15:02:48 #startmeeting neutron_northbound 15:02:48 Meeting started Fri Apr 3 15:02:48 2015 UTC. The chair is regXboi. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 15:02:48 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:02:48 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_northbound' 15:02:56 #chair regXboi edwarnicke 15:02:56 Current chairs: edwarnicke regXboi 15:03:07 #info edwarnicke 15:03:16 #link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/NeutronNorthbound:Meetings#Agenda_for_Next_Meeting_.284.2F3.29 agenda 15:03:21 #info regXboi 15:03:27 others who are here, please info in 15:03:40 #topic roll call + agenda bashing 15:04:04 I've made no progress on #1 15:04:05 so 15:04:08 #action regXboi to put together integration patch (with resource help from dfarrell07|sick) for REST unmarshalling testing of odl-neutron-service with dummy provider. 15:04:21 edwarnicke: have you looked at the documentation patch? 15:04:22 regXboi: many thanks 15:04:44 if not 15:04:44 I thought I +1 ed it 15:04:50 cool 15:05:06 let me check it 15:05:18 yeah you did 15:05:19 so 15:05:44 #action edwarnicke, flaviof to review current doc patch 15:05:56 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/16340/ 15:05:59 #undo 15:05:59 Removing item from minutes: 15:06:09 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/16340/ current documentation patch 15:06:15 action item 3 is done 15:06:17 yea! 15:06:32 #info action items 3 and 4 are done 15:06:46 #info action item 5 is done 15:07:01 Doc patch reviewed 15:07:14 #action flaviof to work karaf system test for merge, integration, and RC events 15:07:21 #info kkoushik 15:07:24 #info action item 7 is ongoing ... so 15:07:34 #action Shreshtha_ to put together junit testing for some apis this week 15:07:42 Hi All, 15:07:51 #info action item 8 is going to be deferred to after lithium 15:08:00 so we are putting it aside 15:08:09 and I didn't do action item 9, so 15:08:17 #action regXboi to float mini-hackathon trial balloon to mailing list 15:08:31 well we got rid of 3 of the 9 15:08:35 I guess that's something 15:08:41 #topic M4 status 15:08:46 Me and Shreshtha have submitted patches of the Junit tests for the LoadBalancer, Routers, Security, Port and meters 15:08:59 #info M4 deadline was 4/2 and we are currently yellow 15:09:12 Bhavesh_: Many thanks :) 15:09:23 Bhavesh: yes, we've been reviewing/merging them - many thanks! 15:09:32 #info API freeze is done 15:09:33 Thank you :) 15:09:54 #info documentaiton is 50% done - we need how to write the yang model side 15:10:12 #info Maven Central requirements are done - that patch got merged this morning 15:10:21 #info integration and system test is the big mess 15:10:53 #info current ETA reported for I&ST is 4/10, but regXboi doesn't have much confidence 15:11:13 edwarnicke: any thoughts/insights/hopes? 15:11:31 Hmm 15:12:11 I can't think of anything to meet this other than what I need to do with action item #1 15:12:27 Can we break it down into pieces folks could pick up? 15:12:30 figure out the darn karaf setup/test process and hook it to jjb and declare victory 15:12:54 regXboi: ah... That piece 15:13:01 So... Let me find the patch 15:13:04 edwarnicke: yeah 15:13:17 I got much of that figured out 15:13:38 And then shague_ took it either to the finish line or damn close 15:14:03 ah, if we have a pattern to run with, then I think that would help mightily 15:15:03 https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/17599/ 15:15:28 Me and the team are going to submit more patches on Junit JAXB in the coming week 15:15:39 Bhavesh_: :) 15:16:00 thanks, Bhavesh_ 15:16:08 If we can contribute more in any area, then please let us know 15:16:39 regXboi: do we have a feature for the dummy provider? 15:16:47 #link https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/17599/ patch to act as pattern for karaf testing 15:16:57 edwarnicke: I *think* so, but I'm not 100% sure 15:17:12 Ok 15:17:35 edwarnicke: I stand corrected, we do not 15:17:43 Ack 15:17:56 can I action you for that? 15:18:23 Sure :) 15:18:38 #action edwarnicke to add karaf feature for dummy provider 15:18:54 #action regXboi to look at karaf testing pattern link 15:19:06 then I think we are ready to move to the next topic 15:19:07 which is 15:19:18 #topic M5 15:19:40 we need to fill in the NB pieces that currently return 501 15:19:50 * edwarnicke feels like the milestones never end 15:19:59 and the transcriber needs code for the yang model 15:20:04 Do we have a list? 15:20:13 list how? 15:20:23 you mean list of what we need to do or list of NB pieces that return 501? 15:20:24 Of the 501 15:20:36 oh... I can generate one pronto 15:21:09 Cool 15:21:20 Could be broken down and worked that way :) 15:21:45 NeutronMeteringLabelsNorthbound.java, NeutronVPNIKEPoliciesNorthbound.java, NeutronVPNIPSECSiteConnectionsNorthbound.java, NeutronVPNServicesNorthbound.java, 15:21:56 NeutronVPNIPSECPoliciesNorthbound.java, and NeutronMeteringLabelRulesNorthbound.java 15:22:03 so six classes 15:22:18 * regXboi just remembered dummy provider needs those classes added too 15:22:55 #action regXboi to extend dummy provider to cover new aware interfaces that were added to meet M4 15:23:12 anybody want to work on filling in those Northbound classes? 