========================= #opnfv-meeting: OPNFV TSC ========================= Meeting started by rpaik at 06:00:15 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2016/opnfv-meeting.2016-06-21-06.00.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Ashiq Khan (Ashiq_Khan, 06:01:06) * Gergely Csatari (csatari, 06:01:17) * Chris Price (ChrisPriceAB, 06:01:29) * Roll Call (ChrisPriceAB, 06:02:15) * Chris Price (ChrisPriceAB, 06:02:20) * Tapio Tallgren (ttallgren, 06:02:31) * Approval of the previous minutes of meeting (ChrisPriceAB, 06:02:52) * Edgar StPierre (edgarstp, 06:02:52) * Bryan Sullivan (bryan_att, 06:03:03) * Ashiq Khan (Ashiq_Khan, 06:03:06) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC#TSC-June14,2016 previous minutes of meeting (ChrisPriceAB, 06:03:20) * Frank Brockners (frankbrockners, 06:03:28) * no comments received minutes approved (ChrisPriceAB, 06:03:32) * Stuart Mackie (StuartMackie, 06:03:40) * Agenda Bashing (ChrisPriceAB, 06:03:41) * Jonas Arndt (JonasArndt, 06:03:47) * LINK: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/798898261 (csatari, 06:04:11) * Update on the TSC Charter to reflect the OPNFV Code of Conduct (ChrisPriceAB, 06:05:01) * rpaik outlines the code of conduct updated proposed to the board have been approved. (ChrisPriceAB, 06:05:22) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/download/attachments/2925933/TSC%20Charter%20May%2031-2016%20v2.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1466094997000&api=v2 (ChrisPriceAB, 06:05:35) * AGREED: rpaik will update the www.opnfv.org page accodingly (ChrisPriceAB, 06:05:47) * Report out from the Design Summit (ChrisPriceAB, 06:06:02) * Uli Kleber (ulik, 06:06:21) * rpaik outlines that our design summit included over 300 people on day 1. (ChrisPriceAB, 06:06:36) * today there will be a number of colocated events during the day with other communities (ChrisPriceAB, 06:06:58) * Julien (Julien-zte, 06:07:07) * Q3 hackfest planning (ChrisPriceAB, 06:09:31) * rpaik now that the second plugfest date has been determined in december our planning for hackfests is coalescing to a needed decision around our Q3 event (ChrisPriceAB, 06:10:09) * two good options are the LinuxCon north america or OpenDaylight summit (ChrisPriceAB, 06:10:34) * rpaik indicates LinuxCon would be a good option for the hackfest, where we would potentially run a meetup at the OpenDaylight summit (ChrisPriceAB, 06:11:13) * Trevor Cooper (trevor_intel_, 06:12:23) * bjskerry notes that LinxuCon NA is about a month before the scheduled Colorado release date (rpaik, 06:13:47) * AGREED: the TSC agrees to pursue the Q3 hackfest at LinuxCon Toronto. (ChrisPriceAB, 06:14:17) * Colorado planning and activities (ChrisPriceAB, 06:14:35) * dmcbride has been working with the infrastructure team at the summit to work thorugh release considerations. (ChrisPriceAB, 06:15:17) * the team has identified challenges related to support of the armband project however in general infra is looking good for Colorado. (ChrisPriceAB, 06:16:14) * An ARM POD will be established during August to support ArmBand. (ChrisPriceAB, 06:17:32) * MANO working group discussion (ChrisPriceAB, 06:17:44) * ChrisPriceAB notes that the MANO working group could be looking at things like common interfaces (rpaik, 06:19:38) * the working group can also work on cross coordination (rpaik, 06:20:09) * prakash outlines the discussion around MANO in relation to the project focusing on the integration of Open-O. (ChrisPriceAB, 06:21:50) * prakash reflects on the challenge of achieving standards compliance across interfaces in open source projects. (ChrisPriceAB, 06:22:41) * AGREED: the TSC agrees that the establishment of a MANO working group is a good idea and supports it. (ChrisPriceAB, 06:24:16) * disccussion that existing working groups (e.g. security, infra, testing) in OPNFV do not have formal charters (rpaik, 06:26:39) * dneary (dneary, 06:27:49) * ACTION: prakash to raise the working group for discussion on the TWS and a time shall be set for the calls. (ChrisPriceAB, 06:29:02) * Joint TSC Board meeting preparation (ChrisPriceAB, 06:29:16) * dmcbride has prepared material for the meeting. (ChrisPriceAB, 06:30:43) * ACTION: dmcbride to distribute the material and TSC members to comment. (ChrisPriceAB, 06:31:09) * uli-k outlines the SPC joint session is being discussed, the SPC goals will be shared openly now prior to the call. (ChrisPriceAB, 06:32:54) * ACTION: rpaik to complete the Bitergia roadmap slides with dneary and also send out to the TSC mailing list (rpaik, 06:33:28) * the SPC has an interest to form a working group to address long term planning and community themes (ChrisPriceAB, 06:34:37) * to be discussed further at the Board/TSC f2f (ChrisPriceAB, 06:34:51) * TSC Governance discussion for the joint Board-TSC meeting (ChrisPriceAB, 06:35:23) * ChrisPriceAB discusses feedback on the TSC composition (e.g. improve the meritocratic nature of the TSC) (rpaik, 06:37:56) * TSC constitution discussion includes maintain the current setup (with committer at large); migrate to an elected TSC; migrate to a fullt merit-based TSC (rpaik, 06:39:33) * frankbrockners notes that there maybe a potentential tradeoff that we need to consider when Platinum members do not automatically get a TSC seat (rpaik, 06:48:06) * dneary asked whether this discussion was the board asking the TSC to change, the TSC asking the board to recommend a structure change, or the TSC informing the board of how we decide to change (dneary, 06:48:25) * ChrisPriceAB says it could be any of the three, right now the board has flagged the concern that the TSC (and project) is perceived as pay-to-play (dneary, 06:49:05) * dneary asked what "suits our needs" means, and what were the trade-offs which would prevent us going to a fully elected-from-community TSC (dneary, 06:49:49) * Several replies - a TSC seat is one of the carrots we "sell" when getting Platinum members to pay; it has been useful to have designates to ensure that there is a communication channel from the community (TSC and projects) into the members (dneary, 06:51:19) * ulik asks how it would work in practice - who would vote/choose TSC members? (dneary, 06:51:50) * Is there a concern about TSC size? The main issue is achieving quorum. (dneary, 06:55:54) * If we have elected membership delegates, we should ensure other membership classes are represented. (dneary, 06:57:18) * The by-laws allow the TSC to have committers elected to the TSC (dneary, 06:58:04) * if we can get a breakout room, we could have further discussions prior to the Board meeting (rpaik, 07:00:00) Meeting ended at 07:00:13 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * dneary * rpaik to complete the Bitergia roadmap slides with dneary and also send out to the TSC mailing list * rpaik * rpaik to complete the Bitergia roadmap slides with dneary and also send out to the TSC mailing list * **UNASSIGNED** * prakash to raise the working group for discussion on the TWS and a time shall be set for the calls. * dmcbride to distribute the material and TSC members to comment. People present (lines said) --------------------------- * ChrisPriceAB (36) * dneary (18) * bryan_att (17) * rpaik (13) * collabot (5) * csatari (3) * ttallgren (2) * ulik (2) * Ashiq_Khan (2) * frankbrockners (1) * trevor_intel_ (1) * Julien-zte (1) * StuartMackie (1) * edgarstp (1) * JonasArndt (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4