13:59:22 #startmeeting OPNFV TSC Meeting 13:59:22 Meeting started Tue Oct 6 13:59:22 2015 UTC. The chair is ChrisPriceAB. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:59:22 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 13:59:22 The meeting name has been set to 'opnfv_tsc_meeting' 13:59:27 #topic roll call 13:59:37 #info Chris Price 13:59:39 #info Uli 13:59:39 #info Gerald Kunzmann 13:59:44 proxy for Ashiq Khan 13:59:49 #info Frank Brockners 14:00:09 #chair rpaik 14:00:09 Current chairs: ChrisPriceAB rpaik 14:00:16 #chair ilu-k 14:00:16 Warning: Nick not in channel: ilu-k 14:00:16 Current chairs: ChrisPriceAB ilu-k rpaik 14:00:22 #chair frankbrockners 14:00:22 Current chairs: ChrisPriceAB frankbrockners ilu-k rpaik 14:00:34 #chair uli-k 14:00:34 Current chairs: ChrisPriceAB frankbrockners ilu-k rpaik uli-k 14:00:40 :D 14:01:26 #info Tapio Tallgren 14:01:44 #topic Previous Minutes of meeting 14:01:53 #info no feedback on previous minutes, approved. 14:02:00 #topic Agenda Bashing 14:02:09 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/tsc Todays Agenda 14:02:14 #info Wenjing 14:02:16 #info Morgan Richomme 14:02:43 #info Narinder Gupta 14:02:45 #info Bryan Sullivan 14:02:58 #info Dirk Kutscher 14:03:33 we now have quorum 14:04:55 #topic Strategic Planning Committee discussion 14:06:31 #info Chris outlines the identified need to address OPNFV consumers in the Brahmaputra timeline with a theme of "lab ready" 14:06:49 #info Chris (Donley) outlines the focus areas the Strategic planning committee has identified for Brahmaputra 14:07:11 #info Parviz Yegani 14:07:39 #info multi-site while important is seen to be heavily dependant on MANO components to realise in a meaningful way in the Brahmaputra time-frame. 14:08:20 #info Chris presents a mapping of the identifies capabilities/themes with projects participating in the Brahmaputra release 14:08:49 fortunately we did not freeze test specifications at milestone C... :) 14:09:08 :) 14:09:48 #info Chris outlines that cadence of release and iterative development is more important that completeness. Some capabilities may not be ready until the C-Release which is acceptable. 14:10:03 #info he asks that the user stories be prioritized rather than completeness of features 14:10:44 #info Chris indicates he will facilitate community support for resource shortages with the board in his capacity as SPC chair 14:11:19 #info Ray Nugent asks if there are preferences on installer tools for the features 14:11:49 #info Chris answers that the installers need to work, but the focus from the committee is on the features in the platform. 14:13:37 #info Ray Nugent asks if the SPC has any views on the release artifacts to be delivered. 14:13:45 #info ChrisPriceAB to post the slides on the wiki 14:14:03 #info Chris responds that the SPC does not have any specific opinions on the form of release. 14:14:36 #info Brian asks if the intention is for targetted testing to focus on these use cases. 14:15:00 #info Chris responds that test cases would be valuable for lab activities and an important component of the activity. 14:17:56 #info Chris adds that the goal is to provide similar feedback earlier for future releases (e.g. prior to milestone C) 14:18:13 #info Chris outlines the committee will focus around 2 releases in the future moving forward. 14:18:48 #topic TSC update to the board 14:20:28 #info topics presented were technical community elections/project lifecycle updates/Brahmaputra milestone C update 14:20:47 #join #opnfv-orange 14:21:07 # sorry 14:23:31 #info also discussed Pharos status 14:26:08 #topic Community lab readiness for Brahmaputra 14:26:15 * ChrisPriceAB thinks we have moved on 14:26:44 #info Parviz asks if we can quantify risks of not having sufficient HW in the LF lab? 14:26:58 #info there is a discussion on establishing more infrastructure in the LF lab. 14:27:39 #info uli-k outlines the risk of not bringing more hardware into the CI infrastructure on the project with combinatorial deployments 14:29:21 #info Julien 14:29:36 #info feedback form the community is that adding the additional capacilty in the existing lab would be highly beneficial for the project. 