13:59:47 #startmeeting carbon release review 13:59:47 Meeting started Wed May 17 13:59:47 2017 UTC. The chair is anipbu. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 13:59:47 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:59:47 The meeting name has been set to 'carbon_release_review' 13:59:53 #topic roll call 14:00:00 #info PTL and TSC members please #info in 14:00:08 Good Morning folks 14:00:12 Let's start the release reviews 14:00:15 hi morning 14:00:19 #info anipbu 14:00:26 Good morning katie 14:00:28 #info AnZa 14:00:31 #info xingjun 14:00:41 #chair zxiiro colindixon 14:00:41 Warning: Nick not in channel: colindixon 14:00:41 Current chairs: anipbu colindixon zxiiro 14:00:43 good morning an 14:00:54 #info Thanh 14:01:09 Let's give a minute for Colin Dixon to arrive 14:01:15 We'll begin shortly 14:01:18 FYI I'm aware of the docs patches build failures and just fixed them a few minutes ago. I think we just need to rebase patches 14:01:52 Anybody hear from colindixon? 14:02:54 before we formally started, want to send a message from casey to every PTLs here: 14:02:58 Would you please provide a short video (few minutes would be fine) to introduce your project? Give a brief introduction, what service of your project can provide. Are there any new features of your project in Carbon release? what is it? When you have the video ready , please fill the video link to the release notes tracking sheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit?us 14:03:32 thanks katie for relaying the message 14:03:59 If colindixon does not show up, we'll start in a minute. 14:04:01 #info gkaempfer 14:04:22 This will really help our project advertise ourself 14:04:25 Well I am afraid that I will not get time slot for video from my emploeyer, so I can't do any promise... Regarding features, there are no new features in Carbon 14:04:56 ok, got it AnZa 14:05:15 Okay let's begin. 14:05:19 #topic TOPOPROCESSING 14:05:25 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/57222 <-- Release Notes 14:05:39 #info AnZa is representing TOPOPROCESSING 14:05:40 Anything you would like to add? 14:05:48 1) Have you tested against RC2 and were there any blockers. Can you update this sheet with your testing? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1166457948? 14:05:54 2) have you signed off on any CSIT test failures? Are there any tests that needs to be IGNORED? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1568731761 14:06:01 nothing special from my side 14:06:19 #info odl-topoprocessing-framewrok is experimental as started on the release notes 14:06:24 I just tested agains RC1 and its working. We have no blockers 14:06:46 No tests need to be ignored, no tests failures 14:06:55 AnZa: can you update the spreadsheet: 14:07:00 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1166457948? 14:07:11 its currently saying blank for topoprocessing 14:07:36 Strange, I fill it some time ago. When I open link I see it filled 14:07:52 AnZa, you ahve to fill it out again for RC1 14:08:06 Ok, I will try 14:08:07 you filled it out for RC0, but we just finished for RC1 14:08:09 Thanks 14:08:24 If you can fill it our now, we can approve your project 14:08:42 But I filled RC1 no RC0. I see it there 14:08:50 #info CSIT jobs are here: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/topoprocessing/job/topoprocessing-csit-1node-topology-operations-all-carbon/ 14:08:50 an, I see it too 14:09:01 Okay thanks 14:09:44 topoprocessing looks good to me. 14:09:48 it is a maintenance project 14:09:53 no real changes in this release 14:09:53 but on the same sheet, RC0 part is not filled 14:09:57 it is ok? 14:10:08 We didn't test RC0 14:10:14 ok, got it 14:10:15 Do folks have any additional comments? 14:10:35 zxiiro: anything you want to raise additionally? 14:10:42 I do not 14:10:55 just want to confirm, no way you are going to have a short video for us? Anza? 14:11:39 I just don't promise that, but I will ask about it... 14:11:42 Okay let's move on. 14:11:51 #info TOPOPROCESSING approved for Carbon. Congratulations! 14:11:53 that is great, thanks Anza 14:11:56 #topic USC 14:11:57 There's some minor formatting issues in topo processing's release docs but I can fix it. Thanks! 14:12:03 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/57205 <-- Release Notes 14:12:08 #info anipbu is representing USC 14:12:40 zxiiro: you're gonna have to review me 14:12:47 Zxiiro can you please review USC? 14:13:01 alright 14:13:16 1) Have you tested against RC1 and were there any blockers. Can you update this sheet with your testing? