#opnfv-meeting: Project lifecycle review

Meeting summary

1. 1. https://wiki.opnfv.org/project_lifecycle Current proposed amended document (ChrisPriceAB, 16:03:01)
   2. the amended proposal covers a few key points including; the removal of the "top level" project stage, additions of proposed metrics for graduation review. (ChrisPriceAB, 16:04:57)
   3. daniel smith (lmcdasm, 16:10:38)
   4. A dialog ensues around changing the existing qualification of release participation with a time based metric for graduation (ChrisPriceAB, 16:23:22)
   5. The text will be amended back to the text based on release participation as opposed to having existed for some period of time. (ChrisPriceAB, 16:24:02)
   6. Perhaps we can borrow graduation metrics from best practices in software engineering. Code quality (bugs, fixes etc), documentation, CI integration? (RayNugent_, 16:32:37)
   7. https://www.opnfv.org/developers/technical-project-governance/project-lifecycle Current lifecycle document (ChrisPriceAB, 16:33:59)
   8. the proposal will be updated based on todays discussions to address primarily the removal of project types and the removal of the "top level" definition. (ChrisPriceAB, 16:42:59)
   9. Ildiko will send out an updated proposal and call for another review. (ChrisPriceAB, 16:43:17)
   10. the next review will include proposed changes to the TSC charter according to the removal of "top level" project. (ChrisPriceAB, 16:43:53)
   11. AGREED: the community on this call agrees that the removal of top level projects and converging the project categories is a good idea. (ChrisPriceAB, 16:57:11)

Action items

1. (none)

People present (lines said)

1. ChrisPriceAB (12)
2. lmcdasm (4)
3. collabot (3)
4. RayNugent_ (2)