13:58:40 <[1]JonasB> #startmeeting OPNFV Fuel Status No 10 13:58:40 Meeting started Wed Apr 29 13:58:40 2015 UTC. The chair is [1]JonasB. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:58:40 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 13:58:40 The meeting name has been set to 'opnfv_fuel_status_no_10' 13:59:14 #info Michal Skalski 13:59:21 #info Stefan Berg 13:59:24 <[1]JonasB> #info Jonas Bjurel 14:00:09 #info Szilard Cserey 14:00:33 <[1]JonasB> #topic Auto deployment 14:00:49 #info IPMI adapter almost complete. 14:00:52 <[1]JonasB> #info Stefan can you give an update of the prototype 14:01:03 #info Looking to test it on Monday in Montreal. 14:01:19 #info It will require an installed Fuel master. 14:01:19 <[1]JonasB> Great! 14:01:33 #info I'm converting prototype to python 14:01:49 #info Initial plan is to only run one compute, one controller so require two (three with FM) blades, 14:01:53 #info + testing the prototype itself 14:02:43 #info Daniel Smit 14:02:54 <[1]JonasB> #info Stefan what hinders us to install the Fuel master just like you did in the previous prototype 14:03:28 #info There's no support in IPMI to handle virtual ISO. 14:03:58 <[1]JonasB> #inf right, but the fuel master runs inside a VM on the jumpstart 14:04:05 <[1]JonasB> #info right, but the fuel master runs inside a VM on the jumpstart 14:04:13 #info The way to do this as generic as possible would be to do the Fuel installation using the custom function in the API, by means of a temporary PXE server. 14:04:37 #info Ah, oh, then it's like ten minutes extra work. :) 14:04:39 question please? 14:04:58 <[1]JonasB> mr Smith, go on! 14:05:25 the HP servers have the method to connect Virtual DVD (via the OA - not the direct ILO on the blade - its a Virtual Connect thing).. so for setting up a Fuel on Baremetal you have that method (not the nicest but works) 14:05:47 and for the virtaul setup, isnt that a case of having a "OS" there already and then calling the same adapter and attaching a "disk image" at boot time to that VM? 14:06:14 <[1]JonasB> lmcdasm: Correct 14:06:17 for ESXi i deliver a "emmpty" ovf that basically has a blank drive and an attached ISO so that it boots and starts with FUEL 14:06:18 lmcdasm: Absolutely! The plan here was to look at a more generic ipmi solution that would work on a larger set of hw flavors. 14:06:23 ahh.. 14:06:29 ok.. sorry then 14:06:48 on that track though - Dell (NUaman) is looking for one for their HW now as well (iDRAC) - dont know if you saw that 14:06:53 No, good comment! 14:07:32 anyway - thx for clarity 14:07:43 <[1]JonasB> Stefan: So then we can try to install fuel with libvirt and the rest with IPMI on mondaY 14:08:29 [1]JonasB: Yes, looking forward to it. I just need to dig up a network diagram to find the jumphost. 14:09:03 <[1]JonasB> #info On Monday we will try to install fuel with libvirt and deploy the rest with IPMI in Eri Lab 14:09:16 Need two blades only then, and that I have already. The existing Fuel server, lmcdasm, it's on the jumphost? 14:09:59 ok 14:10:04 <[1]JonasB> Stefan: which blades do you have? 14:10:04 uhh.. lemme see 14:10:20 for Stefans stuff - the 5,8,13,14,15 (and how Szi has split it up) 14:10:27 i didnt setup a FUEL on those -casuse you have themm 14:10:36 the FUEL that is running is on Blade 7 and used for Baremetal 14:10:37 I suggest I go with 5 + 15 - OK, Szilard? 14:10:46 i was gonna turn that off in about 10 minutes so you dont see it anymore 14:10:48 8, 13 for me 14:10:54 and you can bring up a FUEL wherever you like 14:11:02 I basically have all my stuff on 13 14:11:03 (cause the FUEL for BareMetal is on a ESXI VM) 14:11:11 Cool, 5 + 15 is easy to remember as well. And the jumphost is on another blade? 14:11:13 <[1]JonasB> Stefan you need three dont you, one jumphost + 1 controller + 1 compute? 