17:00:13 #startmeeting tsc 17:00:13 Meeting started Thu Dec 13 17:00:13 2018 UTC. The chair is dfarrell07. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 17:00:13 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:13 The meeting name has been set to 'tsc' 17:00:25 XiongQuan: sorry, can you do that again? 17:00:35 #info TSC members please #info in 17:02:26 #info abhijitk 17:03:14 #info Anil Vishnoi 17:03:22 #project openflowplugin 17:03:23 #info jmorvay 17:03:29 #info premsankar 17:03:30 #project netconf 17:03:36 #project coe 17:03:36 #info Thanh Ha 17:03:48 #info vorburger 17:03:53 #project neutron 17:03:54 #info abelur 17:04:08 #info jamoluhrsen 17:04:10 #project infrautils genius archetypes odlparent controller serviceutils 17:04:13 #info XiongQuan 17:04:16 #info shague via jamoluhrsen proxy 17:04:31 #info LuisGomez 17:04:48 #chair abhijitk 17:04:48 Current chairs: abhijitk dfarrell07 17:05:04 #topic TSC Chair Elections 17:05:11 #chair skitt rovarga_ premsankar LuisGomez vorburger jamoluhrsen 17:05:11 Current chairs: LuisGomez abhijitk dfarrell07 jamoluhrsen premsankar rovarga_ skitt vorburger 17:05:18 #info Reminder to vote 17:05:21 #info faseelak 17:05:35 #project genius serviceutils infrautils coe odltools 17:05:49 #info 9 of 13 TSC members have voted, go vote! 17:05:53 #project distribution 17:06:11 #topic DetNet Project Proposal 17:06:17 #project lispflowmapping 17:06:32 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:DetNet_Plugin 17:06:54 #topic project propsal netdev plugin 17:07:07 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Project_Proposals:DetNet_Plugin proposal wiki 17:07:18 #info proposal has been up on the mailing list for more than two weeks 17:08:30 #info this is a IETF proposal, with implementation in ODL 17:09:05 #info basic idea seems to be around deterministic flows with some guarantees for flows 17:12:55 #info so for example might reserve data plane routes that don't change, or are aggregated 17:14:08 you can go ahead :) 17:14:17 Prem will write here and we can address at end 17:14:35 XiongQuan: What would be the southbound protocol to talk with the devices? 17:15:34 #info seems like this project will be fairly large, will have many components inside of it, see diagram 17:17:08 #info so for example seems like will have topo manager inside this project, as well as some sb protocol, and will also have e2e managing service that does thinks like handle bandwidth guarantees 17:17:58 #info project will make use of ODL components like mdsal, netconf, restconf 17:18:17 #info so prem's question about what SBs project will use to manged devices is 'netconf' 17:18:49 #info dfarrell07 thinks this is exceptionally well thought-out proposal, very good details on the wiki 17:19:52 dfarrell07: Looks like they also use the PCE and BGP-LS 17:20:06 premsankar: say it in the minutes please :) 17:20:19 * dfarrell07 is struggling to parse and make good minutes 17:20:26 #info Looks like they also use the PCE and BGP-LS 17:22:13 #info BGP-LS and PCE will be reused, they will use existing ODL projects 17:23:19 #info this seems like a very clear example of why ODL as a platform is useful - new research idea doesn't have to re-invent much, is reusing huge chunks of ODL 17:23:52 #info there are IETF docs about detailed usecases, but tldr seems to be "5G" 17:24:55 #info there are 5 initial committers, which is a nice number, enough for robustness but not absurd-many 17:26:13 #info all committers are from ZTE, but seems like they are working with other folks through IETF 17:27:12 #info prem asks how CSIT would work, if they need real devices 17:27:53 #info seems like they will use software emulation for tests initially and have some ideas about real devices later 17:29:42 #startvote Shall the TSC approve DetNet Plugin as a Self-Managed project in Incubation state? -1,0,+1 17:29:42 Begin voting on: Shall the TSC approve DetNet Plugin as a Self-Managed project in Incubation state? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 17:29:42 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:30:15 #vote +1 17:30:16 #vote +1 17:30:16 #vote +1 17:30:18 #vote +1 17:30:20 #vote +1 17:30:21 #vote +1 (for shague) 17:30:21 jamoluhrsen: +1 (for shague) is not a valid option. Valid options are -1, 0, +1. 