#opendaylight-meeting: tsc

Meeting started by colindixon at 18:00:25 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. agenda bashing and roll call (colindixon, 18:00:31)
    1. colindixon (colindixon, 18:00:43)
    2. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/index.php?title=TSC:Main&oldid=38379#Agenda the agenda in it's usual place (colindixon, 18:01:18)
    3. https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2015/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2015-11-05-18.00.html last week's meeting minutes (colindixon, 18:01:37)
    4. edwarnicke (is in the room) (colindixon, 18:03:20)
    5. jmedved (irc only) (jmedved, 18:03:27)
    6. ACTION: colindixon to try to find somebody to help with documenting the general procedure for the platform upgrade from Helium to Lithium (for SR3) https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3160 (colindixon, 18:03:59)
    7. LuisGomez (LuisGomez, 18:04:02)
    8. ACTION: ttcacik and zxiiro to work on getting feature-level code coverage numbers (colindixon, 18:04:41)
    9. ACTION: rovarga, alagalah, mohnish, ttkacik, vishnoianil, ebrjohn, RPenno, abhijitkumbhare will try to draft a paragraph around the best practices including this discussion and feedback (to be gotten) from PTLS, they should also feel free to provide feedback around tools and technical solutions to help with upstream/downstream breakages (colindixon, 18:04:54)
    10. mohnish anumala (mohnish_, 18:05:35)
    11. jmedved says that dsbenchmark is moved out of coretutorials, and that rpcbenchmark and ntfbencmark will move this week (colindixon, 18:06:22)
    12. abhijitkumbhare (for ChrisPriceAB ) (abhijitkumbhare, 18:07:28)
    13. jmedved clarifies that the code hasn't been moved, but has been copied so that there is no dependency from the distrubtion to the coretutorials project (colindixon, 18:07:59)
    14. Chris Price gives Abhijit the delegate status for this TSC (phrobb_, 18:08:59)

  2. TSC votes and discussions (colindixon, 18:09:28)
    1. https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2015-October/004026.html TSC at-large elections and platinum designate discussion (colindixon, 18:09:49)
    2. edwarnicke (edwarnicke, 18:10:49)
    3. https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2015-November/004419.html discussion on release about ideas for Boron (colindixon, 18:10:50)
    4. https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2015-November/004144.html moving projects to mature in Beryllum (colindixon, 18:11:14)
    5. ACTION: LuisGomez to give an estimate for a drop-dead date on when we'd need to decide if we actually need a stable distribution (colindixon, 18:13:23)
    6. rovarga says that yangtools had been considering joining the mature bandwagon, but has been so busy that he hasn't even been able to review the requirements (colindixon, 18:15:17)
    7. abhijitkumbhare says roughly the same openflow plugin (colindixon, 18:15:28)
    8. edwarnicke notes that proejcts may be more heads down than allows for doing this, but colindixon adds we should figure out if so and how we might be able to fix it (colindixon, 18:17:15)

  3. events (colindixon, 18:17:43)
    1. OPNFV is going on right now (colindixon, 18:17:53)
    2. MEF hackathon in dallas is next week (colindixon, 18:18:01)
    3. https://www.opendaylight.org/global-events events page in it's usal place (colindixon, 18:18:14)
    4. OVSCon next week might be of interest to people (colindixon, 18:18:48)
    5. http://openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2015/ OVS Fall 2015 conference (abhijitkumbhare, 18:18:50)

  4. beryllium (colindixon, 18:19:05)
    1. missing M3 from next UI toolkit (colindixon, 18:19:23)
    2. M4 is due from offeset 1 today (colindixon, 18:19:33)
    3. autorelease build broke on DIDM, but should build later (colindixon, 18:19:50)
    4. zxiiro has a proof-of-concept to make mvn validate work in autorelase which would catch most breakages in minutes, not hours (colindixon, 18:20:29)
    5. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hci5TMUPyB6PX8Al-fwfVqvs5SQVa2wZLja_7rKWN6o/edit#gid=1368787047 JDK8 we have 43 projects working with JDK8, leaving 9 projects anipbu is following up with them (colindixon, 18:21:44)
    6. jersey/jaxrs may be pushed past beryllium (colindixon, 18:21:58)
    7. AD-SAL code removal will happen on 12/3 assuming VTN remains on time (colindixon, 18:22:19)
    8. dlenrow (dlenrow, 18:23:09)
    9. rovarga asks if we want to push to use the JDK8 build to produce final Beryllium artifacts or not (colindixon, 18:23:10)
    10. anipbu notes that we have JDK8 autorelease, but we haven't made a decision (colindixon, 18:25:10)
    11. rovarga notes that as of a year ago, some projects were using enunciate which would require upgrading enunciate to a JDK8-compatibility version (colindixon, 18:27:11)
    12. colindixon says that his take is unless there's a compelling reason not to, we should aim to try to build our release artifacts using JDK8 (colindixon, 18:27:57)
    13. colindixon asks if JDK8 javac will run under a Java 7 JRE (colindixon, 18:28:27)

