#opnfv-meeting: Octopus Weekly Meeting
Meeting started by ulik at 14:01:07 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/meetings/octopus
(iben_,
14:05:30)
- agenda bashing (fdegir,
14:06:27)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/meetings/octop
(fdegir,
14:06:35)
- Welcome to new committers (ulik, 14:06:52)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/meetings/octopus
(rprakash,
14:07:24)
- Uli reports from the voting (7 +1 votes for the
new committers) (ulik,
14:09:25)
- Uli encourages to document in Jira when doing
contributions (ulik,
14:10:03)
- https://jira.opnfv.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OCTO
(fdegir,
14:12:01)
- Meeting format (ulik, 14:12:33)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/octopus/jenkins_wow
(fdegir,
14:13:08)
- Uli proposes to move to pure IRC
meetings (ulik,
14:13:24)
- it is difficult tpo co-ordinate without voice
calls (rprakash,
14:13:42)
- AGREED: to try IRC
only meetings. (ulik,
14:17:41)
- if we want to add voice we can do so
quickly. (ulik,
14:18:00)
- Status update: connected labs (ulik, 14:18:19)
- Connected labs are ATT, Huawei, Dell, Ericsson,
Intel, Orange (fdegir,
14:18:27)
- https://build.opnfv.org/ci/computer/
(fdegir,
14:18:45)
- "Connected labs" means one or more servers from
these labs are connected to OPNFV Jenkins as slaves (fdegir,
14:20:01)
- and these slaves are currently doing different
things building or testing depending on the lab/server
configuration (fdegir,
14:20:34)
- Intel had Firewall problems for Jenkins slave
to communicate two way with Jenkin Master (rprakash,
14:20:42)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/jenkins#jenkins_slaves
<— a list maintained on the wiki (iben_,
14:20:50)
- https://build.opnfv.org/ci/computer/
(fdegir,
14:21:13)
- Work with connecting slave(s) from Spirent lab
is curently ongoing (fdegir,
14:22:33)
- status update artifact repository (ulik, 14:22:45)
- Google storage is in use now (ulik,
14:22:56)
- using Google storage with Fuel and
Foreman (rprakash,
14:23:06)
- https://build.opnfv.org/ci/computer/
(fdegir,
14:23:27)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/artifactrepos
(iben_,
14:23:35)
- http://artifacts.opnfv.org/
(fdegir,
14:23:38)
- Artifiact Resource Manager (ARM) (rprakash,
14:23:49)
- Example build metadata is (fdegir,
14:24:12)
- http://artifacts.opnfv.org/genesis/fuel/opnfv-35.properties
(fdegir,
14:24:14)
- How to get files to ARM (fdegir,
14:24:52)
- Slave specific tokens are needed (fdegir,
14:25:04)
- Request access/permission by opening ticket to
LF helpdesk (fdegir,
14:25:18)
- need upload permision and can be obtained from
Artic Garner for ARM update (rprakash,
14:25:29)
- We need clear instructions for how to work with
documentation and what to do with produced
documents/artifacts (fdegir,
14:28:11)
- ACTION: We need clear
instructions for how to work with documentation and what to do with
produced documents/artifacts (fdegir,
14:28:48)
- Main source information should be the
repo (fdegir,
14:30:41)
- the wiki will be updated automatically from
HTML (fdegir,
14:30:52)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/exampledoc
(iben_,
14:31:02)
- RST files are created in document directory
corresponding to PDFs (rprakash,
14:31:07)
- uby automatically generating documentation
using the documentation source in Gerrit (fdegir,
14:31:13)
- Documentation (ulik, 14:31:42)
- Is Octopus expected to provide documentation
for R1? (fdegir,
14:32:20)
- ACTION: Uli to
clarify in TSC whether Octopus documentation is part of Arno
(ulik,
14:32:46)
- Octopus should provide documentation for R1
even though it is not expected based on what is written on
Wiki (fdegir,
14:32:51)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/documentation_projects
(iben_,
14:33:05)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/documentation_projects
(fdegir,
14:33:39)
- Scope of Octopus documentation needs to be
decided (fdegir,
14:34:20)
- Octopus should document current
loops/jobs (fdegir,
14:34:35)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/octopus/flows#candidates_for_release_1
(fdegir,
14:34:50)
- Octopus should provide information regarding
