17:00:08 #startmeeting tsc 17:00:08 Meeting started Thu May 18 17:00:08 2017 UTC. The chair is colindixon. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 17:00:08 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:08 The meeting name has been set to 'tsc' 17:00:13 #topic roll call and agenda bashing 17:00:15 #info colindixon 17:00:16 #info skitt 17:00:24 sometime we should do this american idol style with PTLs on a stage and us behind some seats on the floor 17:00:29 #info jamoluhrsen 17:00:38 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/index.php?title=TSC:Main&oldid=55295#Agenda agenda 17:00:41 jamoluhrsen++ 17:00:49 #link https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2017/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2017-05-11-17.00.html last week's meeting minutes 17:00:57 #info rovarga 17:01:06 #info anipbu 17:01:21 #info lori 17:01:29 #info edwarnicke 17:01:34 #action colindixon, zxiiro and phrobb to come up with a proposal for tracking project activity in a positive way 17:01:35 #action phrobb and tykeal to look into an ODL infra micro-datacenter in a box to make things work better at tutorials 17:01:37 #action colindixon to try to either find people to document how to be compatible with an OpenDaylight release with participating in the OpenDaylight simultaneous release 17:01:38 #action phrobb to bring the need for a security manager to the board 17:01:39 #action phrobb to bring the TSC replacment language to the board 17:01:40 #action colindixon to update the Carbon-SR dates once we release Carbon 17:01:49 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events:Main#ODL_Nitrogen_Developer_Design_Forum CaseyODL put the link (and how to register) is on the wiki events page 17:01:50 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2017-May/010850.html colindixon notified release that projects must be in the release in git by 23:59 UTC on Monday, May 15th to participate 17:01:51 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Carbon_Release_Plan#RC0_Download anipbu got pointers to RC0 and notified people appropriately 17:02:13 #action colindixon to send o#ut a release scheduling mail that looks at Boron-SR4, Nitrogen and Carbon schedules 17:02:30 #info abhijitkumbhare 17:02:40 #action jamoluhrsen colindixon anipbu should work to get a better list of expected test failures before SR4 (jamoluhrsen notes that we will at least have apples-to-apples comparison to SR3) 17:02:56 #undo 17:02:56 Removing item from minutes: 17:03:31 #action jamoluhrsen colindixon anipbu should work to get a better list of expected test failures before SR4 (jamoluhrsen notes that we will at least have apples-to-apples comparison to SR3) 17:03:39 #info Anil Vishnoi 17:03:48 #info Thanh 17:04:29 #topic TSC mailing list votes and discussions 17:04:41 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2017-May/007208.html Need for a Beryllium-SR4.1? 17:05:57 +1 to SR5 :) 17:05:59 #topic events 17:06:04 #link https://www.opendaylight.org/global-events 17:06:23 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events:Main 17:06:43 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events:Main#ODL_Nitrogen_Developer_Design_Forum the DDF is coming up on 5/31 and 6/1 17:06:49 #info shague 17:07:21 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events:Main#Eurasia_Network_Operators_Group_ENOG13 new even in st petersburg on 5/23-24 with some major ODL content 17:07:32 #info agenda for DDF should be finalized soon and published 17:08:31 #info we only have 35 registrants for the DDF, please register if you plan to attend, the cost for the event is $225,000, we should talk about how to either make these cheaper and/or not have them if the attendance is this low 17:09:20 #topic boron 17:09:30 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release:Boron_Release_Plan#Schedule <--- Boron SR4 currently scheduled for 6/15/2017 17:09:41 #chair anipbu zxiiro 17:09:41 Current chairs: anipbu colindixon zxiiro 17:10:15 #Info zxiiro note that the boron build has been consistently passing 17:10:28 #info colindixon notes that unless Carbon shifts out past the DDF, things should be fine with that date 17:10:39 #topic carbon 17:10:53 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1746681968 <--- Release Review is ongoing right now: waiting on 6 projects to sign up: dlux, docs, next, sdninterfaceapp, cardinal, snmp 17:11:10 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1178576345 17:11:55 #link goo.gl/OaCOAG <--- 19 Blocker Bugs in bgpcep, controller, genius, netvirt, sfc 17:12:08 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=921315511 <--- Tracking Carbon Blocker Bugs 17:12:28 #link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VcB12FBiFV4GAEHZSspHBNxKI_9XugJp-6Qbbw20Omk/edit#gid=1166457948 <--- RC1 17:12:56 #info for what it's worth, we have patches in the pipe for all blocking bugs but 2 assuming the spreadsheet is up-to-date 17:14:13 #info remaining two are BUG-7451 and BUG-8446 17:14:56 #info rovarga says they're trying to get enough logs to debug BUG-8446, the claim is is that it may have been fixed (masked?) by some other fix, we should know by tomorrow morning 17:15:16 #info it seems like a patch was added for BUG-7451 17:17:54 Much better statement colindixon (raise standard of what is blocker