================================
#opendaylight-nic: weekly-status
================================


Meeting started by dbainbri at 15:02:46 UTC.  The full logs are
available at
http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-nic/2015/weekly_status/opendaylight-nic-weekly_status.2015-07-10-15.02.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* dbainbri  (dbainbri, 15:04:31)
* Hideyuki Tai  (hideyuki, 15:04:33)
* adetalhouet  (adetalhouet, 15:04:38)
* Helium  (adetalhouet, 15:04:47)
  * renato_aguiar  (renato_aguiar, 15:05:05)
  * Cut off for Helium doesn't affect us as we don't have any patches
    (adetalhouet, 15:05:50)

* Berylium  (adetalhouet, 15:06:00)
  * How to document action for each renderer type?  (adetalhouet,
    15:08:44)
  * dbainbri said we could have a different lead for each renderer?
    (adetalhouet, 15:10:09)
  * dbainbri said we could have a lead for the control loop
    (adetalhouet, 15:10:24)
  * lead would have to document the wiki and help folks on how to do
    (adetalhouet, 15:11:05)
  * dbainbri: DSL concept means: intent can be express, so the tough was
    that we could threat all this expression as DSL  (adetalhouet,
    15:12:32)
  * dbainbri the idea is one intent abstraction  (adetalhouet, 15:13:59)
  * two concept: 1. renderer that goes down to some common core
    abstraction (core policies) 2. Other project, as NEMO, could compile
    as Intent, but this couldn't be control  (adetalhouet, 15:15:06)
  * this will allow the renderer to implement Intent how they intend to
    do  (adetalhouet, 15:15:41)
  * Be will keep renderer's flexibility  (adetalhouet, 15:17:14)
  * Renderers should describe how the action behave, how they should be
    compose  (adetalhouet, 15:19:51)
  *   (altonfong, 15:20:29)
  * but for instance Action should be compatible with all renderers as
    we wan't to avoid incompatibility between actions  (adetalhouet,
    15:20:45)
  * idea: have a compiler for each Renderers  (adetalhouet, 15:21:48)
  * idea: when a new action is added, a snippet could be added
    dynamically to each renderer (GBP, VTN, OF, ...)  (adetalhouet,
    15:23:41)
  * we need a PL for each kind of renderer that will well define the
    scope for renderer, in wiki  (adetalhouet, 15:25:55)
  * need to be on the same page regarding terminology  (adetalhouet,
    15:28:07)
  * ACTION: Dave Lenrow to post the link to the draft document regarding
    Intent  (adetalhouet, 15:30:05)

* Project Technical Lead  (adetalhouet, 15:31:11)
  * the TSC won't push this, so the thought is to do a checkpoint as
    each release  (adetalhouet, 15:31:53)
  * if we want to change PTL, someone can just self nominate by sending
    a mail to the mailing list  (adetalhouet, 15:32:23)
  * if no one self nominate, thing stays the same  (adetalhouet,
    15:32:41)

* cookies  (adetalhouet, 15:32:58)



Meeting ended at 15:33:51 UTC.



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* adetalhouet (33)
* odl_meetbot (5)
* gzhao (3)
* dbainbri (3)
* renato_aguiar (1)
* altonfong (1)
* hideyuki (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4