14:59:12 #startmeeting OPNFV TSC 14:59:12 Meeting started Tue Feb 16 14:59:12 2016 UTC. The chair is rpaik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:59:12 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:59:12 The meeting name has been set to 'opnfv_tsc' 14:59:26 #topic roll call 14:59:35 hmm Okay, I think its fixed, anyone else who had problems, please let me know if it doesnt work when logged in 14:59:43 #info Mark Beierl (proxy for Edgar StPierre) 15:00:22 #info Gerald Kunzmann (proxy for Ashiq Khan) 15:00:29 #info Chris Price 15:00:30 #info Uli Kleber 15:00:38 Hi 15:00:40 #info Juha Oravainen (proxy for Tapio Tallgren) 15:00:44 #info Dave Neary 15:01:16 #info Brian Skerry 15:01:25 #info rprakash 15:01:33 #info Jonas Arndt 15:01:38 #info previous minutes approved with no comments/feedback 15:01:53 #info Ashlee Young 15:01:57 #info https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/tsc?&#february_16_2016 meeting agenda 15:03:37 #topic agenda bashing 15:04:02 #info Committer removal for Releng and wiki update are other topics 15:05:08 I confirm that the latest fix solved the wiki editing issue 15:05:12 #info Julien 15:05:15 #info Dirk Kutscher 15:05:24 #info aricg gave an update on the wiki. Once logged in you should be able to edit. If not, please let Aric know. 15:05:29 I also confirm wiki editing works now 15:05:45 #info Bryan Sullivan 15:06:00 #info fdegir notes that there’s no objections from releng committers to remove Victor Laza. 15:07:01 #startvote Does the TSC approve removing Victor Laza as a Committer for releng? (+1, 0, -1) 15:07:01 Begin voting on: Does the TSC approve removing Victor Laza as a Committer for releng? Valid vote options are , +1, 0, -1, . 15:07:01 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 15:07:21 #vote +1 15:07:24 +1 15:07:26 #vote +1 15:07:31 #vote +1 15:07:32 #vote +1 15:07:32 #vote +1 15:07:38 #vote +1 15:07:38 #vote +1 15:07:44 #vote +1 15:08:07 #endvote 15:08:07 Voted on "Does the TSC approve removing Victor Laza as a Committer for releng?" Results are 15:08:07 +1 (8): GeraldK, bryan_att, ChrisPriceAB, uli-k_, Juha_, JonasArndt, Julien-z_, bjskerry 15:08:23 #topic Brahmaputra release update 15:10:23 #info debrascott notes that we have a number of scenarios working with troubleshooting on-going (e.g. for ODL L-3). 15:10:25 mostly blue/yellow https://build.opnfv.org/ci/ 15:11:48 #info few compass & fuel scenarios are ready for release 15:12:29 #info debrascott will edit the wiki with the latest status 15:13:23 debrascott: Editing should work for you on the wiki now. 15:14:30 aricg-: this view is not 100% trustable, for instance, apex has not everything blue, at least we are still troubleshhoting problems with functest which hasn't been run since some days... 15:15:09 the jenkins page is misleading so functest and yardstick consultation is needed 15:16:03 #info ChrisPriceAB notes that identified issues will also be documented on the wiki 15:18:37 daily meetings 15:18:44 daily 15:18:55 that is - keep track of them - not have interim meetings 15:19:29 #info discussion if an interim meeting is needed to evaluate the state of scenarios before the TSC call next week vs. staying with daily meetings 15:20:10 IMHO it is perfectly fine to decide on Tue on whether we include scenarios which don't make the "3 out of 4 runs repeatable" criteria 15:21:18 I'll fix that for you debrascott 15:21:29 #info ChrisPriceAB/debrascott will send a daily mail with updates to the TSC 15:23:32 #topic plugfest/dovetail update 15:23:52 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/plugfest/brahmaputra plugfest wiki page 15:26:22 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/meetings/dt_minutes_20160128 plugfest presentation 15:30:52 #info volunteer for Dovetail 15:31:39 Date: May 9 to 13, 2016 15:32:50 #info bryan_att notes that there’s a discussion going on in ETSI regarding various certification program and bryan_att will provide suggestions to the Dovetail team 15:33:17 #info detailed agenda for the plugfest is also being developed 15:34:36 #info ildikov raised the question on new scenario investigation during the plugfest 15:34:36 #info "Unordered List Item Target Participants: Hardware Suppliers, Integrators, Installation Development Team(s)" what Indegrators means hear? 15:34:40 #info (more) discussions are underway in SDOs etc re role of various orgs in testing/certification of NFV systems. It would be good for OPNFV to serve as the interop home for NFVI and management stack components, as well as content interop (e.g. standard NFV package ingestion and deployment). SDOs will likely focus on interop of systems that implement their 15:34:40 service-specific specs (esp for legacy specs e.g. 3GPP). 