17:00:13 #startmeeting tsc 17:00:13 Meeting started Thu Jul 14 17:00:13 2016 UTC. The chair is colindixon. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 17:00:13 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:13 The meeting name has been set to 'tsc' 17:00:18 #topic agenda bashing and roll call 17:00:21 #chair phrobb anipbu 17:00:21 Current chairs: anipbu colindixon phrobb 17:00:29 TSC members please #info in 17:00:32 #info colindixon 17:00:33 #info gkaempfer 17:00:58 #info rovarga for jmedved 17:00:59 #info Chris Luke 17:01:00 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/index.php?title=TSC:Main&oldid=47673 agenda 17:01:07 #info abhijitkumbhare 17:01:13 #info mohnish anumala 17:01:15 #info Chrisy is here for edwarnicke 17:01:56 #info Anil Vishnoi 17:01:58 #link https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2016/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2016-07-07-17.00.html last week's meeting minutes 17:02:38 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/index.php?title=TSC:Main&oldid=47673#Committer_promotion_process_for_contributors is no longer a draft per last week's meeting minutes 17:02:39 #info Jamo Luhrsen (for Daniel Farrell) 17:03:13 #action vishnoianil, phrobb and abhijitkumbhare to schedule a meeting to discussion the project categorization, so that it can be helpful for users who wants to propose a project proposal and looking for all the relevant projects in that scope. 17:03:22 #action phrobb to work on having a policy for how attendance to design forums works going forward with community involvement 17:04:01 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2016-July/005593.html we have a revision to the ODL summit registration where you can attend the DDF without having to have a gerrit patch 17:04:12 https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/attachments/20160714/658d5edf/attachment-0001.png 17:04:43 #action phrobb to create a wiki page with topics for the September DDF 17:04:54 #action skitt or colindixon to work on removing the ancient org.eclipse dependencies in controller (and elsewhere?) 17:05:01 #action phrobb and dfarrell07 to drive forward tooling and planning for the next TSC election (TWS?) 17:05:29 #action colindixon and phrobb to set up a poll of committers, PTLs and TSC members to see if there's a desire to have one TSC meeting a month at an APAC-friendly time 17:05:49 #action colindixon to try to find somebody to help with documenting the general procedure for the platform upgrade to Boron? 17:06:48 #info abhijitkumbhare wants to talk about openflowplugin staffing 17:07:17 #topic tsc mailing list discussion and votes 17:07:33 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/index.php?title=TSC:Main&oldid=47673#Agenda find them here 17:08:54 #info vishnoianil asks people to please chime in on those topics 17:08:58 #topic events 17:09:04 #link https://www.opendaylight.org/global-events 17:09:18 #info linuxcon japan is now in Tokyo 17:09:58 #info we are (for the first time) doing stuff around openstack days (both east on 8/23 and silicon valley 8/9) 17:10:15 phrobb: did tutorial schedule for ODL Summit get ironed out yet? 17:10:20 #info CFP for OpenStack closed yesterday 17:10:51 #info CFP will be coming for OpenDayilght Forum India 17:10:54 thanks phrobb 17:11:02 #topic boron 17:11:39 #info The IETF Types Migration Effort has completed successfully with 35 patches merged, 1 patch pending (atrium), and two projects with pending issues (groupbasedpolicy and topoprocessing). 17:11:42 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2016-July/007280.html <--- Email summarizing upgrade activity 17:11:48 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zImtd764e-hOgJAxoJKl85fxHCPu2agLfqsBtf13zQY/edit#gid=778533050 <--- Tracking patch status 17:12:09 #info Discussion and concerns related to distribution size, with feedback needed from snmp4sdn, lispflowmapping, nemp, alto, capwap, usc, groupbasedpolicy, sfc, tsdr 17:12:19 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2016-July/007248.html <--- Email thread for distribution size 17:12:38 #info Need feedback from projects regarding their documentation for Boron release: aaa, bgpcep, didm, faas, genius, natapp, nemo, neutron, next, nic, ovsdb, persistence, sdninterfaceapp, snbi, snmp4sdn, topoprocessing, usecplugin 17:12:45 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2016-July/007282.html <--- Email thread for documentation patches 17:13:35 #info Reminder to Offset 0 projects that code freeze was two weeks ago and we are missing M5 Status from three projects: controller, infrautils, netconf 17:14:26 https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/openflowplugin-dev/2016-July/005492.html 17:15:07 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/openflowplugin-dev/2016-July/005492.html "Jozef Bacigal and Andrej Leitner will cease their work on OpenFlow project at the end of July 2016" 17:15:20 #info abhijitkumbhare mentions this as a risk—even for Boron 17:15:57 #info LuisGomez points out that these are the people who brought the new plugin in this release and know it best 17:16:15 #action colindixon to reach out to them about whether we could at least keep them through the Boron release 17:17:36 #info the July 21st meeting of OFP will be a bug scrub, so please come if you want to contribute or pick up bugs 17:19:10 #topic stable/beryllium 17:19:22 #info Autorelease Build is successful. Reminder for projects that the cutoff is in one week and half on July 24 with a release on July 28. 