#opendaylight-ovsdb: OVSDB weekly call
Meeting started by Madhu at 19:03:53 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Neutron L3 support (Madhu, 19:04:08)
- http://dtucker.co.uk/hack/building-a-router-with-openvswitch.html
dave_tucker’s blog on new L3 features (tbachman,
19:05:08)
- existing pipeline had to be modified in order
to support new L3 features (tbachman,
19:05:59)
- Table 0 is a classifier, to determine which
table to send to next (tbachman,
19:06:22)
- Table 100 is ACLs (tbachman,
19:06:27)
- Table 105 is for ARP Responder (tbachman,
19:06:35)
- Table 5 is for L3 Rewrites (tbachman,
19:06:42)
- Table 10 is for L3 Routing (tbachman,
19:06:48)
- Table 15 is for L3 Forwarding (tbachman,
19:07:14)
- Table 20 is for L2 Rewrites (L2 Tun
Encap) (tbachman,
19:07:26)
- Table 20 is for L2 Forwarding (tbachman,
19:07:39)
- the DVR mechanism that is demonstrated will
require an external access from every compute node (Madhu,
19:19:48)
- https://gist.github.com/79503d5b3752e5dc64e7
(dave_tucker,
19:22:25)
- Neutron security groups (tbachman, 19:23:34)
- TCP flags are being used for state (tbachman,
19:25:24)
- long term plan is OVS use of conn
tracker (tbachman,
19:25:54)
- https://github.com/dave-tucker/odl-neutron-drivers/blob/master/odldrivers/lbaas/driver.py
skeleton LBaaS driver (tbachman,
19:39:48)
- Trello Board (tbachman, 19:40:38)
- Neutron security groups (revisited) (tbachman, 19:41:22)
- The range feature for ports isn’t implemented
yet, but individual ports work (tbachman,
19:42:03)
- Madhu says that if there are any NXM
requirements, let him know ASAP (tbachman,
19:43:07)
- We allow specific ports inbound on TCP
SYN (tbachman,
19:43:58)
- the fields focused on are TCP Protocol, TCP
port min/max, and IP Prefix (tbachman,
19:50:09)
- networkstatic stayed away from using resubmit,
in order to support HW platforms (tbachman,
19:53:14)
- Pipeline discussion (tbachman, 19:53:30)
- dave_tucker says a convention would be helpful
so that services know where to put their rules in the
pipeline (tbachman,
19:55:21)
- There’s a question of where security groups
should live (tbachman,
19:56:50)
- Would they be better implemented in the
beginning of the pipeline and use resubmit or should it be somewhere
else in the pipeline (tbachman,
19:57:26)
Meeting ended at 20:08:05 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- (none)
People present (lines said)
- tbachman (38)
- Madhu (8)
- odl_meetbot (5)
- dave_tucker (3)
- networkstatic (0)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.