17:00:37 #startmeeting tsc 17:00:37 Meeting started Thu Oct 27 17:00:37 2016 UTC. The chair is colindixon. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 17:00:37 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:37 The meeting name has been set to 'tsc' 17:00:48 #topic agenda bashing and roll call 17:00:53 TSC members please #info in 17:00:56 #info colindixon 17:01:46 #info gkaempfer 17:01:47 #info adetalhouet 17:02:10 #Link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/index.php?title=TSC:Main&oldid=51341#Agenda the agenda 17:02:15 #Link https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2016/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2016-10-20-17.00.html 17:02:19 #info abhijitkumbhare 17:02:25 #link phrobb to got the OPNFV plugfest on our events page https://www.opendaylight.org/global-events 17:02:30 #link ChrisPriceAB opened a mailing list thread on release@ and tsc@ to talk about how to help projects that cross ODL/OPNFV deliver on promises in both places at the same time 17:02:44 #link colindixon started a thread on networking ODL in Ocata on the neutron-dev list: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/neutron-dev/2016-October/001040.html 17:02:51 #info phrobb sent mail to all people who are eligible to run that they are eligible as well as asking for self-nomination 17:02:57 #link skitt updated the wiki with odlparent being mature: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Category:Mature_Projects 17:03:05 #action colindixon, zxiiro and phrobb to come up with a proposal for tracking project activity in a positive way 17:03:24 #action colindixon and zxiiro to work on trying to build tools to help with what's failing on failures in our jenkins jobs 17:03:24 #action dfarrell07 colindixon to try to drive some/all of the ongoing TSC discussions to completion 17:03:24 #action colindixon to change the project facts template to include a type field and then auto-populate lists based on that information 17:03:38 Oops sorry guys, not on the call. 17:03:39 #action phrobb to work on getting us better control of the events page to make his life less painful 17:03:48 #action phrobb and tykeal to look into an ODL infra micro-datacenter in a box to make things work better 17:04:21 #info Daniel Farrell 17:04:37 #info anipbu has changed it so that the wiki of project types points to the tracking spreadsheet showing project types 17:04:40 #info edwarnicke 17:05:31 #topic mailing list discussions 17:05:41 #info rovarga for jmedved 17:05:46 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/neutron-dev/2016-October/001040.html thread on networking-odl in ocata 17:07:02 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2016-October/006188.html thread on syncing ODL/OPNFV in Danube/Carbon 17:07:03 @colindixon Brady will stand in for me today. 17:07:10 thanks ChrisPriceAB 17:07:12 ebrjohn: welcome 17:07:16 #Info ebrjohn for ChrisPriceAB 17:07:18 :) 17:07:19 #info Brady Johnson 17:07:26 #topic events 17:07:37 #link https://www.opendaylight.org/global-events 17:08:06 #info OpenStack summit is going on in Barcelona right now, anything that has to do with NFV or SFC gets lots of mentioning of ODL 17:08:13 * ebrjohn nice presentation by Phil!! 17:08:23 #info presentations on ODL in the marketplace have been packed, booth is active 17:08:36 #info panels with ODL/OPNFV folks was well-received 17:09:38 #link https://www.opendaylight.org/events/2016-11-16-000000-2016-11-17-000000/opendaylight-forum-india the India forum is coming up soon on 11/16 17:10:09 #topic boron 17:10:10 #chair anipbu phrobb 17:10:10 Current chairs: anipbu colindixon phrobb 17:10:23 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release/Boron/SR1/Status <--- We initially targeted Boron SR1 Release on 10/27, but our latest build has blocker bugs in NETVIRT/SFC, CENTINEL, OPENFLOWPLUGIN, YANGTOOLS 17:11:20 #info I think the lesson learned is that having a release during the the OpenStack summit 17:11:50 * ebrjohn good point colindixon! 