17:19:38 #info cutoff is in 1.5 weeks for SR3 17:19:51 #topic system integration and test 17:20:18 #info all of the boron system test has been moot starting the last week b/c of distribution size, pay attention as we get it going again now 17:20:29 #action colindixon to follow up on distribution size issues 17:21:34 #info rovarga says unless they start pulling in more artifacts or more stuff, it should be fine for Boron (in that it stays under the 512 MB limit), but that's maybe still bad only because of size 17:22:03 #topic infrastructure 17:22:54 #Info there was an issue this morning where Jenkins was in shutdown mode (for reasons tykeal and zxiiro don't understand), when they fixed it, it cause a Jenkins reboot 17:23:17 #info they're investigating ways to move away from "matrix" jobs, which seem to be some source of problems 17:24:12 #info we've fixed our JJB so that we can more easily have per-project (and per-job) VM sizing, which should help some of the problems we saw in the migration to private cloud 17:25:02 #info as part of moving away from "matrix" jobs, we'll also be moving away from the maven job type in Jenkins (this will help because it hasn't been updated in >2 years, but will remove the blue bubble per "artifact" in maven jobs) 17:25:44 #info this will also speed things up by not archiving artifacts even if we tell them not to and avoiding storying md5sums of all artifacts (called fingerprints), which slows down the boot of Jenkins 17:26:24 #info Jenkins with no fingerprints takes about 2 minutes, took 10 minutes today, took 40 minutes before we migrated to the private cloud 17:26:42 #info zxiiro hopes that doing this will speed up builds and effectively giving us more resources 17:27:17 #info tykeal says, from his view, we're holding the line in the private cloud, but we are aware that we are somewhat more constrained than before 17:27:26 #action zxiiro to create a thread outlining the planned JJB changes in infra 17:27:53 #info tykeal is hoping (with help from rackspace) to have a way for CSIT jobs to run in the public cloud, but he can't promise 17:29:02 #info tykeal says the current theory with Nexus issues is that it's the latency to Oregon from Rackspace, they're creating a replica of the authentication in Rackspace to fix it, if not... 17:31:01 #info vishnoianil notes that we're expecting a lot more load as we move toward RCs, tykeal notes that's a bunch of the reason to look at the public cloud 17:32:24 #action vishnoianil and anipbu to work out if and how we can poll projects about how they're doing on their timelines and how that might impact the boron release and infrastructure issues 17:33:05 #topic committer promotions 17:33:23 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2016-July/005592.html Thanh Ha on Documentation 17:33:41 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/project:docs+owner:%22Thanh+Ha+%253Cthanh.ha%2540linuxfoundation.org%253E%22+status:merged+branch:master lots of merged commits 17:34:05 #info two +1s and no -1s in 8 days 17:34:43 #link http://docs.opendaylight.org/en/latest/ he's been instrumental in getting this up and working 17:34:52 #vote +1 17:34:52 #startvote shall the TSC approve Thanh Ha as a committer on docs? -1,0,+1 17:34:52 Begin voting on: shall the TSC approve Thanh Ha as a committer on docs? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 17:34:52 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:34:55 #vote +1 17:34:55 #vote +1 17:34:56 #vote +1 17:34:57 :-) 17:34:58 #vote +1 17:35:00 #vote +1 17:35:01 #vote +1 17:35:02 #vote +1 17:35:03 #vote +1 17:35:04 no brainer :) 17:35:10 totally no brainer 17:35:13 #endvote 17:35:13 Voted on "shall the TSC approve Thanh Ha as a committer on docs?" Results are 17:35:13 +1 (8): mohnish__, gkaempfer, Chrisy, jamoluhrsen, rovarga, colindixon, vishnoianil, abhijitkumbhare 17:35:27 #agree Thanh is a committer on docs 17:35:27 Congrates Thanh :) 17:35:31 congrats zxiiro 17:35:40 yes - no brainer - that’s why rovarga jumped the gun early :) 17:35:50 Congrats zxiiro 17:36:03 Congrats zxiiro 17:36:30 #topic fast and/or phased release schedule in carbon 17:36:39 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2016-June/005428.html discussion 17:37:33 #info colindixon asks if we need to draw a line in the sand to incorporate fast and/or phased into Carbon? 