#opendaylight-meeting: tsc
Meeting started by vishnoianil at 17:01:25 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- mohnish anumala (mohnish__,
17:01:47)
- vishnoianil (vishnoianil,
17:01:53)
- edwarnicke (edwarnicke,
17:01:55)
- gkaempfer (gkaempfer,
17:01:56)
- abhijitkumbhare (abhijitkumbhare,
17:02:00)
- Daniel Farrell (dfarrell07,
17:02:31)
- colindixon (colindixon,
17:02:58)
- https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2016/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2016-06-09-17.03.html
last week's meeting minutes (colindixon,
17:02:59)
- https://wiki.opendaylight.org/index.php?title=TSC:Main&oldid=47102#Agenda
the agenda in it's usual place (colindixon,
17:03:05)
- Chris Price (ChrisPriceAB,
17:03:17)
- Tony Tkacik (ttkacik,
17:03:27)
- ACTION: phrobb and
dfarrell07 to drive forward tooling and planning for the next TSC
election (colindixon,
17:04:05)
- ACTION: phrobb and/or
colindixon to start the mail thread to discuss fast and phased
approach and carbon release planning (colindixon,
17:05:06)
- ACTION: vishnoianil,
phrobb and abhijitkumbhare Need to think of better approach on how
projects can be categorize in a better way, so that it can be (that
is to figure out what projects might be related to what you want to
do) (colindixon,
17:06:13)
- ACTION: vishnoianil,
phrobb and abhijitkumbhare Need to think of better approach on how
projects can be categorize in a better way, so that it can be
helpful for users who wants to propose a project proposal and
looking for all the relevant projects in that scope. This will be
useful in broadly categorizing the projects, that can be used as a
reference for next TSC elections. (colindixon,
17:06:38)
- ACTION: vishnoianil
to schedule a meeting to discussion the project
categorization (colindixon,
17:06:58)
- ACTION: colindixon to
try to find somebody to help with documenting the general procedure
for the platform upgrade to Boron? (colindixon,
17:07:03)
- ACTION: colindixon to
send e-mail about possibly moving our documentation toolchain to
ReStructured Text => Sphinx => Read The Docs, as opposed to
using AsciiDoc => Asciidoctor, which has caused us some
pain (colindixon,
17:07:08)
- rovarga for jmedved (rovarga,
17:07:57)
- ACTION: colindixon to
clean up documentation for the process of project PTL election and
post it on the TSC page in the normal place (colindixon,
17:08:04)
- TSC mailing list votes and discussions (colindixon, 17:09:34)
- https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2016-June/005396.html
Giuseppe Petralia as NetIDE committer (colindixon,
17:09:46)
- https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2016-June/005394.html
Danian Shi and Yaozi Yang as committers on FaaS (colindixon,
17:10:02)
- https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2016-June/005377.html
Additional questions in the Project Proposal Template (colindixon,
17:10:27)
- events (colindixon, 17:10:53)
- https://www.opendaylight.org/global-events
(colindixon,
17:11:01)
- OPNFV summit in Berlin next week with an
OpenDaylight mini summit (colindixon,
17:11:22)
- hackfest two weeks from now in San Jose
(colindixon,
17:11:46)
- preliminary acceptances should have been sent
out for the OpenDaylight summit, please register if you got one,
some more may be coming (colindixon,
17:12:30)
- CaseyODL asks for anyone who might want to do
do a demo or presentation at the ODL booth at OPNFV summit, please
contact him TODAY (colindixon,
17:13:28)
- CaseyODL would also like for volunteers to man
the booth if you're around (colindixon,
17:13:43)
- boron (colindixon, 17:14:03)
- We have merged the removal of YangParserImpl
class (old YANG parser) in ODL projects (MD-SAL, etc) (anipbu,
17:14:15)
- https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2016-June/006840.html
<--- Status email regarding removal of YangParserImpl (anipbu,
17:14:17)
- The patch series for Neutron Yang Model
Revision will be merged soon in one week or two after blocker bugs
are resolved. (anipbu,
17:14:31)
- https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2016-June/006744.html
<--- Status email regarding Neutron Yang Model Revision (anipbu,
17:14:36)
- https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zImtd764e-hOgJAxoJKl85fxHCPu2agLfqsBtf13zQY/edit#gid=1458306352
<--- Google Spreadsheet tracking impacted projects (anipbu,
17:14:41)
- The OpenFlowPlugin project will be changing the
default design on the master branch from the old –he design to the
new –li design on Tuesday. (anipbu,
17:15:00)
- https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2016-June/006858.html
<--- Status email regarding OpenFlowPlugin Li Design (anipbu,
17:15:05)
- odlparent team upgraded netty to 4.0.37 to
resolve possible security issues that can lead to a DOS.
