17:03:22 #startmeeting tsc 17:03:22 Meeting started Thu Mar 30 17:03:22 2017 UTC. The chair is colindixon. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 17:03:22 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:03:22 The meeting name has been set to 'tsc' 17:03:27 #topic agenda bashing and roll call 17:03:29 #Info colindixon 17:03:32 #info skitt 17:03:34 #Info rovarga (on voice) 17:03:36 #info abhijitkumbhare 17:03:38 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/index.php?title=TSC:Main&oldid=53466#Agenda 17:03:45 #link https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2017/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2017-03-24-03.30.html last week's meeting minutes 17:03:55 #info Hideyuki 17:04:03 #info jamoluhrsen 17:04:08 #info katie 17:04:22 #info Thanh Ha 17:04:24 #action colindixon to e-mail about an informal ODL gathering at ONS (abeit a bit late) 17:04:40 #agreed there will be no TSC call next week (decided a few weeks ago) 17:04:48 katiez: only TSC members need to #info in 17:04:58 #actoin colindixon, zxiiro and phrobb to come up with a proposal for tracking project activity in a positive way 17:04:59 #actoin phrobb and tykeal to look into an ODL infra micro-datacenter in a box to make things work better at tutorials 17:05:29 #link next DDF planning thread https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2017-March/006851.html 17:05:33 #info LuisGomez 17:06:07 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events:Nitrogen_Dev_Forum Submit topics to the Nitrogen DDF here. 17:06:14 #action colindixon, zxiiro and phrobb to come up with a proposal for tracking project activity in a positive way 17:06:15 #action phrobb and tykeal to look into an ODL infra micro-datacenter in a box to make things work better at tutorials 17:06:16 #action rovarga, phrobb, CaseyODL, and colindixon to work with marketing about maybe commenting Boron-SR3's RFC-compatible RESTCONF 17:06:17 got it , thanks 17:06:24 ... I'm not chair so that didn't go though. 17:06:35 #chair CaseyODL 17:06:35 Current chairs: CaseyODL colindixon 17:06:51 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events:Nitrogen_Dev_Forum Submit topics to the Nitrogen DDF here. 17:06:55 #action colindixon or katie to send out nastygrams about being removed from the release 17:07:07 #action colindixon to try to either find people to document how to be compatible with an OpenDaylight release with participating in the OpenDaylight simultaneous release 17:07:11 #action colindixon to create postmortem topics for Carbon and add the clustering breakage to it 17:07:58 #topic TSC mailing list 17:08:15 #info see agenda, mostly it's future DDF planning (above) and nitrogen planning (below) 17:08:20 #topic Events 17:08:26 #link https://www.opendaylight.org/global-events 17:08:31 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events:Main 17:08:41 #Info ONS is next week Sunday to Thursday 17:09:47 #info the DDF will have a wiki page up soon to start populating topics for the one end of May and start of June 17:09:59 #info shague 17:10:17 #info CaseyODL thinks that the booth demos are closed for the ONS booth 17:10:23 #topic boron 17:10:39 #info still churning on Boron-SR3 17:10:54 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zImtd764e-hOgJAxoJKl85fxHCPu2agLfqsBtf13zQY/edit#gid=1776065453 spreadsheet 17:11:30 #info zxiiro says we're waiting on 14 projects to OK it for now, colindixon asks if we know what fraction of them are the exact same failures that were OKed in the previous spin 17:11:39 #info jamoluhrsen and zxiiro say they'll look at it after this call 17:12:50 #action colindixon to work with jamoluhrsen and zxiiro on automating "real vs. fake" failures for future releasing 17:14:41 #info ONS has the following Demo times available: Tues, 3 and 4PM. Wed: 2, 3 and 4PM. Thrus: 11AM, 12 and 1:30PM. If you want to showcase a demo in the main LF booth at ONS, please contact me. 17:14:58 +100 to what edwarnicke just said 17:15:04 +1 17:15:45 #info jamoluhrsen, edwarnicke, zxiiro and colindixon say that the right solution to this is really to try very hard to get projects to fix their tests, most of them aren't very hard to fix 17:17:21 #topic carbon 17:18:34 #info katiez reminds all projects to please respond about karaf 4 (don't ignore it) 17:18:50 atrium capwap cardinal centinel integration/distribution next of-config ttp yang-push 17:18:58 missing M2 offset 2 17:19:06 #info the following projects are missing M4: atrium capwap cardinal centinel integration/distribution next of-config ttp yang-push 17:19:25 netconf 0 infrautils 0 genius 1 17:19:33 M5 missing 17:19:36 #info the following (offset 0/1) projecs are