============================================================
#opendaylight-openflowplugin: OpenFlow Plugin Meeting Nov 10
============================================================


Meeting started by abhijitkumbhare at 16:03:00 UTC.  The full logs are
available at
http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-openflowplugin/2016/openflow_plugin_meeting_nov_10/opendaylight-openflowplugin-openflow_plugin_meeting_nov_10.2016-11-10-16.03.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* Agenda  (abhijitkumbhare, 16:05:21)
  * Contributions not already reflected in the release plan
    (abhijitkumbhare, 16:06:35)
  * Topology/inventory discussion  (abhijitkumbhare, 16:07:02)
  * Topology ID discussion  (abhijitkumbhare, 16:07:58)
  * Any other topics  (abhijitkumbhare, 16:10:40)

* Topology ID discussion  (abhijitkumbhare, 16:10:46)
  * Topology ID changed from “flow/1” to “openflow/1”; weather report
    generated for openflow plugin & dlux  (abhijitkumbhare, 16:14:23)
  * vishnoianil does not agree with the change as there are lot of
    dependent projects  (abhijitkumbhare, 16:15:31)
  * vishnoianil feels that there os no conclusive reason to change
    (shuva, 16:19:28)
  * vishnoianil feels that having a config knob, a mechanism to change
    the name but have the default name to flow:1  (shuva, 16:20:05)
  * vishnoianil this problem would ge tcomplex if we change the name
    since it would result in a domino effect  (shuva, 16:21:01)
  * since netvirt-->genius -->sfc would be affected in ways bcoz of this
    (shuva, 16:21:45)
  * vishnoianil keeping flow:1 is reasonable, since the change will have
    cascading effects.  (shuva, 16:22:49)
  * keep flow:1 as the default name but have a knob to change it..
    (shuva, 16:23:15)

* Topology/inventory discussion  (abhijitkumbhare, 16:26:55)
  * vishnoianil asking what happened to the migration of old topology
    model to new topology model  (abhijitkumbhare, 16:28:20)
  * The status of that effort is unknown  (abhijitkumbhare, 16:29:32)
  * abhijitkumbhare asking if there are other projects that are actually
    working on the new topology migration  (shuva, 16:29:38)
  * vishnoianil thinks if the move to the new topology is postponed by
    an year, we can consider moving from inventory to topology
    (abhijitkumbhare, 16:33:13)
  * LuisGomez says this is a topic for the new TSC to figure out if they
    want all the ODL projects to migrate to new topology
    (abhijitkumbhare, 16:33:28)

* Contributions not already reflected in the release plan
  (abhijitkumbhare, 16:36:43)
  * LINK:
    https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OpenFlow_Plugin:Carbon_Release_Plan
    (abhijitkumbhare, 16:37:50)
  * vishnoianil thinks if the move to the new topology is postponed by
    an year, we *might* consider moving from inventory to topology
    (vishnoianil, 16:38:54)
  * vishnoianil says he can pitch in the Single Model Layer
    Implementation
    (https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OpenFlow_Plugin:Implementation_For_Single_Model_Layer)
    (abhijitkumbhare, 16:47:44)
  * Manohar says he will work on the scalability of the Lithium design
    (abhijitkumbhare, 16:48:21)

* Other topics  (abhijitkumbhare, 16:52:45)
  * LINK: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/40817/  (hideyuki,
    16:52:48)
  * hideyuki would like the above patch (40817) for bug 6110 to be
    reviewed & merged  (abhijitkumbhare, 16:53:54)
  * shuva thinks this patch should be tested  (abhijitkumbhare,
    16:55:09)



Meeting ended at 16:57:26 UTC.



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* abhijitkumbhare (26)
* shuva (9)
* odl_meetbot (6)
* hideyuki (3)
* vishnoianil (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4