14:00:18 #startmeeting Octopus Weekly Meeting 14:00:18 Meeting started Mon Jul 13 14:00:18 2015 UTC. The chair is fdegir. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:18 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:00:18 The meeting name has been set to 'octopus_weekly_meeting' 14:00:26 #topic rollcall 14:00:36 anyone who wants to join the Octopus meeting 14:00:40 please type in your attendance 14:00:50 chenshuai 14:01:12 please #info your nick chenshuai__ 14:01:18 #info Fatih Degirmenci 14:01:26 #info chenshuai__ 14:02:08 looks like we're the only ones who are around 14:02:11 will wait a minute or so 14:02:30 fdegir - is there an agenda for this meeting? 14:02:38 #Jun Li 14:02:44 frankbrockners: the usual agenda which I'll type in shortly 14:02:45 #info Jun Li 14:02:48 mostly quick status check 14:03:01 ok - thanks fdegir 14:03:04 np 14:03:09 #topic agenda bashing 14:03:18 #info The agenda is: Action item review / Jira review and assign important topics / work on B-Release / AoB 14:03:49 #topic Action item review 14:04:20 #info Action Item on trozet and radez regarding RDO/TripleO demo: done last week 14:04:30 thanks for good demo 14:04:55 #info Action Item on Uli: ulik and vlaza check and improve description how to comment on documents 14:05:18 #info ulik and vlaza are not around so I'm actioning them again 14:05:27 #action ulik and vlaza check and improve description how to comment on documents 14:05:48 #info Action Item on MatthewLi: Zuul demo 14:06:08 can you please give a quick update and expected demo date MatthewLi? 14:06:10 #info I have finished the deployment in my lab 14:06:45 #info however, there is a need to retify the lab which I am using these days 14:07:18 #info the demo will be given in one or two weeks after the lab is retified 14:07:19 #info Narinder Gupta 14:07:35 MatthewLi: can we say that the demo could be done on 27th of July? 14:07:49 we can always change this if things don't go according the plan 14:07:51 fdegir: no probelm 14:07:52 #info Bryan Sullivan 14:08:07 #action MatthewLi to demo Zuul on 27th of July 14:08:17 fdegir: ok 14:08:24 #info Anyone wants to read about Zuul and give it a try, you can check below link 14:08:27 #link http://techs.enovance.com/7542/dive-into-zuul-gated-commit-system-2 14:08:49 there was no other action item 14:08:54 moving on to the next topic 14:09:11 #topic Jira Review and Assign Important Issues 14:09:26 #info We still have some open Jira issues for Arno maintenance 14:09:34 #info Issues can be seen using below link 14:09:49 #link https://jira.opnfv.org/issues/?filter=10200 14:10:06 yep, I will finish some in the next days which are assigned to me 14:10:11 #info I kindly request everyone to take a look at open Jira issues - including myself - and fix them 14:10:20 maybe in 2 or 3 days, will be very soon 14:10:35 thx MatthewLi 14:11:01 #info Once Arno issues are closed, we can continue adding new issues and work on them for B-Release and onwards 14:11:09 yep 14:11:27 that was it for jira stuff 14:11:38 #topic Starting to work on B-Release 14:12:04 #info As you might now already, we have been doing Octopus brainstorming on Etherpad 14:12:20 #link https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/octopusR2 14:12:39 #info It seems the Etherpad has been quited down so we need to go through ideas there 14:12:56 #info prioritize them and create corresponding issues in Jira 14:13:27 #info Please add your ideas there 14:13:41 #info and if you think we missed a really important item, highlight that there 14:14:07 before infoing the stuff in 14:14:33 I think having virtual deployments has highest priority in order to give feedback from verify and merge jobs as well 14:14:54 anyone thinks otherwise or anything else should be also highlighted? 