15:23:27 or work on the transcriber writing to the YANG models? 15:24:58 #info northbound classes that need filling in are NeutronMeteringLabelsNorthbound.java, NeutronVPNIKEPoliciesNorthbound.java, NeutronVPNIPSECSiteConnectionsNorthbound.java, NeutronVPNServicesNorthbound.java,NeutronVPNIPSECPoliciesNorthbound.java, and NeutronMeteringLabelRulesNorthbound.java 15:25:17 #info transcriber needs to write to the yang models 15:25:40 #info volunteers can either step up on the mailing list or (better yet) push code 15:26:12 #info For M5 the stability branch will need to be cut, but we'll table that for a couple of weeks - do that at the last minute 15:26:18 #undo 15:26:18 Removing item from minutes: 15:26:31 actually, edwarnicke, do you agree with that idea? 15:26:38 "For M5 the stability branch will need to be cut, but we'll table that for a couple of weeks - do that at the last minute" 15:26:40 ? 15:27:02 Yes 15:27:51 #agreed For M5 the stability branch will need to be cut, but we'll table that for a couple of weeks - do that at the last minute 15:28:16 we need to freeze strings, but somehow, I don't think that will be a problem 15:28:29 we'll need to complete documentation :/ 15:28:53 and we'll need to have a system test for each user-facing feature (do we have more than 1)? 15:29:12 but we'll talk about them more next week or on the mailing list 15:29:29 and so .... 15:29:35 #topic open discussion 15:29:50 opening the floor to any and all - have we missed any blind spots? 15:30:49 We are looking to contribute more ... 15:31:24 Bhavesh_: are you folks comfortable with setting up the karaf related testing? 15:31:29 If you have anything for us, then please let us know 15:31:41 Yes, we are pretty comfortable 15:32:42 ok, then I'll pass you my action item on that patch 15:33:06 regXboi: Yeah sure. 15:33:08 we need to basically set up a system that loads the NN karaf feature and the NN dummy provider karaf feature 15:33:18 and push REST in on the input side 15:33:30 and verify that the dummy provider sees the correct object on the output side 15:34:01 that will tell us that the NB->transcriber->*Aware path works 15:34:53 Bhavesh_: Thank you *so* much for all you have done and are willing to do 15:35:07 #action rather than roll back to the previous action Bhavesh_ and co will take up the karaf testing items 15:35:13 Bhavesh_: A big part of my questions like 'Can we break this down into small pieces' was hoping you guys would be willing to help more :) 15:35:24 Bhavesh_: yes thank you SO much 15:35:38 Bhavesh_: Ping me if you get stuck on the karaf testing stuff 15:35:44 Bhavesh_: I can talk you through a lot of it 15:36:01 edwarnicke: Thank you for youe support 15:36:13 anything else? 15:36:17 Bhavesh_: question... any interest in doing the feature for the test-dummy (its a nice small piece of work that's helpful for learning about karaf features ;) ) 15:37:17 edwarnicke: Need to know about it more.. I and the team can pickup 15:37:27 Bhavesh_: Sure 15:37:30 Bhavesh_: So the idea is this 15:37:43 Bhavesh_: In order to be able to do basic testing of the neutron service 15:38:00 Bhavesh_: We need a 'dummy-feature' that doesn't really do anything except claim it can service any request 15:38:32 the java code for that already exists 15:38:41 Bhavesh_: The reason we need this is because the neutron service will respond with an error if there is no provider to provider something (which is correct, but makes testing the neutron service itself hard) 15:38:51 Bhavesh_: Yep, regXboi wrote it :) 15:39:10 Bhavesh_: So we just need a feature for that dummy-provider, so you can start up karaf and install it 15:39:41 So, basically I need to develop a dummy-feature 15:39:42 Bhavesh_: Do you know about karaf features and feature repos? 15:39:47 Bhavesh_: Yep :) 15:40:07 edwarnicke: Yes, I knoe about the karaf features 15:40:14 Bhavesh_: But note: by feature here I just mean the xml in a karaf feature repo such that it can be loaded in karaf :) 15:40:18 Bhavesh_: Cool 15:40:25 Bhavesh_: Do you know about feature *repos* ? 15:40:45 hey - can I end the meeting? 15:40:53 you can continue this topic :) 15:41:16 * regXboi needs to go argue about syslog and threads with some code 15:41:29 edwarnicke: not much 15:41:56 Bhavesh_: so if you look at a features.xml file, that's basically a feature 'repo' as far as karaf is concerned 15:42:02 Bhavesh_: Its just a collection of feature stuff 15:42:09 ok... 15:42:27 #topic no ending topic today 15:42:29 Bhavesh_: The reason I mention it, is that we *probably* don't want to publish the test-dummy in the same repo as our *actual* features, lest it confuse production consumers 15:42:31 #endmeeting