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1166457948? 14:13:23 2) have you signed off on any CSIT test failures? Are there any tests that needs to be IGNORED? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1568731761 14:13:42 zxiiro: yes to 1, updates 14:14:11 #info usc is experimental as stated in the release notes 14:14:12 zxiiro: yes to 2) have signed off on failures 14:14:29 #undo 14:14:29 Removing item from minutes: 14:14:36 zxiiro: usc is not experimental 14:14:46 int eh release notes, it's listed as nonexperimental 14:14:53 we have test coverage for our features 14:15:05 woops was lokoing at the wrong ling 14:15:06 link 14:15:15 zxiiro: no worries 14:15:24 #info usc is non-experimental as stated in the release notes 14:15:32 USC is in maintenance mode, so no changes in this release 14:15:49 #info USC is in maintenance mode, so no changes in this release 14:16:03 Anything additional comments? 14:16:34 If there are no other comments from folks, can you approve my project? 14:17:10 #info USC approved for Carbon. 14:17:14 congrats 14:17:28 an are you going to provide the short video I mentioned for your project? 14:17:36 katie, no video 14:17:37 #topic NEMO 14:17:42 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/57204 <-- Release Notes 14:17:46 #info anipbu is representing NEMO 14:18:00 1) Have you tested against RC1 and were there any blockers. Can you update this sheet with your testing? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1166457948? 14:18:07 2) have you signed off on any CSIT test failures? Are there any tests that needs to be IGNORED? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1568731761 14:18:22 1) yes, we have tested RC1 and found no issues. spreadsheet has been updated 14:18:35 #info NEMO is non-experimental as stated in the release notes. 14:18:55 2) We have signed off on test failures 14:19:07 nemo is in maintenance mode. no changes in this release 14:19:17 #info nemo is in maintenance mode. no changes in this release 14:19:31 Any other comments? 14:19:41 I'm assuming no video for nemo either. 14:19:51 I guess so 14:19:55 katie: no video for nemo 14:20:03 thanks Zxiiro for asking 14:20:11 #info NEMO approved for Carbon. 14:20:12 congrats 14:20:32 * zxiiro passes the ball back to An :) 14:20:38 okay let's move on 14:20:44 #topic DLUXAPPS 14:20:50 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/57208/ <-- Release Notes 14:20:57 #info Daniel Malachovsky is representing DLUXAPPS 14:21:05 dmalachovsky good morning 14:21:06 i'm here 14:21:12 Anything you would like to add? 14:21:18 1) Have you tested against RC2 and were there any blockers. Can you update this sheet with your testing? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1166457948? 14:21:24 2) have you signed off on any CSIT test failures? Are there any tests that needs to be IGNORED? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1568731761 14:21:59 #info all dluxapps features are experimental 14:22:05 1. tested against RC1, no blocker bugs so far, some minor bugs, nothing huge 14:22:47 Could you update the spreadsheet please 14:23:06 it's updated for RC1 14:23:17 2. this should be ignored https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/dluxapps/job/dluxapps-csit-1node-yangman-all-carbon/ 14:23:21 #info DLUXAPPS CSIT have some failures but not blocker issues: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/dluxapps-csit-1node-yangman-all-carbon/ 14:23:32 #info dluxapps have tested RC1 and found no blocker issues 14:23:48 #info dluxapps tests can be ignored: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/dluxapps/job/dluxapps-csit-1node-yangman-all-carbon/ 14:24:06 we know the reason of the error in CSIT, this should fix it https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/54772/, but have verify errors 14:24:31 dmalachovsky: could you update the spreadsheet to reflect that you IGNORE that test case: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1568731761 14:24:53 reason isn't any incompatibility with other features 14:25:04 just need one mmore step for that test 14:25:13 dmalachovsky: any big changes in carbon or was your project in maintenance mode? 14:25:41 dluxapps is new project in carbon, we split dlux into two projects 14:25:55 #info dmalachovsky says dluxapps is new project in carbon, we split dlux into two projects 14:26:14 dmalachovsky: any major changes to the codebase since the split? 