15:35:25 #topic LSOAPI termination review 15:35:54 I am talking but you can't hear. I'll dial in again 15:36:23 I could hear you 15:36:38 Julien-z_, integrators = either vendors who provide integrated platforms, or SIs who deploy NFV platforms 15:36:51 #topic project creation review for Information Modeling 15:37:09 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/project_proposals/models project proposal 15:37:34 #info proposal has been discussed in Weekly Technical meetings 15:38:02 #link https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/models 15:38:55 #info hi, dneary is the version based on OPNFV release? the installer is from OPNFV in the future? 15:40:13 #info from dovetail and plugfest, the test components is from OPNFv, it is very clear, but I wonder the version must be installed from the installers released by OPNFV? 15:41:45 #info brayn_att notes that the project is intended to collect information on data modeling, show best practices, and and then collect references to tools. Goal is to provide conduit to SDOs so they can interact with OPNFV through our tools. 15:43:32 #info suggestion was made to add new committers on the wiki (Mark from HPE & Ulas) 15:43:41 #startvote Does the TSC approve the project creation of Information Modeling? (+1, 0, -1) 15:43:41 Begin voting on: Does the TSC approve the project creation of Information Modeling? Valid vote options are , +1, 0, -1, . 15:43:41 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 15:43:48 #vote +1 15:43:49 #vote +1 15:43:51 #vote +1 15:43:54 #vote +1 15:43:58 #vote +1 15:44:01 #vote +1 15:44:01 #vote +1 15:44:03 #vote +1 15:44:08 #vote +1 15:44:15 #vote +1 15:44:21 #vote +1 15:44:21 #endvote 15:44:21 Voted on "Does the TSC approve the project creation of Information Modeling?" Results are 15:44:21 +1 (11): dneary, dku, GeraldK, bryan_att, uli-k_, ChrisPriceAB, Juha_, frankbrockners, JonasArndt, Julien-z_, mbeierl 15:44:23 #vote +1 15:44:38 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/lsoapi 15:44:47 #topic termination review for LSOAPI 15:45:07 bryan_att, I still see Marc in "contributors" in the wiki page (section "committers and contributors) 15:45:22 bryan_att, It's not identical to the "Key project facts" section 15:45:37 ok, I will fix now. 15:45:51 #info KLuehrs notes that the wiki page list reasons for project termination 15:47:15 #info KLuehrs notes that work can be done in the Boron-release of ODL 15:49:11 dneary: done. I forgot that this was in two places in the proposal - we should probably converge these into the "key facts" section in the proposal template. 15:52:12 can whomever is shoveling nuts/bolts please mute *) 15:53:30 #info request that the opening premise of the LSO termination be removed. It's not accurate. OPNFV is not focused on data center or enterprise markets 15:54:17 #info dneary noted that the termination request seems Brahmaputra-centric and if this is an area that needs to be worked on beyound the Brahmaputra release 15:55:26 #info KLuehrs replies that the problem can be solved within OpenDaylight 15:56:20 #info if a user chooses another controller they will not have this functionality 15:56:41 #info discussion if there’s a need to have a project for use cases (and validation can be moved to other projects like SDNVPN) 15:58:06 dneary, we couldn't understand you 15:58:18 #startvote Does the TSC approve the project termination for LSOAPI? (+1, 0, -1) 15:58:18 Begin voting on: Does the TSC approve the project termination for LSOAPI? Valid vote options are , +1, 0, -1, . 15:58:18 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 15:58:30 #vote 0 15:58:30 #vote +1 15:58:31 #vote 0 15:58:33 #vote +1 15:58:35 #vote: 0 15:58:35 JonasArndt: : 0 is not a valid option. Valid options are , +1, 0, -1, . 15:58:35 #vote 0 15:58:39 #vote +1 15:58:41 #vote +1 15:58:42 #vote 0 15:58:42 #vote +1 15:58:43 #vote 0 15:58:45 #vote +1 15:58:46 uli-k: I said, if this is about avoiding unnecessary duplication of effort, and the use-case is well defined and addressed somewhere else, I support the project's proposal 15:58:49 #vote +1 15:58:49 #vote +1 15:59:03 #endvote 15:59:03 Voted on "Does the TSC approve the project termination for LSOAPI?" Results are 15:59:03 0 (5): JonasArndt, GeraldK, tnadeau, uli-k_, mbeierl 15:59:03 +1 (8): frankbrockners, dku, dneary, bryan_att, ChrisPriceAB, Juha_, Julien-z_, bjskerry 16:00:17 #info will have a longer TSC meeting next week to discuss Brahmaputra release plus C-release planning 16:00:34 #endmeeting