bug - rather than not accept blocker bugs) 17:18:36 #info anipbu says that we will need to push back on blocker bugs harder as we get closer to the release we will have to raise the bar of what a blocker is 17:21:31 * rovarga blushes 17:21:53 good to know rovarga can blush :) 17:22:10 #info colindixon notes that bugs fall into 3 bins: 1.) functionality that is critical for users and was there in prior releases that is broken with no workarounds, 2.) the same thing as 1, but for functionality that is new to Carbon, 3.) things that have workarounds, are very uncommon, or otherwise aren't really blcoking 17:22:19 #info I think the question is what we're going to do around bin 2 17:23:37 #info anipbu notes that we're hoping to build RC2 today, but it looks like it might be tomorrow 17:24:16 #info anipbu further notes that RC3 (which should be the last one) is scheduled for Sunday and ideally we'd then go through the bureaucratic motions of final CSIT testing, and final go/nogo sign offs 17:25:39 #topic infrastructure 17:26:23 #info there are still a couple outstanding WebEx meetings out there, at the end of next week all WebEx meetings and WebEx account will be canceled 17:26:30 #info all recordings will be exported and uploaded to the wiki 17:26:45 #info ALL WEBEX ARE BELONG TO NOT US BY END OF NEXT WEEK 17:27:15 :) 17:27:50 #topic security response team 17:28:05 #info lori is interested in being part of the security response team 17:28:39 #startvote shall the TSC add lori as a member of the security response team? -1,0,+1 17:28:39 Begin voting on: shall the TSC add lori as a member of the security response team? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 17:28:39 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:28:42 #vote +1 17:28:44 #vote +1 17:28:45 #vote +1 17:28:46 #vote +1 17:28:46 vote +1 17:28:47 #vote +1 17:28:48 #vote +1 17:28:48 #vote +1 17:28:50 #vote 0 17:28:53 #vote +1 17:29:02 #endvote 17:29:02 Voted on "shall the TSC add lori as a member of the security response team?" Results are 17:29:02 0 (1): lori 17:29:02 +1 (8): rovarga, skitt, LuisGomez, edwarnicke, colindixon, jamoluhrsen, anipbu, abhijitkumbhare 17:29:17 thanks lori for taking that on 17:29:25 #agreed lori is a member of the security release team unanimously 17:29:49 #action colindixon to prepare a garbage collection vote for old security response team members after talking to them 17:30:04 #undo 17:30:04 Removing item from minutes: 17:30:32 #action colindixon to look to see if any current security response team members would like to voluntarily step down for any reason 17:32:26 #topic beryllium-SR4.1/SR5 17:32:42 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2017-May/007208.html 17:32:52 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2017-May/007209.html 17:33:17 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Security_Advisories description of CVEs here 17:35:17 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/topic:die-xsql-die-stable/beryllium+status:open xsql patches still needed for stable/beryllium 17:37:47 #info vishnoianil notes that if we do this after Carbon, technically we will no longer be supporting even security updates for that 17:41:49 I think if we have a workaround then we should just release note it and move on. 17:44:54 given that we've been told about these vulnerabilities while beryllium was still open for security updates, but have workarounds, do we 1.) just provide release notes with workarounds given that it won't be supported for security updates, 2.) fix the issues and ship the ones for which we have patches, or 3.) do nothing 17:45:44 #startvote given that we've been told about these vulnerabilities while beryllium was still open for security updates, but have workarounds, do we 1.) just provide release notes with workarounds given that it won't be supported for security updates, 2.) fix the issues and ship the ones for which we have patches, or 3.) do nothing? 1, 2, 3 17:45:44 Begin voting on: given that we've been told about these vulnerabilities while beryllium was still open for security updates, but have workarounds, do we 1.) just provide release notes with workarounds given that it won't be supported for security updates, 2.) fix the issues and ship the ones for which we have patches, or 3.) do nothing? Valid vote options are 1, 2, 3. 17:45:44 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:45:52 #vote 2 17:45:54 #vote 1 17:45:54 #vote 1 17:45:55 #vote 1 17:45:59 #vote 1 17:46:01 #vote 1 17:46:02 #vote 2 17:46:09 #vote 2 17:46:26 shague: 17:46:26 edwarnicke: 17:46:28 #vote 1 17:46:29 #vote 2 17:46:34 #vote 2 17:46:36 #vote 1 17:47:18 #endvote 17:47:18 Voted on "given that we've been told about these vulnerabilities while beryllium was still open for security updates, but have workarounds, do we 1.) just provide release notes with workarounds given that it won't be supported for security updates, 2.) fix the issues and ship the ones for which we have patches, or 3.) do nothing?" Results are 17:47:18 1 (7): zxiiro, LuisGomez, colindixon, lori, abhijitkumbhare, anipbu, vishnoianil 17:47:18 2 (5): shague, skitt, rovarga, jamoluhrsen, edwarnicke 17:48:54 #action given the precedent this might set, colindixon to ping the last two TSC members for votes 17:52:39 #topic cookies 17:52:42 #endmeeting