#opendaylight-sfc: sfc_weekly

Meeting summary

1. agenda (tbachman, 16:00:45)
   1. https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/sfc-dev/2015-April/001081.html Email describing today’s agenda (tbachman, 16:01:05)
   2. https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-sfc/2015/sfc_weekly/opendaylight-sfc-sfc_weekly.2015-03-26-16.00.html Minutes from meeting 2 weeks ago (tbachman, 16:01:18)
   
   
2. SFC Status in OPNFV (tbachman, 16:03:43)
   1. ebrjohn attended today’s meeting, but had technical problems and couldn’t present SFC (tbachman, 16:03:57)
   2. ebrjohn will present SFC at next week’s OPNFV meeting instead (tbachman, 16:04:41)
   
   
3. M4 Milestone (tbachman, 16:05:05)
   1. Next Thursady (4/16) is the M4 milestone (tbachman, 16:05:17)
   2. ebrjohn says we need APIs frozen; APIs at draft revision; and simple integration tests done (tbachman, 16:05:33)
   3. ebrjohn says he finished his portion of the docs today (tbachman, 16:05:42)
   4. ebrjohn asks when folks finish their portion of the documentation, please send the gerrit links (tbachman, 16:06:03)
   5. ebrjohn asks about the status of the current APIs - any problems with freeze next week? (tbachman, 16:06:25)
   6. Christophe says the L7 matchers have been merged; just pushed a change today; feels from API perspective, it’s pretty clear now (tbachman, 16:06:57)
   7. ebrjohn says as far as APIs, he’s mostly talking about the yang models (tbachman, 16:07:08)
   8. ebrjohn asks if anyone has spare cycles to write a simple integration test (tbachman, 16:08:31)
   9. https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/16831/ (tbachman, 16:09:25)
   10. https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/16831/ tbachman provides an example of a stub for integration test for groupbasedpolicy (tbachman, 16:10:26)
   
   
4. status (tbachman, 16:13:05)
   1. Christophe pushed a patch for an extension to the yang models for the L7 matchers (tbachman, 16:13:22)
   2. paulq asks if Christophe envisions being the first classifier, the next stage classifier, or both (tbachman, 16:14:36)
   3. Christophe says they can be both (tbachman, 16:14:48)
   4. ebrjohn says one month after M4 is M5, which is code freeze (tbachman, 16:16:12)
   5. paulq says the SFC stuff at IETF last week went well (tbachman, 16:16:46)
   6. paulq says there was some discussion about a few changes here and there, but it’s mostly moving forward; additional discussions about offload and bypass (tbachman, 16:17:12)

Action items

1. (none)

People present (lines said)

1. tbachman (27)
2. odl_meetbot (4)
3. ebrjohn (1)