17:15:22 #info colindixon asks and it turns out that the blocking bugs above appear to all not be regressions from Boron release, but rather regressions either from intended behavior or from Beryllium release 17:15:45 #info it is still the case that these are all significant bugs that we'd like to get fixed 17:17:20 #agreed we will wait until next week to try to release Boron-SR1 17:17:44 #info at some point, we will have to draw a line in the sand and be pretty strict about what's a blocker and not 17:19:11 #topic carbon 17:19:23 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Carbon_Release_Plan#M1:_Draft_Plan <--- Carbon M1 Offset 1 Status is due on today 10/27 17:19:30 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Weather#Fix_of_mandatory_nodes_augmentation_to_target_in_another_module <--- Mandatory nodes cannot be added to node from another module via augmentation 17:20:00 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2016-October/008601.html <--- There are Carbon Autorelease Build Failures in sal-clustering-commons. 17:21:33 Atrium: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/47141/ 17:22:12 #info the weather item has already been merged, no complaints so far 17:22:14 Centinel: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/47630/ 17:23:26 https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/atrium-dev/2016-October/000029.html 17:23:29 I think this is us getting back to the issue where committer lists aren't well maintained, hence lack of active committers 17:25:53 You would think when the last commiter steps down, they would say let people know there are no more committers 17:26:28 #Info colindixon asks if we can try to reach out to the other two committers and drop atrium from autorelease to unblock things in the meantime 17:28:49 anipbu: the following people have committer rights in atrium still: Subhash Singh& Harsh Awasthi 17:29:52 #action anipbu to reach out to the two committers on atrium to tell them Barathi Subrahmaniyam , Subhash Singh 17:30:39 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/47630/ centinel reported the bug as blocking in Boron-SR1, it was merged on master, but not stable/boron 17:30:40 colindixon: not Barthi, but Suhash Singh 17:30:54 #undo 17:30:54 Removing item from minutes: 17:30:56 #undo 17:30:56 Removing item from minutes: 17:31:25 #action anipbu to reach out to the two committers on atrium to tell them Harsh Awasthi , Subhash Singh 17:31:30 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/47630/ centinel reported the bug as blocking in Boron-SR1, it was merged on master, but not stable/boron 17:31:54 #info colindixon says that if centinel hasn't bothered to report the bug or merge the patch, he's tempted to ship it broken in Boron-SR1 17:35:37 yet another good point colindixon 17:36:01 #action anipbu will continue to attempt to contact centinel, warning them that we relaly need it merged 17:36:09 #undo 17:36:09 Removing item from minutes: 17:36:25 #action anipbu will continue to attempt to contact centinel, warning them that we relaly need it merged, if we get to a boron respin without that patch, maybe ask the question again on the tsc list 17:36:40 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/46265/ 17:37:06 #info the above patch will fix an issue with an sdninterface app that is the same as the centinel patch 17:37:34 #action anipbu to follow up with sdninferfaceapp w.r.t. 46265 17:38:18 #topic system integration and test 17:38:36 #info a system test library broke a couple projects for the distribution test jobs, it should be fixed now 17:39:04 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/47558/ <--- system test library fix/workaround 17:39:39 #topic infra 17:39:39 #info last Saturday we upgraded nexus and jenkins sandbox 17:39:39 #info this past week on Tuesday and yesterday, we had security updates rolled out because of the dirty cow CVE 17:40:08 #info the only issue that came out was that the CSIT jobs had issues as things came back up because of a huge swatch of jobs, but it resolve itself over 90 minutes 17:40:31 #Info tykeal has info about upgrading F5 devices with 10G NICs, but hasn't had a chance to look at it yet 17:41:04 #topic Federation Service Creation Review 17:41:07 gkaempfer: you there? 