14:05:07 <abhijitkumbhare> #startmeeting OF plugin meeting
14:05:07 <odl_meetbot> Meeting started Tue Sep 16 14:05:07 2014 UTC.  The chair is abhijitkumbhare. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html.
14:05:07 <odl_meetbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:05:07 <odl_meetbot> The meeting name has been set to 'of_plugin_meeting'
14:05:41 <abhijitkumbhare> Hi kamal_rameshan vishnoianil oflibMichal
14:05:55 <kamal_rameshan> Hi all
14:05:57 <oflibMichal> hi
14:06:08 <abhijitkumbhare> oflibMichal - is michal_rehak around?
14:06:24 <oflibMichal> yes he is
14:06:30 <oflibMichal> he will be online in a sec
14:06:41 <abhijitkumbhare> OK
14:07:14 <tbachman> oflibMichal: sent an email with updated info on the NPE, fwiw
14:07:41 <abhijitkumbhare> There is a central page now for the bugs for all the projects - the OF plugin bugs are at: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Bugs#openflowplugin
14:08:03 <abhijitkumbhare> Or actually from that link: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/buglist.cgi?bug_severity=blocker&bug_severity=critical&bug_severity=major&bug_severity=normal&bug_severity=minor&bug_severity=trivial&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=IN_PROGRESS&bug_status=WAITING_FOR_REVIEW&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cresolution%2Cshort_desc%2Cchangeddate%2Ccf_target_milestone&f1=cf_target_milest
14:08:03 <abhijitkumbhare> one&list_id=16708&n1=1&o1=substring&product=openflowplugin&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&v1=Lithium
14:08:48 <abhijitkumbhare> OK best to use the link https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Bugs#openflowplugin and navigate to the Helium bugs query
14:08:49 <oflibMichal> tbachman: ok, i will check it
14:08:56 <tbachman> oflibMichal: thx!
14:09:49 <abhijitkumbhare> There are a few new bugs sent by Peter Gubka
14:10:00 <abhijitkumbhare> The first one is: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1765
14:10:59 <abhijitkumbhare> Actually before we embark on those - I think we should also look at which ones are a must fix for Helium - as there is only 1.5 weeks left
14:11:49 <abhijitkumbhare> So while looking at bugs individually - lets also decide whether we can defer it to Lithium
14:12:12 <abhijitkumbhare> So https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1765
14:12:15 <oflibMichal> tbachman: Action [_action=NxActionOutputRegNodesNodeTableFlowApplyActionsCase [_nxOutputReg=NxOutputReg [_maxLen=65535, _src=Src [_ofsNbits=31,
14:12:26 <tbachman> yeah — that ofsNbits, right?
14:12:36 <oflibMichal> java.lang.NullPointerException: nullat org.opendaylight.openflowjava.nx.codec.action.RegLoadCodec.serialize(RegLoadCodec.java:32) ~[na:na]
14:12:37 <tbachman> is that correct?
14:12:57 <tbachman> I think that’s what we’re trying to set it to (31)
14:13:18 <oflibMichal> it looks like you want to serialize Outputreg action ... but it goes into regload action codec
14:13:54 <abhijitkumbhare> What is Peter trying to say on this bug?
14:14:10 <abhijitkumbhare> OK bad HTTP request
14:14:46 <kamal_rameshan> I think its breaking at the restconf layer
14:14:47 <abhijitkumbhare> Is it actually a bad request?
14:14:47 <michal_rehak> looks like update is not working
14:14:58 <abhijitkumbhare> i.e. bad xml
14:15:09 <michal_rehak> xml looks ok
14:15:25 <abhijitkumbhare> what about the "strict" part?
14:15:53 <kamal_rameshan> "Schema node "strict" was not found in module"
14:15:58 <michal_rehak> It might be caused by the POST method - I believe that rest specification prescribes to use PUT for update
14:16:52 <abhijitkumbhare> OK - michal_rehak shall we ask Peter to try out with PUT?
14:17:09 <michal_rehak> hi is already gone for today
14:17:21 <michal_rehak> I will try this xml
14:17:23 <abhijitkumbhare> OK - I will put that in the bug
14:17:26 <abhijitkumbhare> OK
14:17:56 <abhijitkumbhare> Next one: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1840
14:18:27 <tbachman> oflibMichal: so, to make sure I understand — the flow that I dumped looks bad?
14:19:46 <abhijitkumbhare> This one is probably not causing issues - right? things have been stored different in operational than config
14:20:06 <mbobak> abhijitkumbhare: I can take 1840
14:20:10 <abhijitkumbhare> OK
14:20:31 <mbobak> abhijitkumbhare: done
14:20:43 <abhijitkumbhare> Great
14:21:06 <abhijitkumbhare> Next one: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1846
14:22:25 <mbobak> abhijitkumbhare: I can take that one as well
14:22:30 <abhijitkumbhare> some flows in the test provider not working - f26 and f27
14:22:32 <abhijitkumbhare> OK
14:22:40 <abhijitkumbhare> thx mbobak
14:22:54 <mbobak> abhijitkumbhare: u r welcome ;-)
14:23:15 <abhijitkumbhare> michal_rehak - next one is https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1759
14:24:06 <abhijitkumbhare> This is one of the VTN bugs
14:24:25 <michal_rehak> this is partially caused by bug in AD-SAL
14:24:33 <abhijitkumbhare> OK
14:25:22 <abhijitkumbhare> are u advocating him to directly use MD-SAL for this case? from your comment looks like it
14:27:33 <abhijitkumbhare> so michal_rehak will keep working on this 1759 - right? we can move to the next one
14:29:28 <abhijitkumbhare> I have asked Luis an update for https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1468
14:29:39 <michal_rehak> but Ed told us not to change AD-SAL
14:29:55 <michal_rehak> so this is ready, just waiting for merge
14:29:59 <abhijitkumbhare> OK - michal_rehak
14:31:08 <abhijitkumbhare> but will VTN hit the issue or are they avoiding it by using MD-SAL?