14:31:49 #info Tapio raises the point that including ARM servers in the lab would be beneficial for the community. 14:32:43 Tapio_T_: ARMband project aims to provide an ARM based lab into pharos 14:33:21 #agree Ths TSC would like to request additional funding for filling the existsing LF infra rack with servers to enable more deployment PODs in the LF lab. 14:33:56 #info uli-k outlines the need for more lab infrastructures to be made available for the community in the Pharos context. 14:34:27 #info uli-k describes the need to activate the community labs and make them available to the community. 14:35:20 #action Pharos project to identify labs that intend to participate in Brahmaputra and be part of the CI pipeline. 14:36:41 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos/hw_resource_allocation 14:37:08 We can continue Pharos discussion in release meeting coming up next meeting 14:37:09 #topic OPNFV community election process - proposal 14:37:49 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/community_election_procedure latest proposal 14:39:34 #topic Committer removal processes 14:39:54 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/developer/committer_removal link to the proposed process 14:41:42 I think an abstain is a 0 14:41:55 if people want their vote to be counted, they have reasonable means to communicate their vote (i.e.: email) 14:42:44 Perhaps for removal set a specific reply by date and only then lack of response is a 0? 14:43:07 I'd say the responsibility for voting or finding a proxy when they are away is on the committer 14:43:31 #topic OPNFV release artifacts decision 14:44:18 @ChrisPrice - can you please post the questions being posed to the TSC here on IRC? 14:44:18 ThomasNadeau: Error: "ChrisPrice" is not a valid command. 14:44:25 ChrisPrice - can you please post the questions being posed to the TSC here on IRC? 14:44:25 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/releases/brahmaputra/release_artifacts_discussion#optionsrelease_artifacts options for release artifacts 14:45:07 Can you vote for more than 1 ? 14:46:48 one of the clarifications is that all options include documentation as a mandatory requirement 14:47:38 it further assumes that all active install options (script, bootable ISO) include the ability to complete an offline install 14:47:51 #startvote Preference on minimum requirements on release artifacts? (A.1a, A.1b, A.1c, A.2a, A.2b, A.2c, abstain) 14:47:51 Begin voting on: Preference on minimum requirements on release artifacts? Valid vote options are , A, 1a, A, 1b, A, 1c, A, 2a, A, 2b, A, 2c, abstain, . 14:47:51 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 14:47:57 #vote abstain 14:48:02 #vote ab 14:48:02 tapio_: ab is not a valid option. Valid options are , A, 1a, A, 1b, A, 1c, A, 2a, A, 2b, A, 2c, abstain, . 14:48:11 #vote 2b 14:48:15 #vote A.2b 14:48:15 ChrisPriceAB: A.2b is not a valid option. Valid options are , A, 1a, A, 1b, A, 1c, A, 2a, A, 2b, A, 2c, abstain, . 14:48:32 #endvote 14:48:32 Voted on "Preference on minimum requirements on release artifacts?" Results are 14:48:32 abstain (1): GeraldK 14:48:32 2b (1): tapio_ 14:48:37 #vote A2b 14:48:50 #startvote Preference on minimum requirements on release artifacts? (A1a, A1b, A1c, A2a, A2b, A2c, abstain) 14:48:50 Begin voting on: Preference on minimum requirements on release artifacts? Valid vote options are , A1a, A1b, A1c, A2a, A2b, A2c, abstain, . 