====================== #opendaylight-nic: NIC ====================== Meeting started by adetalhouet at 15:01:12 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-nic/2015/nic/opendaylight-nic-nic.2015-09-04-15.01.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * gzhao (gzhao, 15:02:39) * M2 Status / Release Planning (adetalhouet, 15:02:47) * Initial planning is done (adetalhouet, 15:03:18) * Now we have 2 millstones to accomplish the features (adetalhouet, 15:03:34) * LINK: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/nic-dev/2015-September/000878.html (raphaelamorim_, 15:05:12) * LINK: release plan https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/NIC:Beryllium:Release_Plan (adetalhouet, 15:06:29) * renato_aguiar (renato_aguiar, 15:07:41) * Community goals for NIC (adetalhouet, 15:09:53) * reviewing the trello board (adetalhouet, 15:12:01) * OF Renderer is almost done, a few review to address (adetalhouet, 15:12:13) * Lot of items in the backlogs, please pick one and start working on it :) (adetalhouet, 15:13:35) * dlenrow added 2 proposed goals on the Main page (adetalhouet, 15:14:55) * dlenrow hope we can plan work on those 2 goals (adetalhouet, 15:16:20) * Are we agree with the proposed goals? (adetalhouet, 15:16:49) * 1st goal: Solve the problem of resource contention between disparate ODL apps/services (adetalhouet, 15:17:07) * mlemay asking how it does fit with the extension of OFP, ... (adetalhouet, 15:18:10) * ACTION: mlemay to send thread on discussions around this (adetalhouet, 15:18:42) * Should we solve multiple writer in NIC? (adetalhouet, 15:19:17) * mlemay say it might be an issue (adetalhouet, 15:19:26) * Let's have a conversation around the layers where the conflict could happen (adetalhouet, 15:20:33) * dlenrow says NIC is the common arbitration layer (adetalhouet, 15:22:12) * 2nd goal: Provide a controller based, performant, easy to deploy (adetalhouet, 15:22:51) * make the netvirt implementation coexist between the various SDN services (adetalhouet, 15:23:34) * dlenrow would like NIC to do what NN does conceptually to handle better OpenStack (adetalhouet, 15:24:54) * colindixon said, "I think that no matter how much we feel like everyone should go through NIC, there will be people who don't and they *will* solve their conflicts in some way at a lower layer." (helenchen, 15:25:11) * mlemay mentioned that there is a lot of discussion around rewriting the plugin for OpenStack (adetalhouet, 15:26:55) * gzhao asks if we're going to maintain Boulder? (adetalhouet, 15:27:45) * dlenrow says it's a use case the world would be really interested in (adetalhouet, 15:28:00) * raphaelamorim says that this is one of the BE deliverable (adetalhouet, 15:28:37) * we need folks to invest time in its implementation (adetalhouet, 15:29:02) * Boulder could help to make people being engaged in ODL-NIC (adetalhouet, 15:29:59) * mlemay says that Boulder allow you to script the Intent (adetalhouet, 15:30:21) * mlemay says Boulder is a scripting layer on top of NIC (adetalhouet, 15:30:45) * raphaelamorim says this allow for SDN controller to have a common NB interface (adetalhouet, 15:32:10) * ACTION: start the discussion on the ML (adetalhouet, 15:33:43) * raphaelamorim says the 2 goals presented by dlenrow are in accordance with the current release planning (adetalhouet, 15:34:44) * dlenrow says those 2 goals are the based principles of NIC project, and this is normal to address them (adetalhouet, 15:35:51) * raphaelamorim says that even in the Neutron community, they are ready to discuss about skipping the NB interface and going directly into MD-SAL (adetalhouet, 15:36:25) * ACTION: raphaelamorim to provide pointers about that (adetalhouet, 15:38:19) * gvrangan_ says this is pretty much abstract and would like us to discuss around this (adetalhouet, 15:39:09) * dlenrow says that we will discuss the design as a community (adetalhouet, 15:39:27) * raphaelamorim mentioned that there are also bunch of stuff that need to be done to maintain the Intent, how they are manage, resolve, .. (adetalhouet, 15:40:49) * raphaelamorim says that it would be nice to have tasks that add value to both NIC and surrounding project (adetalhouet, 15:41:46) * raphaelamorim referring to the 2nd goals (adetalhouet, 15:42:07) * raphaelamorim presents the sample renderer: it aims it to make folks who want to create their renderer to have an exemple to start with (adetalhouet, 15:44:32) * raphaelamorim says this won't be part of the NIC features (adetalhouet, 15:44:53) * it's a really open/abstract implementation (adetalhouet, 15:45:53) * An H asks if renderer should resides in NIC or outside NIC (adetalhouet, 15:46:22) * raphaelamorim says all renderer should be in NIC (adetalhouet, 15:46:32) * dlenrow takes a concrete exemple with Netvirt: we don't want to build a new one, we want to leverage the one from the OVSDB project (adetalhouet, 15:47:55) * dlenrow asks if we should have another meeting the discuss issues around bringing NN and OVSDB into NIC (adetalhouet, 15:48:54) * raphaelamorim says it's a good idea (adetalhouet, 15:49:18) * ACTION: dlenrow to send a mail to the list (adetalhouet, 15:50:07) * cookies (adetalhouet, 15:50:25) Meeting ended at 15:50:30 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * dlenrow * dlenrow to send a mail to the list * raphaelamorim * raphaelamorim to provide pointers about that * **UNASSIGNED** * mlemay to send thread on discussions around this * start the discussion on the ML People present (lines said) --------------------------- * adetalhouet (63) * odl_meetbot (10) * colindixon (3) * helenchen (2) * gzhao (1) * renato_aguiar (1) * raphaelamorim_ (1) * dlenrow (1) * raphaelamorim (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4