16:02:21 <narindergupta> #startmeeting JOID
16:02:21 <collabot`> Meeting started Wed May 24 16:02:21 2017 UTC.  The chair is narindergupta. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:02:21 <collabot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
16:02:21 <collabot`> The meeting name has been set to 'joid'
16:02:34 <narindergupta> #info Narinder Gupta
16:02:44 <durschatz> #info Dave Urschatz (CENGN)
16:03:18 <lakerzhou> #info Bin Zhou (lenovo)
16:04:17 <narindergupta> #info Agenda bashing  https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/joid
16:04:31 <narindergupta> Danbube 3.0 status
16:04:51 <narindergupta> #info OPNFV Summit
16:05:01 <narindergupta> Cengn POD status
16:05:08 <narindergupta> E release implementation
16:05:22 <narindergupta> anything else please feel free to add
16:05:46 <durschatz> for Cengn POD?
16:06:01 <narindergupta> we are listing just Agenda topics
16:06:16 <narindergupta> any other agenda item for today?
16:06:24 <rprakash> Ovn?
16:07:02 <narindergupta> added anything else?
16:07:10 <rprakash> Scenario for ovvn4nfv ...Vikram
16:07:23 <rprakash> Thanks
16:07:32 <narindergupta> added
16:08:37 <narindergupta> i am seeing no progress on the OCL and ODL so no changes are expected in Danube 3.0 status then
16:09:16 <narindergupta> aynone has any other updates on Danube 3.0
16:09:52 <narindergupta> ok lets move to next topic OPNFV Summit
16:11:08 <rprakash> Any presentations or tutorials on JOID at summit?
16:11:22 <narindergupta> we will come to know today for sure
16:11:30 <rprakash> Ok
16:11:46 <durschatz> CENGN plans to demo "D" release with kubernetes on cengn-pod1
16:11:47 <narindergupta> but we are working with durschatz on the kubernetes demo at their pod
16:12:18 <rprakash> +1
16:12:39 <narindergupta> next topic CEngn pod status.
16:13:06 <narindergupta> durschatz: was working on moving the pod to different network and need to know the status to start work for demo.
16:13:16 <narindergupta> durschatz: would you please update?
16:13:21 <durschatz> all blades deploy
16:13:36 <durschatz> waiting on blade 3 RAM return today or tomorrow
16:14:00 <durschatz> starting deploy burn-in testing today
16:14:18 <narindergupta> durschatz: ok more or less we can start working on tomorrow or day after
16:14:26 <durschatz> I'll need some of Narinder's time
16:14:30 <durschatz> yes
16:14:43 <narindergupta> durschatz: today?
16:15:11 <durschatz> if you have time today that would help.
16:15:25 <durschatz> juju is not respoinding
16:15:26 <narindergupta> durschatz: not today i might be availble over irc
16:15:32 <durschatz> OK
16:15:34 <narindergupta> oh ok need to look into it
16:15:42 <narindergupta> let me see if i can help on my free time
16:15:46 <narindergupta> as i am at event
16:15:53 <durschatz> sure :-)
16:15:57 <narindergupta> so can not confirm
16:16:17 <narindergupta> anything else durschatz?
16:16:18 <durschatz> I'll keep working at it on my own in the mean time
16:16:22 <durschatz> no
16:16:24 <narindergupta> sure
16:17:37 <narindergupta> E release currently working on virtual deployment. Found few issues where vm does not get created
16:17:53 <narindergupta> will look into details and try to fix that. But baremetal deployment is working.
16:18:31 <narindergupta> current i am working on K8, lxd and nosdn scenarios
16:19:10 <rprakash> Does cell v2 and region or seurity groups impact vm creation on vPOD
16:19:40 <narindergupta> vm creation should not but accessibility yes
16:19:47 <rprakash> Is lxd on batemetal or vPID?
16:20:00 <narindergupta> lxd on baremetal
16:20:22 <rprakash> Ok ognore vPOD
16:20:37 <rprakash> Ignore
16:20:42 <narindergupta> ok +1
16:21:05 <narindergupta> ONOS and ODL i need confirmation from erspective teams to handle the scenario.
16:22:23 <rprakash> You mean onosfw and odl opnfv-sfc team ptl's
16:22:35 <narindergupta> correct
16:22:50 <rprakash> +1
16:22:52 <narindergupta> as new policity is feature owner owns the scenario now
16:23:11 <narindergupta> and installer will help in installation procedure.
16:23:29 <narindergupta> and integrated into it.
16:23:35 <rprakash> Ok
16:24:18 <narindergupta> rprakash: onosfw team has to own the scenario rprakash can u confirm with the team whether they will participate or not?
16:24:35 <rprakash> Ok
16:25:15 <narindergupta> any other information on E release needs to be discussed?
16:25:34 <durschatz> CI?
16:26:02 <durschatz> when will the CI for any project  be released
16:26:29 <durschatz> does JOID need to do anything for that
16:26:48 <rprakash> What are the actions for PTLs of feature projects to get the build and deploy for installer JOID to be able to support projects like ovn4nfv , onosfw etc?
16:27:22 <narindergupta> rprakash: they need to send me detials what is project requirement is
16:27:54 <rprakash> So the PTLs need to proovide project requirements
16:27:59 <rprakash> +1
16:28:00 <narindergupta> JOID does not need to do anything
16:28:25 <durschatz> thx +1
16:28:31 <narindergupta> rprakash: yes project requirement for integration
16:28:57 <narindergupta> rprakash: thats a starting point. As installers are responsible for installation if ecosystem is ready
16:29:39 <narindergupta> and its upto scenario owner to debug and make it operantional.
16:29:54 <durschatz> will this be discussed more at the Summit?
16:30:01 <narindergupta> sure
16:30:11 <rprakash> Action me to follow up on project requirent for Integration with JOID installer will communicate to onosfw & ovn4nfv ptl's
16:30:28 <narindergupta> rprakash: thanks praekash.
16:30:43 <narindergupta> last topic was ovn4nfv
16:32:27 <rprakash> Is Vikram in, else I talk to him , was looking for os-nosdn-ovn-ha or noha scenario with ovs2.6 or >
16:32:48 <rprakash> Will confirm with Vikram
16:33:10 <narindergupta> rprakash: please ask vikram to list in the scenario document run by David from linux foundation
16:33:24 <narindergupta> as he has to know what scenarios we are offering and who is owner.
16:33:32 <rprakash> So enabling ovn feature in ovs will help
16:34:22 <narindergupta> yes definetely and we can discuss more on that topic what exactly are requirement and then we can work out how to integrete
16:34:27 <rprakash> Sure will ask scenario doc to be run through David, thete is one equivalent thete for Apex
16:34:53 <narindergupta> but scenario listing is seperate document.
16:34:54 <rprakash> Nothing more from my end
16:35:30 <rprakash> Ok will follow up with PTL vikram pn that for ovn4nfv
16:35:56 <rprakash> Anything more?
16:36:12 <narindergupta> no nothing from my side
16:36:26 <narindergupta> anyone else have any other topic?
16:36:43 <durschatz> no
16:37:17 <rprakash> Done
16:37:41 <rprakash> I will quit now
16:38:38 <narindergupta> so lets end the meeting
16:38:41 <narindergupta> #endmeeting