13:59:44 #startmeeting TSC Meeting 13:59:44 Meeting started Tue Aug 2 13:59:44 2016 UTC. The chair is ChrisPriceAB. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:59:44 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 13:59:44 The meeting name has been set to 'tsc_meeting' 13:59:50 #topic Roll Call 13:59:55 #info Chris Price 13:59:58 #info Uli Kleber 13:59:59 #info Tapio Tallgren 14:00:00 #info Frank Brockners 14:00:04 #info Brian Skerry 14:00:12 #info Edgar StPierre 14:00:26 Cecili 14:01:38 Cecilia, you should type "#info Cecilia" so you get logged. 14:02:09 #info Dirk Kutscher 14:02:11 #info JonasArndt 14:02:16 #topic Approval of previous minutes of meeting 14:02:17 #info Ceciliacorbi 14:02:30 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC#TSC-July26,2016 previous minutes of meeting for approval 14:02:43 #info no comments were received the minutes are approved 14:02:53 #topic Agenda Bashing 14:03:01 #info Gerald Kunzmann 14:03:03 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC 14:03:06 #info Bin Hu (for Bryan Sullivan) 14:03:12 sorry, on mute now 14:03:12 we now have a quorum 14:04:22 #info no additional topics 14:04:58 #info Dave Neary 14:05:02 Forgot that bit 14:05:04 #topic TSC update to the board 4th of August 14:05:14 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/download/attachments/2925933/OPNFV%20TSC%20Board%20update%204%20August%202016%20v1.pptx?version=1&modificationDate=1470141017976&api=v2 prepared material 14:07:52 #info Bryan Sullivan 14:08:06 #info Chris will discuss Colorado update, Committer-at-Large election, and Community Events during the Board meeting on Aug. 4th 14:08:14 #undo 14:08:35 #info ChrisPriceAB will discuss Colorado update, Committer-at-Large election, and Community Events during the Board meeting on Aug. 4th 14:09:32 looks very good to me 14:09:38 #info ChrisPriceAB asks for feedback on the material via email/IRC/etc. 14:13:07 Interesting topic... 14:13:24 Needs a proposal & discussion on the list, I think 14:13:55 #info bjskerry asks how we will achieve quorum and how delegates for nominated TSC representatives will be handled. 14:14:20 #info Brian Skerry asks what the new quorum will be for the TSC meetings, and whether elected TSC members can name alternates 14:14:25 #info this is not so clear at this time and further discussion will be required and to be captured on the wiki page . 14:14:26 #undo 14:14:30 Sorry 14:14:33 Can't undo 14:14:42 #info this is not so clear at this time and further discussion will be required and to be captured on the wiki page. 14:14:49 #undo 14:14:49 Removing item from minutes: 14:14:51 lol 14:16:36 #info Julien 14:16:49 #info the process for how the community election will be run in the context of limiting TSC seats to 2 per company needs to be clearly documented. 14:17:33 #action chrispriceab to amend the wiki for the next TSC for clarififcation prior to the elections progressing that far. 14:18:36 #action bjskerry to start a mail thread on how we handle delegates for elected TSC members 14:18:55 #topic October-January budget amendment and activities 14:19:34 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Budget budget proposal for Q4'2016 14:20:03 #info OPNFV's fiscal calendar will move to January - December (vs. Oct - Sep today) 14:22:58 #info rpaik outlines the bullet list of budget items for the october-january budget. 14:23:48 #info in addition to additional IT support staff we will in addition need to acquire a new switch in the lab to accommodate newly donated hardware. 14:24:56 #topic Committer Promotions 14:25:12 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Committer+Promotions committer promotion process 14:27:17 fwiw I've never seen a minus wrt a committer vote. 14:30:29 #startvote Does the TSC approve the use of gerrit for committer promotion as described on the Committer Promotions wiki? (-1, 0, +1) 14:30:29 Begin voting on: Does the TSC approve the use of gerrit for committer promotion as described on the Committer Promotions wiki? Valid vote options are , -1, 0, +1, . 14:30:29 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 14:30:32 #vote +1 14:30:33 #vote +1 14:30:36 #vote +1 14:30:37 #vote +1 14:30:38 #vote +1 14:30:39 #vote +14 14:30:39 frankbrockners: +14 is not a valid option. Valid options are , -1, 0, +1, . 14:30:40 #vote +1 14:30:41 #vote +1 14:30:46 #vote +1 14:30:47 #vote +1 14:30:50 #vote +1 14:30:50 #vote +1 14:30:59 #vote +1 14:31:00 #vote +1 14:31:07 #endvote 14:31:07 Voted on "Does the TSC approve the use of gerrit for committer promotion as described on the Committer Promotions wiki?" Results are 14:31:07 +1 (12): frankbrockners, dku, dneary, tapio_, ChrisPriceAB, Julien-zte, bin_, JonasArndt, bjskerry, GeraldK, edgarstp, ulik 14:31:26 #agree the TSC agrees to adopt the updated committer promotion process. 14:31:50 #topic Colorado planning and activities 14:32:19 #info dmcbride outlines that reporting has increased significantly since the focus on getting it done. 14:32:28 #undo 14:32:28 Removing item from minutes: 14:32:36 #info dmcbride outlines that Colorado project reporting has increased significantly since the focus on getting it done. 14:33:19 #info dmcbride explains the % values in the material provided to the TSC last week 14:36:09 #info dmcbride notes that the scenario table is sortable by different columns 14:36:42 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/octopus/Finalizing+OPNFV+Releases release process CI flow for Colorado 14:37:19 #info uli-k explains that the steps to Colorado release will be the same as for Brahmaputra and that he has updated the process and described it for Colorado miletsones. 14:40:07 #info uli-k outlines that after code freeze all Colorado development will follow stable branch handling. 14:42:54 if you leave it to projects to police their own cherry picks as only bug fixes, why not trust them to only submit bug fixes to master? 14:44:38 why not have those projects who do master only work with David on this 14:45:40 jmorgan1: agree 14:48:46 just say code freeze means only bug fixes...doesnt matter what branch it's in 14:52:14 I think 'feature freeze' maybe a better term to use here 14:52:22 or 'scenario freeze' 14:52:30 bramwelt: yeah 14:53:51 aricg: that helps to eliminate CI resource contention 14:54:23 trozet: yes, I think that will please everyone. 14:54:33 agree 14:55:18 aricg: only problem is order of cherry-picks 14:55:24 aricg: without any ci validation 14:59:19 dneary: takes 2.5 hours 14:59:22 dneary: for a verify job 14:59:34 at least on apex.. 14:59:38 trozet, Today? Or post MS9? 14:59:45 dneary: well post it will be double 14:59:54 dneary: for doing the cherry pick 15:00:07 OK 15:00:10 Thanks 15:00:16 #info there was a lot of discussion around the final milestones for Colorado, where some projects feel they should not branch to stable at this time. 15:00:29 #info discussion on testing resource requirements on master vs. stable 15:00:58 #action dmcbride to follow up on this discussion and understand the impacts of changing the Colorado milestones, or allowing exemptions. 15:01:14 thanks 15:01:15 #endmeeting