14:26:16 but changes were mostly in infrastructure, not in applications itself 14:26:38 #info dmalachovsky says changes were mostly in infrastructure, not in applications itself 14:26:47 we changed feature names - from odl-dlux to odl-dluxapps 14:26:47 okay, dluxapps looks good to me 14:26:59 do folks have any other comments? 14:27:11 daniel , would you please provide the video for your project? 14:27:22 katie, no video right now 14:27:23 #info dluxapps feature name changes: odl-dlux to odl-dluxapps 14:27:35 ok, got it 14:28:26 Okay let's move on 14:28:53 #info DLUXAPPS approved for Carbon. Congratulations! 14:28:57 thanks 14:28:59 #topic FEDERATION 14:29:04 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/57207/<-- Release Notes 14:29:14 good morning 14:29:20 #info Gideon Kaempfer is representing DLUXAPPS 14:29:23 #undo 14:29:23 Removing item from minutes: 14:29:27 #info Gideon Kaempfer is representing FEDERATION 14:29:33 Anything you would like to add? 14:29:40 1) Have you tested against RC2 and were there any blockers. Can you update this sheet with your testing? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1166457948? 14:29:47 2) have you signed off on any CSIT test failures? Are there any tests that needs to be IGNORED? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1568731761 14:29:56 3) katie: do you have any videos? 14:30:14 Thanks An for asking 14:30:40 the video is : 14:30:41 unfortunately no good news. The entire team working on Federation has recently been let go by HPE. 14:30:41 #info all federation features are experimental 14:30:51 Would you please provide a short video (few minutes would be fine) to introduce your project? Give a brief introduction, what service of your project can provide. Are there any new features of your project in Carbon release? what is it? When you have the video ready , please fill the video link to the release notes tracking sheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit?us 14:31:06 gkaempfer: so sorry to hear that 14:31:37 sorry to hear it 14:31:49 federation is tested only by means of NetVirt (via the NetVirt federation plugin) and should be OK but I wasn't able to positively establish testing status before this review. 14:31:53 tnx 14:32:09 gkaempfer: did federation get a test waiver? 14:32:35 I don't think that there is a formal waiver. 14:33:11 gkaempfer: in future releases, please request test waiver since it is tested by NetVirt 14:33:31 gkaempfer: 1) Have you tested against RC2 and were there any blockers. Can you update this sheet with your testing? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1166457948? 14:34:00 #info federation is tested only by means of NetVirt (via the NetVirt federation plugin) and should be OK but I wasn't able to positively establish testing status before this review. 14:34:11 gkaempfer: any blocker in RC1? 14:34:12 no testing against RC2 (as mentioned above) 14:34:17 no known blockers 14:34:35 #info FEDERATION has rested against RC1 and found no blocker 14:34:35 s/RC2/RC1/g 14:34:52 same for RC1 14:34:53 gkaempfer: could you update the spreadsheet please 14:35:16 gkaempfer: the row for federation is currently blank on the spreadsheet 14:35:42 will do once I receive positive feedback from the NetVirt federation people. 14:36:06 sorry running late 14:36:09 here now 14:36:10 (they are under the same unfortunate status as mentioned above) 14:36:30 #action gkaempfer will follow up on RC1 testing with release team once receive positive feedback from the NetVirt federation people 14:37:09 gkaempfer: could you let us know once the spreadsheet is updated. Thanks 14:37:22 i mean after you confirm with netvirt 14:37:57 sure 14:38:17 For federation, we'll wait for testing to complete before we approve the project. 14:38:42 Once gkaempfer updates the spreadsheet, we can review their project again and analyze it for approval 14:38:49 Any other comments form folks? 14:40:09 Nope. Thanks. 14:40:18 Okay. Let's move on 14:40:36 #info FEDERATION is pending. Waiting on completion of action items as stated above. 14:40:55 #topic FAAS 14:41:01 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/57212/<-- Release Notes 14:41:07 #info xingjun chu is representing FAAS 14:41:20 Anything you would like to add? 14:41:28 No, nothing special to add 14:41:35 1) Have you tested against RC1 and were there any blockers. Can you update this sheet with your testing? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1166457948? 14:41:41 2) have you signed off on any CSIT test failures? Are there any tests that needs to be IGNORED? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1568731761 14:41:50 Yes, we have tested against RC1, no issues found. 14:42:15 we have updated the RC1 track speadsheet 14:42:31 3) Do you have any short video to introduce your project? Give a brief introduction, what service of your project can provide. Are there any new features of your project in Carbon release? what is it? When you have the video ready , please fill the video link to the release notes tracking sheet 14:42:31 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit?us 14:42:45 #info FAAS has tested RC1 and found no blocker issues 14:42:59 We have one, but I may have to reduce its size a bit 14:43:12 that is great xingjun, 14:43:29 #info FAAS has video, which will be reduced in size 14:43:31 when you have it , please fill the video link to the table and let us know 14:43:56 xingjun: any CSIT tests to ignore? 14:43:57 Sure, I need to post to youtube ? or somewhere? 14:44:07 no CSIT failures 14:44:10 youbube is fine 14:44:25 I have some minor feedback on the release notes patch. 14:44:36 ok 14:44:38 sorry, I mean youtube 14:44:52 ok 14:45:05 #info all FAAS features are experimental as stated on the release notes 14:45:22 I will fix it Colin 14:45:45 thanks 14:45:53 colindixon, did you publish the minor feedback? i don't see your comments on the patch 14:46:32 anipbu: just now 14:46:33 yes 14:46:40 #info FAAS performs only manual testing as stated on the release notes 14:46:58 xingjun: please request test waiver in the future since your project has no CSIT tests 14:47:08 the only one of note is that FaaS says it supports migration, but gives no steps how, the only way I can imagine that being true is if it is stateless in the data store 14:47:10 is that true? 14:47:33 xingjun: ^^^ 14:47:43 and that can be answered offline 14:48:00 no, it is not stateless. but we don't have configuration change this release 14:48:26 so it should be compatbile from previous release 14:48:36 yes, but there's no out-of-the-box way to migrate from Boron to Carbon with data in the data store unless you've tested that and it works 14:48:46 #info xingjun says that faas is not stateless, but don't have configuration change this release. 14:48:53 so, at the very least, users would need to somehow get all the data out and put it all back in 14:49:27 In theory yes. but we haven't tested it 14:50:00 OK. So, I think you need to change that either migration isn't supported or give steps for peole to export and re-import their data. 14:50:11 OK, will do that 14:50:18 #info colindixon raised concerns on compatibility and migration. at the very least, users would need to somehow get all the data out and put it all back in 14:50:41 #action xingjun will update the release notes on the migration and compatibility as per colindixon's comments 14:50:48 I don't think that should be blocking though 14:50:54 #action xingjun to respond to docs feedback on the release notes patch 14:50:55 * colindixon starts reading GBP 14:50:58 sorry BGP 14:51:09 Hi everyone 14:51:11 xingjun: could you please follow up? 14:51:18 yeah, do it now 14:51:27 FAAS looks good to me 14:51:32 Any other comments form folks? 14:51:50 If not, let's move on. 14:51:55 #info FAAS approved for Carbon pending action items and follow up. Congratulations! 14:52:00 #topic BGPCEP 14:52:02 Thanks 14:52:06 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/57244/ <-- Release Notes 14:52:11 #info Claudio D. Gasparini is representing BGPCEP 14:52:16 Anything you would like to add? 14:52:28 no additional info 14:52:34 cgasparini: 1) Have you tested against RC1 and were there any blockers. Can you update this sheet with your testing? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1166457948? 14:52:41 2) have you signed off on any CSIT test failures? Are there any tests that needs to be IGNORED? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1568731761 14:52:50 both already updated 14:53:10 cgasparini: any of those tests you want us to IGNORE? 