(anipbu,
17:15:22)
- http://netty.io/news/2016/06/07/4-0-37-Final.html
<--- security bug-fix filled as CVE-2016-4970 (anipbu,
17:15:26)
- https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/39978/
<--- Patch upgrading Netty (anipbu,
17:15:30)
- Boron M4 Offset 1 are due today 6/16/2016.
Projects should take a moment to send their status. (anipbu,
17:15:45)
- https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2016-June/006855.html
<--- Status Email Template (anipbu,
17:15:51)
- The Boron Autorelease job was failing to build
vtnmanager-vsemprovider. The VTN team has fixed the issue with
patch 40319 and we are awaiting the results of a new build.
(anipbu,
17:16:13)
- https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/40319/
<--- Patch fixing autorelease (anipbu,
17:16:18)
- Atrium and Eman are still not in autorelease.
Reminder that projects should build successfully in autorelease by
M4. (anipbu,
17:16:30)
- Reminder that M5 is coming up and that is the
suggested “line in the sand” for Boron Stable Distribution.
(anipbu,
17:16:45)
- autorelease submodule timeout during cloning
bumped to 60 minutes due to slow network (zxiiro,
17:17:21)
- we're expecting this to go away when jenkins
and nexus move to the private cloud (colindixon,
17:19:01)
- rovarga says that Nexus has been causing merge
failures, recently, presumably for the same reasons (colindixon,
17:19:59)
- colindixon asks if we can move production
jenkins sooner than 6/25 (currently scheduled), but tykeal says no
because we'd need to move 2.5 TB of information, which is
hard (colindixon,
17:21:09)
- stable/beryllium (colindixon, 17:21:26)
- nothing this week (colindixon,
17:21:31)
- system integration and test (colindixon, 17:21:47)
- it seems pretty unlikely at this point it seems
unlikely that there will be a stable feature in Boron because it
needs to be done by 6/30 (offset 0 M5) (colindixon,
17:23:12)
- https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2016/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2016-05-12-17.00.html
(anipbu,
17:23:30)
- colindixon asks why that's happening,
jamoluhrsen comments that it's because we don't have stable
features, colindixon asks why that's true (colindixon,
17:23:58)
- jamoluhrsen says nobody's made the effort to
become stable yet, dfarrell07 says he feels like we just need one
project to pioneeer it (colindixon,
17:24:59)
- vina_ermagan says that she feels like
lispflowmapping would be there save dependencies (colindixon,
17:25:24)
- rovarga says it pretty much has to be
odlparent (colindixon,
17:25:31)
- ACTION: colindixon to
reach out to skitt about making odlparent stable (colindixon,
17:25:48)
- vrpolak_ says that other things blocking are
peformance and stablity tests for config subsystem as a well as
experimental features in restconf (colindixon,
17:26:28)
- autorelease stability (colindixon, 17:27:37)
- we expect boron and beryllium will be fixed,
we'll find out sometime tomorrow (colindixon,
17:27:59)
- infrastructure (colindixon, 17:28:13)
- we made modifications to timeouts for gerrit
with autorelease to fix intermittent faliures (colindixon,
17:28:35)
- no major system-level changes, yet (colindixon,
17:28:47)
- we're now working to make sure the private
cloud sandbox works right to make sure things go smoothly when we
move jenkins into the private cloud on 6/25 (colindixon,
17:29:30)
- tykeal says that they're working on making the
public cloud available for bursting as well (colindixon,
17:30:03)
- CaseyODL says they're looking at maybe moving
toward something on stackoverflow instead of our own
ask.opendaylight.org, so bring up questions if you have them
(colindixon,
17:30:54)
- user groups (colindixon, 17:31:04)
- if you run a user group, CaseyODL should have
reached out to you about moving to some new kind of meetup
system (colindixon,
17:31:32)
- w.r.t. stack overflow/ask.odl, the key new