  5. stable/lithium (colindixon, 18:29:27)
    1. the lithium SR3 cuttoff is 11/15 at 11:59p UTC for release on 11/19 (colindixon, 18:29:46)

  6. system integration and test (colindixon, 18:29:54)
    1. jamoluhrsen says all is quiet (colindixon, 18:30:13)

  7. infastructure (colindixon, 18:30:52)
    1. on 11/5 a change on puppet manifests caused gerrit mail to break, we are missing gerrit mail from 11/5 to 11/10, this is fixed, but patches created in that window are still misbehaving (colindixon, 18:32:07)

  8. Sharon Aicler as committer on AAA (colindixon, 18:32:35)
    1. https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2015-November/004124.html the mail with 4 +1s from Daniel, Luis, Colin, and Chris Price (colindixon, 18:33:15)
    2. dlenrow votes +1 (colindixon, 18:33:26)
    3. jmedved vots +1 (colindixon, 18:33:34)
    4. edwarnicke votes +1 (colindixon, 18:33:39)
    5. mohnish +1 (mohnish_, 18:33:54)
    6. AGREED: Sharon is a committer on AAA (colindixon, 18:33:57)
    7. mohnish_ votes +1 (colindixon, 18:34:01)

  9. Spectrometer creation review (colindixon, 18:34:19)
    1. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1-DZSIWavQTCyrfNEBEAPr1zbs9RvdG2KQ7MtBLYESQc/edit?pli=1#slide=id.p (TomNadeau, 18:34:26)
    2. Daniel Farrell (dfarrell07, 18:34:31)
    3. http://spectrometer.opendaylight.org/ we have a spectrometer today which provides stats, but but it's been unreliable of late and hard to maintain without it being a formal project where failrues and others things can be tracked (colindixon, 18:37:48)
    4. TomN notes that the current thing is a fork of stackalytics from about two years ago, as a fork, moving things forward is hard (colindixon, 18:38:43)
    5. TomN also points out that the current code is not easy to read and modify, the changes aren't well-dcoumented, the tests don't run against live code, and a variety of other reasons why we want a new project that is a formal project in opendaylight (colindixon, 18:41:57)
    6. https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Spectrometer project proposal wiki page (colindixon, 18:43:19)
    7. https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/2015-October/000370.html proposed on 10/23 (colindixon, 18:43:39)
    8. zxiiro says he'd like to be invovled (colindixon, 18:44:54)
    9. anipbu said he'd like to contribute as well (colindixon, 18:46:09)
    10. zxiiro and anipbu will be added as committers (colindixon, 18:48:29)
    11. edwarnicke and colindixon suggest that the scope be broadened to other sources fo project-related stats as well (colindixon, 18:48:46)
    12. VOTE: Voted on "shall the TSC move the spectrometer project from a propoposal to be an incubation project pending IPR?" Results are, +1: 7 (colindixon, 18:52:28)
    13. AGREED: the spectrometer project is moved to incubation (colindixon, 18:52:44)

  10. cookies (colindixon, 18:54:30)


Meeting ended at 18:54:32 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. colindixon to try to find somebody to help with documenting the general procedure for the platform upgrade from Helium to Lithium (for SR3) https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3160
  2. ttcacik and zxiiro to work on getting feature-level code coverage numbers
  3. rovarga, alagalah, mohnish, ttkacik, vishnoianil, ebrjohn, RPenno, abhijitkumbhare will try to draft a paragraph around the best practices including this discussion and feedback (to be gotten) from PTLS, they should also feel free to provide feedback around tools and technical solutions to help with upstream/downstream breakages
  4. LuisGomez to give an estimate for a drop-dead date on when we'd need to decide if we actually need a stable distribution


Action items, by person

  1. abhijitkumbhare
    1. rovarga, alagalah, mohnish, ttkacik, vishnoianil, ebrjohn, RPenno, abhijitkumbhare will try to draft a paragraph around the best practices including this discussion and feedback (to be gotten) from PTLS, they should also feel free to provide feedback around tools and technical solutions to help with upstream/downstream breakages
  2. colindixon
    1. colindixon to try to find somebody to help with documenting the general procedure for the platform upgrade from Helium to Lithium (for SR3) https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3160
  3. LuisGomez
    1. LuisGomez to give an estimate for a drop-dead date on when we'd need to decide if we actually need a stable distribution
  4. zxiiro
    1. ttcacik and zxiiro to work on getting feature-level code coverage numbers


People present (lines said)

  1. colindixon (74)
  2. jmedved (13)
  3. odl_meetbot (8)
  4. TomNadeau (4)
  5. dfarrell07 (4)
  6. abhijitkumbhare (4)
  7. dlenrow (3)
  8. LuisGomez (3)
  9. mohnish_ (3)
  10. phrobb_ (3)
  11. edwarnicke (2)
  12. zxiiro (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.