14:48:50 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 14:48:51 #vote A2b 14:48:55 #vote abstain 14:48:57 #vote A2b 14:49:00 #vote A.2b 14:49:00 bryan_att: A.2b is not a valid option. Valid options are , A1a, A1b, A1c, A2a, A2b, A2c, abstain, . 14:49:01 #vote a2b 14:49:01 #vote A1b 14:49:02 #vote A2b 14:49:04 #vote A2b 14:49:08 Vote#A2b 14:49:08 #vote A2b 14:49:12 #vote A2b 14:49:18 #endvote 14:49:18 Voted on "Preference on minimum requirements on release artifacts?" Results are 14:49:18 A2b (7): frankbrockners, dku, tapio_, bryan_att, ChrisPriceAB, uli-k, bjskerry 14:49:18 abstain (1): GeraldK 14:49:18 A1b (1): julien_ZTE 14:49:48 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/releases/brahmaputra/release_artifacts_discussion#optionsrelease_maintenance release maintenance options 14:49:51 #startvote Preference on release maintenance? (M1, M2a, M2b, M3a, M3b, abstain) 14:49:51 Begin voting on: Preference on release maintenance? Valid vote options are , M1, M2a, M2b, M3a, M3b, abstain, . 14:49:51 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 14:50:04 #vote M2a 14:50:12 M3b 14:50:15 #vote abstain 14:50:16 #vote M2a 14:50:20 #vote M3b 14:50:25 #vote M2a 14:50:26 #vote M2a 14:50:29 #vote abstain 14:50:36 #vote M2b 14:50:58 #vote M2b 14:51:14 #endvote 14:51:14 Voted on "Preference on release maintenance?" Results are 14:51:14 abstain (2): GeraldK, dku 14:51:14 M2a (4): tapio_, frankbrockners, julien_ZTE, ChrisPriceAB 14:51:14 M2b (2): bryan_att, bjskerry 14:51:14 M3b (1): uli-k 14:51:21 #vote abstain 14:51:40 #topic WiKi tool decision 14:52:26 #info rpaik outlines that the preference for voters seems to be to move to confluence. 14:53:27 #startvote Shall the TSC determine to migrate our WiKi to confluence? (+1, 0, -1) 14:53:27 Begin voting on: Shall the TSC determine to migrate our WiKi to confluence? Valid vote options are , +1, 0, -1, . 14:53:27 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 14:53:35 #vote +1 14:53:36 #vote +1 14:53:37 #vote 0 14:53:38 #vote 0 14:53:38 #vote 0 14:53:40 #vote +1 14:53:40 #vote +1 14:53:42 #vote +1 14:53:44 #vote 0 14:53:50 #vote 0 14:54:15 #vote +1 14:54:37 #endvote 14:54:37 Voted on "Shall the TSC determine to migrate our WiKi to confluence?" Results are 14:54:37 0 (5): tapio_, uli-k, dku, bjskerry, julien_ZTE 14:54:37 +1 (6): GeraldK, frankbrockners, bryan_att, ChrisPriceAB, ThomasNadeau, Parviz 14:55:15 Discussing this is not a cause for making a discussion. There is a clear majority to leave it as is. Lets make the call. 14:55:20 what was the point of having surveys, etc if tsc was going to vote in the end 14:56:24 fdegir: Maybe you should ask your company's TSC rep ;-) 14:56:32 fdegir, the issues is the surveys were inconclusive 14:56:36 :) 14:56:42 Atlassian is free for open source projects 14:56:49 licensing should be very clear 14:57:14 #info vote count migration to confluence: 7/abstain:5 14:57:18 #agree The TSC agrees to migrate our wiki to Confluence. 14:57:34 #topic TSC Meeting during OpenStack Summit 14:57:53 #link https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/OpenStackTokyo sign-up for OPNFV booth 14:58:44 #info rpaik describes the activities at the OpenStack summit are listed in the link above 14:59:17 #info rpaik proposes we move the TSC call to 17:00 Tokyo time on Monday to reduce conflict with the OpenStack summit 15:00:00 I'll be there 15:00:04 I'll be in Tokyo 15:00:05 I'll be there 15:00:07 I am not attending 15:00:09 okay to move to 17:00 15:00:14 I am not 15:00:18 I'm not 15:00:31 i suggest canceling the TSC meeting that week rather than trying to reschedule. 15:00:49 I'm not going to Tokyo but Jonne or Juha can join the meeting 15:01:17 There will also be the BOF session (Iben and I are doing that) 15:01:22 let's keep the current slot... 15:01:38 #endmeeting