17:02:24 #startmeeting tsc 17:02:24 Meeting started Thu Aug 17 17:02:24 2017 UTC. The chair is colindixon. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 17:02:24 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:02:24 The meeting name has been set to 'tsc' 17:02:26 colindixon: bot didn't talk back 17:02:28 #topic roll call and agenda bashing 17:02:28 ah, slow 17:02:33 TSC members please #info in 17:02:35 #info rovarga 17:02:35 #info skitt 17:02:40 (no, I misspelled 17:02:42 #info colindixon 17:02:48 * colindixon is dialing in, give me two secs 17:03:30 #info Abhijit Kumbhare 17:03:45 #info LuisGomez 17:03:46 #info jamoluhrsen 17:03:55 #info anipbu 17:05:23 #info klou 17:05:53 #undo 17:05:53 Removing item from minutes: 17:06:04 klou: only TSC members #info in 17:06:12 #info Thanh 17:06:21 #info lori 17:06:28 #info Anil Vishnoi 17:06:30 klou: you do not need to #info 17:06:48 #link https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2017/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2017-08-10-17.00.html last week's meeting minutes 17:07:28 #info shague 17:09:14 #action phrobb to pursue the opportunity and keep the TSC up to speed around the December cross-project meet-up 17:09:30 #info CaseyODL started a thread to discuss a December meet-up 17:09:44 #action colindixon to follow up about one last non-responsive security response team member 17:10:08 #info colindixon allowed co-hosts in the Zoom meeting 17:11:11 #info the release engineering team ( zxiiro, anipbu, colindixon, klou ) read this and made sure that it can actually be done during nitrogen branch cutting 17:11:17 #info yangtools oxygen looks okay, I will check downstreams once we release Nitrogen 17:12:07 #action phrobb and/or CaseyODL to figure out if there's a way to find a security manager for ODL 17:12:48 #topic next week's TSC call 17:13:10 #link https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2017&month=8&day=24&hour=3&min=30&sec=0&p1=771&p2=33&p3=248&p4=283&p5=263&p6=37 Next week's TSC meeting is at APAC time 17:13:36 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2017-August/007753.html actively used projects with oversubscribed committers 17:13:57 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2017-August/007798.html Marek Ryznar is now a committer on UNIMgr 17:14:06 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2017-August/007798.html Daniel Malachovsky is now a committer on DLUX 17:14:16 sorry 17:14:30 I would like to encourage people to comment on the commiters thread 17:14:39 * rovarga has a loud environment 17:15:07 Could we get a link to rovarga 17:15:12 's magic doc ? 17:15:16 yeah it's good 17:15:31 +1 17:15:42 and I fixed my poorly-explained commit message ;-) 17:15:51 (the one that's referred to in Robert's doc) 17:16:05 skitt: it was entirely unnecessary :) 17:16:14 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2017-August/007773.html this is rovarga's thread on how to do reviews and how to write commits that are easy to review 17:16:28 rovarga, I know, I just thought it would be nice to improve it 17:16:46 rovarga, I would like everyone to write commit messages like TomP 17:17:23 #info for dhuge commits, it is best to socialize them -- kernel call, TWS, etc. 17:17:45 #topic events 17:17:54 #link https://www.opendaylight.org/global-events 17:17:55 agree rovarga (socialize about large commits) 17:18:11 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Events:Main 17:18:28 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2017-July/007684.html Oxygen DDF, please add topics 17:19:11 #info dfarrell07 asks what hotel to stay at, they're still working on that, in the meantime it's across the street from Hyatt Regency Santa Clara, but we're seeing if we can get a room rate 17:19:35 #action CaseyODL to figure out if there's a hotel for the Oxygen DDF 17:19:35 Embassy Suites by Hilton Santa Clara Silicon Valley 17:19:54 #topic carbon 17:20:06 #info Ideal location for across the street for the DDF Embassy Suites by Hilton Santa Clara Silicon Valley 17:20:11 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Simultaneous_Release/Carbon/SR2/Status <--- We initially targeted Carbon SR2 Release on 8/17, but we currently have a blocker bug in controller clustering. May delay Carbon SR2. 17:20:27 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2017-August/012032.html <--- Patch 61433 is believed to be impacting several projects: netvirt, vtn, etc. 17:20:36 sorry, I have to take this on IRC 17:20:49 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2017-August/012041.html <--- Patch to revert may be fixing the tests 17:21:08 #info the problem with reverting that patch is that it re-introduces a memory leak, which does crash us 17:21:22 #link this is the likely problem patch 17:21:25 #undo 17:21:25 Removing item from minutes: 17:21:51 #info so the plan of record is to get debugs from the netvirt (was it) CSIT 17:21:56 #info find the root cause and fix it 17:22:05 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/61433/ this is the likely problem patch, but rovarga notes that