17:41:14 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:Federation_Service 17:41:46 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/2016-October/000537.html Proposed on 10/5/2016 17:44:41 #info the federation service is a set of utilities to allow for two different OpenDaylight clusters to share information with eachother to allow for cross-cluster functionality 17:48:02 #info this is different is from existing mechanims that are mostly about syncing state, not sharing state 17:49:01 dmalachovsky: you're going to be up next 17:49:03 how long will it take? 17:49:47 colindixon: 5-10 mins from my side, then questions 17:50:36 https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:DluxApps 17:50:41 if people want to pre-read at all 17:51:49 #info edwarnicke asks why offset 1 and kernel vs. offset 0, gkaempfer basically says it's not quite so basic as offset 0 projcts, but still important 17:52:34 #info rovarga says that having this be offset 0 woudl help having staged releases of kernel vs. plugin 17:53:12 #startvote shall the TSC move the federation project to an incubation project? -1,0,+1 17:53:12 Begin voting on: shall the TSC move the federation project to an incubation project? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 17:53:12 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:53:21 #vote +1 17:53:23 #vote +1 17:53:28 #vote +1 17:53:29 #vote +1 17:53:31 #vote +1 17:53:51 dfarrell07: 17:53:53 #vote +1 17:53:55 #vote +1 17:53:59 #endvote 17:53:59 Voted on "shall the TSC move the federation project to an incubation project?" Results are 17:53:59 +1 (7): ebrjohn, rovarga, adetalhouet, edwarnicke, dfarrell07, colindixon, abhijitkumbhare 17:54:17 #agreed the federation project is now an incubation project in ODL 17:54:19 congrats! 17:54:23 #topic Dlux Apps Creation review 17:54:23 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:DluxApps 17:54:25 #link proposed on https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/project-proposals/2016-October/000544.html proposed 10/13/2016 17:55:45 for what it's worth, I did review the nitty gritty of the federation service to make sure that things seemed good with scope, committers, names, etc. 17:56:30 #info basically this is a split of Dlux into the core of dlux that people know how to maintain and apps that are harder to get things fixed for and getting patches merged for apps 17:57:20 #info the goal is to have an apps repo with more committers to allow apps to updated with fewer blocking times, while keeping the integrity of the dlux core and committers on that project 17:59:23 #Info the plan is to have this bee offset 1 and ideally share mailing lists with dlux because they are so close 18:00:06 #info colindixon asked over e-mail if this really solves the problem since we'll still likely have a bunch of committers who don't know all the apps in the single apps repo, but the hope is that a broader set of committers will keep things better than before 18:00:39 #info abhijitkumbhare asks if dlux is offset 1, how can dlux apps also be offset 1? 18:00:48 #Info dmalachovsky says that they feel the can manage it 18:01:10 #info the same way yangtools and netconf can be in offset-0 :) 18:02:05 #Info colindixon notes that there are only 3 offsets and the dependency tree for ODL is somewhre in the the 9-12 range, so there must be projects that depend on each other in the same offset 18:02:31 #startvote shall the TSC move DluxApps to being an incubation project? -1,0,+1 18:02:31 Begin voting on: shall the TSC move DluxApps to being an incubation project? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 18:02:31 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 18:02:34 #vote +1 18:02:34 #vote +1 18:02:37 #vote 1 18:02:37 adetalhouet: 1 is not a valid option. Valid options are -1, 0, +1. 18:02:39 #vote +1 18:02:43 #vote +1 18:02:43 #vote +1 18:02:46 #vote +1 18:02:46 #vote +1 18:02:49 #endvote 18:02:49 Voted on "shall the TSC move DluxApps to being an incubation project?" Results are 18:02:49 +1 (7): ebrjohn, rovarga, adetalhouet, dfarrell07, edwarnicke, colindixon, abhijitkumbhare 18:03:11 #agreed DluxApps is now an incubation proejct 18:03:41 #info colindixon asks if it should be dlux/apps or dluxapps? 18:04:07 #Info edwarnicke points out that will result in a directory called apps, which could be confusing 18:04:13 #info it sounds like dluxapps is a better move 18:04:22 * edwarnicke notes he is easily confused 18:04:28 #topic cookies 18:05:40 #info there was meeting on networking-odl in ocata in Barcelona and there will more details on the public thread to follow 18:05:53 #endmeeting