17:30:27 #vote +1 17:30:30 #vote +1 17:30:34 #vote +1 17:30:39 8 17:30:42 #vote +1 17:30:42 that carries 17:30:46 9 17:30:56 #endvote 17:30:56 Voted on "Shall the TSC approve DetNet Plugin as a Self-Managed project in Incubation state?" Results are 17:30:56 +1 (8): vorburger, LuisGomez, faseelak, premsankar, jamoluhrsen, zxiiro, abhijitk, abelur 17:31:24 #agreed OpenDaylight TSC approves DetNet Plugin as a Self-Managed project in Incubation state 17:32:31 #info please reach out to helpdesk@opendaylight.org to add committers, get repos 17:33:36 #info they want to join for Neon, which is fine but they don't have much time 17:33:49 #undo 17:33:49 Removing item from minutes: 17:34:01 #info they want to join the release after Neon, not Neon, so lots of time 17:34:21 #info since they are self-managed they can join the relase however they like, reach out to LuisGomez for help 17:34:25 #topic Super committer Discussion 17:34:58 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/77837/ Proposal for the super committer 17:35:55 #info idea is to put more process around who can be a super committer for releng activities like bumping versions 17:36:04 #info that woud allow non-LF-admins to do this work 17:36:17 #info there are detailed docs on exactly when this power can be turned on 17:36:27 #startvote Shall OpenDaylight have an official TSC Managed super committer list? -1,0,+1 17:36:27 Begin voting on: Shall OpenDaylight have an official TSC Managed super committer list? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 17:36:27 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 17:36:38 #info and there are detaile docs about tthe limits of when this can be used, for what 17:36:52 #vote +1 17:36:54 #vote +1 17:36:55 #info the detailed docs also have a list of initial super committers 17:36:55 #vote +1 17:36:56 #vote +1 17:36:58 #vote +1 17:36:59 #vote +1 17:37:01 #vote +1 17:37:01 #vote +1 17:37:11 8 17:37:15 #vote 0 17:37:20 I don't know how to officially vote for shague? 17:37:29 #vote +1 17:37:40 #endvote 17:37:40 Voted on "Shall OpenDaylight have an official TSC Managed super committer list?" Results are 17:37:40 0 (1): vishnoianil 17:37:40 +1 (9): vorburger, LuisGomez, dfarrell07, faseelak, premsankar, jamoluhrsen, zxiiro, abhijitk, abelur 17:37:50 #info dfarrell07 vote was for sam hague 17:38:19 #topic Fluorine DDF Retrospective Follow-up 17:38:31 #undo 17:38:31 Removing item from minutes: 17:38:38 #agreed the TSC approves super-committer process as doc here 17:38:53 #undo 17:38:53 Removing item from minutes: 17:38:56 #agreed the TSC approves super-committer process as doc here https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/77837/ 17:39:33 #topic Governing Board Meeting Update 17:40:44 Fluorine Retrospective https://docs.google.com/document/d/16ssjcNRzP_uQr1HMZCkb_lc8gLeYNfqrGAI6XEw9Gko/edit# 17:44:05 #info We gave ODL update to Board, they like idea ot onboard new devs to kernel projects by trading training for support, might get help 17:44:41 #info We gave proposal on direct project representation to board, also well received 17:46:13 #info TF TAC vote is ongoing, dfarrell07 voted against because: 1. TF is single-vendor dominated and unhealthy in a variety if ways related to that; dfarrell07 thinks unlikely to be fixable 2. they are taking a pretty huge chunk of money from existing projects 17:46:56 #info there are a few very vocal supporting companies that have voted +1 and a ton of company reps who don't seem to really be paying attention but just vote +1 because it's easy/friendly 17:47:31 #info there are a fair number of people who haven't voted because don't want company to look bad, but have told dfarrell07 off-list they disapprove 17:48:15 #info Board vote hasn't happened yet, but dfarrell07 suspects will pass for same reason TAC vote will pass - lots of companies that aren't paying enough attention to know better 17:49:01 #info dfarrell07 was wrong on the vocal update about this passing already, thanks for correction phrobb/CaseyLF, notes above are right 17:50:13 #info Fluorine Retrospective 17:50:16 #undo 17:50:16 Removing item from minutes: 17:50:18 dfarrell07: is the update done? 17:50:22 #topic Fluorine Retrospective 17:50:36 #link Fluorine Retrospective https://docs.google.com/document/d/16ssjcNRzP_uQr1HMZCkb_lc8gLeYNfqrGAI6XEw9Gko 17:50:37 thx dfarrell07 17:50:42 abhijitk: np :) 17:57:39 #info lots of discussion about infra but dfarrell07 fails to take minutes 18:01:19 #vote Meeting next week? -1,0,+1 18:01:24 #vote +1 18:01:25 #startvote Meeting next week? -1,0,+1 18:01:25 Begin voting on: Meeting next week? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 18:01:25 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 18:01:28 #vote +1 18:01:36 #vote 0 18:01:45 #vote 0 18:01:49 #vote 0 18:01:54 #vote 0 18:01:54 #vote 0 18:02:02 #vote 0 18:02:03 #vote 0 18:02:22 #vote 0 18:03:23 #endvote 18:03:23 Voted on "Meeting next week?" Results are 18:03:23 0 (8): LuisGomez, dfarrell07, arieladam, abhijitk, premsankar, zxiiro, CaseyLF, abelur 18:03:23 +1 (1): jamoluhrsen 18:03:43 #info we mostly don't care if meeting but CaseyLF talks us out of it at last moment 18:03:51 #info so no meeting next week 18:04:00 #info do things over email and respond 18:04:04 #topic cookies 18:04:07 #endmeeting