14:15:55 #info Working on virtual deployments in order to improve CI coverage is probably the highest priority 14:16:18 something which is only implicitly on the etherpad is the ability to do build/deploy/test sequentially for several installers on a single POD 14:16:20 #info In order for Octopus to work on this, one of the PODs in the LF lab must be reconfigured 14:16:40 frankbrockners: good point 14:16:44 this "sequential execution on a single POD" ability would be a high prio item as well IMHO 14:16:51 info'ing it and putting it to etherpad 14:17:11 fdegir - do you - or should I? 14:17:18 frankbrockners: I can add it 14:17:22 thanks 14:17:23 thx for reminding 14:17:52 #info frankbrockners reminds that we have to prirotize the work needed to do the sequential execution on a single POD - build/deploy/test for multiple installers on one node 14:18:02 #action fdegir to add this to etherpad 14:18:26 anyone like chasing people? 14:18:35 we need to poke LF and Pharos regarding LF lab reconfiguration 14:19:24 #action fdegir to contact LF and Pharos regarding LF Lab reconfiguration - assigning one of the PODs for CI 14:19:50 moving on to last agenda item 14:19:53 #topic AoB 14:20:03 ayone wants to bring anything? 14:20:36 fdegir: May I have a question? 14:20:50 please go ahead chigang 14:21:12 what would you like to ask? 14:21:18 fdegir: I saw each Lab that have a different in Jenkins dashboard 14:21:52 fdegir: Can we make rules for them to manage them? 14:22:01 chigang: you mean different slaves from each lab is connected to Jenkins? 14:22:11 https://build.opnfv.org/ci/computer/ 14:22:12 fdegir: different name 14:22:44 they all have different names already 14:22:54 or can you please explain a bit more? 14:23:41 chigang: do u mean we should set a rule to name the slaves? 14:23:47 Can we rename them in some rule, such as company-location-workfor--- 14:24:01 good idea chigang 14:24:14 yep, we can their use from their name. 14:24:23 yep, we can see their use from their name. 14:24:35 #info chigang proposes naming slaves connected to OPNFV Jenkins in certain way 14:24:54 #info Proposal is: company-location-etc - details to be defined 14:25:05 chigang: can I action you to propose a naming scheme? 14:25:18 OK 14:25:22 on etherpad https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/octopusR2 14:25:39 #action chigang to propose naming scheme for slaves connected to Jenkins on https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/octopusR2 14:25:46 I add in etherpad 14:25:48 thx for bringing this up 14:26:00 this might require us to disconnect and reconnect all the non-LF slaves 14:26:11 as the name change may require us to change tokens 14:26:38 but can check this with one of the slaves first once we have the proposed naming scheme 14:27:14 #info once chigang propose naming scheme, we should try this with one slave first to see if it impacts the slave tokens 14:27:31 anything else? 14:27:36 yes , it need some work for rename, so we should discuss the rules together. 14:27:51 yep 14:28:10 please create a jira ticket regarding this so we can subscribe to the ticket 14:28:33 ok 14:28:34 and go to etherpad once you add comment to the ticket regarding your work 14:28:39 then we add our comments to etherpad 14:29:13 if nothing else, I propose to close the meeting 14:29:34 bryan_att: how is your congress doing 14:29:59 maybe you can put your patch up in the repo 14:30:40 bryan_att: ping 14:31:25 I've added some thoughts to etherpad regarding this after yours MatthewLi 14:31:27 Still trying to get a testbed off the ground so we can start working on the patch. 14:31:49 Have not successfully deployed Arno yet...step 1 14:32:39 I info this in so we can check back this again coming weeks to see if we can be any help 14:32:49 Thx 14:33:09 #info bryan_att is working on setting up testbed and Arno installation in order to continue with Congress work 14:33:25 #info Octopus will keep an eye on this work and give hand if needed 14:33:27 bryan_att: if there's sth need help, I can give some, few days ago, i have put an patch to deploy rally in openstack 14:33:47 Great, I will reach out when ready 14:34:02 ok then 14:34:13 closing the meeting and we can continue discussions on #opnfv-octopus as usual 14:34:17 thx for joining 14:34:20 #endmeeting