15:16:05 #startmeeting weekly meeting 15:16:05 Meeting started Mon Jul 23 15:16:05 2018 UTC. The chair is mpeterson. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html. 15:16:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:16:05 The meeting name has been set to 'weekly_meeting' 15:16:16 #topic Agenda 15:16:21 what do we have for today? 15:16:28 #info SBI 15:16:35 #info L3 15:16:55 anything else? 15:17:11 manjeets, poothia___, shague ? 15:17:21 CI ? 15:17:26 #info CI 15:17:52 okey, if you have any other let me know and we'll add it 15:18:04 oh one more 15:18:24 #info removal of fullstack and useless tests 15:18:30 #topic SBI 15:18:49 okey, we wanted to try to get this in for rocky 15:19:01 but I don't think this will happen at the current pace 15:19:28 the freeze is REALLY soon 15:19:59 and the most important patch would be the first one, as it has the DB migrations and thus is not a backport candidate 15:20:13 can we put an effort in merging that at least? 15:20:45 i'll take a look at it today or tomorrow 15:20:47 NOTE: it's missing the migrations now that I say that out loud... I'll add them tomorrow... 15:20:50 but please review the code 15:21:08 because if we have that, perhaps the driver v3 could be backported once done 15:21:15 as it shouldn't have any migrations at all 15:21:27 manjeets: thanks! 15:21:47 #action all to review SBI before the freeze! 15:21:53 #info L3 15:22:02 same for this, we want this before the freeze 15:22:13 that one already has my +2 15:22:29 we need mike's review there 15:22:37 so mkolesni should review and approve as soon as he is back from his sick leave 15:22:44 he's got a virus or something 15:23:02 if not, worst case scenario we'll +W anyways 15:23:11 manjeets: I do have a question though 15:23:23 manjeets, suure 15:23:32 do you think the patches on neutron that allow this to work could be backported in the future? 15:23:51 because this is supposed to fix L3 in a better way than the current fixes 15:24:04 so we could ditch the old L3 and replace with L3 flavors 15:24:05 mpeterson, all the patches in neutron and neutron-lib are already merged 15:24:19 which were required for this to work 15:24:28 manjeets: right, but if we would want to backport queens for instance 15:25:06 as not everyone that uses OS will rush to use rocky once it's out 15:25:13 manjeets, couple of bug fixes were backported, but we added callback priority mechanism which I doubt can be backported 15:25:31 manjeets: that's what I thought :/ 15:25:46 manjeets: that's a pitty 15:25:55 mpeterson, I won't recommend backporting a new driver tbh 15:26:41 manjeets: yeah, but if it's the only solution for bugs that might arise then perhaps it's the last resort 15:26:52 manjeets: we'll cross that bridge when and if it presents 15:27:34 okey, ready to continue to the next topic, manjeets ? 15:27:46 mpeterson, neutron i guess only need one backport of patch, callback mechanism was added to neutron-lib, so using that version of lib with backported to neuton in worst case ? 15:28:17 manjeets: yeah, I guess we need to analyse feasability 15:28:46 manjeets: let's move on 15:28:49 anyway i'll create a list of patches that were done in neutron-lib and neutron and send it to you 15:28:50 #topic CI 15:28:56 manjeets: awesome! thanks! 15:29:26 #action manjeets (for the previous topic) to create a list of patches needed for in neutron(-lib) for L3 flavors 15:29:33 okey, CI 15:29:38 stable/queens is fixed 15:29:43 manjeets: thanks for that 15:30:33 openstack/requirements merged a patch which broke everything (required zuulv3) when we got close to getting zuul v3 in queens team reverted that patch 15:30:53 so minor fixes to mkolesni's existing patch made it pass 15:31:02 awesome 15:31:46 do you reckon the same would apply to pike as well? do we even care about pike? 15:31:49 :) 15:32:30 mpeterson, I have to look into reason for pike failure, if it is just nexus odl url failure then it could fix pike as well 15:33:00 wait someone cherrypicked it to pike 15:33:15 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/584872/ 15:33:42 but it is still failing 15:33:44 manjeets: and it's -1 :) 15:33:56 manjeets: I wouldn't put an effort to fix it now TBH 15:34:04 manjeets: we have more pressing matters 15:34:22 yea stable/pike is the lowest priority 15:35:21 manjeets: great 15:35:22 manjeets, looked at logs seems like url is still the issue, since there's difference b/w queens ci and pike ci job definition so just cherrypick may not work 15:35:27 need some extra tweaking 15:35:58 mpeterson, ^^ 15:36:06 just a FYI, your local tox environments are probably broken and require https://review.openstack.org/#/c/584791/ 15:36:51 manjeets: support for it will be dropped once rocky is released so let's not wait a second on it 15:37:16 manjeets, beta versions are allowed in requirements or lower-constraints.txt ? 15:37:18 manjeets: at least not now, now let's focus on the FF for SBI and L3 15:37:40 mpeterson, why I am referring myself, sorry the m + tab is messing it 15:37:41 manjeets: the requirements job didn't complain 15:37:51 manjeets: yeah, don't worry 15:38:06 ohk, i'll look at it 15:38:42 manjeets: and if they don't want beta versions then they should change the job ;) 15:38:53 manjeets: other projects also merged beta versions anyways 15:39:21 manjeets: I actually tried 13.0.0 but pip ignores beta versions unless it is actually a beta in the requirements 15:39:23 mpeterson, fair enough ! assuming requirements jobs should complain if that's not allowed 15:40:11 manjeets: okey, I think that covers CI and related 15:40:39 mpeterson, whats the situation with fullstack ? 15:40:49 #topic removal of fullstack and other useless tests 15:41:08 manjeets: fullstack we'd love to remove the job and the code associated with it 15:41:21 manjeets: as we talked in the previous meeting, IDK if you had time to review it's code 15:41:24 *its 15:41:57 oh yes, I totally forgot, I've added a reminder to review it this week 15:42:28 manjeets: thanks, I appreciate it 15:42:43 manjeets: and please review the patch from mike to narrow down tempest 15:42:58 manjeets: which I think it's quite a useful patch 15:43:02 mpeterson, sure ! 15:43:26 manjeets: with it tempest is way more stable and we could consider enabling it 15:43:38 that's the end of it 15:43:43 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/582176/ ? 15:43:53 manjeets: correct 15:44:27 any other topics to discuss? if not I'll give you 15' of your life so you can go and review review and review :) 15:45:00 mpeterson, i have a question its also disabling api.network tests ? 15:45:14 api.network is relevant to ODL right ? 15:46:34 manjeets: we would need to check.. you could comment that 15:47:09 manjeets: although what I think he did is run tempest with ODL off and the tests that passed anyways were removed from the test list 15:47:38 manjeets: so it could be that those tests are only testing the neutron api and not the interaction with ODL 15:47:47 I just asked over patch, will wait for his reply to +w 15:48:12 manjeets: I think it's a good way to go 15:48:18 okey, guys 15:48:23 thanks a lot for your participation 15:48:27 I think we can call it a day 15:48:34 thank you mpeterson :) 15:48:36 go review! (or drink a coffee) 15:48:45 #endmeeting