missing M5: netconf, infrautils and genius 17:20:21 #action anipbu to work with katiez to validate the M4 status reports (use colindixon if need be) 17:20:49 #info anipbu 17:21:23 https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7976 17:21:38 https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8021 17:21:53 #link two API change waivers: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7976 17:21:58 #link two API change waivers: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8021 17:22:28 #Info rovarga says that they should affect nobody in OpenDaylight, but might affect downstream, one is a typo fix another is a race condition fix which requires a small API change 17:23:23 #info rovarga asks if we're still planning to cut the carbon branch today or hold off 17:24:33 #info jamoluhrsen notes that adding a new branch will increase CSIT from boron + carbon running daily to boron + carbon + nitrogen running daily? 17:27:23 #info colindixon asks how we're doing with Karaf 4? jamoluhrsen says that during the integration call the problem is that RESTCONF doesn't work in Karaf 4 and everything is blocked on that. 17:27:49 zxiiro: barring the discussion going on right now, would the branch pull happen at the 11:59 utc? netvirt and genius have patches in gates right now so we were expecting to at least get to that time today 17:28:12 #info vrpolak notes that many jobs to a RESTCONF check to get a 200 OK, and they never get it 17:28:22 #info skitt says that RESTCONF never comes up in the traces that vrpolak sees 17:29:39 #action rovarga will take a look at the isuse with RESTCONF as soon as vrpolak files a bug for it 17:31:20 #agreed we will cut stable/carbon branches on Monday, April 10th unless otherwise decided 17:31:24 #Undo 17:31:24 Removing item from minutes: 17:32:37 #agreed we will cut stable/carbon branches on Monday, April 10th at 10pm UTC unless otherwise decided 17:32:51 #action colindixon to statt a thread as to when branch makes sense for stable/carbon 17:33:38 # link https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8117 <-- the karaf4 restconf bug 17:34:03 #link https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8117 <-- the karaf4 restconf bug 17:34:10 #info skitt says that the bug tracker has 24 issues open, but that may be more like 20 17:35:26 #info skitt says that skitt has had lots of requests for help with Karaf 4 migrations recently, he thinks that many of the 20 projects are just starting or have yet to start 17:35:47 #link https://bugs.opendaylight.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=4219&hide_resolved=1 17:36:28 #info rovarga says that the issue in GBP is actually caludio helping and discovering projects which don't follow best practices upstream of GBP 17:36:43 #info rovarga says that claudio says that things get worse as they move to offset 2 17:36:58 #info skitt notes that some offset 2 projects don't have the SingleFeatureTest enabled, which means it's usually broken 17:37:40 #action colindixon to work with katiez to let projects that don't have karaf 4 done that they will be dropped from the release without it 17:38:13 #info skitt notes that almost everyone has moved to features-parent, but need to do pacakging jar to get the SingleFeatureTest to run 17:39:48 #info skitt says it would be really good if people could test their karaf4 code now 17:40:28 #info to test with Karaf 4, switch from karaf-parent to karaf4-parent and use the features4 repository instead of features 17:40:39 #undo 17:40:39 Removing item from minutes: 17:40:59 #info to test with Karaf 4, switch from you're local karaf disgtributions use of karaf-parent to karaf4-parent and use the features4 repository instead of features 17:41:31 #info colindixon asks about Karaf 5, skitt says Karaf 4.1 is easy, Karaf 4.2 or 5.0 will use Java 9 which is a wildcard 17:41:41 #info skitt says that the next fun upgrade after Karaf 4 will be guava 17:41:49 #info skitt qualifies "easy" as "not too hard" 17:41:58 #topic system integration and test 17:42:29 #info we have reduced the numbers of times we need to run our CSIT jobs, yay! 17:42:49 #topic infrastructure 17:42:52 #info none this week 17:43:02 #topic gaps in release management 17:44:17 #info colindixon notes that you may have been hearing more from him, jamoluhrsen and zxiiro during the last few weeks with Boron-SR3 and carbon as we transition from different people in release management roles 17:44:52 #info colindixon notes that we would love help 17:46:13 #info CaseyODL notes that one major thing people are commenting about is the test failures being reported for builds and then easier to update things frequently 17:47:00 #info CaseyODL also