14:53:18 no 14:53:31 otherwise we woudl ahve to ask that you sign off on them again in RC2, RC3, etc =( 14:54:10 I ll prefer in that way 14:54:18 #info odl-bgpcep-bgp/bmp/pcep are nonexperimental as stated on the release notes 14:55:15 #info bgpcep has extensive test coverage: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/bgpcep/ but several are failing in CSIT 14:55:32 #info bgpcep has tested RC1 and found no blocker bugs 14:56:03 cgasparini: gerat job on the test coverage =) 14:56:09 #info colindixon provided some (mostly minor) feedback on the release notes patch, the only one of note is asking if it makes sense to point out that MD5 is believed broken, so presumably TCP-MD5 authentication is as well 14:56:22 thank you :D 14:56:46 Claudio would you provide a short video to introduce your project? Give a brief introduction, what service of your project can provide. Are there any new features of your project in Carbon release? what is it? When you have the video ready , please fill the video link to the release notes tracking sheet 14:57:27 also, there may be some formatting issues with the patch, not sure yet since it hasn't passed verify yet 14:57:34 I ll review the notes and provide feedback, regarding the video I ll what can be done 14:57:43 *see 14:57:46 thanks 14:58:06 #action cgasparini will follow up on colindixon feedback for the release notes 14:58:53 cgasparini: were there any major changes in bgpcep this release? 14:59:15 no 15:00:39 #info BGPCEP had no major changes in this release 15:00:55 so i take it you are also in maintenance mode 15:01:05 BGPCEP looks good to me 15:01:14 Any other additional comments from folks? 15:01:38 none beyond what I said above 15:02:16 cgasparini: please follow up on your actions 15:02:29 Okay let's move on 15:02:32 #info BGPCEP approved for Carbon pending action items and follow up. Congratulations! 15:02:37 #topic GROUPBASEDPOLICY 15:02:42 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/57243/ <-- Release Notes 15:02:48 #info Vladimir Lavor is representing GROUPBASEDPOLICY 15:02:52 Hello everyone 15:02:53 Anything you would like to add? 15:03:07 vlavor: 1) Have you tested against RC1 and were there any blockers. Can you update this sheet with your testing? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1166457948? 15:03:14 2) have you signed off on any CSIT test failures? Are there any tests that needs to be IGNORED? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1568731761 15:03:30 1) RC1 was tested, no major issues were found 15:03:51 #info groupbasedpolicy has tested RC1 and found no blocker bugs 15:04:33 vlavor: could you please sign off on your your RC1 test failures? 15:04:58 2) CSIT failures will be fixed soon, so I suppose they should be mark ignored for now 15:05:29 #info vlavor notes test failures that can be ignored. 15:05:48 done 15:05:55 #Info colindixon provded some feedback on the patch with the only one of note being that the migration should probably say that migration isn't supported since it seems like it's not 15:05:56 vlavor: thanks 15:06:19 #action vlavor to follow up on feedback on the release notes patch 15:06:49 vlavor: can you please follow up on feedback on patch after the meeting? 15:06:57 ok 15:07:10 none of it is blocking, just trying to get the information right for when others come to look at it 15:07:16 #info all groupbasedpolicy features are experimental as stated on the release notes 15:07:38 vlavor: any major changes in gbp in this release? 15:07:45 or is your project in maintenance mode as well? 15:08:17 anipbu, colindixon: checking in. 15:08:28 welcome jamoluhrsen 15:08:29 no it is not, some features are under development 15:09:20 #info groupbasedpolicy has some CSIT for some features (which are all experimental). The current set of CSIT test failures can be ignored. 15:09:55 #info groupbasedpolicy is currently an active project with some features still under development 15:10:26 #info groupbasedpolicy has some API changes in this release: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/49041/ https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/49190/ 15:10:26 vlavor: would you provide a short video to introduce your project? Give a brief introduction, what service of your project can provide. Are there any new features of your project in Carbon release? what is it? When you have the video ready , please fill the video link to the release notes tracking sheet 15:10:59 we don't have any video for now but we will talk about it 15:11:17 great thanks 15:11:46 GROUPBASEDPOLICY looks good to me 15:11:58 Any additional comments from folks? 15:14:01 i'm good. 15:14:09 Okay lets move on 15:14:22 vlavor: please follow up on your action items 15:14:27 somehow the release review spreadsheet has no video on all later project today 15:14:37 I guess I don't need to ask anymore today 15:14:43 and respond to the feedback 15:14:47 of the patch form colindixon 15:14:52 Oaky Let's move on 15:14:54 thanks 15:14:59 #info GROUPBASEDPOLICY approved for Carbon pending action items and follow up. Congratulations! 