14:00:51 #startmeeting Test subgroup weekly meeting June 2nd 14:00:51 Meeting started Thu Jun 2 14:00:51 2016 UTC. The chair is morgan_orange. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:51 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:00:51 The meeting name has been set to 'test_subgroup_weekly_meeting_june_2nd' 14:00:57 #topic call role 14:00:59 GTM is busy? 14:01:06 #info Mark Beierl (StorPerf) 14:01:07 #info kubi 14:01:11 waiting for opnfv project? 14:01:14 #info Jose Lausuch 14:01:36 When I launched (as PTL), it told me another meeting was still running 14:01:58 So I am given the option of terminating the other meeting or logging out 14:03:04 #info Morgan 14:03:10 #info Maryam Tahhan 14:05:25 #topic Action point follow up 14:05:30 #info nothing this week 14:05:35 #topic Colorado Status 14:05:55 #chair jose_lausuch MatthewLi 14:05:55 Current chairs: MatthewLi jose_lausuch morgan_orange 14:06:02 #chair mbeierl 14:06:02 Current chairs: MatthewLi jose_lausuch mbeierl morgan_orange 14:07:30 #info vsperf started integration with yardstick, moongen integration is well underway and outstanding item for C release is the update to use the new results API 14:07:42 #info storperf relatively quiet (part time job, really??), new Cengn contributor joined, discussion with Yardstick (initiated during the plugfest) 14:10:47 morgan 14:11:06 #action morgan_orange presentation of refactored test API next week, Senera will be in Berlin for the Summit 14:11:19 i'm on line 14:11:24 but no audio 14:11:31 wait a moment 14:11:46 #info Functest stable (first blue balls in CI) 14:11:51 #info Trevor Cooper 14:12:03 #info first Apex results collected this week 14:12:56 #info new testcases about security scanning 14:13:38 #link http://testresults.opnfv.org/reporting/functest/release/master/index-status-apex.html 14:15:27 #info yardstick new plugin made available for sub projects: vsperf, storperf, etc. 14:15:38 #info meeting yardstick / ha 14:16:20 kubi002: where is the gerrit review? 14:17:47 mbeierl: #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/14823/ 14:18:41 jose_lausuch: yardstick team also provide some sample for mutli-VMs in Ping scenario. 14:19:27 jose_lausuch: #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/15041/ 14:19:48 kubi002: yes, they are treated as nodes, not at host/target :) 14:19:49 thanks 14:22:23 #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/15087/2 14:22:25 +1/w00t @ "upstream, upstream, upstream" morgan_orange :) 14:22:48 #info Gerrit review for the Presentation ^ 14:23:32 #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/15087 14:23:42 in case there are more patches.... oops 14:29:43 #info In Brahmaputra feature projects had 2 choices to place tests cases, functest and yardstick 14:30:22 #info the allocation was decided according to the idea of sharing the load between them, without thinking much the nature of the test case (functional, performance,.... ) 14:31:09 #info Morgan suggests to rethink the way we use the umbrella projects for testing 14:32:06 #info ebrjohn, Brady Johnson SFC PTL 14:33:53 #info when selecting a test project, there are some steps to follow like declaring the test in the DB, provide a success criteria of the test cases, create JIRA for integration and work together with the test project members and collaborate with documentation 14:35:24 #info Morgan proposes a if-else diagram about the nature of the test cases to make clear where to place the tests 14:36:46 #info question: where to find information about the different testing frameworks in OPNFV --> also needed when deciding where to place the tests 14:39:22 ebrjohn: you have a similar situation ... 14:39:37 yes, Im waiting for Tim to finish to ask my question 14:42:57 question on how difficult it is to migrate a testcase from Yardstick to Functest? Does it make sense for tests that already exist 14:43:25 or functest to yardstick 14:43:31 yes 14:43:54 and as said prjects may use both..depending on the nature of the tests 14:44:02 the 2 frameworks are complementary 14:44:05 I think the plugin framework that is being proposed in yardstick may help to answer that from the yardstick side 14:44:29 if I understood kubi002's comment on what the review is 14:51:25 #chair dfarrell07 14:51:25 Current chairs: MatthewLi dfarrell07 jose_lausuch mbeierl morgan_orange 14:51:37 working on it 14:51:47 Dan saves the day again... 14:52:01 #startvote Shall the test projects adopt the layout of Yardstick/Functest as described by morgan_orange? -1,0,+1 14:52:01 Begin voting on: Shall the test projects adopt the layout of Yardstick/Functest as described by morgan_orange? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 14:52:01 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 14:52:07 #vote +1 14:52:11 #vote +1 14:52:13 #vote +1 14:52:13 #vote +1 14:52:15 #vote +1 14:52:18 #vote +1 14:52:19 #vote +1 14:52:20 #vote +1 14:52:22 * ebrjohn who gets to vote?? 14:52:28 * ebrjohn committers only 14:52:38 * ebrjohn :) 14:52:44 #vote +1 14:52:48 anyone else? 14:52:53 #vote +1 14:52:58 #endvote 14:52:58 Voted on "Shall the test projects adopt the layout of Yardstick/Functest as described by morgan_orange?" Results are 14:52:58 +1 (9): ebrjohn, mtahhan, timirnich, morgan_orange, dfarrell07, kubi002, trevor_intel_, jose_lausuch, mbeierl 14:53:13 ebrjohn: you voted twice! 14:53:15 :) 14:53:16 kubi002: where are you located? What time is it? 14:54:27 * ebrjohn has to leave to pick the kids up from school 14:54:48 * ebrjohn putting on my taxi hat now :) 14:56:35 mbeierl: shanghai, 22:57 14:56:59 kubi002: it is late evening for you then! Thanks for joining! 14:58:49 #action PTL => provide input on test slicing 14:59:36 mbeierl: It's my pleasure. 14:59:52 morgan_orange: where do we provide the feedback? Are you putting that up on the wiki and we can comment there? 15:00:03 #topic AoB 15:00:24 #action morgan_orange create wiki page to reflect discussion on test tiering 15:00:43 got to drop. Thanks folks 15:01:13 bye 15:01:13 #endmeeting