17:37:59 #info jamoluhrsen says it feels almost too late now, there's not enough discussion to safely put it in a plan 17:38:33 #Info vishnoianil points out that we need to run the pilot first and we likely can't reasonably do that before Carbon 17:39:21 #info mohnish__ agrees with vishnoianil, but asks if we know how much development time we have if we go with "fast" and have only 2 months 17:39:54 #info rovarga says that one thing that might help is if you had experimental features, which need not be tracked as part of a given release as they're worked on across release 17:39:56 #undo 17:39:56 Removing item from minutes: 17:39:58 #info rovarga says that one thing that might help is if you had experimental features, which need not be tracked as part of a given release as they're worked on across releases 17:40:45 #info rovarga also notes that if people take 2-3 weeks off (which they do) during a 2-month release with only 6 weeks of coding, that can trash a release 17:41:29 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2016-July/005588.html this is the "pilot" vishnoianil referenced 17:42:06 #info the idea would be to do it sometime on the side during Carbon 17:44:22 #Info colindixon suggests maybe we should wait until edwarnicke comes back, but Chrisy notes he's out for 3 weeks 17:45:04 #info rovarga agrees that we don't really have any of the scripts and tooling around, and that we can't have any real hope of getting to it in Carbon 17:45:13 #info rovarga suggests having a hackfest during Carbon working on this 17:48:32 #startvote shall the TSC put together a 6-month release (like Boron) that will start shortly after Boron? -1,0,+1 17:48:32 Begin voting on: shall the TSC put together a 6-month release (like Boron) that will start shortly after Boron? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 17:48:32 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:49:29 #endvote 17:49:29 Voted on "shall the TSC put together a 6-month release (like Boron) that will start shortly after Boron?" Results are 17:50:44 #info the consensus on the call (without edwarnicke) is that we really don't enough runway to make an drastic changes to the Carbon release, e.g., fast and/or phased 17:51:38 #info vishnoianil asks if we should have a parallel pilot with a few projects on a topic branch during carbon, colindixon thinks that's right 17:52:10 #info vishnoianil points out (and colindixon and phrobb agrees vehemently) that would give projects clarity that we will have a normal, 6-month release in Carbon, at the same time as giving us experience 17:53:43 #info phrobb suggests that as part of the Carbon release plan which projects would be part of the pilot and how they'd do it, e.g., topic branches 17:55:21 #action phrobb to put out a sample Carbon release plan based on Boron, which we could then iterate on 17:56:35 #action Chrisy to reach to to edwarnicke about fast and/phased carbon 17:57:52 would it be helpful to set a deadline when we want to make such a decision (not about the merits of either, but just to set a deadline)? 17:58:09 #action colindixon will try to get us to some clarity by next week's TSC call, not to rush things, but to make sure that we give projects clarity, especially new ones 17:59:04 makes sense to me 18:02:12 shall the TSC commit to having the basic outline of the main Carbon release, e.g., approx length and milestones w/approx dates, by 7/28? 18:03:03 #startvote shall the TSC commit to having the basic outline of the main Carbon release, e.g., approx length and milestones w/approx dates, by 7/28? -1,0,+1 18:03:03 Begin voting on: shall the TSC commit to having the basic outline of the main Carbon release, e.g., approx length and milestones w/approx dates, by 7/28? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 18:03:03 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 18:03:13 #vote +1 18:03:14 #vote +1 18:03:14 #vote +1 18:03:15 #vote +1 18:03:16 #vote +1 18:03:20 #vote +1 18:03:20 #vote +1 18:03:21 #vote +1 18:03:26 #endvote 18:03:26 Voted on "shall the TSC commit to having the basic outline of the main Carbon release, e.g., approx length and milestones w/approx dates, by 7/28?" Results are 18:03:26 +1 (8): mohnish__, gkaempfer, rovarga, Chrisy, colindixon, jamoluhrsen, vishnoianil, abhijitkumbhare 18:03:50 #agree the TSC commits to having the basic outline of the main Carbon release, e.g., approx length and milestones w/approx dates, by 7/28 18:04:16 #action colindixon to bring the commitment to a outline of a Carbon release plan up on the TSC mailing list 18:04:22 #topic cookies 18:04:31 #endmeeting