13:59:32 #startmeeting OPNFV TSC 13:59:32 Meeting started Tue Jun 7 13:59:32 2016 UTC. The chair is ChrisPriceAB. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:59:32 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 13:59:32 The meeting name has been set to 'opnfv_tsc' 13:59:48 #topic Roll Call 13:59:53 #info Chris Price 14:00:01 #info Jonas Arndt 14:00:09 #info Dirk Kutscher 14:00:14 #info Edgar StPierre 14:00:46 #info Morgan Richomme (IRC only) 14:00:53 #info Jack Morgan 14:01:24 #info Bryan Sullivan 14:01:40 #info David McBride 14:01:57 #info Dave Neary 14:02:03 #info Brian Skerry 14:02:18 #info Stuart Mackie 14:02:27 #topic Approval of previous minutes of meeting 14:02:37 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC#TSC-May31,2016 previous minutes 14:02:48 #info no comments or updates received for the minutes 14:02:52 #info Frank Brockners 14:02:59 #agree the TSC approves the previous minutes 14:03:10 #topic Agenda Bashing 14:03:23 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC today's agenda 14:03:34 we now have a quorum 14:04:13 #info Uli Kleber 14:04:54 That sounds like someone saying something, not someone on mute. 14:05:04 #info Tapio Tallgren 14:05:20 Is that what jitter is? 14:05:48 I think that was more like packet drop than jitter 14:06:18 #topic ETSI PlugTest Plan 14:06:24 #info Parviz Yegani 14:06:24 Do you guys know if there is an official "OPNFV" template for PowerPoint presentations for the summit, or if we just use whatever? 14:06:49 +1 - if there is a template somewhere, can it get put up on Confluence? 14:07:01 JOnasArndt: There is a template that we can use. 14:07:21 ChrisPriceAB: Thanks. I couldn't find it. Do you have a link? 14:07:35 Is there a reveal.js template also? 14:07:38 We can have it added to the wiki for people to grab, I'll try and find a link now. (if someone takes notes here.) 14:07:47 #info Julien 14:07:59 ChrisPriceAB: Thanks! 14:08:12 think we wuld have to make one tapio_ 14:08:23 would ^^ 14:08:23 Ok :-) 14:08:57 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/download/attachments/2925933/NFV%20Plugtests%20-%20May%202016.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1465308483443&api=v2 ETSI plugtest presentation link 14:09:02 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/download/attachments/2925933/NFV%20Plugtests%20-%20May%202016.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1465308483443&api=v2 ETSI PlugTest presentation 14:09:05 :-) 14:09:06 hehe 14:10:14 tapio_: I merged a reveal stuff https://git.opnfv.org/cgit/functest/tree/docs/com 14:10:42 tapio_: but it is not official, done for Functest pres during the summit 14:10:54 @morgan_orange: Thanks, I will take a look! 14:10:54 tapio_: Error: "morgan_orange:" is not a valid command. 14:11:03 morgan_orange: Thanks, I will take a look! 14:11:34 ETSI Center for Testing and Interoperability (CTI) 14:12:25 folks, the ppt template for the summit is here: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Berlin+Design+Summit+Planning?preview=%2F6819410%2F6823164%2FOPNFV_Summit2016_Germany_PPT_16-9_v2_ac.pptx 14:13:36 #info Pierre walks through the plans for the ETSI PlugTest activity and outlines the purpose and scope of the event. 14:14:19 Wow. That template is very different 14:14:27 #info the PlugTest will focus on interoperability over standard interfaces. 14:14:39 yeah, deep-purple... 14:15:22 #info The HIVE tool will be used for remote equipment hardware and software configuration/test staging. 14:15:23 does that make smoke over a river somewhere...? 14:16:03 only when you try to convert it to reveal.js 14:20:11 #info The test case proposal will be submitted to the ETSI NFV for approval prior to the event. 14:21:02 #info Pierre indicates the PlugTest team would like OPNFV to participate, potentially to coordinate with our PlugFest activities. 14:21:13 #info this is the first PlugTest for NFV and planned frequency is TBD 14:21:42 #undo 14:21:49 this is the first PlugTest for ETSI and planned frequency is TBD 14:22:41 #info The PlugTest is likely to be run during January, it is not yet confirmed. 14:24:20 #info dneary asks if the ETSI NDA is compatible to having OPNFV coordinate as an entity. 