18:00:11 #startmeeting tsc 18:00:11 Meeting started Thu Mar 2 18:00:11 2017 UTC. The chair is colindixon. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 18:00:11 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 18:00:11 The meeting name has been set to 'tsc' 18:00:16 #topic roll call and agenda bashing 18:00:21 TSC members please #info in 18:00:30 #info skitt 18:00:37 #info anipbu 18:00:43 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/index.php?title=TSC:Main&oldid=53150#Agenda today's agenda 18:00:57 #link https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2017/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2017-02-24-04.34.html last week's meeting minutes (thanks vishnoianil!) 18:01:03 #info Hideyuki 18:01:03 #info colindixon 18:01:15 #info Thanh 18:01:25 #chair anipbu zxiiro phrobb CaseyODL 18:01:25 Current chairs: CaseyODL anipbu colindixon phrobb zxiiro 18:01:31 #info edwarnicke_ 18:01:59 #action vishnoianil, anipbu will follow-up wtih LACP project to clean -up the committer list and raise the vote for Ravi for committer to the project 18:02:00 #action colindixon, zxiiro and phrobb to come up with a proposal for tracking project activity in a positive way 18:02:01 #action colindixon and zxiiro to work on trying to build tools to help with what's failing on failures in our jenkins jobs 18:02:01 #action phrobb and tykeal to look into an ODL infra micro-datacenter in a box to make things work better at tutorials 18:02:11 #info Anil Vishnoi 18:02:33 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MufwajG-YwGU7dth97x07VVRznVx4UgPHkfRFk6-bQg/edit#gid=1293046707 18:02:33 #info abhijitkumbhare 18:02:42 #info jamoluhrsen 18:02:47 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MufwajG-YwGU7dth97x07VVRznVx4UgPHkfRFk6-bQg/edit#gid=1293046707 <--- Categorizing autorelease failures 18:03:21 #info rovarga 18:03:45 #info LuisGomez 18:04:02 #link Current progress on Karaf 4: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=4219&hide_resolved=1 18:05:21 Having audio issues - trying to reconnect 18:06:39 #info it seems like we're planning to get readouts about Karaf 4 from M5 milestones per katie and anipbu, phrobb asks if we could do it earlier, skitt says that the above linked bug dependency tree is a good list of what's left 18:07:21 #Info rovarga and skitt say that skitt has done the bulk of the work here 18:08:17 #info rovarga says that cross-project stuff doesn't seem to be work and that worries him from an SR and planning perspective 18:09:57 #info skitt says it's worrying to see so little engagment from so many projects, e.g., this work and mockito from vorburger 18:10:46 #info colindixon says in general, his approach has been you can't make projects stay engaged, you can make it as easy as possible to stay engaged and you can make it so disengaged projects hurt the rest as little as possible 18:11:57 #info vishnoianil says that his take is that things like this (cross-project) need to be scoped and fully anounced by M3 to get things done easily, and we have to make it clear we'll drop people if they don't do it, edwarnicke_ agrees that's sort of our one hammer, not shipping projects 18:13:51 #Info it's pretty clear that this has been a huge burden on a very small number of people, e.g., skitt, rovarga and vorburger, which isn't sustainable, healthy or good for the OpenDaylight community 18:14:43 vorburger does a lot, but he hasn't done much (yet) on the Karaf 4 migration ;-) 18:14:50 skitt: noted 18:14:55 I meant that generally 18:15:02 not jut for Karaf 4 18:15:08 sorry if that wasn't clear 18:15:08 right, cross-project work yes 18:15:12 exactly 18:19:31 #info vishnoianil and rovarga go back and forth about how that might be resolve and why projects don't respond and if we should change things to encourage projects to be more attentive 18:20:28 #info rovarga says that we should consider shifting our stance to kick people out of the release if they do things like miss multiple milestones 18:21:58 #info edwarnicke_ says he's open with that, as long as we make it clear when people will be dropped and how they can remediate it and when 18:23:42 #info an example might be if you milestone readout is late (how late?) then you will be removed for some period of time until you get the new ones, that might get more compliance 18:25:46 #action colindixon to start a thead talking about what we migth do to address unresponsive projects and have something to actually act on in the next meeting or so 18:26:24 #Info abhijitkumbhare says that in line with that, there's too many projects and too many unusable projects 18:26:51 #info skitt says that he gets the impression that many projects use OpenDaylight for infra and release, basically you get code-dump at M4 or M5 with no open development 18:27:09 #info skitt says we need to figure out carrots in addition to sticks 18:28:59 #info colindixon notes that docuemnting how to ship apps and projects that work with an SR but aren't part of the SR might alleviate some pressure, edwarnicke_ notes that will intereact potentailly badly with offline installation and running of ODL 18:30:25 #action vrpolak is creating a karaf 4 distribtion and its running into some issues with netconf that he's resolving, will keep working there 18:30:32 #action colindixon to set up some kind of meeting (or at least thread) about semantic-versioning-ish things for nitrogen 18:31:10 #topic carbon 18:31:25 #Info all M4 offset 0 and offset 1 are in but aa 18:31:27 #Undo 18:31:27 Removing item from minutes: 18:31:29 #Info all M4 offset 0 and offset 1 are in but aaa 18:31:35 #undo 18:31:35 Removing item from minutes: 18:31:45 #Info all M4 