feature we seem to be seeking is basically e-mail to bulletin board
portal (colindixon,
17:32:25)
- ACTION: CaseyODL to
add a TWS on ask/stack overflow (colindixon,
17:32:40)
- OpenDaylight wiki indexing (colindixon, 17:33:02)
- abhijitkumbhare asks how we can make more of
the wiki searchable via search engines (colindixon,
17:33:18)
- CaseyODL says they can enable specific pages
manually if you would like, for now all links from the main page and
the project lists should be searchable now (colindixon,
17:33:56)
- colindixon asks if there's a way we can manage
the robot.txt more easily, e.g., as a file in a git repo somewhere
that we could modify easily (colindixon,
17:36:01)
- rovarga asks if there is some what to make that
a tag in the wiki itself, colindixon says that we haven't found a
way to make it a whitelist instead a blacklist tag (colindixon,
17:38:23)
- ACTION: CaseyODL to
start a thread on how to better manage the list of whitelisted
pages (colindixon,
17:38:41)
- project lifecycle states (colindixon, 17:40:45)
- https://www.opendaylight.org/project-lifecycle-releases
vishnoianil asks if offest 0, 1 and 2 projects can all be core (colindixon,
17:41:11)
- https://www.opendaylight.org/tsc-policy
(vishnoianil,
17:41:45)
- colindixon says that offsets technically can't
impact the lifecycle state since offsets aren't mentioned in the
lifecycle states, but as edwarnicke points out to be central to
OpenDaylight, it's more likely that you'll be offset 0 than
others (colindixon,
17:42:22)
- https://www.opendaylight.org/tsc-policy
vishnoianil also asks how we plan do deal the signularity clause
(colindixon,
17:43:15)
- rovarga says it will be dealt with on projects
moving to core, edwarnicke instead suggests that the singularity
clause is harmful (colindixon,
17:43:46)
- ACTION: edwarnicke
and/or colindixon to add a discussion of the singularity clause as a
TSC mailing list thread or future topic (colindixon,
17:44:30)
- http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/singularity
colindixon also notes that the definition of singularity doesn't
really match the meaning we want (colindixon,
17:49:14)
- TSC elections progress (colindixon, 17:49:52)
- http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/180179?redirectedFrom=singularity#eid
<- a dictionary that actually believes words mean things ;) (edwarnicke,
17:50:20)
- phrobb and dfarrell07 met to discuss how we can
run the condorcet elections we'd like to run (colindixon,
17:51:40)
- we're exploring tooling, but right now we've
realized that web-based ones don't provie what we need (colindixon,
17:52:19)
- implementing the framework should be pretty
easy with libraries for voting (colindixon,
17:52:49)
- we need a user-guide for voting, rather than
our current developer guide (colindixon,
17:53:00)
- we also need to figure out the settings of the
knobs in our framework, e.g., the represented groups and their
sizes (colindixon,
17:53:33)
- cookies (colindixon, 17:54:43)
Meeting ended at 17:54:47 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- phrobb and dfarrell07 to drive forward tooling and planning for the next TSC election
- phrobb and/or colindixon to start the mail thread to discuss fast and phased approach and carbon release planning
- vishnoianil, phrobb and abhijitkumbhare Need to think of better approach on how projects can be categorize in a better way, so that it can be (that is to figure out what projects might be related to what you want to do)
- vishnoianil, phrobb and abhijitkumbhare Need to think of better approach on how projects can be categorize in a better way, so that it can be helpful for users who wants to propose a project proposal and looking for all the relevant projects in that scope. This will be useful in broadly categorizing the projects, that can be used as a reference for next TSC elections.
