============================ #opnfv-meeting: Test meeting ============================ Meeting started by dfarrell07 at 14:10:11 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2016/opnfv-meeting.2016-07-21-14.10.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * It looks like the topics we needed to do were "Status on testing white paper (A.Serda) - Deferred" and "Discussion of APAC friendly timeslot for this meeting" (dfarrell07, 14:10:14) * Did mbeierl send APAC email? (dfarrell07, 14:10:23) * is Alan on call? (dfarrell07, 14:10:29) * LINK: http://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2016-July/011566.html mbeierl's email about APAC timezones (dfarrell07, 14:11:50) * point of doing that APAC question over email was to get responses of ppl who don't attend this meeting (dfarrell07, 14:12:29) * Larry Lamers (ljlamers, 14:12:42) * so dfarrell07's idea about maybe voting on first/second option here isn't so helpful (dfarrell07, 14:12:43) * could take a vote, or could ask ppl to respond to thread with #votes (dfarrell07, 14:12:59) * decision to do meeting on IRC (dfarrell07, 14:14:50) * just a few things to cover, APAC vote (dfarrell07, 14:14:56) * questions from thread First question: is the current time slot of 14:00 UTC good for everyone? Second question: is it useful to move one meeting a month to start at 08:00 UTC? (dfarrell07, 14:15:22) * dfarrell07 asks for thoughts (dfarrell07, 14:15:39) * baring thoughts, I'll start a vote for the first (dfarrell07, 14:16:00) * Being in North America, this time works for me, but I am in agreement to have a change of time once a month (mbeierl, 14:16:11) * some +1s for both ideas, moving and this works (dfarrell07, 14:16:21) * If you have anyone that can't make it regularly from Asia, the change makes sense (bryan_att, 14:17:27) * VOTE: Voted on "Does the current time slot, 14:00 UTC, work as our meeting time?" Results are, +1: 6 (dfarrell07, 14:18:19) * AGREED: Of the people on the meeting, knowing we have sampling bias, this slot works (dfarrell07, 14:18:42) * dfarrell07 asks for input about next idea, do we want a 1-per-month meeting friendly for APAC? (dfarrell07, 14:19:04) * Proposed time for APAC-friendly meeting is 08:00 UTC (dfarrell07, 14:19:29) * dfarrell07 has recently been in Japan and had pain of staying up very late for meetings, +1 (dfarrell07, 14:19:51) * jose_lausuch points out that we may want to do meetings in this timeslot to cover very important topics, in addition to normal 1-per-month (dfarrell07, 14:20:31) * some +1's to jose_lausuch's note that we can call to do this meeting at APAC time as-needed (dfarrell07, 14:21:02) * some +1s that 1-per-month is good rate (dfarrell07, 14:21:36) * VOTE: Voted on "Shall the test projects meet by default once per month at an APAC-friendly timezone, proposed as 08:00UTC, and perhaps additionally for very important topics?" Results are, +1: 5 (dfarrell07, 14:24:34) * AGREED: Test projects will meet at least once per month at 8UTC to be APAC friendly (dfarrell07, 14:25:04) * yujunz votes +1 (dfarrell07, 14:25:23) * ACTION: dfarrell07 will take this as data to the thread (dfarrell07, 14:25:47) * dfarrell07 notes that we should not think of this as the final decision, point is to get input from others who can't make this meeting (dfarrell07, 14:26:14) * Yardstick test suite evolution (dfarrell07, 14:26:56) * kubi001 reports that Yardstick test evolutino work we talked about last meeting has been completed (dfarrell07, 14:28:45) * kubi001 reports that tests have run per-secenario via Jenkins, so should be working (dfarrell07, 14:29:06) * jose_lausuch asks kubi001 if test cases in yardstick use floating IPs (dfarrell07, 14:29:28) * kubi001 tells jose_lausuch that depends on test suit config, and that most of them config floating IPs, more offline (dfarrell07, 14:30:09) * dfarrell07 asks for additional topics (dfarrell07, 14:30:37) * Wiki page move (dfarrell07, 14:31:40) * I sent an email to the list, and got some positive feedback (dfarrell07, 14:31:46) * I would like to have agreement here that I will do that today (dfarrell07, 14:31:50) * And put a marker page in place to let people know where it went in case they end up in the old page (mbeierl, 14:31:52) * Any objections to the move? (mbeierl, 14:32:20) * CENGN has some LF interns, and every two weeks they have an iteration demo (mbeierl, 14:33:34) * I have asked folks at CENGN if they would like to open the demos up to the broader OPNFV community and they thought it would be a good idea (mbeierl, 14:34:17) * So if anyone is interested, watch for an email from them (mbeierl, 14:34:59) * dfarrell07 asks for any additional topics (dfarrell07, 14:35:26) * mbeierl will get back to email thread about storperf yardstick result (dfarrell07, 14:36:34) * mbeierl says storperf test results page is out of date, there's a power point that is more up to date (dfarrell07, 14:36:54) * dfarrell07 asks for any additional topics (dfarrell07, 14:37:13) * dfarrell07 notes that we should follow up about chairs maybe (dfarrell07, 14:38:09) * Bottleneck is chair next week, with Yardstick minutes (dfarrell07, 14:38:44) Meeting ended at 14:39:08 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * dfarrell07 * dfarrell07 will take this as data to the thread People present (lines said) --------------------------- * dfarrell07 (88) * mbeierl (28) * kubi001 (18) * collabot (14) * jose_lausuch (13) * yujunz (9) * bryan_att (4) * ljlamers (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4