notes that keeping blocking bugs up-to-date is key 17:47:51 #link https://bugs.opendaylight.org/buglist.cgi?bug_severity=blocker&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=IN_PROGRESS&bug_status=WAITING_FOR_REVIEW&f1=cf_target_milestone&f2=cf_target_milestone&j_top=OR&list_id=75953&o1=substring&o2=substring&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&v1=Boron&v2=--- blocking bugs list 17:48:02 https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Weather#Blocker_Bugs 17:50:00 #Info katiez asks where blocking bugs come from, colindixon says the authoritative place where people track bugs is in the tracking spreadsheet here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MufwajG-YwGU7dth97x07VVRznVx4UgPHkfRFk6-bQg/edit#gid=1293046707 (for carbon) 17:50:27 #Info periodically, people queriy the buzilla for blocking bugs to find them and move them to the speadsheet 17:51:07 #action zxiiro and katiez to work together to describe how to to generate the build failure reports from distribution jobs 17:51:25 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zImtd764e-hOgJAxoJKl85fxHCPu2agLfqsBtf13zQY/edit#gid=1703426731 17:51:51 #Link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zImtd764e-hOgJAxoJKl85fxHCPu2agLfqsBtf13zQY/edit#gid=1703426731 columns D and E are semi-automatically generated on distribution jobs 17:53:23 #topic conference call platform platforms 17:53:49 #info CaseyODL and phrobb say that the LF uses Zoom effectively for cross-OS conference calling with large numbers of participants 17:55:09 #link https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8091 related to release engineering, this but is asking for notifications on merge failiures for active releases, which should signify a major problem 17:55:46 #info CaseyODL notes that Zoom has nearly universal support for OSes (Linux, Mac, Windows) 17:56:15 #info it allows for local and cloud recording to mp4 files as well as anyone to record (or not) which means you don't need to have the host code to record and easliy get recordings out 17:56:44 #info license only comes with 1 GB of cloud storage, but can be upraded to $10/GB/mo, but local recording allows for that 17:57:46 #info each license $14.99/mo for 50 people, can go up to 100 people for $40/mo, can allow some licenses to be community administered to let phrobb and CaseyODL get out of the way from people scheduling meetings 17:57:57 #info can get suage reports, if people want to use them 17:58:59 +1 to demo on TWS 17:59:10 +1 to TWS 17:59:13 what is the downside to webex? 17:59:28 because from what I can see it's a no brainer if it works. 17:59:28 #info starting at $100/mo, we can get international dial-ins, credit for dial ins to numbers 17:59:37 jamoluhrsen: skitt and vorburger among others can't make it work 17:59:47 linux users can't use webex without substantial hoops 17:59:47 under Linux 17:59:51 colindixon, ah, well then I hate it. 17:59:52 colindixon, I've got it working, 17:59:54 :) 17:59:55 does zoom work in China? 18:00:01 colindixon, but it's going to die with Firefox 52 18:00:01 anipbu: it says 18:00:24 #info edwarnicke asks if does who's talking notifcation + can mute people for them + recording indication 18:01:02 #info colindixon says that he has motivated humans at the Kernel projects + TWS when we have one 18:01:39 #info edwarnicke asks if multilple concurrent meetings to go on at the same time, need a separate license for each meeting, we could have multiple licenses 18:03:06 #info CaseyODL said that having ~6 licenses which would more than take care of our needs a lower cost than what we do now 18:04:02 #info abhijitkumbhare says given that we usually ask people before recording, how will that work with local recording, CaseyODL say that by default only admins can record, can be done per-call to allow only certain people to record if we want to make sure to notify people 18:04:28 CaseyODL: are they a pull of licenses or are they assigned to a specific number? Thinking of cases where meetings are back to back and if a number is shared their could be a conflict 18:04:54 #action CaseyODL to send mail about Zoom to relevant lists 18:05:00 #topic security mailng list 18:05:27 #info the mailing list is defunct, rovarga says that there are only 2 people reading it and neither seem to have time respond 18:05:42 #topic cookies 18:05:48 shague: They would be a specific number. So they would be broken up in Meeting Group 1, 2 etc.. We can have 6 running a time. We would just need to coordinate to ensure that the groups don't overlap. 18:06:15 #action colindixon to add security community population to the TSC next time 18:06:16 #topic cookies 18:06:17 #endmeeting