15:15:03 #topic HONEYCOMB/VBD 15:15:08 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/57250 <-- Release Notes 15:15:15 #info Michal Cmarada is representing HONEYCOMB/VBD 15:15:19 Hi 15:15:20 Anything you would like to add? 15:15:32 no, nothing 15:15:32 Good morning michal-cmarada|2 15:15:47 michal-cmarada|2: 1) Have you tested against RC1 and were there any blockers. Can you update this sheet with your testing? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1166457948? 15:15:53 2) have you signed off on any CSIT test failures? Are there any tests that needs to be IGNORED? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1568731761 15:15:54 colindixon: i have replied to your comment 15:16:32 Yes, RC1 was tested. no blockers found. dockument should be up to date 15:17:13 We don`t have any CSITs running yet 15:17:15 #info VBD has tested RC1 and found no blocker 15:17:26 #info VBD does not run any CSIT tests 15:18:01 michal-cmarada|2 did you project request a test waiver? 15:18:25 #info All VBD features are experimental as stated in the release notes 15:19:10 michal-cmarada|2 VBD seems to be missing documentation. Any plans to create READTHEDOCS documentation? 15:19:29 No, we didn`t. However we are running some aditional automated tests as part of Fast Data Stacks (FDS) testing suites 15:20:13 There is only documentation on our wiki page. 15:20:28 #info colindixon notes that he has feedback on the patch with the only major part being getting clarification on migratoin 15:20:28 michal-cmarada|2, do you have a link to that FDS automation? or you can put it on your wiki, if not already there. 15:20:40 it's already there I think 15:20:52 see the QA section 15:20:59 lines 53-58 15:21:06 the link is provided in release notes but I can add it to wiki too. 15:21:07 http://testresults.opnfv.org/reporting/functest/release/danube/index-status-apex.html 15:21:42 got it, thanks. 15:22:14 Currently there is ongoing migration for these test so they are not showing results now but should be ready next week 15:22:23 #info VBD running some aditional automated tests as part of Fast Data Stacks (FDS) testing suites 15:23:14 #action michal-cmarada|2 to follow up on feedback from colindixon on release notes patch regarding clarification on migration 15:23:34 #info colindixon, for the FaaS project release notes, I have just replied to all your comments and pushed a new patch. thx 15:23:51 xingjun: thanks 15:24:11 Yes, I will follow up on comments by Colin 15:24:30 no problem. 15:24:44 jamoluhrsen: thoughts on VBD tests? All features are experimental, but they did not get test waiver. 15:25:32 anipbu, vbd is not going to be the only one without a waiver and no csit, I think. I can't parse the FDS results yet. 15:25:50 anipbu, but if all features are going experimental, then not worth digging too deep I guess 15:26:12 jamoluhrsen: okay, do you think this is blocker or can we approve? 15:26:42 i'm fine to approve 15:26:53 VBD looks good to me 15:27:01 Any additional comments from folks? 15:27:48 not from me 15:27:53 Okay let's move on 15:27:56 same feedback about migratoin 15:28:06 AAA is next 15:28:12 #info HONEYCOMB/VBD approved for Carbon pending action items and follow up. Congratulations! 15:28:18 #topic AAA 15:28:23 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/57286 <-- Release Notes 15:28:29 #info Ryan Goulding is representing AAA 15:28:35 Anything you would like to add? 15:28:38 no 15:28:52 rgoulding: 1) Have you tested against RC1 and were there any blockers. Can you update this sheet with your testing? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1166457948? 15:28:58 2) have you signed off on any CSIT test failures? Are there any tests that needs to be IGNORED? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1568731761 15:29:31 I looked through everything and it looked good other than minor reST formatting stuff that I can fix later if rgoulding doens't 15:29:57 the test failures are expected to my knowledge 15:30:10 RC1 looks good 15:30:42 #info AAA has tested RC1 and found no blocker 15:30:52 colindixon: i've updated gbp release notes according to your comments 15:30:54 i put all as “IGNORE” 15:31:10 the idmlight test suite never worked well (JamO is fixing parts of it for master) 15:31:15 the other test suite i have no idea never seen it 15:31:19 #info AAA has three CSIT test failures but they have been updated as "IGNORE" on the spreadsheet 15:31:19 i think it was contributed this release 15:31:26 no idea who did it or why 15:31:45 rgoulding: any major changes in this release or is AAA in maintenance mode? 15:31:54