undoing reintroduces a memory leak that does hurt us 17:22:23 shague: skitt: you guys hash out which one is more imprtant :) 17:22:30 rovarga, yes ;-) 17:22:56 #info it is a Carbon -> SR1 regression 17:23:20 #info observed at 18M committed transactions 17:24:12 #info without the patch, ODL stays up long enough to pass CSIT, but crashes at some point in time, with the patch CSIT fails for other reasons 17:24:38 #Info anipbu says that the current plan of record is to find a better solution based on finding the real root cause of problems after the patch 17:24:53 #info we can revert, ship SR2, but we WILL need SR2.1 pretty much right after that 17:25:12 #info tell-based protocol is not affected 17:25:18 #info the default config is 17:25:30 #info tell-based is not quite ready for prime-time in SR1 17:25:43 rovarga: can you use the controller 3node jobs that started failing after the patch went in: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/controller-csit-3node-periodic-benchmark-all-carbon/ 17:25:45 #action colindixon to work with rovarga and skitt to figure out if we should send mail saying Carbon-SR1 has an issue that means you should hold off for SR2 17:26:15 shague: yeah, all they need is a tweak logging to add those debugs ... I don't know how to do that 17:26:26 #topic nitrogen 17:26:40 colindixon: shague: skitt: we really need longevity jobs here ... 17:26:47 rovarga, +1 17:26:51 #link https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/autorelease-release-nitrogen/164 Autorelease Nitrogen in progress 17:27:00 #info klou our last good build was on 7/24, we're trying to a good build 17:27:09 vrpolak, rovarga dont we have a 23h 3node csit job in controller? 17:27:14 shague, rovarga: Yes, I have seen the same symptom there. It seems that low traffic from some unrelated feature is enough to cause trouble in performance tests. 17:27:30 jamoluhrsen: we do, but it is not DS, IIRC 17:27:42 jamoluhrsen: We have, but only of -only- type, and they are not affected. 17:27:44 jamoluhrsen: we could use end-user feature CSIT running over and over again 17:27:59 #Info at least one current issue is that not everyone is on the right odlparent version 17:28:08 jamoluhrsen: i.e. have netvirt repeated for 23 hours :) 17:28:15 rovarga, I have that in the plans for netvirt csit. maybe it needs to bump up in priority 17:28:30 rovarga, yeah. we need it. 17:28:39 #link https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2017-August/012036.html - latest email from tsdr project lead 17:29:10 LuisGomez: colindixon: would it make sense to talk to the user advisory group? 17:29:21 (about tsdr) 17:29:26 yeah 17:31:08 anipbu: colindixon: what about the branch freeze? is it still on? 17:31:26 i can't unmute, but why do we want to keep giving work to everyone else. 17:31:53 #info colindixon suggests maybe seeing if adding them to the autorelease and distribution works, they get one shot at that if there's issues, we'll give up 17:32:02 colindixon: anipbu: this is a prime example of a 'used project, no committers' 17:32:10 rovarga: yeah 17:32:18 the deadline is over, and this will be *work* for someone 17:32:24 colindixon: and, in my opinion, horrible code :) 17:32:34 #info LuisGomez notes that it's hard patch for int/dist because they have lots of features 17:32:58 #info it's not only a lot of features, it is a lot of uncleaned third-party dependencies 17:33:48 #info i.e. high risk of causing issues in compatible-with-all 17:34:10 #info consensus is we need autorelease and int/dist patches by EOD tomorrow, it seems likely that this may not go cleanly 17:34:52 rovarga and there we need early sign on these kind of project, waiting till last time is not a solution 17:34:58 colindixon: we were supposed to do that at RC0 17:35:32 anipbu: it's in the release plan says, as was approved by the TSC 17:35:38 rovarga, vishnoianil: i vote to move on without... it's been plenty of time... can't unmute to speak though :) 17:35:54 jamoluhrsen: yeah… 17:36:19 i think we should add feature in bitrega to generate notification to tsc mailing list based on project activities 17:36:49 #startvote shall the TSC give TSDR until EOD tomorrow (8/18) to get patches for autorelease and int/dist or drop them from nitrogen? drop, abstain, friday 17:36:49 Begin voting on: shall the TSC give TSDR until EOD tomorrow (8/18) to get patches for autorelease and int/dist or drop them from nitrogen? Valid vote options are drop, abstain, friday. 