============================= #opendaylight-sfc: sfc_weekly ============================= Meeting started by tbachman at 16:00:00 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-sfc/2015/sfc_weekly/opendaylight-sfc-sfc_weekly.2015-03-12-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * LINK: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/sfc-dev/2015-March/001014.html Agenda for today’s meeting (tbachman_, 16:03:22) * LINK: https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-sfc/2015/sfc_weekly/opendaylight-sfc-sfc_weekly.2015-03-05-17.01.html Minutes from last week’s meeting (tbachman_, 16:03:25) * status (tbachman, 16:04:31) * repenno says we’re reaching a point in SFC where a lot of stuff is working well and stable, but we need to improve unit tests and make them work reliably (tbachman, 16:06:31) * repenno ran the unit tests yesterday and said there are a lot of problems (tbachman, 16:06:47) * repenno reached out to some folks to clean these up, but encourages others to run the unit tests themselves and resolve the issues (tbachman, 16:07:20) * ebrjohn says the unit tests should be run in jenkins — asks why these NPEs aren’t causing the tests cases to fail (tbachman, 16:07:57) * repenno also discovered that different team members tests in different configurations — e.g. with things “connected”, without things “connected”, etc. (tbachman, 16:09:11) * ebrjohn says we should create some tasks — the first task should be that any exception thrown from a test case should cause the test case to fail (tbachman, 16:09:41) * ebrjohn says then each responsible party can clean up the exceptions (tbachman, 16:10:03) * ebrjohn says repenno mentioned that there are some tasks related to the RPC that was recently deprecated (tbachman, 16:10:28) * ebrjohn says the team may want to consider using the Trello board to track the growing list of items (tbachman, 16:10:45) * ACTION: ebrjohn to set up a Trello board for SFC (tbachman, 16:10:58) * ACTION: ebrjohn john will create Trello card for unit tests to fail on exceptions (tbachman, 16:11:27) * ebrjohn says when you start karaf and look at the logs, there are some exceptions in the logs that should be cleaned up as well (e.g. 6-7 or exceptions about not being able to create bundles) (tbachman, 16:13:19) * OPNFV (tbachman, 16:14:54) * ChrisPriceAB says there’s a proposal for OPNFV function chaining waiting for some action (tbachman, 16:15:18) * ChrisPriceAB says in parallel, there’s a discussion with GBP, as GBP is providing a level of abstraction that OpenStack can communicate through in order to do SFC (tbachman, 16:15:44) * ChrisPriceAB says after the first release of OPNFV in April, looking to bring in ODL trunk, and start to run and deploy that (tbachman, 16:16:12) * ChrisPriceAB says he’d like to wrap that in an OPNFV recognized activity (tbachman, 16:16:27) * ChrisPriceAB wants to see where we are in response to that, and if the late April/early May time frame looks okay to do this (tbachman, 16:17:16) * ebrjohn says this is absolutely beneficial for ODL and SFC to participate in OPNFV — unless someone objects, recommends doing that (tbachman, 16:17:40) * ebrjohn says by end of April/beginning of May, should be able to export that out to OPNFV (tbachman, 16:18:00) * repenno says we need to fix the deliverables; the Intel folks had an interest in the project (tbachman, 16:21:12) * ChrisPriceAB says the Qosmos team is coming on board and also has expressed an interest (tbachman, 16:21:29) * repenno says from the ODL/GBP perspective, we can show something, but from OPNFV perspective, there’s some packaging/installation questions (tbachman, 16:22:19) * repenno says that doesn’t stop us from showing GBP + SFC (tbachman, 16:22:38) * ChrisPriceAB says there might be a number of installers, but the endpoint is a stable state of OpenStack and OpenDaylight (tbachman, 16:22:59) * ebrjohn says if we have an API freeze on 4/16, and code freeze on 5/14 (tbachman, 16:25:01) * ebrjohn says we can also create a branch to pull if needed (tbachman, 16:25:11) * ChrisPriceAB says we do this work on the Lithium main branch so that when it’s released, it’s coupled with the OpenStack “L” release (tbachman, 16:25:34) * ebrjohn is more concerned about the API freezes (tbachman, 16:25:58) * repenno would prefer not to hinge the SFC project on the requirements (tbachman, 16:28:05) * ebrjohn asks how Andrej how his effort is progressing (tbachman, 16:29:49) * Andrej says he hasn’t had a chance to look at the documentation (tbachman, 16:30:00) * ACTION: ebrjohn to touch base with Andrej on all of the things that are being worked on (tbachman, 16:30:53) * ACTION: ebrjohn to touch base with ContexStream and Intel folks on Monday, re: M3 (tbachman, 16:33:16) * repenno says the Intel guys did the new SFC/GBP API, which allows GBP to pass a list of service functions (tbachman, 16:33:49) * repenno had a discussion with Intel yesterday, and they’re going to try to do a generic SFC Netconf implementation (tbachman, 16:34:27) * repenno says if this goes well, we should include that in our M3 (tbachman, 16:34:44) Meeting ended at 16:35:13 UTC. People present (lines said) --------------------------- * tbachman (51) * tbachman_ (4) * odl_meetbot (4) * ChrisPriceAB (3) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4