17:48:55 #startmeeting tsc 17:48:55 Meeting started Thu Aug 17 17:48:55 2017 UTC. The chair is colindixon. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 17:48:55 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:48:55 The meeting name has been set to 'tsc' 17:49:04 #topic committers on int/dist 17:49:09 #startvote shall the TSC approve Thanh Ha as an int/dist committer? -1,0,+1 17:49:09 Begin voting on: shall the TSC approve Thanh Ha as an int/dist committer? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 17:49:09 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:49:13 #vote +1 17:49:14 #vote +1 17:49:14 #vote +1 17:49:15 #vote +1 17:49:15 #vote +1 17:49:15 #vote +1 17:49:18 rovarga: in chess a good move is indicated by “!" 17:49:21 #vote +1 17:49:22 #vote +1 17:49:24 edwarnicke: I think there was a discussion around there ... but can't be bothered to intsall webex player and spend couple of hours to hunt for the discussion :) 17:49:25 #vote +1 17:49:28 #info rovarga 17:49:29 #vote +1 17:49:36 #endvote 17:49:36 Voted on "shall the TSC approve Thanh Ha as an int/dist committer?" Results are 17:49:36 +1 (10): rovarga, skitt, LuisGomez, edwarnicke, shague, colindixon, lori, abhijitkumbhare, anipbu, vishnoianil 17:49:46 #agreed Thanh Ha is a int/dist committer 17:49:56 abhijitkumbhare: yeah, I'll need to start playing that again :) 17:50:00 #link jamoluhrsen int/dist votes: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/integration-dev/2017-August/010191.html 17:50:12 although I've never been good at gaining tempo :) 17:50:15 #link jamoluhrsen int/dist commits: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/owner:jluhrsen%2540redhat.com+status:merged 17:50:20 rovarga: even better move !! 17:50:29 #startvote shall the TSC approve jamoluhrsen as an int/dist committer? -1,0,+1 17:50:29 Begin voting on: shall the TSC approve jamoluhrsen as an int/dist committer? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 17:50:29 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:50:30 #vote +1 17:50:31 #vote +1 17:50:32 #vote +1 17:50:33 #vote +1 17:50:33 #vote +1 17:50:34 #vote +1 17:50:37 #vote +1 17:50:45 skitt int/dist committer 17:50:51 #vote +1 17:50:59 https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/integration-dev/2017-August/010199.html 17:51:00 skitt: you are gaining a lot of hats :) 17:51:03 #endvote 17:51:03 Voted on "shall the TSC approve jamoluhrsen as an int/dist committer?" Results are 17:51:03 +1 (8): rovarga, skitt, zxiiro, edwarnicke, colindixon, abhijitkumbhare, anipbu, vishnoianil 17:51:14 rovarga, yeah, I need to give up the SNMP hat 17:51:16 #agreed jamoluhrsen is an int/dist committer 17:51:22 https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/integration-dev/2017-August/010197.html 17:51:25 mail thread 17:51:26 rovarga, not as many as you though ;-) 17:51:38 https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/owner:skitt%2540redhat.com+status:merged 17:51:40 #link skitt int/dis committer votes: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/integration-dev/2017-August/010197.html 17:51:41 contributions 17:51:45 skitt: the rate is alarming, I feel threatened :-D 17:51:48 zxiiro: By the way, have you ever officially agreed to become Int/Dist committer? 17:51:53 #link skitt int/dist commits: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/owner:skitt%2540redhat.com+status:merged 17:51:57 rovarga, ROFL 17:51:59 #vote +1 17:52:07 #startvote shall the TSC approve skitt as a committer on int/dist? -1,0,+1 17:52:07 Begin voting on: shall the TSC approve skitt as a committer on int/dist? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 17:52:07 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:52:09 #vote +1 17:52:09 #vote +1 17:52:10 #vote +1 17:52:10 #vote +1 17:52:10 #vote +1 17:52:11 #vote +1 17:52:11 #vote +1 17:52:16 #vote +1 17:52:28 #endvote 17:52:28 Voted on "shall the TSC approve skitt as a committer on int/dist?" Results are 17:52:28 +1 (8): rovarga, zxiiro, edwarnicke, shague, colindixon, abhijitkumbhare, anipbu, jamoluhrsen 17:52:36 #agree skitt is now an int/dist committer 17:52:41 By 2.5 as Ed has stepped down. 17:52:54 Elections... 17:53:02 LOL 17:53:11 #topic odlparent version bumping 17:53:13 wow we closed teh vote in 19 seconds ;) 17:53:56 colindixon: actually we made it a SR requirement 17:54:13 rovarga: no, we explictly didn't as far as I recall 17:54:14 dfarrell07: colindixon: I would be okay if it was fully automated 17:54:15 you can opt out 17:54:35 #info anipbu asks is we can let projects opt-in to auto version bumping for things like odlparent 17:54:38 (i.e. it is a robot proposing the patches :-D) 17:54:49 rovarga, I’ll publish my script somewhere 17:54:53 ;-) 17:55:05 someone still needs to clickc the submit button 17:55:35 colindixon: fair enough, my faith in my memory is rapidly dropping these days :) 17:57:00 colindixon: anipbu: yes, projects can opt in. strictly speaking we should have a committer vote 17:57:29 #info colindixon says it's certainly OK for projects to opt into this, but it's less clear for whether the prior offer of opt-out applies 17:57:31 colindixon: anipbu: but since each project pretty much has its own governance, PTL's word usually works well enough 17:58:08 * rovarga hears a lot about autorelease 17:58:29 should we socialize the idea of projects dropping out of autorelease? 17:58:32 :) 17:59:03 skitt: yes. as soon as Nitrogen is released, we are dropping out of autorelease 17:59:08 #info as rovarga notes, probably this technically requires a vote a committers, but in general the PTL saying yes and letting committers object later shoudl be fine 17:59:13 skitt: I almost submitted the patch today :) 17:59:58 #action CaseyODL to send mail about elections and/or make sure it's on next week's TSC agenda 18:00:06 skitt: sorry to rain on your parade, but I think there is a lurking problem with ranges in dependencies and compilations ... we will need to discuss it at DDF or a TWS 18:00:06 CaseyODL: unless you need it to be now 18:00:20 rovarga, yeah no doubt 18:00:30 rovarga, but it helps with remerges at least 18:00:34 so anipbu can/should start collecting opt-ins 18:00:38 skitt: i.e. maven-bundle-plugin deriving the *minimum* version 18:00:40 rovarga, possibly with a constrained repo 18:00:51 It doesn't need to be now. Just wanted to let everyone know that there will be a round of elections coming for the TSC, CAL, and TSC Chair. 18:01:05 CaseyODL, that's November, isn't it? 18:01:31 #topic cookies 18:01:56 dfarrell07: Has a strong tendency to believe dfarrell07 when he says things about elections... ;) 18:02:11 edwarnicke +1 ;) 18:02:11 edwarnicke: :-D 18:02:20 rovarga, let's add that for the Oxygen DDF 18:02:25 edwarnicke: I heard you lost a game of governance sparing :) 18:02:29 rovarga, I'll run some experiments in the mean-time 18:02:51 skitt: definitely a topic for odlparent planning or offset-0 BoF 18:02:58 rovarga, yup 18:02:59 rovarga: LOL... governance is always a collaborative effort ;) 18:03:08 skitt: btw. do you want to co-run the BoF? 18:03:27 rovarga, heh, that would be cool 18:03:30 #action colindixon to look at the board approval of the election periods for TSC members and send a mail 18:03:41 rovarga, I was planning on merging the odlparent planning session with that 18:03:46 rovarga, if you don't mind 18:04:00 rovarga, as in, not having a separate odlparent planning session 18:04:06 skitt: no problem ... except it may be a lot of topics 18:04:13 skitt: we'll play it by the ear 18:04:17 rovarga, yes indeed 18:04:27 #endmeeting