created new tests 17:49:22 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/integration-dev/2015-May/003211.html Thread with votes from current active Integration committers 17:49:22 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2015-May/003078.html 17:49:40 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/project:integration+owner:%22Vratko+Pol%25C3%25A1k+%253Cvrpolak%2540cisco.com%253E%22 his commits on integration 17:50:10 #link http://spectrometer.opendaylight.org/?metric=commits&user_id=vrpolak&module=integration looks like 11 commits and ~1389 lines of code 17:50:22 * ChrisPriceAB lol alagalah, that's why I suffered as a kid 17:50:31 #info LuisGomez says he has also help to review a ton of patchs (dfarrell07 says that’s be huge) 17:50:35 #startvote Shall the TSC approve Vratko Polak as a committer for the Integration project? -1, 0, +1 17:50:35 Begin voting on: Shall the TSC approve Vratko Polak as a committer for the Integration project? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 17:50:35 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:50:40 #vote +1 17:50:42 #vote +1 17:50:44 #vote +1 17:50:44 #vote +1 17:50:45 #vote +1 17:50:47 #vote +1 17:51:01 #vote +1 17:51:01 #vote +1 17:51:03 * ChrisPriceAB +1 17:51:06 #vote +1 17:51:09 #endvote 17:51:09 Voted on "Shall the TSC approve Vratko Polak as a committer for the Integration project?" Results are 17:51:09 +1 (9): dlenrow, jmedved, LuisGomez, ChrisPriceAB, edwarnicke, cdub, mohnish, colindixon, Youcef 17:51:09 #endmeeting