15:08:05 #startmeeting Colorado planning meeting 15:08:05 Meeting started Tue Mar 22 15:08:05 2016 UTC. The chair is ChrisPriceAB. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:08:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 15:08:05 The meeting name has been set to 'colorado_planning_meeting' 15:08:15 #chair davidmcbride 15:08:15 Current chairs: ChrisPriceAB davidmcbride 15:08:38 #chair HKirksey 15:08:38 Current chairs: ChrisPriceAB HKirksey davidmcbride 15:09:00 #chair uli-k_ 15:09:00 Current chairs: ChrisPriceAB HKirksey davidmcbride uli-k_ 15:09:01 can try as well 15:09:08 #chair fdegir 15:09:08 Current chairs: ChrisPriceAB HKirksey davidmcbride fdegir uli-k_ 15:09:14 #info rprakash will help 15:09:15 #topic Roll Call 15:09:22 #info Bryan Sullivan 15:09:22 #info Maryam Tahhan (VSPERF, SFQM) 15:09:24 #info Bin Hu 15:09:28 #info Frank Brockners 15:09:28 #info Chris Price 15:09:35 #info Ana Cunha (Yardstick) 15:09:36 #info Morgan Richomme 15:09:41 #info Fatih Degirmenci (Releng) 15:09:41 #info Tim Irnich (SDN VPN) 15:09:45 #info Uli Kleber, Octopus 15:09:46 #info Bryan Sullivan (Copper, Models) 15:09:54 #info RayNugent 15:10:03 is it GTM or IRC only 15:10:15 we're on GTM as well 15:10:19 same as TSC call 15:10:34 #info Ashlee Young Networkfw 15:10:36 #info Tim Rozet (Apex) 15:10:45 #chair rprakash 15:10:45 Current chairs: ChrisPriceAB HKirksey davidmcbride fdegir rprakash uli-k_ 15:10:49 #info Mark Beierl (StorPerf) 15:11:10 * ChrisPriceAB wants trozet to update https://wiki.opnfv.org/releases/brahmaputra/2.0.release.plan when he get a chance today 15:11:25 4#info for Ulas Kozat Domino 15:11:36 #topic Colorado Planning 15:11:58 ChrisPriceAB: will do 15:12:18 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/releases/colorado current approved Colorado plan 15:13:08 I thought we were supposed to copy the releaseplan page and edit it on our wikis... I have started that. 15:13:31 e.g. https://wiki.opnfv.org/models/releaseplan 15:14:58 #info Should we include the new release manager in these planning meetings? 15:15:02 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/releases/colorado/projects list of participating projects for colorado 15:15:06 Is the definition of scenario the same for this release? I think we had issues with the concept in B. I think we may need to disconnect features from the scenarios if there is no low-level dependency e.g. OVS 15:15:26 Thanks 15:15:35 (just some topics to consider 15:16:11 all good topics bryan_att 15:18:30 #topic Hack-Fest retrospective follow up 15:19:33 #info David outlines the feedback that the test development and framework development happened in parallel with test cases in Brahmaputra. 15:20:36 #info David raises the questions on if we would be able to close on the test infrastructure during Colorado. 15:23:11 For the Models project I will be working to pattern the vIMS test approach as a generic way to test other use cases, and make that available soon in the release. I don't know if others will find that useful but just FYI. 15:23:34 #info Capbity ofr feature tesing should be listed early like MS1 rther than Ms2 15:23:41 #undo 15:24:03 #info Capbity for feature tesing should be listed early like MS1 rther than Ms2 15:24:36 #info Framk says that we now have a test framework like Yardstick, Functest... 15:24:47 #undo 15:25:11 #info Frank says that we now have a test framework like Yardstick, Functest... and even Installers are ready 15:27:12 #info Morgan says create a stable scenerio with features declaraton and tickets for steering to correct testing project 15:28:09 #info Selecting test cases accordingly and testing what is proven to work is paramount 15:28:48 #info Challenging but need to define CI test objective as well Feature test Objectives seperated and also frequenecy like weekly monthly tests etc. 15:29:19 #info There is no point in testing everything on Baremetal is not necessary 15:30:05 #info Tests Strategy must agree on mimimum vs exhaustive testing and schedule accordingly 15:30:40 #info Relaying too much on Installer development is a sore point for some projects 15:30:49 #undo 15:31:04 #info Relying too much on Installer development is a sore point for some projects 15:31:52 #info Creating environment in CI so that Developers can test independent for minimal testing 15:33:44 #info We need an OPNFV as a service project for testing from Cloud needs to be introduced and Bryan suggests Ravello as a showcase to see its viability 15:35:37 #info Fathi to review if OPNFV virtual environment using BP can be established uisng Ravello for VNF 15:37:01 #info Ravello is running on Mutiple servers and has emulated IPMI as per Bryan and Frank mentions that its a paid service and verify nested virtualization in LF 15:37:39 #info Ravello is just a trial and if we can do it in LF then we will be in control 15:38:28 bryan_att: I 15:38:37 ll send my findings to you 15:38:57 cause I've been experiencing some stabiltiy issues, vcpu exceptions, crashes, hangings and so on 15:42:20 #info TSC call to adress broad community colaboration issue 15:42:26 the Ravello proposal/evaluation has 2 aspects; providing resources for the projects for development purposes 15:42:35 and using Ravello for CI/CD purposes 15:43:42 #info Bryan can demo Ravello session in next 2 weeks 15:45:08 #info Weekly test co-ordination call should address test co-ordination plan - Trevor can be assigned th Action Item 15:45:56 * ChrisPriceAB has to drop off the call. (rprakash don't forget to endmeeting at the end.) 15:46:03 #info need to define detail to seperate Dvelopment and Production testing 15:46:25 ok will do 15:48:59 #info nextweeks call we can discuss How do we allow individual Scenerios to allow testing like immediate dependencies versus actual targgetted 15:49:24 #info eg starting with Liberty but ending with Mitaka etc. 15:50:14 #info to cover upstream feedback etc so we should start discussions at next meeting 15:50:38 #info Frank is documenting and will bring it to next meeting 15:51:00 #info am going to end the meeting 15:51:06 #endmeeting 15:51:24 #endmeeting