14:11:22 Stefan - i dont know about your jumpstart host. 14:11:28 you can "use" the Baremetal ESXI one 14:11:41 yuou can build a new one on bladed 14 if you like (libvirt) or whatever0 14:11:43 up to you 14:12:11 Ah, OK, I thought it was already existing. That's cool, I'll set it up on blade 14 then. 14:12:38 ya.. the qeustion is one of 'context",, there are lots (about 10 FUEL servers) running inside that sandbox now 14:12:45 Actually quite good, then I can drive the deploy from there and it's already a "ci blade". 14:12:46 however, for your blades since they are Baremetal 14:12:52 they are tied to the FLB nis (for booting) 14:13:01 en1 and en2? 14:13:04 so you can see the FUEL VM that is used for the HA Baremetal now - cause of networking 14:13:14 ya.. if thats what Ubuntu calls them 14:13:21 <[1]JonasB> #info Stefan will use Bl 5,14, 15 for the Monday test 14:13:23 the ones you cant boot from are p1px and p2px 14:13:35 lets update this 14:13:57 on the etherpad 14:14:01 i will do it 14:14:12 <[1]JonasB> lmcdasm: great 14:14:23 I think we need a small network plan here. Oh, that't great lmcdasm! 14:14:23 <[1]JonasB> Jose: are you online? 14:14:44 agree, network plan would be wonderful :) 14:14:58 lmcdasm: (And you are referring to the non mezzanine nics right? They are then en1 and en2, yes.) 14:15:34 #stefan_berg - ok - they change depending on the OS :) - RHEL calls em something else.. but no biggyt.. so long as you know what nics you need :) 14:16:45 Szi - check this out (not perfect) - http://elxjtqrs22-wv.ki.sw.ericsson.se:9001/p/montreal 14:17:00 thanks 14:17:41 hey sorry 14:17:54 not many updates today 14:17:59 struggling with installation 14:18:05 #updated the doc. 14:18:10 <[1]JonasB> #topic testing 14:18:28 <[1]JonasB> Jose:What problem do you have 14:18:34 #info - not - Jose is trying a Mutli-HA on a single blade installation 14:18:41 #info created http://artifacts.opnfv.org/functest/docs/functest.html 14:19:02 #info still discussing how to provide the functest container 14:19:08 #info - so there will be some challenges there - we adding a new NTP there to accomodate and JOse can explain the rest for installation issues 14:19:29 #info - got the conatiner info and i have rally installed in a container.. should be able to delivery to the group sometime today for them to takea look at 14:19:42 #info not problems really, just had a bad installation and had to redeploy with some additionals settings 14:20:03 #info I will try the container in BL9 14:20:06 <[1]JonasB> Jose:Ok, great 14:20:27 <[1]JonasB> lmcdasm: How will you deliver the container, a dowmload? 14:20:47 #info - first i will just put it up on our public net server for Jose and team to test 14:20:54 when they are happy (cause im sure it wont work 100& first time) 14:20:59 then we will add a stub in the build system 14:21:11 and it can be "built" as they need (Dockerfile will be added into GIT somewhere) 14:21:13 * stefan_berg likes the idea of building it 14:21:23 <[1]JonasB> Ok 14:21:26 and they we can sort out when it gets called (as part of FUEL or something bigger) 14:21:55 <[1]JonasB> Anything more 14:21:58 shall we add the dockerfile in the functest repo? 14:22:00 <[1]JonasB> ? 14:22:02 since in my mind, im working towards a "push button" that deliveres not just FUel (and deployment) but the testing VM's as well so we have an entire CI chain built on the fly (making im dreaming) 14:22:11 sure Jose.. whever you think is best 14:22:16 ok 14:22:29 wherever .. once you guys are happy with it we can discuss where the best fit it 14:22:30 is* 14:22:38 #info vPing script added to the repo for review 14:22:59 ok 14:23:04 <[1]JonasB> jose: Add all of us for review! 14:23:16 who "all" ? :) 14:23:25 Szi, Stefan, me, JOnas 14:23:26 : 14:23:27 :) 14:23:28 all 14:23:37 <[1]JonasB> exactly ;-) 14:23:41 ok 14:23:58 <[1]JonasB> Anything more? 14:23:59 and of course, Tim and Dan if you want them to look at it for the FOREMAN side of things 14:24:07 yes - Jonas one thing :) 14:24:17 <[1]JonasB> lmcdasm: go 14:25:15 I would like to tear down blade 11 and 12 (Nested) and add them to the IMS core setup (since im gonna be tight on space) if thats ok - and secondly, i need you and Chris to follow up with Ray and team about Ostack Summit and how this IMS Core is gonna be presented, etc - since we "arent" really earmarked for anything -when you can :) 14:25:23 sorry, vPing got merged already, my mistake.. 