how to work with jobs using JJB (fdegir,
14:35:41)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/octopus/flows#candidates_for_release_1
(fdegir,
14:35:44)
- Documentation regarding Artifact
Repository (fdegir,
14:35:56)
- Documentation regarding how to connect external
labs to OPNFV Jenkins (fdegir,
14:36:17)
- https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/genesis-fuel-daily-att-master/
(iben_,
14:36:20)
- This list is the bare minimum for R1
(fdegir,
14:37:27)
- releng not found (rprakash,
14:39:05)
- story for Ocotpus documentation (fdegir,
14:39:13)
- https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/OCTO-33
(fdegir,
14:39:14)
- https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/admin/projects/releng
(iben_,
14:39:41)
- confirmed
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/admin/projects/releng works
(rprakash,
14:40:44)
- 4 documents (rprakash,
14:41:11)
- We need help with documenting (fdegir,
14:41:24)
- How to connect labs to OPNFV Jenkins
(fdegir,
14:41:25)
- How to use JJB (fdegir,
14:41:30)
- How to use Artifact Repository (fdegir,
14:41:37)
- fdegir is working with documenting current
jobs (fdegir,
14:41:50)
- Achieving RC2 (ulik, 14:42:49)
- LF hardware not yet fully functional
(ulik,
14:43:26)
- LF hardware is not fully fucntional yet
(rprakash,
14:43:30)
- waht time do we need once LF hardware is
ready (rprakash,
14:44:03)
- what is the topo of test env. jenkins
master->jump server(slave)->LF hardware? (jerryz,
14:44:46)
- we connect Jenkins Slave server that's not
enough will need automation and that takes a day least (rprakash,
14:44:52)
- Have a deploy script ready but need to
test (rprakash,
14:45:17)
- Scripts are already prepared, so we can easily
move forward as soon as the hardware is ready. (ulik,
14:45:51)
- Foreman deploy scripts are ready (fdegir,
14:46:09)
- Foreman deploy script are ready not for
Fuel (rprakash,
14:46:21)
- We need to check Fuel deploy script
(fdegir,
14:46:22)
- compass has vm-based deploy.sh ready
(jerryz,
14:46:22)
- The requirement is to have bare metal
deployment for R1 (fdegir,
14:47:03)
- concluding statement: Octopus is fine for RC2.
About one day after hardware is ready. (ulik,
14:50:12)
- Hardware ready means that they are connected to
Jenkins as slaves (fdegir,
14:50:39)
- for rc2 deployment scripts once ready need a
day or two to test once LF harware is ready with Jenkins Mater
/Salve connected to labs (rprakash,
14:50:56)
- starting to think about release 2 (ulik, 14:51:54)
- release 1 is just basic (rprakash,
14:52:38)
- We need to go through the R1 CI setup and
evaluate it (fdegir,
14:52:52)
- Improve the CI moving forward (fdegir,
14:53:12)
- workflow needs to be im[roved and Zool may be a
good idea to investigate (rprakash,
14:53:29)
- s/Zool/Zuul (jerryz,
14:53:51)
- Project needs are important for CI to improve
its workflow (rprakash,
14:54:05)
- Jeera story for CI example (rprakash,
14:54:37)
- https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/OCTO-31
(fdegir,
14:54:45)
- ACTION: Uli to start
discussion on etherpad and send email to all projects (ulik,
14:55:24)
- We need input from people who have experience
with different tools upstream projects use (fdegir,
14:55:33)
- Then we need to evaluate these tools to
determine if they add value (fdegir,
14:55:44)
- or if they increase the complexity (fdegir,
14:55:52)
- get agreement for inputs to CI from other
projects to feed the etherpad that will be setup by Uli (rprakash,
14:56:23)
- build priority list of requirments for CI in
etherpad and go over them weekly yo agree on what to do (rprakash,
14:57:39)
- AoB (ulik, 14:57:53)
Meeting ended at 14:58:54 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- We need clear instructions for how to work with documentation and what to do with produced documents/artifacts
- Uli to clarify in TSC whether Octopus documentation is part of Arno
- Uli to start discussion on etherpad and send email to all projects
People present (lines said)
- iben_ (127)
- fdegir (82)
- ulik (34)
- rprakash (29)
- jerryz (12)
- collabot (5)
- frankbrockners (2)
- radez (2)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.