14:25:12 ChrisPriceAB, Not just the NDA, but the IPR rules governing participation 14:25:14 #info Pierre answers that the NDA is a current practice and could be further discussed 14:25:38 ah, missed the detail sorry dneary 14:25:52 #info OPNFV did not have an NDA, but had a "FrienDA" - rules of engagement with a common non-binding understanding 14:26:31 #info uli-k asks if there is a desire to have common test cases or activities. Pierre answers that he is presenting to our TSC to facilitate some form of coordinated activity. 14:29:26 "selling cat's clothes"? /me needs an explanation of the metaphor 14:29:59 "selling past close" ^^ 14:30:08 Ah 14:30:12 That makes more sense 14:32:34 #info ChrisPriceAB notes that one possibility out of the 2nd OPNFV Plugfest is to identify scenarios that OPNFV can bring to the ETSI Plugtest 14:35:28 #action rpaik to call for volunteers from the technical community to have discussions with ETSI PlugTest team 14:35:36 #action rpaik to arrange a set o volunteers to discuss in more detail with ETSI, in conjunction with the C&C committee 14:35:51 #topic Joint Board-TSC meeting in Berlin 14:38:23 ChrisPriceAB, Is there a list of joint TSC-Board meeting topics somewhere? I did not catch them all on the call 14:38:48 #info Uli volunteered to lead the discussion on SPC engagement 14:39:31 I volunteer to participate for Infra WG 14:40:14 #info fdegir will lead the infra WG readout 14:41:16 #info rpaik will work work with dneary on Bitergia roadmap topic 14:43:43 will do 14:43:57 #topic Design Summit update 14:44:01 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Berlin+Design+Summit+Planning schedule 14:45:14 hi julien, are you there? 14:46:31 #topic Colorado planning and activities 14:47:14 #info dmcbride has closed the action on establishing clear stable branch date, August 15th has been identified as the right date. 14:48:13 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Release+Process new release process table 14:50:09 #startvote Does the TSC approve the updated Colorado plan as described on the above release process link? (-1, 0, +1) 14:50:09 Begin voting on: Does the TSC approve the updated Colorado plan as described on the above release process link? Valid vote options are , -1, 0, +1, . 14:50:09 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 14:50:44 david sent out a schedule via email 14:51:16 #endvote 14:51:16 Voted on "Does the TSC approve the updated Colorado plan as described on the above release process link?" Results are 14:51:24 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Release#Release-May31,2016 14:52:26 what happened there? 14:53:16 #action chrispriceab to create a concise vote on the Colorado plan and execute the vote via mail this week. 14:53:23 dneary ^^ 14:53:47 #topic Project creation review of the Daisy Nfv project 14:54:10 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Daisy+Nfv project proposal wiki 14:55:43 #info Zhijiang notes that Daidy4nfv introduces Kolla to speed up deployment and atomic upgrades 14:55:54 #undo 14:56:04 #info Zhijiang notes that Daisy4nfv introduces Kolla to speed up deployment and atomic upgrades 14:57:50 #info plan is to be ready for the D-release 14:58:43 what is the overlap between daisy and what we have already built in our installer system/s? 14:59:04 #info Weiding Shao notes that there are a lot of similarities with other installer projects and there maybe opportunities for collaboration 14:59:17 #undo 14:59:29 #info Weidong Shao notes that there are a lot of similarities with other installer projects and there maybe opportunities for collaboration 15:01:50 this seems to overlap %100 with our existing installer 15:02:08 how many installer projects do we need? 15:02:13 ChrisPriceAB, Many similar concerns were expressed in the technical review meeting 15:02:27 ChrisPriceAB, My suggestion is to go once more around Tech Planning 15:02:40 And have some people on the call if they have issues 15:02:49 +1 15:02:58 #info will need to pick-up this topic again next week 15:03:29 if adopted, it would seem a big overlap to have with our existing installer. It would seem the question we should be asking with this is if accepted, should it subsume the existing installer? 15:04:33 #info chrispriceab intends to raise the question of infrastructure usage for installer projects as a topic for consideration on this weeks infra call. 15:04:35 #endmeeting