========================= #opnfv-meeting: OPNFV-TSC ========================= Meeting started by dlenrow at 13:57:46 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2014/opnfv-meeting.2014-10-07-13.57.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Chris Price (ChrisPriceAB, 14:01:21) * Dave Lenrow (dlenrow, 14:01:33) * Wenjing Chu (Wenjing, 14:03:21) * Ray Paik (rpaik, 14:05:42) * DirkKutscher (DirkKutscher, 14:07:07) * Tapio Tallgren (TapioTallgren, 14:07:07) * a popular IRC web client is http://www.irccloud.com, no personal or HP interest here, just FYI (dlenrow, 14:09:55) * Brian Smith (B_Smith_, 14:11:18) * https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/tsc (ChrisPriceAB, 14:19:29) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/tsc (ChrisPriceAB, 14:19:33) * CP proposes to defer approval of previous minutes to next week (dlenrow, 14:20:37) * no additions to agenda (dlenrow, 14:21:13) * project proposals and reviews (dlenrow, 14:21:22) * need to put proposals on main wiki under project proposals (dlenrow, 14:21:45) * LINK: project proposals https://wiki.opnfv.org/project_proposals (ChrisPriceAB, 14:22:01) * use template there and send email to discuss to announce added proposal (dlenrow, 14:22:05) * Current four week window for public review/discussion (dlenrow, 14:23:10) * before they can seek approval (dlenrow, 14:23:22) * probably want to revisit duration of public review period (dlenrow, 14:24:33) * Need to set a date for cutoff to join first simult. release (dlenrow, 14:26:08) * we then back out dates for when projects need to get approved (dlenrow, 14:26:30) * approved No objections to vote changing project proposal public review period to 2 weeks instead of 4 (dlenrow, 14:29:27) * upstream community plan (dlenrow, 14:29:55) * CP reminds we were proposing to target stable releases from upstream projects (dlenrow, 14:30:23) * CP reached out to discuss with ODL (dlenrow, 14:30:43) * question asked how do we engage in making upstream changes? (dlenrow, 14:31:48) * CP: suggests we have devs who work in upstream projects and serve OPNFV needs (dlenrow, 14:32:42) * Ashiq: Can we setup sort of liasion with OSS upstream (dlenrow, 14:34:13) * agreement that, although hard to formally do so with OSS projects, we can have point of contact assigned within OPNFV TSC (dlenrow, 14:35:00) * Parviz asks single or group of contacts (dlenrow, 14:36:30) * Ian: if we had group of folks working upstream should they be a project? Have TSC oversight? (dlenrow, 14:38:48) * for example, OpenStack need planning/process to make community-consumable. Work may be non-trivial. (dlenrow, 14:39:54) * Palani: Describes two parts 1) blueprint/planning 2) aligning release dates for features, etc. Need close coordination (dlenrow, 14:42:00) * proposed action item for TSC. Write down timeline for integrating with upstream projects identified to date (dlenrow, 14:43:34) * Palani: Yes we need gap analysis against upstream roadmaps (dlenrow, 14:43:59) * CP starts with OStack and ODL and proposes Juno and Helium as the platform for our 1H2015 first release (dlenrow, 14:44:54) * This means we need to articulate our needs to upstream six months in advance (dlenrow, 14:45:15) * Need solid plan for working with upstream (dlenrow, 14:45:43) * need to start firming up a simultaneous release process so that folks can begin to plan. (dlenrow, 14:46:11) * CP asks for folks with experience to help draft a SR process? (dlenrow, 14:46:33) * Palani volunteers to work but can't start this week. (dlenrow, 14:47:53) * ACTION: Dlenrow to draft SR process wiki page ASAP (dlenrow, 14:49:31) * Need a CI project proposal ASAP (dlenrow, 14:50:09) * ACTION: Ian/Ulrich begin to draft this (dlenrow, 14:51:48) * group is working on testing project proposal (dlenrow, 14:53:07) * CP propose getting initial thoughts on the wiki (dlenrow, 14:53:35) * question where are the proposed activities from community discussion? (dlenrow, 14:54:21) * they are on the wiki (dlenrow, 14:54:27) * reminder project proposal mostly captures scope. There is not need to document implementation plans in detail (dlenrow, 14:56:17) * Agree to start threads to work on these projects-to-be (dlenrow, 14:57:58) * CP will follow up with folks self-identified as willing to work (dlenrow, 14:58:16) * testing has already scheduled a follow up call (dlenrow, 14:58:32) * Once projects are approved, we need to create a project page on wiki and not make changes to proposal pages (dlenrow, 15:00:18) * That is end of published agenda. (dlenrow, 15:01:08) * CP asks for other business? (dlenrow, 15:01:26) * question on results of the lightning round last week (dlenrow, 15:01:58) * test and CI got lots of attention and will become initial projects (dlenrow, 15:02:59) * lots of notes and white boards captured and on Wiki\ (dlenrow, 15:03:16) * question: how do folks get visibility to progress if not already involved in a project (dlenrow, 15:04:39) * Projects will have their own weekly (or similar) calls and IRC channels and info will be on project wiki. Anyone can join any project meeting or read minutes/docs/wiki (dlenrow, 15:06:20) * LINK: http://new.livestream.com/accounts/5312056/events/3434564 (ChrisPriceAB, 15:07:05) * http://new.livestream.com/accounts/5312056/events/3434564 (rpaik, 15:07:08) * Ray asks if we also need summary type minutes (dlenrow, 15:10:04) * agree to have summary on wiki (dlenrow, 15:10:39) * do we know what we plan to accomplish with release 1? (dlenrow, 15:11:40) * we don't know enough to define that yet (dlenrow, 15:12:24) Meeting ended at 15:13:15 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * dlenrow * Dlenrow to draft SR process wiki page ASAP People present (lines said) --------------------------- * dlenrow (59) * ChrisPriceAB (8) * collabot (3) * B_Smith_ (2) * DirkKutscher (2) * rpaik (2) * nstpierre (1) * AndChat|71489 (1) * bin_ (1) * Serge (1) * TapioTallgren (1) * Wenjing (1) * chrispriceAB (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4