========================= #opnfv-meeting: OPNFV TSC ========================= Meeting started by ChrisPriceAB at 14:57:56 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2014/opnfv-meeting.2014-11-18-14.57.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (ChrisPriceAB, 14:58:06) * palani (palani, 14:58:19) * Chris Price (ChrisPriceAB, 14:58:21) * Bryan Sullivan (bryan_att, 15:03:06) * Frank Brockners (frankbrockners, 15:03:33) * Aric Gardner (aricg, 15:03:44) * Pranav Mehta (Pranav, 15:03:51) * Ulrich Kleber (uli_, 15:04:22) * Agenda Bashing (ChrisPriceAB, 15:07:28) * No issues with minutes - unanimously approved (dneary, 15:07:45) * Project status - testing group (dneary, 15:08:04) * margaret joined (margaret, 15:08:52) * Tapio Tallgren (TapioT, 15:09:35) * Discussion on project review (no projects officially up for review, but we want to know how to get started) (dneary, 15:10:34) * distribution selection https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/opnfv_distribution (palani, 15:10:42) * Liaising with SDOs, co-hosting events (dneary, 15:10:47) * Maintaining a clean wiki (dneary, 15:11:02) * Action item review (dneary, 15:11:09) * Adding item to review the distro WiKi page and discuss. (ChrisPriceAB, 15:11:46) * Ashiq (Ashiq, 15:12:31) * Chris Wright (cdub, 15:13:11) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/opnfv_distribution (rpaik, 15:14:52) * Discussion of base distribution as starting point for OPNFV (dneary, 15:18:05) * palani sees PackStack and CentOS as the favoured platform now, and proposes that we get started with that (dneary, 15:19:16) * Feedback that the table in https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/opnfv_distribution needs more fields filled out (dneary, 15:21:02) * there is some confusion as to the relevance of some informational elements on the selection of the platform. Clarification and discussion was held around each topic. (ChrisPriceAB, 15:25:53) * Decision to move on with no conclusion - installer and base platform decision deferred (dneary, 15:36:09) * Getting Started project proposal and discussion (dneary, 15:36:27) * https://wiki.opnfv.org/get_started (frankbrockners, 15:36:39) * get started (ChrisPriceAB, 15:36:41) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/get_started (dneary, 15:36:46) * get started is an activity to establish a 3 node OPNFV baseline deployment (ChrisPriceAB, 15:41:49) * many known issues are not intended to be solved in this activity, they will be postponed until after the foundation work has been done (ChrisPriceAB, 15:42:29) * the deployment would be based around 2 control nodes and one compute node (ChrisPriceAB, 15:43:03) * Aric asked if the 2 control nodes are for redundancy or another purpose, the 2 control nodes are intended to be for redundancy (ChrisPriceAB, 15:44:01) * for community discussion please address the mailing list using [getstarted] in the subject line. (ChrisPriceAB, 15:47:37) * TSC voted to create the sandbox using Linux Foundation facilities - sounds like Frank's proposal could proceed without waiting for TSC approval (dneary, 15:50:03) * the project is something we have to do anyway, so will support it (bryan_att, 15:53:35) * Bootstrap/get started to get started. (dneary, 16:14:34) * Performance and testing (dneary, 16:15:24) * morgan_orange gives background on testing & performance effort - dependent on a CI project (Octopus, bootstrap) producing a testable platform. (dneary, 16:17:19) * Project proposal will be ready to be submitted next week (dneary, 16:17:32) * Project also depends on VNFs to be deployed for test purposes (dneary, 16:18:47) * Project proposals pending review. (ChrisPriceAB, 16:21:31) * For requirements projects, it may help to have outcomes clearly listed (rpaik, 16:31:19) * Chris Price asked the TSC how best to approach project creation approval (ChrisPriceAB, 16:32:07) * Chris W describes that some practical experience (like the get started / bootstrap initiative ) would provide valuable intput to the TSC around the scope of each project proposal (ChrisPriceAB, 16:34:18) * Ashiq mentioned for requirement and documentation projects this would not be required. (ChrisPriceAB, 16:34:41) * Frank B explains that being concise of the deliverables of the project would help establish the foundation for project approval. (ChrisPriceAB, 16:35:15) * ChrisPriceAB proposes that for documentation and requirements project, we should start reviewing and approving them next week. (dneary, 16:36:32) * ChrisPriceAB proposes that for infrastructure, integration, testing projects, we need more clarity on what will be produced by the projects; practical experience bootstrapping the CI will be useful (dneary, 16:37:17) * uli_ asks how project members can avail of the sandbox environment (dneary, 16:40:45) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/get_started (ChrisPriceAB, 16:42:06) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/get_started (rpaik, 16:42:06) * aricg is the Linux Foundation contact for the sandbox - no process exists yet (dneary, 16:42:15) * We should use the get started / bootstrap wiki as a means to engage in the collaborative (sandbox) based activities. (ChrisPriceAB, 16:44:54) * Proposals can be submitted any time, but a 2 week review period is required before the TSC can approve it (dneary, 16:45:56) * Can I have 30 seconds on an update on the Copper (Deployment Policy) project? (bryan_att, 16:53:16) * Improving the wiki (dneary, 16:53:27) * Feedback that information is hard to find on the wiki (project proposals, meeting times, Google indexing) (dneary, 16:55:55) * ChrisPriceAB suggests we keep it tidy - naming conventions, page organization (dneary, 16:56:22) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/tsc <- This says the meeting is 1h - should be updated (or we shorten the meeting ;-) (dneary, 16:58:35) * Proposal that Marie-Odile Pauli speaks with ETSI about co-hosting an OPNFV hack-fest the week of ETSI NFV ISG #9 in Prague (dneary, 17:01:58) * bryan_att says that OPNFV work in AT&T is not overlapping with ETSI, he prefers focus on developer events, not SDO events (dneary, 17:02:44) * conclusion is that critical mass exists for Prague hackfest, but opportunities for other events exist (dneary, 17:03:45) * Simultaneous Release call tomorrow (dneary, 17:04:15) Meeting ended at 17:04:24 UTC. People present (lines said) --------------------------- * dneary (43) * ChrisPriceAB (28) * Wenjing (10) * cdub (9) * collabot (7) * TapioT (4) * bryan_att (4) * rpaik (3) * julienjut (3) * palani (2) * frankbrockners (2) * Pranav (1) * aricg (1) * uli_ (1) * margaret (1) * RK-Sandvine (1) * Ashiq (1) * wenjing (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4