offset 0 and offset 1 are in but aaa and snmp 18:31:58 weather item link is here : https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Weather#OpenFlowPlugin_-_Turn_Single_Layer_Serialization_on_by_default 18:32:11 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Weather#OpenFlowPlugin_-_Turn_Single_Layer_Serialization_on_by_default weather item 18:32:40 Description: Single Layer Serialization will be turned on by default. For those who will want to revert back to Multi Layer Serialization, please follow the following guide: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OpenFlow_Plugin:OF13%2B_Single_Layer_Serialization#Disabled After you will do above, recompile project and you can use Multi Layer Serialization again 18:32:51 #Info if you want to go back to the old way of OpenFlow serialization, you can follow instructions here: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OpenFlow_Plugin:OF13%2B_Single_Layer_Serialization#Disabled 18:33:10 #Info M4 offset 2 is due today 18:33:23 #info katiezhang says that there are not many missed M3 offset 2 reports 18:33:24 katiezhang: the instructions will be updated - as we will have a config knob rather than recompile 18:33:35 for the weather report I mean 18:33:53 #Info M5 offset 0 is today 18:34:39 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sNscMkUl1uehVF9YF_MDs2p1tWX0is0Q_hgHiHtcQHI/edit#gid=1544647361 18:35:01 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sNscMkUl1uehVF9YF_MDs2p1tWX0is0Q_hgHiHtcQHI/edit#gid=1544647361 milestone readouts so far here 18:36:03 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sNscMkUl1uehVF9YF_MDs2p1tWX0is0Q_hgHiHtcQHI/edit#gid=355465003 <= M2 status 18:36:05 #Info hideyuki note that many offset 2 projects don't have M3 milestones, rovarga adds that we're missing M2 status too 18:38:15 #info rovarga says that his take is that we have many projects now which are now 3 milestones behind 18:42:17 #action katiezhang will let projects know that the TSC will likely drop projects from the release unless they submit correct, acceptable M4 and M5 18:43:50 #info anipbu notes that you also need to review M4 and M5 readouts carefully to make sure they're correct 18:44:21 here are list of projects missing M3 18:44:24 M3 offset 1 snmp offset 1 M3 offset 2 "atrium capwap cardinal centinel didm eman integration/distribution iotdm lacp natapp next of-config opflex sdninterfaceapp snbi usecplugin vpnservice yang-push yangide" 18:44:54 #info from katie: M3 offset 1 snmp offset 1 M3 offset 2 "atrium capwap cardinal centinel didm eman integration/distribution iotdm lacp natapp next of-config opflex sdninterfaceapp snbi usecplugin vpnservice yang-push yangide" 18:45:31 #topic boron 18:45:43 #info nothing this week 18:45:49 #Undo 18:45:49 Removing item from minutes: 18:46:35 #info boron SR3 release on 3/23, cutoff on 3/19, so that's 3 weesk to releas, 2.5 weeks to cutoff 18:46:53 #Info boron autorelease is currently failing (caused by security update of bouncycastle) rovarga will look at it 18:47:07 #action rovarga will be looking at boron autorelease failures with USC and bouncycastle having issues 18:47:22 #topic events 18:48:00 #info ONS is coming up the first week of April, we're having a docfest Sunday and Monday, there will be space on Monday, there may be space on Sunday too, but we'll have hotel rooms if nothing else 18:48:40 #Info LuisGomez asks if you can come to the docfest w/o registering, if that's an issue let us know 18:48:58 i need a smuggling 18:49:08 undo 18:49:33 #topic system integration and test 18:49:36 #info nothing this week 18:49:44 #Undo 18:49:44 Removing item from minutes: 18:49:45 #Undo 18:49:45 Removing item from minutes: 18:50:23 #info skitt asking about having a summit later this year, phrobb says it's up in the air, his take is less than 50/50, the board needs to decide by 3/15 18:51:18 #info phrobb says that the goal of the LF right now is to have an end user and business and general interest networking event in the spring and have that be ONS 18:52:00 #Info phrobb says that there is a goal to have a fall conference that's more techincally oriented (closer to how the ODL summit was), but do it with more than just ODL, e.g., ODL + OPNFV + FD.io + … 18:52:21 #Info phrobb says that the question is if we have the runway to do the fall one in 2017 or punt to 2018 18:52:49 #info phrobb says that we may end up doing more, smaller events in more areas instead of a big bang summit 18:53:21 #topic system integration and test 18:53:23 #Info nothing this week 18:56:23 #topic events cont'd 18:57:41 #info we need be sure to keep cirtical mass, people just flying in for 2 days is harder to get funds for, gets lower attendance, and is incentives less people to come, e.g., DDFs w/o an attached summit 18:58:05 #action phrobb to start a thread on how to have the best DDF-like developer event that works for everyone, e.g., colocated with OPNFV summit in Beijing? 18:58:59 #info abhijitkumbhare asks if we should move it to some other time, phrobb says that in general we've tried to line up DDFs coincident with the gap between releases 18:59:18 #Info this is to the extent that we haven't done them all with summits in the past some of the time 18:59:51 #info if those constraints are changing, phrobb would love to note 19:00:23 #Info rovarga suggests that maybe just making it a DDF + hackfest that is longer without necessarily having a major colocated event might actually work well too 19:00:41 #info skitt agrees with that point 19:01:47 #Info skitt also note that cross-community DDFs (which which might be easier if we synced releases) 19:02:30 #topic cookies 19:03:02 #endmeeting