- vishnoianil to schedule a meeting to discussion the project categorization
- colindixon to try to find somebody to help with documenting the general procedure for the platform upgrade to Boron?
- colindixon to send e-mail about possibly moving our documentation toolchain to ReStructured Text => Sphinx => Read The Docs, as opposed to using AsciiDoc => Asciidoctor, which has caused us some pain
- colindixon to clean up documentation for the process of project PTL election and post it on the TSC page in the normal place
- colindixon to reach out to skitt about making odlparent stable
- CaseyODL to add a TWS on ask/stack overflow
- CaseyODL to start a thread on how to better manage the list of whitelisted pages
- edwarnicke and/or colindixon to add a discussion of the singularity clause as a TSC mailing list thread or future topic
Action items, by person
- abhijitkumbhare
- vishnoianil, phrobb and abhijitkumbhare Need to think of better approach on how projects can be categorize in a better way, so that it can be (that is to figure out what projects might be related to what you want to do)
- vishnoianil, phrobb and abhijitkumbhare Need to think of better approach on how projects can be categorize in a better way, so that it can be helpful for users who wants to propose a project proposal and looking for all the relevant projects in that scope. This will be useful in broadly categorizing the projects, that can be used as a reference for next TSC elections.
- colindixon
- phrobb and/or colindixon to start the mail thread to discuss fast and phased approach and carbon release planning
- colindixon to try to find somebody to help with documenting the general procedure for the platform upgrade to Boron?
- colindixon to send e-mail about possibly moving our documentation toolchain to ReStructured Text => Sphinx => Read The Docs, as opposed to using AsciiDoc => Asciidoctor, which has caused us some pain
- colindixon to clean up documentation for the process of project PTL election and post it on the TSC page in the normal place
- colindixon to reach out to skitt about making odlparent stable
- edwarnicke and/or colindixon to add a discussion of the singularity clause as a TSC mailing list thread or future topic
- dfarrell07
- phrobb and dfarrell07 to drive forward tooling and planning for the next TSC election
- edwarnicke
- edwarnicke and/or colindixon to add a discussion of the singularity clause as a TSC mailing list thread or future topic
- vishnoianil
- vishnoianil, phrobb and abhijitkumbhare Need to think of better approach on how projects can be categorize in a better way, so that it can be (that is to figure out what projects might be related to what you want to do)
- vishnoianil, phrobb and abhijitkumbhare Need to think of better approach on how projects can be categorize in a better way, so that it can be helpful for users who wants to propose a project proposal and looking for all the relevant projects in that scope. This will be useful in broadly categorizing the projects, that can be used as a reference for next TSC elections.
- vishnoianil to schedule a meeting to discussion the project categorization
- UNASSIGNED
- CaseyODL to add a TWS on ask/stack overflow
- CaseyODL to start a thread on how to better manage the list of whitelisted pages
People present (lines said)
- colindixon (74)
- anipbu (17)
- odl_meetbot (6)
- vishnoianil (6)
- rovarga (3)
- edwarnicke (3)
- ChrisPriceAB (2)
- mohnish__ (1)
- gkaempfer (1)
- tykeal (1)
- zxiiro (1)
- dfarrell07 (1)
- ttkacik (1)
- abhijitkumbhare (1)
- jamoluhrsen (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.