#opendaylight-nic: Be Planning

Meeting summary

1. 1. adetalhouet (adetalhouet, 17:03:59)
   2. dbainrbri (dbainbri, 17:04:00)
   3. Hideyuki (hideyuki, 17:04:10)
   4. fongalt_ (fongalt__, 17:05:06)
   5. renato_aguiar (renato_aguiar, 17:05:31)
   6. raphaelamorim_ (raphael, 17:05:57)
   7. raphaelamorim (raphaelamorim, 17:07:50)
   8. dbainbri thinks that intent is a DSL on top of some core abstraction in ODL that drives a desired network state (continuously) (dbainbri, 17:08:42)
   9. raphael asks where conflict resolution happens (dbainbri, 17:10:00)
   10. raphael asks who compiles to the core abstraction (dbainbri, 17:10:16)
   11. VTN not only provisions the network, but also monitors the changes in the network and reacts to those changes to continuous ensure that the desired network state specified via VTN is maintained (dbainbri, 17:28:38)
   12. discussion about continuing to follow the current implementation where intent can support multiple renderes and not render to a specific model. (dbainbri, 17:44:19)
   13. discussion about the value in collaborating with GBP in terms of the end point registry (dbainbri, 17:44:53)
   14. need to make the high level intent language better (dbainbri, 17:46:51)
   15. need to make renderers better (dbainbri, 17:47:08)
   16. need to work on the end point resolution (dbainbri, 17:47:16)
   17. discussion about focusing on the core language of intent (dbainbri, 17:49:07)

Action items

1. (none)

People present (lines said)

1. dbainbri (13)
2. odl_meetbot (3)
3. raphaelamorim (1)
4. renato_aguiar (1)
5. adetalhouet (1)
6. fongalt__ (1)
7. raphael (1)
8. hideyuki (1)