14:32:11 <michal_rehak> for the new plugin is made default VTN is using AD-SAL "front-end" then adapters and md-sal
14:32:45 <michal_rehak> we fixed adapters so that TOS value from AD-SAL is handled as DSCP (subset of TOS)
14:34:51 <abhijitkumbhare> so will you be pushing the code change?
14:35:04 <michal_rehak> already pushed
14:35:16 <abhijitkumbhare> OK - great
14:35:24 <abhijitkumbhare> just needs to be merged?
14:35:55 <michal_rehak> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/11132/
14:35:55 <michal_rehak> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/11114
14:35:57 <michal_rehak> yes
14:36:01 <michal_rehak> one is in controller
14:37:04 <abhijitkumbhare> OK - can you add the info to the bug?
14:38:18 <abhijitkumbhare> So folks - the following to me looks like a candidate for Lithium: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1725 . What do you folks think?
14:39:13 <abhijitkumbhare> Its a protocol spec conformance issue - good to fix - but probably Lithium timeframe looks better
14:39:28 <abhijitkumbhare> any thoughts or objections?
14:40:33 <abhijitkumbhare> OK - moving it to Lithium
14:43:46 <abhijitkumbhare> kamal_rameshan - do you have the status on https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1509 ?
14:44:30 <kamal_rameshan> i need to investigate on this. Was reported by Learning Switch project
14:44:37 <abhijitkumbhare> OK - we had put this to Lithium - will change the deadline
14:44:45 <kamal_rameshan> ok
14:45:20 <abhijitkumbhare> How about https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1540 kamal_rameshan ?
14:46:29 <kamal_rameshan> well this one i have not seen it happening. Will talk to moiz today and get it closed, unless he objects
14:46:53 <abhijitkumbhare> OK - kamal_rameshan . mbobak - any thoughts on https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1764
14:47:32 <abhijitkumbhare> mbobak: Bug 1764 is pushing of default config for OF switch should be moved into separate module
14:48:00 <abhijitkumbhare> Do you think we should do this at the late stage or in Lithium?
14:49:58 <mbobak> abhijitkumbhare: I suppose Lithium it is, there are some things in controller that need to be done before OF switch config can be separated in openflowplugin
14:51:17 <abhijitkumbhare> How about https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1587 ?
14:51:50 <mbobak> abhijitkumbhare:  that's still waiting for 1484 to be completed
14:52:04 <abhijitkumbhare> Yes - saw that comment
14:53:24 <abhijitkumbhare> mbobak : https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1667
14:53:46 <mbobak> abhijitkumbhare: that just needs to be merged
14:53:50 <abhijitkumbhare> You have the patch there - you want michal_rehak to review it?
14:54:16 <mbobak> abhijitkumbhare: oh yes, that woul help much
14:55:07 <abhijitkumbhare> so michal_rehak - can you review https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/10943/ :) ?
14:56:05 <michal_rehak> rebasing
14:56:40 <abhijitkumbhare> oflibMichal tbachman - I will just assign https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1907 to oflibMichal. After initial investigation - we can figure out - is that OK?
14:56:49 <michal_rehak> this will turn on statistics exposed via jmx in integration/distributions/base
14:57:00 <tbachman> abhijitkumbhare: that works for me :)
14:57:15 <oflibMichal> abhijitkumbhare: this will be a bug in openflowplugin translation or in controller
14:57:54 <oflibMichal> looks like last outputReg action is being serialized by regLoadCodec
14:57:58 <oflibMichal> which is not good
14:58:06 <oflibMichal> i believe it is not ofjava bug
14:58:29 <abhijitkumbhare> can you add the info to the bugs
14:58:35 <oflibMichal> sure
14:58:38 <abhijitkumbhare> I mean to the bug
14:59:04 <abhijitkumbhare> we are out of time - we can continue/finish tomorrow
14:59:09 <kamal_rameshan> are any of your guys attending the design summit?
14:59:39 <abhijitkumbhare> the topic that folks are asking on in the simultaneous release meeting is the testing projects are doing
15:00:28 <abhijitkumbhare> kamal_rameshan - I am attending the first day (till around just before 4 pm)
15:01:03 <abhijitkumbhare> michal_rehak & oflibMichal  - are you folks attending?
15:01:28 <kamal_rameshan> oh ok. thx abhijitkumbhare
15:01:54 <michal_rehak> I will try
15:01:58 <abhijitkumbhare> I am travelling that evening - so will miss the second day
15:02:01 <michal_rehak> I have meeting in 28 mins
15:02:24 <abhijitkumbhare> talking about the design forum in santa clara michal_rehak
15:03:03 <abhijitkumbhare> OK - will do end meeting
15:03:10 <abhijitkumbhare> #endmeeting