17:36:49 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:36:51 #vote drop 17:36:55 #vote drop 17:36:58 #vote drop 17:36:59 #vote drop 17:37:03 #vote abstain 17:37:08 #vote abstain 17:37:08 #vote drop 17:37:11 #drop 17:37:14 #vote abstain 17:37:14 #vote drop 17:37:15 #vote drop 17:37:18 #vote drop 17:37:22 #vote friday 17:37:27 #endvote 17:37:27 Voted on "shall the TSC give TSDR until EOD tomorrow (8/18) to get patches for autorelease and int/dist or drop them from nitrogen?" Results are 17:37:27 abstain (3): colindixon, lori, edwarnicke 17:37:27 drop (8): rovarga, skitt, anipbu, LuisGomez, shague, jamoluhrsen, zxiiro, vishnoianil 17:37:27 friday (1): abhijitkumbhare 17:38:01 #agreed we will drop TSDR from Nitrogen based on the TSC assessment of risk in adding them back 17:38:07 colindixon: they can come back in SR1, though 17:38:11 I think :) 17:38:37 colindixon: true :) 17:39:00 rovarga colindixon or we can help them to figure out how their user can pull in their bundles from maven in the nitrogen 17:39:10 vishnoianil: +1 17:39:27 anipbu: colindixon: I really feel strongly about RC0 not being an RC without a lockdown 17:39:29 #info we'll lock the nitrogen branch on Monday per the verbal plan, but not the wiki 17:40:10 vote? 17:40:12 colindixon: if we don't in this release, we should commit to doing that in Oxygen 17:40:16 rovarga nitrogen probably we can take exception, given that their is no time between M5 and RC0, but in general i agree with rovarga on it 17:40:24 and not go back on it like we're doing now 17:40:28 as it stands we don't have a successful build anyway. and we can't have an RC until at least something passes 17:40:29 #startvote shall we lock the nitrogen branch now or monday? now, monday 17:40:29 Begin voting on: shall we lock the nitrogen branch now or monday? Valid vote options are now, monday. 17:40:29 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:40:36 #vote now 17:40:39 #vote now 17:40:40 #vote now 17:40:41 #vote monday 17:40:42 #vote monday 17:40:43 #vote monday 17:40:43 #vote monday 17:40:48 #vote monday 17:40:55 #vote monday 17:40:56 #vote monday 17:41:00 #vote monday 17:41:12 but we should explictly mention that it's one time exception we are taking here 17:41:12 #endvote 17:41:12 Voted on "shall we lock the nitrogen branch now or monday?" Results are 17:41:12 now (3): colindixon, rovarga, zxiiro 17:41:12 monday (8): LuisGomez, edwarnicke, shague, lori, abhijitkumbhare, anipbu, vishnoianil, jamoluhrsen 17:41:14 anipbu: we have taken august vacations into account when doing the SR... 17:41:24 the release plan, I mean 17:41:31 given the short release cycle and M5=RC0 17:41:37 #agreed we will lock the nitrogen branch on Monday 17:43:24 #action projects please, please, please review the CLM violations for your M5 (it seems like DLUX might be the source of most of them) 17:43:49 klou: colindixon: the DLUX thing should get better when we get an active committer there (hopefully in this meeting) 17:44:08 #action klou and/or anipbu to follow up with dlux 17:44:13 sorry, missed that :) 17:44:22 #undo 17:44:22 Removing item from minutes: 17:44:58 skitt: colindixon: klou: I think the security team should take the action to track the security issues in DLUX and progress on them 17:45:15 #info it sounds like the dlux issues are false positives and it's OK 17:45:46 #topic system integration and test 17:45:49 jamoluhrsen: 17:45:50 nothing 17:45:56 #info nothing this week 17:45:57 zoom rocks! 17:46:03 #topic infra 17:46:09 jamoluhrsen: what's broken about it? 17:46:12 #Info nothing this week 17:46:24 colindixon, I click the mic with a red line in it and it does not work 17:46:30 #topic committers on int/dist 17:46:34 colindixon: we really should dig into history of int/dist 17:46:41 colindixon: np;) 17:46:45 int/dist for skitt: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/integration-dev/2017-August/010199.html 17:46:53 colindixon: there's one for skitt too 17:46:54 hash vote +1 (or +2) 17:46:55 int/dist for jamoluhrsen and zxiiro https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/integration-dev/2017-August/010191.html 17:46:59 colindixon: if my memory serves, int/dist is special in that it was made by TSC to manage the release vehicles 17:47:02 #link Thanh Ha for Int/Dist (votes) https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/integration-dev/2017-August/010191.html 17:47:04 #vote +1 17:47:09 colindixon: which would mean that it has different governance 17:47:20 rovarga: Not quite 17:47:26 #vote +1 17:47:26 #link Thanh Ha for Int/Dist (changes) https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/owner:thanh.ha%2540linuxfoundation.org+status:merged 17:47:27 colindixon: dfarrell07: like TSC maybe being able to appoint committers 17:47:31 #vote +1 17:47:32 rovarga: it broke out of the old integration project 17:47:40 this is not for the special int/dist committer. just full committer status 17:47:48 #vote +1 17:47:54 colindixon: I think somebody needs to hear the creation review recording :) 17:47:56 #startvote shall the TSC approve Thanh Ha as an int/dist committer? -1,0,+1 17:47:56 Begin voting on: shall the TSC approve Thanh Ha as an int/dist committer? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 17:47:56 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:47:56 I think the vote has not started :) 17:47:59 #vote +1 17:48:00 #vote +! 17:48:00 rovarga: +! is not a valid option. Valid options are -1, 0, +1. 17:48:03 #vote +1 17:48:03 #vote +1 17:48:05 #vote +1 17:48:05 #vote +1 17:48:05 #vote +1 17:48:06 #vote +1 17:48:07 #vote +1 17:48:08 #vote +1 17:48:09 rovarga: You might be overly excited about this vote ;) 17:48:21 edwarnicke: 'shift' timing :) 17:48:48 #endmeeting