========================= #opnfv-meeting: OPNFV TSC ========================= Meeting started by ChrisPriceAB at 13:59:40 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2016/opnfv-meeting.2016-08-16-13.59.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (ChrisPriceAB, 13:59:44) * Chris Price (ChrisPriceAB, 13:59:53) * Tapio Tallgren (tapio_, 14:00:10) * Tim Rozet (Proxy for Dave Neary) (trozet, 14:00:16) * Yujun Zhang (Proxy for Julien) (yujunz, 14:00:40) * Mark Beierl (Proxy for Edgar StPierre) (mbeierl, 14:00:57) * Jack Morgan (Proxy for Brian Skerry) (jmorgan1, 14:01:22) * Approval of previous minutes of meeting (ChrisPriceAB, 14:01:34) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC#TSC-August9,2016 previous minutes (ChrisPriceAB, 14:01:41) * Gerald Kunzmann (GeraldK, 14:01:42) * Frank Brockners (frankbrockners, 14:01:51) * Ashlee Young (for Uli) (ashyoung, 14:01:52) * no comments, minutes are approved (ChrisPriceAB, 14:01:57) * Agenda Bashing (ChrisPriceAB, 14:02:11) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC today's agenda (ChrisPriceAB, 14:02:23) * Bin Hu (bin_, 14:02:29) * no new topics mentioned (ChrisPriceAB, 14:03:48) * Next week's TSC meeting (ChrisPriceAB, 14:03:57) * the hackfest kicks off next Tuesday, we would like to kick off the hackfest with the TSC call followed by the release meeting. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:04:33) * this implies a one hour shift in the meeting time, one hour earlier. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:04:50) * rpaik asks if this adjustment would be acceptable to the TSC (ChrisPriceAB, 14:05:09) * The proposal is to elicit further input although the plan will be to move the meetings if the change is not too detrimental. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:09:25) * Technical community elections (ChrisPriceAB, 14:10:21) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Accepted+Nominations+for+2016+Committer-at-Large+TSC+election current list of accepted nominations for committer-at-large TSC election (rpaik, 14:11:33) * AGREED: the TSC agreed to extend the nomination period for the election to two weeks and begin the voting period at the end of that period. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:14:57) * frankbrockners asks if the elections can be moved back a further week. rpaik adds that we can extend the voting period for a further week to allow for community engagement. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:16:29) * CAL TSC elections close on Sep 2nd with results published on Sep. 6th (rpaik, 14:18:14) * rpaik will update the wiki page and inform the community of these updates. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:19:23) * OPNFV IRC channels (ChrisPriceAB, 14:20:13) * jack states that the tool is useful and is being used well as far as he is concerned. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:22:34) * dan adds that it could be useful to have some "main channels" where we can collaborate. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:23:05) * During last testperf meeting, someone pointed out that using common channel such as #opnfv-meeting has "a problem because all meeting minutes get stored in the same dir and there's not a good way to find testperf ones" (yujunz, 14:25:23) * LINK: http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2016/opnfv-meeting.2016-08-11-14.01.log.html (yujunz, 14:25:34) * Colorado planning and activities (ChrisPriceAB, 14:25:35) * dmcbride outlines that the stablebranch and docs milestones arrived yesterday. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:26:00) * projects are beginning to request stable branches during the stable-branch window. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:26:27) * the stable branch window will close next Monday. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:26:42) * dmcbride outlines that some projects are not going to participate in the release. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:27:08) * Gerald asks for clarification on how projects participate in the release and are considered to be participating. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:27:35) * dmcbride states we should discuss project participation in detail during the release meeting. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:33:37) * chrispriceab asks about the ARM and Intel deployment scenarios (ChrisPriceAB, 14:36:13) * dmcbride outlines that the ARM team wants to provide a status update on the scenarios they are supporting however there is no hardware architecture reporting ability in our scenario planning. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:36:57) * ACTION: jack to discuss long term planning around hardware architectures and scenarion compatibility on the infra wg (ChrisPriceAB, 14:41:20) * need Armband team at Infra WG meeting to help discussion (jmorgan1, 14:42:15) * ACTION: dmcbride to discuss with sofia and morgan on how to document and capture the results of the hardware testing for colorado. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:42:22) * Project creation review orchestra project (ChrisPriceAB, 14:42:35) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra project creation proposal (ChrisPriceAB, 14:42:58) * guiseppe outlines the initial scope to focus on vnf testing and deployment (ChrisPriceAB, 14:43:47) * guiseppe states that they have begun discussions with the models project, functest and the installation tools. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:44:38) * some scenario's will focus on fault management and resource reservation, so collabotation with promise and doctor will be important for the project. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:45:11) * no further concerns with the name "Orchestra" (rpaik, 14:47:32) * VOTE: Voted on "Does the TSC approve the creation of the orchestra project?" Results are, +1: 10 (ChrisPriceAB, 14:48:48) * AGREED: the TSC approves the creation of the orchestra project. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:49:03) * AoB (ChrisPriceAB, 14:49:13) Meeting ended at 14:50:52 UTC. People present (lines said) --------------------------- * ChrisPriceAB (44) * collabot (9) * jmorgan1 (6) * rpaik (6) * yujunz (5) * ashyoung (3) * bin_ (3) * SteveW_ (2) * frankbrockners (2) * tapio_ (2) * trozet (2) * mbeierl (2) * GeraldK (1) * aricg (1) * StuartMackie (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4