==========================================
#opnfv-meeting: OPNFV TSC - project review
==========================================


Meeting started by ChrisPriceAB at 14:00:52 UTC.  The full logs are
available at
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2014/opnfv-meeting.2014-12-04-14.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* roll call  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:01:09)
  * Chris Price  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:01:15)
  * Tapio Tallgren  (TapioT, 14:01:17)
  * Dirk Kutscher  (dku, 14:01:37)
  * Ashiq Khan  (Ashiq, 14:02:24)
  * Uli Kleber  (uli_, 14:03:28)
  * Frank Brockners  (frankbrockners, 14:03:43)
  * Pranav Mehta  (Pranav, 14:04:41)
  * dlenrow  (dlenrow, 14:05:05)
  *   (ghellmann, 14:05:10)

* Resource management project review  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:08:28)
  * LINK:
    https://wiki.opnfv.org/requirements_projects/resource_management
    (ChrisPriceAB, 14:08:48)
  * Bryan Sullivan  (bryan_att, 14:09:34)
  * palani  (palani, 14:10:22)
  * Ashiq describes the current issue around resource reservation in
    OpenStack, that it is not possible to reserve resources for future
    asignment  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:11:09)
  * Hui  (rpaik, 14:13:04)
  * Andrea__  (rpaik, 14:13:25)
  * ghellmann  (ghellmann, 14:15:23)
  * Pranav asks if there will be investigations into the security
    aspects of reserving resources with specific security profiles
    (ChrisPriceAB, 14:16:14)
  * Ashiq describes that such criteria may be used for mapping.
    (ChrisPriceAB, 14:16:45)
  * A discussion ensues on how policies and the underlying
    implementation can be resolved in the requirements projects.  Bryan
    describes there is a need for collaboration between the policy and
    resource reservation projects.  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:18:17)
  * Mike Bugenhagen asks which network capability abstractions and
    service requirement abstractions will be documented in this project.
    (I think)  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:19:25)
  * A discussion ensues on the policy project...  (ChrisPriceAB,
    14:20:27)
  * clarification ensues that the reservation lifecycle abstractions
    will need to be captured clearly in this project.  (ChrisPriceAB,
    14:21:52)
  * julien_ZTE  (rpaik, 14:22:07)
  * cdub  (rpaik, 14:22:38)
  * Bryan indicates that the capabilities provided in this project may
    be able to be purposed to identify reource wateage.  (ChrisPriceAB,
    14:23:03)
  * resource wasteage  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:23:11)
  * Ashiq indicates that this is not addressed in the scope of this
    project  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:23:25)
  * frankbrockners describes that use case descriptions would be
    beneficial to clarify the proposal.  ( as a recoomendation )
    (ChrisPriceAB, 14:29:05)
  * another suggestion to add email addresses of committers/contributors
    (rpaik, 14:29:19)
  * there is a clarification that this covers network/storage/compute
    resources.  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:29:29)
  * the promise project has been approved for creation by the TSC.
    (ChrisPriceAB, 14:32:48)

* Project review for copper project  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:33:04)
  * LINK:
    https://wiki.opnfv.org/requirements_projects/virtual_infrastructure_deployment_policies
    (bryan_att, 14:33:11)
  * Bryan describes the copper project's goal is to determine when a
    resource has been allocated/deallocated according to a decision.
    (focused on policy driven decisions)  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:34:53)
  * the project shall perform gap analysis of existing capabilities and
    identify areas fr improvement or further development  (ChrisPriceAB,
    14:35:36)
  * event collection is a component of the project scope that may
    provide additional value.  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:37:09)
  * topics to be covered are; what is available today and is it
    sufficient, how are cross component policies coordinated.
    (ChrisPriceAB, 14:38:59)
  * bryan describes that a publish/subscribe model for modelling data
    will enable automated policy functions to be realized.
    (ChrisPriceAB, 14:42:26)
  * Bryan clarifies that the contributors on the project would fill the
    role of committer for project creation.  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:46:53)
  * frankbrockners indicates that a clarification on the output of the
    project and project committers is required.  (ChrisPriceAB,
    14:49:36)
  * Ashiq indicates that a policy realization is deployment specific and
    asks if the project will attempt to define policies or define policy
    object types.  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:50:38)
  * bryan answers that the project will define the policy object types
    rather than deployment specific policies.  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:51:17)
  * Bryan is asked if this is an assesment of the current state, or if
    this will address known NFV policy goals.  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:51:47)
  * bryan responds that an assesment will be made and the goal is to
    establish NFV based policy solutions.  (ChrisPriceAB, 14:52:20)
  * bryan_att please add a contibuor of my colleague
    "tand.delong@zte.com.cn"  (julien_ZTE, 14:53:48)
  * ACTION: Bryan to update the committer/contributor list and
    deliverables for review on Tuesdays TSC call for a final vote.
    (ChrisPriceAB, 14:55:49)



Meeting ended at 14:55:56 UTC.



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* ChrisPriceAB (42)
* collabot (7)
* rpaik (5)
* dlenrow (3)
* bryan_att (3)
* ghellmann (3)
* Ashiq (3)
* Pranav (2)
* frankbrockners (2)
* TapioT (2)
* Gerald (2)
* uli_ (2)
* dku (2)
* julien_ZTE (2)
* palani (1)
* Hui (1)
* ImranK (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4