14:25:59 <[1]JonasB> lmcdasm: I'll talk to Chris 14:26:08 great. 14:26:21 <[1]JonasB> lmcdasm: Who is using 11 and 12? 14:26:22 for the blades- we can leave them till Friday but i will take them on Monday? 14:26:34 currently no-one officially 14:26:46 <[1]JonasB> lmcdasm: goahead 14:26:48 ack 14:26:52 updating the page now as wlel 14:26:54 well* 14:26:55 <[1]JonasB> #topic hollidays 14:27:23 <[1]JonasB> #info Friday is public holliday in sweden, Thu is normaly half day in Sweden 14:27:43 <[1]JonasB> #info Jonas will be away on Thu, Fri 14:27:53 <[1]JonasB> Rest of you? 14:27:55 #info in Hungary we have only Friday as public holliday 14:27:57 in Poland also Friday is holiday 14:28:02 #info Stefan away Thu, Fri as well. 14:28:03 #info - Daniel off on friday - in the office on Thursday 14:28:16 #info Jose away Fri 14:28:20 #info Michal off in Friday 14:28:29 <[1]JonasB> Great! 14:28:32 #info Szilard off Fri 14:28:34 #info _ using Jonas credit card to purchase libations for the Fridya - 14:28:50 <[1]JonasB> ;-) 14:28:59 * lmcdasm expects to see pictures of Stefan Berg's burning drunken Swedish man 14:29:10 :) 14:29:14 haha! 14:29:19 <[1]JonasB> Anything more? 14:29:32 just one regarding test 14:29:41 you confirmed the fuel based installation will integrate heat? 14:29:43 <[1]JonasB> Hi Morgan 14:29:50 it is required by Metaswitch for vIMS 14:30:00 Hi All, and sorry for the wild merge of vPing.. 14:30:21 just to precise it is a very basic tests that probably already exists in tempest 14:30:30 <[1]JonasB> morgan: yes we can do that, anything more they need in terms of networking or other stuff? 14:30:42 just using python client to boot VM get IP and run Ping in cloud-init 14:31:07 it was the main concern of Andrew and Martin 14:31:17 nothing special on network side 14:31:31 hey Morgan 14:31:35 <[1]JonasB> What about storage? 14:31:38 they boot a VM IMS (just basic core) + a tester VM (sipp with scenario) and play basic SIP scenario 14:31:54 for Andrew and Martin - they were concerned cause i didnt open up Horizon and Heat for them (network wise) 14:32:02 but that can be donem, the tools are all there 14:32:06 as far as I understood they use external images 14:32:11 thats fine 14:32:19 they can either SCP them to the node 14:32:26 or they can pull (one-way) from the network 14:32:47 im still looking for a network diagram on what they are building so I can ensure that they have what they need (i have a list of "things") 14:33:03 they are shy to share doc ... 14:33:06 one question- which environment are they going to do this on - an /// one we setup? 14:33:15 I asked them to comment/modify/ what I initiated in the doc 14:33:32 hehe.. i know- but i mean, its a hard thing to take when they say "the enviornment isnt useable" and we try to make it right for them in th edark :) 14:33:35 the dark* 14:33:45 We suggets them, to use one E/// POD then LF 14:33:51 sorry I have to speak 14:33:55 hehe.. no sweat 14:33:58 meeting with NTT started 14:34:05 <[1]JonasB> going once 14:34:09 Jonas 14:34:16 <[1]JonasB> Yes 14:34:26 is the tests that Morgan is talking about now gated on the LF POD installation? 14:34:45 <[1]JonasB> Dont know 14:34:46 i just dont want us to get Andre and guys ready when we dont have a system for them yet / are they aware that LF POD1 isnt ready yet? 14:34:47 ok 14:35:03 ill send a mail to Morgan to follow up and sync in Joseph G. (our man!). 14:35:08 no they are waiting for green light 14:35:12 so they can be in the loop together as that POD comes up 14:35:16 great.. thanks Morgan! 14:35:24 <[1]JonasB> going once 14:35:33 <[1]JonasB> going twise 14:35:50 <[1]JonasB> Thanks all and have good hollidays! 14:35:57 <[1]JonasB> #endmeeting